Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

RE-SWOT: From User Feedback to Requirements via Competitor Analysis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality (REFSQ 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 11412))

Abstract

[Context & Motivation] App store reviews are a rich source for analysts to elicit requirements from user feedback, for they describe bugs to be fixed, requested features, and possible improvements. Product development teams need new techniques that help them make real-time decisions based on user feedback. [Question/Problem] Researchers have proposed natural language processing (NLP) techniques for extracting and organizing requirements-relevant knowledge from the reviews for one specific app. However, no attention has been paid to studying whether and how requirements can be identified from competing products. [Principal ideas/results] We propose RE-SWOT, a tool-supported method for eliciting requirements from app store reviews through competitor analysis. RE-SWOT combines NLP algorithms with information visualization techniques. We evaluate the usefulness of RE-SWOT with expert product managers from three mobile app companies. [Contribution] Our preliminary results show that competitor analysis is a promising path for research that has direct impact on the requirements engineering practice in modern app development companies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://github.com/RELabUU/RE-SWOT.

  2. 2.

    http://www.cortical.io/compare-text.html.

References

  1. Bano, M., Zowghi, D.: A systematic review on the relationship between user involvement and system success. Inf. Softw. Technol. 58, 148–169 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Berry, D.: Natural language and requirements engineering–nu? In: International Workshop on Requirements Engineering (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bourque, P., Fairley, R.E.: Guide to the software engineering body of knowledge (SWEBOK (R)): version 3.0. IEEE Computer Society Press (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, N., Lin, J., Hoi, S.C.H., Xiao, X., Zhang, B.: AR-miner: mining informative reviews for developers from mobile app marketplace. In: Proceedings of ICSE, pp. 767–778 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cooper Jr., J.R., Lee, S.W., Gandhi, R.A., Gotel, O.: Requirements engineering visualization: a survey on the state-of-the-art. Proceedings of REV, pp. 46–55 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dalpiaz, F., van der Schalk, I., Brinkkemper, S., Aydemir, F.B., Lucassen, G.: Detecting terminological ambiguity in user stories: tool and experimentation. Inf. Softw. Technol. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2018.12.007

  7. Di Sorbo, A., et al.: What would users change in my app? Summarizing app reviews for recommending software changes. In: Proceedings of FSE, pp. 499–510 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fu, B., Lin, J., Li, L., Faloutsos, C., Hong, J., Sadeh, N.: Why people hate your app: making sense of user feedback in a mobile app store. In: Proceedings of SIGKDD, pp. 1276–1284 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gao, C., Wang, B., He, P., Zhu, J., Zhou, Y., Lyu, M.R.: PAID: prioritizing app issues for developers by tracking user reviews over versions. In: Proceedings of ISSRE, pp. 35–45 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Genc-Nayebi, N., Abran, A.: A systematic literature review: opinion mining studies from mobile app store user reviews. J. Syst. Softw. 125, 207–219 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Groen, E.C., et al.: The crowd in requirements engineering: the landscape and challenges. IEEE Softw. 34(2), 44–52 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Guzman, E., Maalej, W.: How do users like this feature? A fine grained sentiment analysis of app reviews. In: Proceedings of RE, pp. 153–162 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Harman, M., Jia, Y., Zhang, Y.: App store mining and analysis: MSR for app stores. In: Proceedings of MSR, pp. 108–111 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hill, T., Westbrook, R.: SWOT analysis: it’s time for a product recall. Long Range Plann. 30(1), 46–52 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hosseini, M., Phalp, K., Taylor, J., Ali, R.: Towards crowdsourcing for requirements engineering. In: Proceedings of REFSQ, pp. 82–87 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jin, J., Ji, P., Gu, R.: Identifying comparative customer requirements from product online reviews for competitor analysis. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 49, 61–73 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Johann, T., Maalej, W.: Democratic mass participation of users in Requirements Engineering? In: Proceedings of RE, pp. 256–261 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kabbedijk, J., Brinkkemper, S., Jansen, S., van der Veldt, B.: Customer involvement in requirements management: lessons from mass market software development. In: Proceedings of RE, pp. 281–286 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Keertipati, S., Savarimuthu, B.T.R., Licorish, S.A.: Approaches for prioritizing feature improvements extracted from app reviews. In: Proceedings of EASE, pp. 1–6 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Maalej, W., Nabil, H.: Bug report, feature request, or simply praise? On automatically classifying app reviews. In: Proceedings of RE, pp. 116–125 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Maalej, W., Nayebi, M., Johann, T., Ruhe, G.: Towards data-driven requirements engineering. IEEE Softw. 33, 1–6 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pagano, D., Maalej, W.: User feedback in the AppStore: an empirical study. In: Proceedings of RE, pp. 125–134 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Panichella, S., Di Sorbo, A., Guzman, E., Visaggio, C.A., Canfora, G., Gall, H.C.: How can I improve my app? Classifying user reviews for software maintenance and evolution. In: Proceedings of ICSME 2015, pp. 281–290 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Parente, M.G.: Using NLP and information visualization to analyze app reviews. Master’s thesis, Utrecht University, the Netherlands (2018). https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/368082

  25. Pfitzner, D., Hobbs, V., Powers, D.: A unified taxonomic framework for information visualization. In: Proceedings of APVis (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Reddivari, S., Rad, S., Bhowmik, T., Cain, N., Niu, N.: Visual requirements analytics: a framework and case study. Requir. Eng. 19(3), 257–279 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Shneiderman, B.: The eyes have it: a task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations. In: Proceedings of VL/HCC, pp. 336–343 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Srivastava, P.K., Sharma, R.: Crowdsourcing to elicit requirements for MyERP application. In: Proceedings of CrowdRE, pp. 31–35 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Weihrich, H.: The TOWS matrix–a tool for situational analysis. Long Range Plan. 15(2), 54–66 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wohlin, C., Runeson, P., Höst, M., Ohlsson, M.C., Regnell, B., Wesslén, A.: Experimentation in Software Engineering. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29044-2

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Yang, H., Liang, P.: Identification and classification of requirements from app user reviews. In: Proceedings of SEKE, pp. 7–12 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. RE-Lab, Department of Information and Computing Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Fabiano Dalpiaz

  2. Scaura B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Micaela Parente

Authors
  1. Fabiano Dalpiaz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Micaela Parente
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabiano Dalpiaz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden

    Eric Knauss

  2. paluno – The Ruhr Institute for Software Technology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany

    Michael Goedicke

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Dalpiaz, F., Parente, M. (2019). RE-SWOT: From User Feedback to Requirements via Competitor Analysis. In: Knauss, E., Goedicke, M. (eds) Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality. REFSQ 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11412. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15538-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15538-4_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-15537-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-15538-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation