Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Universities as Living Labs for Sustainable Development pp 671–696Cite as

Participatory Action Research (PAR) as a Research Approach for Sustainable Community Development: A Case Study in Pulau Mantanani, Sabah

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

  • 1960 Accesses

Part of the book series: World Sustainability Series ((WSUSE))

Abstract

Current efforts and research on sustainable community development has garnered increasing interest among academicians, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and government. Additionally with the global alignment on the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), there has been a strong emphasis on understanding the various approaches, concepts, and mechanisms of accomplishing or contributing to the successful implementation of the SDGs. Such studies often focus on the sustainability of interventions, whether initiated by the government or NGOs, to provide long term benefits to the beneficiaries or community. Nevertheless, the sustainability of interventions is widely debated in terms of identifying the various factors that are necessary for sustainable community development to materialize. As an interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary subject, researchers apply a variety of research methodologies in order to study, understand and analyse the sustainability of interventions for sustainable community development, a precursor to sustainable development. Using a case study approach, this paper documents the application of the Participatory Action Research (PAR) methodology in studying the sustainability of NGO interventions for sustainable community development. The values and limitations of the PAR approach as a research approach in studying the sustainability of NGO interventions for sustainable community development in Pulau Mantanani are presented in this manuscript and aims to encourage researchers on sustainable community development to integrate the PAR method in their research designs. The author argues that the application of the PAR methodology in research on sustainable community development is a suitable and robust methodology for researchers to capture in-depth, and inclusive and collaborative knowledge-generating perspectives with the community and generate action that aims to improve livelihood and reduce economic, environmental and social inequities of communities through involving the people who, in turn, take actions to improve their own livelihood. Additionally, this paper also aligns the benefits of the PAR method in facilitating research that contributes to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adger WN (2000) Social and ecological resilience: are they related? Prog Hum Geogr 24(3):347–364. https://doi.org/10.1191/030913200701540465. SAGE Publications, UK

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahsan Ullah AKM, Routray JK (2007) Rural poverty alleviation through NGO interventions in Bangladesh: how far is the achievement? Int J Soc Econ 34(4):237–248. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison EH, Horemans B (2006) Putting the principles of the sustainable livelihoods approach into fisheries development policy and practice. Marine Policy 30(6):757–766. Elsevier, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Altman DG (1995) Sustaining interventions in community systems: on the relationship between researchers and communities. Health Psychology 14(6):526. APA Publications, Washington D.C., USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris C, Putnam R, Smith DM (1985) Action science: concepts, methods and skills for research and intervention, Jossey-Bass. San Francisco, CA, USA. ISBN 0-87589-665-0

    Google Scholar 

  • Bebbington A (2004) NGOs and uneven development: geographies of development intervention. Prog Hum Geogr 28(6):725–745. SAGE Publications, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergold J (2007) Participatory strategies in community psychology research—a short survey. In Poland welcomes community psychology: proceedings from the 6th European conference on community psychology pp 57–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleckley D (2008) Assessing participatory development processes through knowledge building. SPNA Rev 4(1):3. SAGE Publications, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P (1983) Social sciences and philosophy. Res Soc Sci 47(1):45–52. Elsevier, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury H (ed) (2015) The Sage handbook of action research. SAGE Publications, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Brocklesby MA, Fisher E (2003) Community development in sustainable livelihoods approaches—an introduction. Community Dev J 38(3):185–198. Taylor and Francis Group, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Brydon-Miller M (2008) Covenantal ethics and action research: exploring a common foundation for social research. In: Mertens D, Ginsberg P (eds) Handbook of social research ethics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp 243–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Brydon-Miller M, Wadsworth Y, Satiani A (2004) A parting of the ways—for the time being. In: Brydon-Miller M, Maguire P, McIntyre A (eds) Traveling companions: feminism, teaching, and action research. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, pp 179–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers R (1997) Progress in participatory development: opening up the possibility of knowledge through progressive participation. In: Sanderson E, Kindon S (eds) (2004) Progress in development studies, vol 4, pp 114–126. SAGE Publications, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Chataway CJ (1997) An examination of the constraints on mutual inquiry in a participatory action research project. J Soc Issue 53(4):747–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke B, Kothari U (eds) (2001) Participation: the new tyranny? Zed Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornwall A, Jewkes R (1995) What is participatory research? Soc Sci Med 41(12):1667–1676. Elsevier, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornwall A, Pratt G (2003) Pathways to participation: critical reflections on PAR. Briefing drew on the Pathways to Participation working papers series. Institute of Development Studies (IDS) Publications, Brighton, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillard J (1991) Accounting as a critical social science. Acc Auditing Accountability J 4:8–28. Emerald Group Publishing, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Fals-Borda O (2006) Participation (action) research in social theory: origins and challenges. In: Reason P, Bradbury H (eds) Handbook of action research. SAGE Publications, UK, pp 27–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan S, Hazell P, Thorat S (2000) Government spending, growth and poverty in rural India. Am J Agric Econ 82(4):1038–1051. Oxford University Press, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth T, Walker A (2008) Forest guardians, forest destroyers: the politics of environmental knowledge in northern Thailand. University of Washington Press, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire P (1972) Creating alternative research methods: learning to do it by doing it. Studies in Adult Education, University of Dar-es-Salaam Press, Tanzania, 20 July 1972

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire P (1982) Creating alternative research methods: learning to do it by doing it. In: Hall B, Gillette A, Tandon R (eds) Creating knowledge: a monopoly? Participatory Research in Development. Society for Participatory Research in Asia, New Delhi. CIP-UPWARD, International Development Research Center, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • George MA, Green LW, Daniel M (1996) Evolution and implications of PAR for public health. Health Promot Educ 3:6–10. Wolters Kluwer—Medknow Publications, India

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood DJ, Levin M (2006)  Introduction to action research: social research for social change. Sage Publications, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussin R, Weirowski F (2013) Dari Perikanan Kepada Pekerjaan Ekonomi Alternatif Oleh Komuniti Nelayan Pulau Mantanani, Kota Belud, Sabah: Terpaksa Atau Relevan Untuk Berubah? In: Proceeding Persidangan Kebangsaan Masyarakat, Ruang dan Alam Sekitar MATRA 2013, Hotel Eastin, Pulau Pinang. UTM Press, Malaysia, pp 52–78, 26–27 Okt 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussin R, Kunjuraman V, Weirowski F (2015) Work transformation from fisherman to homestay tourism entrepreneur: a study in Mantanani Island Kota Belud, Sabah, East Malaysia. Jurnal Kemanusiaan 24(1):15–29. UTM Press, Malaysia

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaafar M, Paijo MAN, Mohamad D, Ismail MM (2016) Tourism development and social impact: the case of Mantanani Island, Sabah (Malaysian Borneo), vol 1, pp 0–4. Information Age Publication, North Carolina, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson S, Rogaly B (1997) Microfinance and poverty reduction. OXFAM Press, Oxford, p 99

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis S (2006) Participatory action research and the public sphere. Educ Action Res 14(4):459–476. Taylor & Francis, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenworthy L (1999) Do social-welfare policies reduce poverty? A cross-national assessment. Soc Forces 77(3):1119–1139 (Oxford University Press, United Kingdom)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar R, Best ML (2006) Impact and sustainability of e-government services in developing countries: lessons learned from Tamil Nadu, India. Inf Soc 22(1):1–12. Taylor & Francis, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre A (2007) Participatory action research, vol 52. SAGE Publications, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Maguire P (2000) Uneven ground: feminisms and action research. In: A handbook of action research. SAGE Publications, UK, pp 60–70

    Google Scholar 

  • McGregor S (2003) Critical science approach: a primer. In: Kappa Omicron Nu FORUM, vol 15, no 1. University of Saskatchewan Press, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • McTaggart R (1991) Principles for participatory action research. Adult Educ Q 41(3):168–187. SAGE Publications, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgaine CA (1994) Enlightenment for emancipation: a critical theory of self-formation. Fam Relat 43(3) (Jul., 1994). Published by National Council on Family Relations, Wiley-Blackwell, New Jersey, USA, pp 325–335. Article Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/585425. Accessed on 23 Dec 2015

  • Mosley P, Hudson J, Verschoor A (2004) Aid, poverty reduction and the ‘new conditionality’. Econ J 114(496). Wiley-Blackwell, New Jersey, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuman WL (2000) Social research methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches, 4th edn. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Noor KBM (2008) Case study: a strategic research methodology. Am J Appl Sci 5(11):1602–1604. Science Publications, United Arab Emirates

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakley P (1991) Project with people. Geneva: ILO

    Google Scholar 

  • Pain R, Francis P (2003) Reflections on participatory research. R Geogr Soc 35(1):46–54. Wiley-Blackwell, New Jersey, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason P, Bradbury H (eds) (2001) The SAGE handbook of action research. Participative inquiry and practice, 1st edn. SAGE Publications, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason P, Bradbury H (eds) (2008) The sage handbook of action research: participative inquiry and practice. SAGE Publications, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Reef Check Malaysia (2015) Status of coral reefs in Malaysia, 2015. Reef Check Malaysia website (www.reefcheck.org.my). Malaysia

  • Reyes CM, Valencia LE (2003) Poverty reduction, decentralisation and community-based monitoring system. CBMS: Philippines Research Paper. Partnership for Economic Policy, Kenya

    Google Scholar 

  • Selener D (1997) Participatory action research and social change (No. Ed. 2). The Cornell Participatory Action Research Network, Cornell University, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith JA (ed) (2015) Qualitative psychology: a practical guide to research methods. SAGE Publications, United Kingdom

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuman M (2013) Going local: Creating self-reliant communities in a global age. Routledge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Stringer CB (1996) Current issues in modern human origins. In: Contemporary issues in human evolution, vol 21. California Academy of Sciences San Francisco, USA, pp 115–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Torbert W (2001) Toward timely action: through 1st-, 2nd, and 3rd-person research/practice. In: Park P, Silverman B (eds) Keynote address at the proceedings of the fielding graduate institute action research symposium. Alexandria VA, July 2001

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas A (1998) The foundations of social research: meaning and perspective in the research process [Book Review]. Rural Soc 8(3):289. Taylor & Francis, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsey K, Patterson D, Whiteside M, Baird L, Baird B, Tsey K (2004) A microanalysis of a participatory action research process with a rural Aboriginal men’s health group. Aust J Primary Health 10(1):64–71. CSIRO Publishing, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Trickett EJ, Beehler S, Deutsch C, Green LW, Hawe P, McLeroy K, Trimble JE (2011) Advancing the science of community-level interventions. Am J Public Health 101(8):1410–1419. American Public Health Association, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Program (UNDP) Small grant projects project. www.sgp.undp.org (website)

  • Wallerstein N (1999) Power dynamics between evaluator and community: research relationships within New Mexico’s Healthier Communities. Soc Sci Med 49:39–53. Elsevier, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Ma H, Zhao Y (2014) Exploring the relationship between urbanization and the eco-environment—a case study of Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region. Ecol Indic 45:171–183. Elsevier, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead J, McNiff J (2006) Action research: living theory. SAGE Publications, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Whyte WFE (1991) Participatory action research. SAGE Publications, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Woo SP, Yasin Z, Ismail SH, Tan SH (2013) The distribution and diversity of sea cucumbers in the coral reefs of the South China Sea, Sulu Sea and Sulawesi Sea. Deep Sea Res Part II 96:13–18. Elsevier, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu-hui LIU (2005) The analysis of China’s human-environment relationship fluctuations between 1961–2001: study based on the EF (Ecological Footprint) Model. Econ Geogr 2:019. Taylor & Francis, USA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. EcoKnights, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

    Yasmin Rasyid

  2. Department of Science and Technology, Faculty of Sciences, University Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

    Yasmin Rasyid

Authors
  1. Yasmin Rasyid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yasmin Rasyid .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. European School of Sustainability Science and Research, HAW Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany

    Walter Leal Filho

  2. European School of Sustainability Science and Research, HAW Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany

    Amanda Lange Salvia

  3. Department of Geography, University of South Africa, Johannesburg, South Africa

    Rudi W. Pretorius

  4. University of Passo Fundo, Passo Fundo, Brazil

    Luciana Londero Brandli

  5. Democritus University of Thrace, Komotini, Greece

    Evangelos Manolas

  6. Department of Social Sciences and Management, Universidade Aberta, Porto, Portugal

    Fatima Alves

  7. Universidade de Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal

    Ulisses Azeiteiro

  8. School of Architecture and Design, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

    Judy Rogers

  9. Department of Life and Environmental Science, Bournemouth University, Poole, UK

    Chris Shiel

  10. Department of Business and Economics, Research Unit NECE, Universidade da Beira Interior, Covilha, Portugal

    Arminda Do Paco

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rasyid, Y. (2020). Participatory Action Research (PAR) as a Research Approach for Sustainable Community Development: A Case Study in Pulau Mantanani, Sabah. In: Leal Filho, W., et al. Universities as Living Labs for Sustainable Development. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15604-6_41

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation