Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Is Being Conservative at Home Whilst Taking Risks Abroad a Suitable Competitive Strategy? The Case of Spanish Family Firms Internationalizing to Mexico

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Entrepreneurship and Family Business Vitality

  • 1097 Accesses

Abstract

Family firms’ (FFs) importance for industrialized and developing countries and the growing competition has led to an increased interest in knowing how FFs develop their competitive strategies. Since FFs usually have a long-term vision when deciding how to compete, analyzing competitive strategies—usually linked with the long-term—makes even more sense. Furthermore, FFs’ behavior is especially interesting when they have been internationalized. Thus, the purpose of our study is to improve the understanding of the competitive strategies of FFs’ internationalizing to Mexico, namely, exploitation (at a national level) and exploration (at international level). Briefly, a firm’s exploitation strategy is characterized by better-using firms’ existing resources and knowledge, whereas a firm’s exploration strategy involves exploring new ways of doing. Based on data collected from 81 CEOs of Spanish firms that have been internationalized to Mexico, we use partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) technique. We conclude that FFs’ exploitation strategy (at a national level) has a positive impact on firms’ exploration strategy (at international level). In other words, being more efficient and leveraging current knowledge at a national level help to pursue opportunities internationally actively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adler, P., Benner, M. J., Brunner, D. J., MacDuffie, J. P., Osono, E., Staats, B. R., & Winter, S. G. (2009). Perspectives on the productivity dilemma. Journal of Operations Management, 27(2), 99–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexiev, A. S., Jansen, J. J., Van den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2010). Top management team advice seeking and exploratory innovation: The moderating role of TMT heterogeneity. Journal of Management Studies, 47(7), 1343–1364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arzubiaga, U., Maseda, A., & Iturralde, T. (2017). Exploratory and exploitative innovation in family businesses: The moderating role of the family firm image and family involvement in top management. Review of Managerial Science, 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bammens, Y., Notelaers, G., & Van Gils, A. (2014). Implications of family business employment for employees’ innovative work involvement. Family Business Review, 28(2), 123–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battaglia, D., Neirotti, P., & Paolucci, E. (2018). The role of R&D investments and export on SMEs’ growth: A domain ambidexterity perspective. Management Decision, 56(9), 1883–1903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 238–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bierly, P. E., III, Damanpour, F., & Santoro, M. D. (2009). The application of external knowledge: Organizational conditions for exploration and exploitation. Journal of Management Studies, 46(3), 481–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binz, C., Patel, V. K., & Wanzenried, G. (2014). A comparative study of CB-SEM and PLS-SEM for theory development in family firm research. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5(1), 116–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Björnberg, Å., Elstrodt, H. P., & Pandit, V. (2015). Joining the family business: An emerging opportunity for investors (Vol. 2, pp. 22–26). McKinsey & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booltink, L. W., & Saka-Helmhout, A. (2018). The effects of R&D intensity and internationalization on the performance of non-high-tech SMEs. International Small Business Journal, 36(1), 81–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botero, I. C., Cruz, C., De Massis, A., & Nordqvist, M. (2015). Family business research in the European context. European Journal of International Management, 9(2), 139–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calabrò, A., Vecchiarini, M., Gast, J., Campopiano, G., De Massis, A., & Kraus, S. (2018). Innovation in family firms: A systematic literature review and guidance for future research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(3), 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao, Q., Gedajlovic, E., & Zhang, H. (2009). Unpacking organizational ambidexterity: Dimensions, contingencies, and synergistic effects. Organization Science, 20(4), 781–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carney, M. (2005). Corporate governance and competitive advantage in family-controlled firms. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 29(3), 249–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casprini, E., De Massis, A., Di Minin, A., Frattini, F., & Piccaluga, A. (2017). How family firms execute open innovation strategies: The Loccioni case. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(6), 1459–1485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassia, L., De Massis, A., & Pizzurno, E. (2012). Strategic innovation and new product development in family firms: An empirically grounded theoretical framework. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 18(2), 198–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castillo-Apraiz, J., & Matey de Antonio, J. (2018). Does quality pay in the pharmaceutical industry? The mediating role of training of personnel between quality management and performance. Revista de Dirección y Administración de Empresas, 25. (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Y. Y., & Hughes, M. (2012). Drivers of innovation ambidexterity in small-to-medium-sized firms. European Management Journal, 30, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Y. T., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1996). Learning the innovation journey: Order out of chaos? Organization Science, 7(6), 593–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. In M. GA (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295–336). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaun Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Classen, N., Carree, M., Van Gils, A., & Peters, B. (2014). Innovation in family and non-family SMEs: An exploratory analysis. Small Business Economics, 42(3), 595–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowling, M., Liu, W., Ledger, A., & Zhang, N. (2015). What really happens to small and medium-sized enterprises in a global economic recession? UK evidence on sales and job dynamics. International Small Business Journal, 33(5), 488–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui, A. P., Walsh, M. F., & Zou, S. (2014). The importance of strategic fit between host-home country similarity and exploration-exploitation strategies on small and medium-sized enterprises’ performance: A contingency perspective. Journal of International Marketing, 22(4), 67–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Massis, A., Audretsch, D., Uhlaner, L., & Kammerlander, N. (2018). Innovation with limited resources: Management lessons from the German Mittelstand. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 35(1), 125–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Massis, A., Frattini, F., Pizzurno, E., & Cassia, L. (2015). Product innovation in family versus nonfamily firms: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(1), 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghemawat, P., & Ricart Costa, J. E. I. (1993). The organizational tension between static and dynamic efficiency. Strategic Management Journal, 14(S2), 59–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goel, S., & Jones, R. J., III. (2016). Entrepreneurial exploration and exploitation in the family business: A systematic review and future directions. Family Business Review, 29(1), 94–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G., & Shalley, C. E. (2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 693–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Castillo, J., Cepeda, G., & Roldán, J. L. (2019). Manual de Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Terrasa (Barcelona). España: Omnia Science.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Jr., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2012). Editorial-partial least squares: The better approach to structural equation modeling? Long Range Planning, 45(5–6), 312–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Pieper, T. M., & Ringle, C. M. (2012). The use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in strategic management research: A review of past practices and recommendations for future applications. Long Range Planning, 45(5–6), 320–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Mena, J. A. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 414–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, Z. L., & Wong, P. K. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15(4), 481–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 115–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C., & Sinkovics, R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Advances in International Marketing, 20, 277–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations. Intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival. The software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, R. J., Hanges, P. M., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • IEF. (2015). La empresa familiar en España. Madrid: Instituto de la Empresa Familiar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, J., George, G., Van den Bosch, F., & Volberda, H. W. (2008). Senior teams’ attributes and organizational ambidexterity: The moderating role of transformational leadership. Journal of Management Studies, 45, 982–1007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kammerlander, N., Burger, D., Fust, A., & Fueglistaller, U. (2015). Exploration and exploitation in established small and medium-sized enterprises: The effect of CEOs’ regulatory focus. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(4), 582–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • König, A., Kammerlander, N., & Enders, A. (2013). The family innovator’s dilemma: How family influence affects the adoption of discontinuous technologies by incumbent firms. Academy of Management Review, 38(3), 418–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kortmann, S. (2015). The mediating role of strategic orientations on the relationship between ambidexterity-oriented decisions and innovative ambidexterity. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(5), 666–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kortmann, S., Gelhard, C., Zimmermann, C., & Piller, F. T. (2014). Linking strategic flexibility and operational efficiency: The mediating role of ambidextrous operational capabilities. Journal of Operations Management, 32(7–8), 475–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koryak, O., Lockett, A., Hayton, J., Nicolaou, N., & Mole, K. (2018). Disentangling the antecedents of ambidexterity: Exploration and exploitation. Research Policy, 47, 413–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyu Kim, K., Yul Ryoo, S., & Dug Jung, M. (2011). Inter-organizational information systems visibility in buyer-supplier relationships: The case of telecommunication equipment component manufacturing industry. Omega, 39(6), 667–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Breton-Miller, I., Miller, D., & Lester, R. H. (2011). Stewardship or agency? A social embeddedness reconciliation of conduct and performance in public family businesses. Organization Science, 22(3), 704–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 95–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, H. E., & McDonough, E. F., III. (2014). Cognitive frames, learning mechanisms, and innovation ambidexterity. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31, 170–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, S., & Si, S. (2018). The influence of exploration and exploitation on born globals’ speed of internationalization. Management Decision, 57(1), 193–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Love, J. H., & Roper, S. (2015). SME innovation, exporting and growth: A review of existing evidence. International Small Business Journal, 33(1), 28–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubatkin, M. H., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y., & Veiga, J. F. (2006). Ambidexterity and performance in small-to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. Journal of Management, 32(5), 646–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzi, C. (2011). Family business and financial performance: Current state of knowledge and future research challenges. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 2(3), 166–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Memili, E., Fang, H., Chrisman, J. J., & De Massis, A. (2015). The impact of small and medium-sized family firms on economic growth. Small Business Economics, 45(4), 771–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mom, T. J., Van Den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2007). Investigating managers’ exploration and exploitation activities: The influence of top-down, bottom-up, and horizontal knowledge inflows. Journal of Management Studies, 44(6), 910–931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss, T. W., Payne, G. T., & Moore, C. B. (2014). Strategic consistency of exploration and exploitation in family businesses. Family Business Review, 27(1), 51–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, C. A., III, & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 324–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raisch, S., & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management, 34(3), 375–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G., & Tushman, M. L. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organization Science, 20(4), 685–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randerson, K., Bettinelli, C., Fayolle, A., & Anderson, A. (2015). Family entrepreneurship as a field of research: Exploring its contours and contents. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 6(3), 143–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter, N. F. (2014). Information costs in international business: Analyzing the effects of economies of scale, cultural diversity and decentralization. Management International Review, 54(2), 171–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter, N. F., Cepeda, G., Roldán, J. L., & Ringle, C. M. (2016). European management research using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). European Management Journal, 34(6), 589–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter, N. F., Hauff, S., Schlaegel, C., Gudergan, S., Ringle, C. M., & Gunkel, M. (2016). Using cultural archetypes in cross-cultural management studies. Journal of International Management, 22(1), 63–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rigdon, E. E. (2016). Choosing PLS path modeling as an analytical method in European management research: A realist perspective. European Management Journal, 34(6), 598–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J. M. (2014). SmartPLS 3. Hamburg: SmartPLS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Smith, D., Reams, R., & Hair, J. F., Jr. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): A useful tool for family business researchers. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5(1), 105–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simsek, Z. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Towards a multilevel understanding. Journal of Management Studies, 46, 597–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirmon, D. G., & Hitt, M. A. (2003). Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management, and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 27(4), 339–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, W. K., & Tushman, M. L. (2005). Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organization Science, 16(5), 522–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stadler, C., Rajwani, T., & Karaba, F. (2014). Solutions to the exploration/exploitation dilemma: Networks as a new level of analysis. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16(2), 172–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stubner, S., Blarr, W. H., Brands, C., & Wulf, T. (2012). Organizational ambidexterity and family firm performance. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 25(2), 217–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, N., Swart, J., & Maylor, H. (2013). Mechanisms for managing ambidexterity: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15, 317–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uotila, J. (2018). Punctuated equilibrium or ambidexterity: Dynamics of incremental and radical organizational change over time. Industrial and Corporate Change, 27(1), 131–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veider, V., & Matzler, K. (2016). The ability and willingness of family-controlled firms to arrive at organizational ambidexterity. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 7, 105–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voorhees, C. M., Brady, M. K., Calantone, R., & Ramirez, E. (2016). Discriminant validity testing in marketing: An analysis, causes for concern, and proposed remedies. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(1), 119–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wassmer, U., Li, S., & Madhok, A. (2017). Resource ambidexterity through alliance portfolios and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 38(2), 384–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zellweger, T. M. (2007). Time horizon, costs of equity capital, and generic investment strategies of firms. Family Business Review, 20(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, A., Raisch, S., & Cardinal, L. B. (2018). Managing persistent tensions on the frontline: A configurational perspective on ambidexterity. Journal of Management Studies, 55(5), 739–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Bilbao, Spain

    Julen Castillo-Apraiz & Unai Arzubiaga

  2. Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Chihuahua, Mexico

    Jesús Manuel Palma-Ruiz

Authors
  1. Julen Castillo-Apraiz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Unai Arzubiaga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jesús Manuel Palma-Ruiz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julen Castillo-Apraiz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. EGADE Business School-Tecnologico de Monterrey, Zapopan, Jalisco, Mexico

    José Manuel Saiz-Álvarez

  2. University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal

    João Leitão

  3. Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Chihuahua, Mexico

    Jesús Manuel Palma-Ruiz

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Castillo-Apraiz, J., Arzubiaga, U., Palma-Ruiz, J.M. (2020). Is Being Conservative at Home Whilst Taking Risks Abroad a Suitable Competitive Strategy? The Case of Spanish Family Firms Internationalizing to Mexico. In: Saiz-Álvarez, J.M., Leitão, J., Palma-Ruiz, J.M. (eds) Entrepreneurship and Family Business Vitality. Studies on Entrepreneurship, Structural Change and Industrial Dynamics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15526-1_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation