Skip to main content

Flirting on Film: Boundaries and Consent, Visibility and Performance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Flirting in the Era of #MeToo

Abstract

Teen film presents a variety of intimacies between characters, sometimes in constructive ways, other times in ways that demonstrate a lack of care for the self or others. As a popular, accessible textual form, teen film can provide a space to explore ethical practices of relating through flirting. In order to appeal to the largest possible audience, flirting, innuendo, touching, glancing, and talking often replace the representation of sex in teen film, playing a part in testing the waters and learning how to relate to other people. In this way, film has the potential to provide an environment to discuss aspects of relationships and relating that sometimes fall to the wayside. This chapter considers how teen films present pedagogical moments which might be valuable for starting conversations or discussions regarding the negotiation of intimacy, rather than resorting to scandal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • 10 Things I Hate About You. 1999. Directed by Gil Junger. USA: Touchstone Pictures, Mad Chance, Jaret Entertainment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albury, Kath. 2013. Young People, Media and Sexual Learning: Rethinking Representation. Sex Education 13 (Suppl. 1): S32–S44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2018. Sexual Expression in Social Media. In The Sage Handbook of Social Media, ed. Jean Burgess, Alice Marwick, and Thomas Poell. London: SAGE Publications. [Electronic Version]. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473984066.n25.

  • Albury, Kath, and Paul Byron. 2016. Safe on My Phone? Same-Sex Attracted Young People’s Negotiations of Intimacy, Visibility, and Risk on Digital Hook-Up Apps. Social Media + Society 2: 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, Meg-John, Rosalind Gill, and Laura Harvey. 2018. Mediated Intimacy: Sex Advice in Media Culture. Newark: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnhill, Anne. 2010. Just Pushy Enough. In Dating Philosophy for Everyone: Flirting with Big Ideas, ed. Kristie Lyn Miller and Marlene Clark, 90–100. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Beasley, Chris, and Carol Bacchi. 2005. The Political Limits of ‘Care’ in Re-imagining Interconnection/Community and an Ethical Future. Australian Feminist Studies 20 (46): 49–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. Envisaging a New Politics for an Ethical Future: Beyond Trust, Care and Generosity—Towards an Ethic of ‘Social Flesh’. Feminist Theory 8: 279–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Making Politics Fleshly: The Ethic of Social Flesh. In Engaging with Carol Bacchi: Strategic Interventions and Exchanges, ed. Angelique Bletsas and Chris Beasley, 99–120. Adelaide, SA: University of Adelaide Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham, David, and Sara Bragg. 2004. Young People, Sex and the Media: The Facts of Life? Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carmody, Moira. 2015. Sex, Ethics, and Young People. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, Kyra. 2017. Affective Sexual Pedagogies in Film and Television. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Colling, Samantha. 2017. The Aesthetic Pleasures of Girl Teen Film. London: Bloomsbury Academic and Professional.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Austin K. 2018. ‘Love, Simon’: Progress in the Form of Deliberate Banality. TheRinger.com , March 16, 2018. http://www.theringer.com/movies/2018/3/16/17129342/love-simon-film-review-josh-duhamel-nick-robinson-jennifer-garner.

  • Cover, Rob. 2000. First Contact: Queer Theory, Sexual Identity, and ‘Mainstream’ Film. International Journal of Sexuality and Gender Studies 5 (1): 71–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Glyn, and Kay Dickinson. 2004. Introduction. In Teen TV: Genre, Consumption and Identity, ed. Glyn Davis and Kay Dickinson, 1–13. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, Sara K. 2017. Mean Girls End Up Dead: The Dismal Fate of Teen Queen Bees in Popular Culture. In Bad Girls and Transgressive Women in Popular Television, Fiction, and Film, ed. Julie A. Chappell and Mallory Young, 135–155. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll, Catherine. 2011. Teen Film: A Critical Introduction. Oxford: Berg.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, Richard. 1982. Don’t Look Now. Screen 23 (3–4): 61–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elsaesser, Thomas. 2011. James Cameron’s Avatar: Access for All. New Review of Film and Television Studies 9 (3): 247–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, Paul. 2015. The Art of Flirtation: Simmel’s Coquetry Without End. In Flirtations: Rhetoric and Aesthetics This Side of Seduction, ed. Daniel Hoffman-Schwartz, Barbara Natalie Nagel, and Lauren Shizuko Stone, 19–30. New York: Fordham Scholarship Online.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garland-Thomson, Rosemarie. 2009. Staring: How We Look. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, Rosalind, and Shani Orgad. 2018. The Shifting Terrain of Sex and Power: From the ‘Sexualization of Culture’ to #MeToo. Sexualities 21 (8): 1313–1324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halberstam, J. Jack. 2012. Gaga Feminism: Sex, Gender and the End of Normal. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasinoff, A.A. 2016. How to Have Great Sext: Consent Advice in Online Sexting Tips. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 13 (1): 58–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemmings, Clare. 2018. Resisting Popular Feminisms: Gender, Sexuality and the Lure of the Modern. Gender, Place & Culture 25 (7): 963–977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hjorth, Larissa. 2011. Mobile Specters of Intimacy: A Case Study of Women and Mobile Intimacy. In Mobile Communication: Bringing Us Together, or Tearing Us Apart, ed. Rich Ling and Scott W. Campbell, 37–60. Edison, NJ: Transaction Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Höcker, Arne. 2015. Playing with Yourself: On The Self-Reference of Flirtation. In Flirtations: Rhetoric and Aesthetics This Side of Seduction, ed. Daniel Hoffman-Schwartz, Barbara Natalie Nagel, and Lauren Shizuko Stone, 51–60. New York: Fordham Scholarship Online.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman-Schwartz, Daniel. 2015. Barely Covered Banter: Flirtation in Double Indemnity. In Flirtations: Rhetoric and Aesthetics This Side of Seduction, ed. Daniel Hoffman-Schwartz, Barbara Natalie Nagel, and Lauren Shizuko Stone, 13–18. New York: Fordham Scholarship Online.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kaveney, Roz. 2006. Teen Dreams: Reading Teen Film from Heathers to Veronica Mars. London: I.B. Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kofoed, Jette, and Malene Charlotte Larsen. 2016. A Snap of Intimacy: Photo-Sharing Practices Among Young People on Social Media. First Monday 21 (11). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v21i11.6905.

  • Love, Simon. 2018. Directed by Greg Berlanti. USA: Fox 2000 Pictures, New Leaf Literary & Media, Temple Hill Entertainment, Twisted Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maltby, Richard. 2003. Hollywood Cinema. London: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortensen, Kristine Køhler. 2017. Flirting in Online Dating: Giving Empirical Grounds to Flirtatious Implicitness. Discourse Studies 19 (5): 581–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paper Towns. 2015. Directed by Jake Schreier. USA: Fox 2000 Pictures, Temple Hill Entertainment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, Adam. 1994. On Flirtation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Punyanunt-Carter, Narissra M., and Thomas R. Wagner. 2018. Interpersonal Communication Motives for Flirting Face to Face and Through Texting. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 21 (4): 229–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renold, Emma, and Jessica Ringrose. 2017. Selfies, Relfies and Phallic Tagging: Posthuman Part-icipations in Teen Digital Sexuality Assemblages. Educational Philosophy and Theory 49 (11): 1066–1079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roettgers, Janko. 2018. More Than 80 Million Subscribers Watched Netflix Rom-Coms This Summer. Variety Online, October 16, 2018. https://variety.com/2018/digital/news/netflix-rom-coms-80-million-1202981966/.

  • Say Anything. 1989. Directed by Cameron Crowe. USA: Gracie Films, Twentieth Century Fox.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, Georg. 1984. Georg Simmel: On Women, Sexuality and Love. Translated by Guy Oakes. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sixteen Candles. 1984. Directed by John Hughes. USA: Universal Pictures, Channel Productions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, Lauren Shizuko. 2015. Staging Appeal, Performing Ambivalence. In Flirtations: Rhetoric and Aesthetics This Side of Seduction, ed. Daniel Hoffman-Schwartz, Barbara Natalie Nagel, and Lauren Shizuko Stone, 61–63. New York: Fordham Scholarship Online.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Kissing Booth. 2018. Directed by Vince Marcello. USA: Komixx Entertainment.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Perks of Being a Wallflower. 2012. Directed by Stephen Chbosky. USA: Summit Entertainment, Mr Mudd.

    Google Scholar 

  • To All the Boys I’ve Loved Before. 2018. Directed by Susan Johnson. USA: All the Boys Productions, Awesomeness Films, Overbrook Entertainment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomkins, Silvan. 1995. Shame and Its Sisters: A Silvan Tomkins Reader. Edited by Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick and Adam Frank. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zarkov, Dubravka, and Kathy Davis. 2018. Ambiguities and Dilemmas Around #MeToo: #ForHowLong and #WhereTo? European Journal of Women’s Studies 25 (1): 3–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alison Bartlett .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bartlett, A., Clarke, K., Cover, R. (2019). Flirting on Film: Boundaries and Consent, Visibility and Performance. In: Flirting in the Era of #MeToo. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15508-7_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics