Skip to main content

The Political Economy of Health Reforms in Chile: A Case Study of the Privatization Process

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Hospital Transformation
  • 658 Accesses

Abstract

Health issues are contradictory. Although they are intertwined economically and politically, they relate to intangible, elusive and sometimes ethereal concepts. They can simultaneously be the object and the result of change, and the instrument of status-quo. Health reforms need to be explained with reference to the economic conditions and the various interests they sustain, where people are seen not as autonomous individuals but as actors within specific social locations and relationships. The context of health reforms in Latin America and in Chile was more the articulation of conflicting interests in the political arena, mediated by the political strength and mobilization capacity of the political actors and the organized civil society, as well as the armed forces. This chapter discusses the evolution of the Chilean health care system along with the result of negotiations that transpired between a web of economic, political and cultural forces during the following time periods where crucial health reforms were implemented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The crisis in Chile that began in 1981 and lasted until 1986 saw inflation rise to almost 30% and caused a currency devaluation of 40%, which created a serious debt problem, exacerbated by a significant drop in the price of copper, the principal source of foreign exchange.

  2. 2.

    Institutos de Salud Previsional, ISAPRES, created by Law 18,933 (1990) which also derogated DFL no 3 (1981).

  3. 3.

    Decree Law 2763 (1979). Regulations for the Ministry of Health, National Health Service System, National Health Fund, Public Health Institute of Chile and Central Supply Centre of the National Health Service. In addition, it established the foundations for a de-regionalized National Health Care System. It established a Ministerial Health Secretariat for each of the country’s regions and created Health Services authorized to delegate tasks to the universities, unions, employers’ associations and other bodies with technical capacities for the activities assigned to the Health Services. The funding would come from the National Health Fund, which was the legal successor to SERMENA and the SNS.

  4. 4.

    Each Service was under the charge of a director, responsible for the supervision, coordination, and control of the facilities and services of the system.

  5. 5.

    The National Health Fund was a functionally de-centralized public service, with a legal capacity and financial resources of its own. Legally, it was a continuation of the National Health Service for Employees and the National Health Service, for the purpose of carrying out administrative and financial actions.

  6. 6.

    The Public Health Institute of Chile was created as a functionally de-centralized public service, also with a legal capacity and financial resources of its own. It contributed to the national laboratory, and was a referential source for s the fields of Microbiology, Immunology, Pharmacology, Clinical Laboratory, Environmental Pollution and Occupational Health. It was the legal continuation of the National Health Service with respect to its relation with the Bacteriological Institute of Chile and the National Institute of Occupational Health.

  7. 7.

    The Supply Center of the National Health Service came into being as a functionally de-centralized public service, again, with a legal capacity and financial resources of its own. It provided the medicines, instruments and other supplies that may be required by the agencies, organizations, institutions and persons affiliated to the Health System, for the implementation of incentive measures, protection or restoration of health, and the rehabilitation of sick people. The Supply Central was the legal successor of the National Health Service.

  8. 8.

    The Ministry of Health was responsible for formulating and implementing the health policies. It had to perform the following functions: direct and guide all government activities relating to the health system; lay out the internal technical, administrative and financial regulations to be followed by the agencies, and institutions of the health system; and supervise, monitor and evaluate the implementation of policies and health plans.

  9. 9.

    Decree-Law 2575 extended the medical and dental benefits of Law 16,781 (1968) to the beneficiaries of the National Health Service. The legal beneficiaries of the National Health Service were eligible for the health care system under Law 16,781, without prejudice to the care that they were entitled to of that service in accordance with Law 10,383 and its amendments. The National Health Service had to pay the amount equal to the percentage paid by the Medical Assistance Fund, as established by Law 16,781. Any difference between the amount funded by the National Health Service and the total value of the benefit was charged to the beneficiary.

  10. 10.

    In developed countries, drug expenses represented between 9% and 10% of the budget destined for health services. These figures more than doubled in underdeveloped countries. These numbers were even more eloquent in Chile, as it was reported that pharmaceutical expenses comprised of almost a third of all expenses recorded in the health sector. Ernesto Medina & Ana María, Kaempfer, “Análisis crítico de la metodología de planificación de salud”, (1968) Revista Médica de Chile 455. The concentration of the pharmaceutical industry in Chile demonstrated that in 1977, out of 57 active companies, 24 were foreign and the 5 largest of these already controlled 32% of the market. The leading 25 companies controlled 80.5% of the total market and 18 were foreign multinationals. Also, since foreign pharmaceutical companies hold patents rights the possibility of transfer of technologies was very limited. At the same time, this allowed artificially high pricing, sales linked to the purchase of other products and finally restrictions in domestic exportation. See Constantine Vaitsos in Meredeth Turshen, “An analysis of the medical supply industries”, (1976) 6 International Journal of Health Services at 275.

References

  1. Murdock CJ. Physicians, the state and public health in Chile, 1881-1891. J Lat Am Stud. 1995;27(3):551–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Trumper R, Phillips L. Give me discipline and give me death: neoliberalism and health in Chile. Race and Class. 1996;37(Jan/Mar):19–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Frenk J. Dimensions of health system reform. Health Policy. 1994;27:19–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fitzpatrick T. In search of a welfare democracy. Soc Policy Soc. 2002;1(1):11–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Poulantzas N. Political power and social class. London: New Left Books; 1973; Joseph J. A realist theory of hegemony. J Theory Soc Behav. 2000; 30(2):188. (Blackwell Publishers, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Althusser L, Balibar E. Reading capital (trans: Brewster, B.). New Left Books. 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gramsci A. Selection of the Prison Notebooks. London: Lawrence and Wisharts; 1971; Joseph J. A realist theory of hegemony. J Theory Soc Behav. 2000; 30(2): 181. (Blackwell Publishers, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gill S. Epistemology, ontology and the ‘Italian School. In: Gill S, editor. Gramsci, historical materialism and international relations. Cambridge Univ. Press; 1993; Barrios P. Liberal environmentalism and the international law of hazardous chemicals. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of British Columbia. 2007. p. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rupert M. Alienation, capitalism and the inter-state system: towards a Marxian/Gramscian critique. In: Gill S, editor. Gramsci, historical materialism and international relations. Cambridge Univ. Press; 1993; Barrios P. Liberal environmentalism and the international law of hazardous chemicals. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of British Columbia; 2007. p. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Augelli E, Murphy C. America’s quests for supremacy and the third world: a Gramscian analysis. London: Pinter in Rupert Mark; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Joseph J. A realist theory of hegemony. J Theory Soc Behav. 2000;30(2):179–202. (Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, UK)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Barton J. State Continuismo and Pinochetismo: The Keys to Chilean transition. Bull Lat Am Res. 2002;21(3):358–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Eldabi T, Irani Z, Paul RJ. A proposed approach for modeling health care systems for understanding. J Manag Med. 2002; 16(2/3): 170–187; Gómez CA. Influencia de los grupos de interés. Revista Gerencia y Políticas de Salud. No 9, December 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. CIESS, Conferencia Interamericana de Seguridad Social. Informe anual sobre la seguridad social en las Américas 2005. Fragmentación y alternativas para aumentar la cobertura del seguro en dalud, Mexico, DF. 2004; Gómez CA. Influencia de los grupos de interés. Revista Gerencia y Políticas de Salud. 2005; No 9, December, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Heidenheimer A, et al. Comparative public policy. New York: St.Martin’s Press; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fleury S. Reforming health care in Latin America: challenges and options. In: Fleury S, Belmartino S, Baris E, editors. Reshaping health care in Latin America, Chap. 1. Ottawa: IDRC; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tedeschi SK, Brown TM, et al. Salvador Allende: physician, socialist, populist, and president. J Public Health. 2003;93(12):2014–5.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gómez CA. Influencia de los grupos de interés y asociación en las reformas y los sistemas de salud. Gerencia y Políticas de Salud. 2005;9:62–80.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Picó, J. Modelos sobre el Estado de Bienestar. De la ideología a la práctica. In: Casilda R, Tortosa, J. editors. Pros y contras del Bienestar, Madrid: Tecnos; 1966; Parada M. Ph.D. Dissertation, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Picó J. Teorías sobre el Estado del Bienestar. Madrid: Siglo Veintiuno de España Editores; 1999; Parada M. Ph.D. Dissertation, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ratliff W. Development and civil society in Latin America and Asia. Ann Am Acad Political Soc Sci. 1999;565(1):91–112.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. de la Jiménez Jara J, Bossert T. Chile’s health sector reform: lessons from four reform periods. Health Policy. 1995;32:155–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Parada M. Ph.D. Dissertation, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Waitzkin H, Iriart C, Estrada A, Lamadrid S. Social medicine then and now: lessons from Latin America. Am J Public Health. 2001;91:1592–601.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Belmar R, et al. Teaching of public health and social medicine. Rev Méd Chil. 1971;99(7):529–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Horev T, Babad Y. Healthcare reform implementation: stakeholders and their roles – the Israeli experience. Health Policy. 2005;71:1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. de la Jiménez Jara J, editor. Medicina Social en Chile. Santiago: Ediciones Aconcagua; 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Barrios P. Liberal environmentalism and the international law of hazardous chemicals. Ph.D Dissertation, University of British Columbia; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Unger RM. The critical legal studies movement. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Chossudovsky M. Human rights, health and capital accumulation en the third world. Int J Health Serv. 1979;9(1):61–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Taylor M. The Reformulation of Social Policy in Chile, 1973-2001. Questioning a Neoliberal Model. Glob Soc Policy. 2003;3(1):21–44.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Castiglioni R. The politics of retrenchment: the quandaries of social protection under military rule in Chile, 1973-1990. Lat Am Politics Soc. 2001;43(4):37–66.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Scarpaci JL, Bradham DD. A three-tiered health system and its inherent cost inflation: the case of medical care inflation in Chile 1979-1983. Health Policy. 1988;10:65–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Bravo A. Sistemas y modelos de Organización de Salud. In: Lavados H, editor. Desarrollo Social y Salud en Chile, (first part). Santiago: Corporación de Promoción Universitaria; 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Bruce N. The chilean health care reforms: model or myth? J Publ Int Aff. 2000;11:69–86.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ehrenreich B, Ehrenreich J. The American health empire: power, profits, and politics. New York: Random House; 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Flaño N. Planificación o mercado en el sector salud enfoque teórico con aplicación al caso de Chile, Apuntes CIEPLAN, No 19, October, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Livingstone M. In: Raczinsky D, editor. Salud Pública y Bienestar Social. Santiago: CIEPLAN; 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ministerio de Salud. Política Económica y financiamiento de la salud. October, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Nocvak V. The other drug lords. Int J Health Serv. 1993;23(2):263–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Ruderman P. Economic adjustment and the future of health services in the Third World. J Public Health Policy. 1990;11(4):481–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Sapelli C. Risk segmentation and equity in the Chilean mandatory health insurance system. Soc Sci Med. 2004;58(2):259–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Viveros-Long AM. Changes in the health financing: the Chilean experience. Soc Sci Med. 1986;22:384.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Bize R. Asignación de Recursos Financieros a las regiones de Salud y Sistema de Costos Hospitalarios in Lavados, Desarrollo Social y Salud en Chile. In: Montes L, editor. Desarrollo Social y Salud en Chile. Santiago: Corporación de Promoción Universitaria; 1981. p. 382; Viveros-Long A. Changes in the health financing: the Chilean experience. Soc Sci Med. 1986; 22: 394.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Bravo AB. Principios básicos para la organización de un sistema de servicios de salud: el caso chileno. In: Lavados Desarrollo Social y Salud en Chile. Ibid; 1980. p. 394.

    Google Scholar 

  46. De Kadt E. Las desigualdades en el campo de la salud. In: Livingstone, Raczynski, editors. Salud Pública y Bienestar Social. Santiago: CIEPLAN; 1976. p. 31–2.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Fleury S. Reshaping health care in Latin America: toward fairness? In: Fleury S, Belmartino S, Baris E, editors. Reshaping Health Care in Latin America, Chap. 9. Ottawa: IDRC; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Berlinguer G. Globalization and global health. Int J Health Serv. 1999;29(3):579–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Isaacs S, Solimano G. Health reform and civil society in Latin America. Development. 1999;42(4):70–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Kay SJ. The perils of private pensions. Foreign Policy. 2000;118:21.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Castells M. Análisis marxista de la crisis del capitalismo. In: Mercer H, Escudero JC, editors. Políticas de Salud en los Estados capitalistas de excepción: Argentina, Chile y Uruguay. México: UAM-Xochimilco, Editorial Mimeo; 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Clarke DB. Consumer society and the post-modern city. New York: Routledge; 2003.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  53. Crawford R. You are dangerous to your health: the ideology and politics of victim blaming. Int J Health Serv. 1977;7:663.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. El Mercurio. Editorials 2, 6, 10 & 22 May, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  55. El Mercurio. Editorials 8 & 29 May, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Cutler, et al. In: Buse K, Dagerk N, Fustukian S, Lee K, editors. Globalisation and health policy trends and opportunities; Lee K, et al. editors. Health politics in a globalasing world, Cambridge University Press; 2001. p. 253. 1999.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jaime Llambías-Wolff .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Llambías-Wolff, J. (2019). The Political Economy of Health Reforms in Chile: A Case Study of the Privatization Process. In: Burke, D., Godbole, P., Cash, A. (eds) Hospital Transformation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15448-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15448-6_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-15447-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-15448-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics