Advertisement

Democracy in Rhetoric and Reality

  • Avery PooleEmail author
Chapter
  • 176 Downloads
Part of the The Theories, Concepts and Practices of Democracy book series (PSTCD)

Abstract

Why have references to democracy become standard in the rhetoric of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)? This chapter explores the development of references to democracy in ASEAN, and the positions of member states in the context of their domestic political circumstances. It argues that ASEAN statements on democracy are not underpinned by a uniform approach to, or understanding of, democracy. Rather, there are many diverse views. Some member state representatives want to see a regional role for ASEAN in regard to democracy, while others are concerned about the potential challenges to sovereignty and non-interference norms. However, even non-democratic regimes recognise the legitimacy conferred by the term ‘democracy’ as a rhetorical tool.

Keywords

ASEAN Democracy Rhetoric Legitimacy 

References

  1. Abramowitz, Michael J. 2018. “Democracy in Crisis.” In Freedom in the World 2018. Washington, DC: Freedom House.Google Scholar
  2. Al Jazeera. 2016. “Thailand Referendum: New Constitution Wins Approval.” August 7, 2016. http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2016/08/thailand-referendum-vote-favor-constitution-160807120506423.html.
  3. Antara. 2016. “Bali Democracy Forum Calls for Synergy of Religions and Tolerance.” December 11, 2016. https://bali.antaranews.com/berita/99669/bali-democracy-forum-calls-for-synergy-of-religions-tolerance-and-democracy.
  4. Arifianto, Alexander R. 2017. “Indonesia Ban on Civil Society Bodies: Spot on or Overreach?” RSIS Commentary. S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, No. 136/2017. July 18, 2017. https://www.rsis.edu.sg/rsis-publication/rsis/co17136-indonesia-ban-on-civil-society-bodies-spot-on-or-overreach/#.WYFTR0bwkhs.
  5. ASEAN. 2004. Vientiane Action Programme 2004–2010. https://www.asean.org/uploads/archive/VAP-10th%20ASEAN%20Summit.pdf.
  6. ASEAN. 2005. Kuala Lumpur Declaration on the Establishment of the ASEAN Charter. Kuala Lumpur, December 12, 2005. https://asean.org/asean/asean-charter/kuala-lumpur-declaration/.
  7. ASEAN. 2006. Report of the Eminent Persons Group on the ASEAN Charter. https://www.asean.org/wp-content/uploads/images/archive/19427.pdf.
  8. ASEAN. 2007. Charter of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations. Singapore, November 20, 2007. http://www.aseansec.org/21069.pdf.
  9. ASEAN. 2009. ASEAN Political-Security Community Blueprint. Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat. http://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/archive/5187-18.pdf.
  10. ASEAN. 2014. ASEAN Foreign Ministers’ Statement on the Developments in Thailand. May 14, 2014. http://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/24th-Statement-on-Thailand.pdf.
  11. Asian Correspondent. 2018. “Thai Pro-democracy Protesters Arrested as Anti-junta Sentiment Grows.” May 23, 2018. https://asiancorrespondent.com/2018/05/thai-pro-democracy-protesters-arrested-as-fatigue-on-junta-rule-grows/.
  12. Associated Press. 2016. “Thai Ex-premier Says Ruling Junta Seeks ‘Backward Democracy’.” March 10, 2016. http://www.businessinsider.com/ap-thai-ex-premier-says-ruling-junta-seeks-backward-democracy-2016-3/?r=AU&IR=T.
  13. Capie, David, and Paul Evans. 2007. The Asia-Pacific Security Lexicon. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
  14. Cayetano, Alan Peter S. 2017. “We Continue to Value Sanctity of Freedom.” Borneo Bulletin, June 21, 2017. http://borneobulletin.com.bn/continue-value-sanctity-freedom/.
  15. Cerojano, Teresa. 2017. “‘This Is a Democracy’: Int’l Court May Be Next for Duterte.” Associated Press, May 16, 2017. https://www.dailycommercial.com/news/20170516/this-is-democracy-intl-court-may-be-next-for-duterte.
  16. Cigaral, Ian Nicolas P. 2016. “Government to Relax Foreign Ownership Limit, Protect BPOs.” Business World Online, December 14, 2016. http://www.bworldonline.com/content.php?section=Nation&title=government-to-relax-foreign-ownership-limit-protect-bpos&id=137754.
  17. Collier, David, and Steven Levitsky. 1997. “Democracy with Adjectives.” World Politics 49, no. 3 (April): 430–451.Google Scholar
  18. Cooley, Alexander. 2015. “Countering Democratic Norms.” Journal of Democracy 26, no. 3 (July): 49–63.Google Scholar
  19. Croissant, Aurel, and Jeffrey Haynes. 2014. “Thematic Section: ‘Inequalities and Democracy in Southeast Asia’.” Democratization 21, no. 5: 775–779.Google Scholar
  20. Dahl, Robert A. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Diamond, Larry J. 1999. Developing Democracy: Towards Consolidation. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Diamond, Larry J. 2015a. “Facing Up to the Democratic Recession.” In Democracy in Decline?, edited by Larry Diamond and Mark F. Plattner, 98–118. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Diamond, Larry J. 2015b. “Facing Up to the Democratic Recession.” Journal of Democracy 26, no. 1 (January): 141–155.Google Scholar
  24. Emmerson, Donald K. 2005. “Security, Community, and Democracy in Southeast Asia: Analyzing ASEAN.” Japanese Journal of Political Science 6, no. 2 (August): 165–185.Google Scholar
  25. Emmerson, Donald K. 2008. “Critical Terms: Security, Democracy and Regionalism in Southeast Asia.” In Hard Choices: Security, Democracy and Regionalism in Southeast Asia, edited by Donald K. Emmerson, 3–58. Stanford, CA: Walter H. Shorenstein Asia-Pacific Research Center.Google Scholar
  26. Emmerson, Donald K. 2012. “Is Indonesia Rising? It Depends”. In Indonesia Rising: The Repositioning of Asia’s Third Giant, edited by Anthony Reid, 49–76. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
  27. Erviani, Ni Komang. 2015. “Jusuf Kalla Blames Democracy for Growing Terrorist Threats.” The Jakarta Post, December 11, 2015.Google Scholar
  28. Finnemore, Martha, and Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change.” International Organization 52, no. 4 (Autumn): 887–917.Google Scholar
  29. Fitri, Nurul Fitri, and Haeril Halim. 2017. “Democracy ‘Gone Too Far’: Jokowi.” The Jakarta Post, February 23, 2017. http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2017/02/23/democracy-gone-too-far-jokowi.html.
  30. Freedom House. 2017. Freedom in the World 2017. Washington, DC: Freedom House. https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/freedom-world-2017.
  31. Gomez, James, and Robin Ramcharan. 2014. “Introduction: Democracy and Human Rights in Southeast Asia.” Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs 33, no. 3: 3–17.Google Scholar
  32. Halim, Haeril. 2017. “Jokowi Seeks Security Over Democracy.” The Jakarta Post, June 7, 2017. http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2017/06/07/jokowi-seeks-security-over-democracy.html.
  33. Hamid, Shadi. 2018. “What Democracies Can Learn from Malaysia.” The Atlantic, May 16, 2018. https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2018/05/malaysia-democracy-najib/560534/.
  34. Huntington, Samuel P. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
  35. Hutt, David. 2016. “The Cogs of Indonesia’s Death Machine.” The Diplomat, June 8, 2016. http://thediplomat.com/2016/06/the-cogs-of-indonesias-death-machine/.
  36. Khalik, Abdul. 2007. “Indonesia Holds Ground on ASEAN Charter.” The Jakarta Post, June 15, 2007.Google Scholar
  37. Kurlantzick, Joshua. 2014. “Southeast Asia’s Regression from Democracy and Its Implications.” Working Paper, May 2014. New York: Council of Foreign Relations. http://i.cfr.org/content/publications/attachments/Democratic_Regression_Paper.pdf.
  38. Levitsky, Steven, and Lucan A. Way. 2010. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes After the Cold War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Massola, James. 2018. “‘Democracy Is Dead in Cambodia’: Deputy Opposition Leader Speaks Out.” Sydney Morning Herald, March 21, 2018. https://www.smh.com.au/world/asia/democracy-is-dead-in-cambodia-deputy-opposition-leader-speaks-out-20180321-p4z5g7.html.
  40. Massola, James, and Nara Lon. 2018. “Cambodia Election ‘the End of the Road for Democracy’.” Sydney Morning Herald, July 30, 2018. https://www.smh.com.au/world/asia/cambodia-election-the-end-of-the-road-for-democracy-20180729-p4zubq.html.
  41. Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Singapore. 2007. “Statement by ASEAN Chair, Singapore’s Minister for Foreign Affairs George Yeo in New York.” September 27, 2007”. https://www.mfa.gov.sg/content/mfa/overseasmission/washington/newsroom/press_statements/2007/200709/press_200709_03.html.
  42. Morgenbesser, Lee. 2016. Behind the Façade: Elections Under Authoritarianism in Southeast Asia. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  43. Morgenbesser, Lee, and Thomas B. Pepinsky. 2018. “Elections as Causes of Democratization: Southeast Asia in Comparative Perspective.” Comparative Political Studies (Online Version, February).Google Scholar
  44. Murdoch, Lindsay. 2016. “Military’s Iron Grip Tightens with ‘Thai-Style Democracy’.” Sydney Morning Herald, April 8, 2016. https://www.smh.com.au/world/militarys-iron-grip-on-thaistyle-democracy-20160406-gnzher.html.
  45. Natalegawa, Marty M. 2010. “Statement by H.E. Dr. R.M. Marty M. Natalegawa, Minister for Foreign Affairs, Republic of Indonesia.” United Nations General Assembly, 65th Session, New York. September 28, 2010. https://gadebate.un.org/sites/default/files/gastatements/65/65_ID_en.pdf.
  46. Ortmann, Stephen. 2011. “Singapore: Authoritarian but Newly Competitive.” Journal of Democracy 22, no. 4 (October): 153–164.Google Scholar
  47. Peou, Sorpong. 2014. “The Limits and Potential of Liberal Democratisation in Southeast Asia.” Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs 33, no. 3: 19–47.Google Scholar
  48. Pepinsky, Thomas. 2017. “Southeast Asia: Voting Against Disorder.” Journal of Democracy 28, no. 2 (April): 120–131.Google Scholar
  49. Pevehouse, Jon C. 2005. Democracy from Above: Regional Organizations and Democratization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Phillips, Kimberley. 2017. “‘Fake News’, Populism Flagged as Threats to Democracy at ASEAN Forum.” Democratic Voice of Burma, September 5, 2017. http://www.dvb.no/news/fake-news-populism-flagged-threats-democracy-asean-forum/77243.
  51. Poole, Avery D. H. 2015a. “The Foreign Policy Nexus: National Interests, Political Values and Identity.” In Indonesia’s Ascent: Power, Leadership, and the Regional Order, edited by Christopher Roberts, Ahmad Habir, and Leonard Sebastian, 155–176. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  52. Poole, Avery D. H. 2015b. “‘The World Is Outraged’: Legitimacy in the Making of the ASEAN Human Rights Body.” Contemporary Southeast Asia 37, no. 3 (December): 355–380.Google Scholar
  53. Prime Minister’s Office Singapore. 2015. “Transcript of Dialogue with Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong at the SG50+ Conference on 2 July 2015.” July 2, 2015. http://www.pmo.gov.sg/mediacentre/transcript-dialogue-prime-minister-lee-hsien-loong-sg50-conference-2-july-2015.
  54. Przeworski, Adam. 1999. “Minimalist Conception of Democracy: A Defence.” In Democracy’s Value, edited by Ian Shapiro and Casiano Hacker-Cordón, 23–55. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Reuters. 2018. “UK, France Should Press Thai PM on Rights, to End Military Rule: Group.” June 18, 2018. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-thailand-politics/uk-france-should-press-thai-pm-on-rights-to-end-military-rule-group-idUSKBN1JE0NI.
  56. Robison, Richard, and Vedi R. Hadiz. 2017. “Indonesia: A Tale of Misplaced Expectations.” Pacific Review 30, no. 6: 895–909.Google Scholar
  57. Rueschemeyer, Dietrich. 2004. “Addressing Inequality.” Journal of Democracy 15, no. 4 (October): 76–90.Google Scholar
  58. Schedler, Andreas. 2015. “Electoral Authoritarianism.” Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences (May): 1–16. Google Scholar
  59. Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1943. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London: Unwin University Books.Google Scholar
  60. Sony, Ouch. 2018. “Cambodia Does Not Need International Recognition for Upcoming Elections: PM.” Channel News Asia, January 19, 2018. https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asiapacific/cambodia-does-not-need-international-recognition-for-upcoming-9874358.
  61. Sukma, Rizal. 2008. “Political Development: A Democracy Agenda for ASEAN?” In Hard Choices: Security, Democracy and Regionalism in Southeast Asia, edited by Donald K. Emmerson, 135–150. Stanford, CA: Walter H. Shorenstein Asia-Pacific Research Center.Google Scholar
  62. Sukma, Rizal. 2011. “Indonesia Finds a New Voice.” Journal of Democracy 22, no. 4 (October): 110–123.Google Scholar
  63. The Economist Intelligence Unit. 2017. Democracy Index 2017. https://www.eiu.com/topic/democracy-index.
  64. The Sun Daily. 2017. “Call for More Resilient Democracy in ASEAN Region.” September 14, 2017. http://www.thesundaily.my/news/2017/09/03/call-more-resilient-democracy-asean-region.
  65. Viray, Patricia Lourdes. 2017. “ASEAN Warned: Adhere to Democracy but Choose Leaders Well.” Philippines Star, October 13, 2017. https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2017/10/13/1748408/asean-warned-adhere-democracy-choose-leaders-well.
  66. Wai, Albert. 2016. “Thai PM Wants New ‘Strategic Equilibrium’ Amid Security Threats.” Today Online, June 4, 2016. https://www.todayonline.com/world/asia/asia-needs-new-strategic-equilibrium-tackle-security-challenges-thai-pm.
  67. Wirajuda, Hassan. 2009. “Statement by H.E. Dr. N. Hassan Wirajuda, Minister for Foreign Affairs, Republic of Indonesia.” United Nations General Assembly, 64th Session, New York. September 29, 2009. http://www.un.org/en/ga/64/generaldebate/pdf/ID_en.pdf.
  68. World Bank. 2018. “Data: Indonesia.” http://data.worldbank.org/country/indonesia.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Australia and New Zealand School of Government (ANZSOG)CarltonAustralia

Personalised recommendations