Skip to main content

Democracy in Rhetoric and Reality

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Democracy, Rights and Rhetoric in Southeast Asia

Part of the book series: The Theories, Concepts and Practices of Democracy ((PSTCD))

  • 300 Accesses

Abstract

Why have references to democracy become standard in the rhetoric of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)? This chapter explores the development of references to democracy in ASEAN, and the positions of member states in the context of their domestic political circumstances. It argues that ASEAN statements on democracy are not underpinned by a uniform approach to, or understanding of, democracy. Rather, there are many diverse views. Some member state representatives want to see a regional role for ASEAN in regard to democracy, while others are concerned about the potential challenges to sovereignty and non-interference norms. However, even non-democratic regimes recognise the legitimacy conferred by the term ‘democracy’ as a rhetorical tool.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Note that Timor-Leste is not (yet) a member of ASEAN. While Timor-Leste’s democratic institutions are still young and developing, it scored the highest of the Southeast Asian states in The Economist Intelligence Unit’s Democracy Index in 2017, and was the only Southeast Asian state to be categorised as ‘Free’ by Freedom House’s Freedom in the World report (The Economist Intelligence Unit 2017; Freedom House 2017).

  2. 2.

    Of course, authoritarian states are themselves often qualified. Cambodia, Malaysia and Singapore have been referred to as electoral authoritarian (e.g. Croissant and Haynes 2014, 777), and alternatively as competitive authoritarian (e.g. Morgenbesser 2016; Ortmann 2011). Morgenbesser (2016) describes Vietnam and Laos as hegemonic authoritarian and Thailand and Brunei as closed authoritarian. For the purposes of this book, the focus is on democracy and its adoption in ASEAN rhetoric.

  3. 3.

    This followed an attempt to impeach Duterte on the grounds that he has incited more than 8000 extrajudicial killings of suspected drug users and dealers, as well as bystanders. The impeachment complaint was unsurprisingly defeated in the House of Representatives.

  4. 4.

    Taking a hard line on crime is not, of course, particular to the Philippines. Several governments in ASEAN states emphasise law and order as being in the interests of a stable democratic society. For example, Indonesia’s Attorney General, Muhammad Prasetyo, argued in July 2016 that implementing the death penalty for narcotics crimes is necessary to ‘save the nation from the danger of drugs’ (quoted in Hutt 2016).

  5. 5.

    The role of chair rotates among ASEAN states in alphabetical order, and the chair has a considerable influence over the agenda in that particular year.

  6. 6.

    As discussed in Chapter 1, the ASEAN Minus X principle allows for some flexibility to in the norm of consensus decision-making. If a member state does not agree with a particular decision, but is not affected by it, the member state should refrain from voting against it, and should instead abstain from voting (Capie and Evans 2007, 132).

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Avery Poole .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Poole, A. (2019). Democracy in Rhetoric and Reality. In: Democracy, Rights and Rhetoric in Southeast Asia. The Theories, Concepts and Practices of Democracy. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15522-3_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics