Skip to main content

Behind-the-Meter Energy Storage Implementation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
R&D Management in the Knowledge Era

Part of the book series: Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management ((ITKM))

Abstract

With the growth of alternative forms of energy, and depletion of fossil fuels, energy storage will play an important part in the energy grid of the future. Mechanical forms of energy, although cheap, require specific geological features, and so increasingly electrochemical forms of energy, or batteries, are relied on. The implementation of these batteries relies on certain technological, economical, and regulatory factors. Although costs are lowering, they are still too high to have wide adoption levels at the current price level. There are opportunities to implement battery storage widely at the home level, but there is a lot of restructuring and regulations needed to jump start this process, as the traditional electrical utilities were not set up with the intention of isolated grids. Like both the solar and wind industries, market transformation will be needed to increase adoption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. EIA. (2017). Electricity data. Eia.gov [Online]. Retrieved August 18, 2017, from https://www.eia.gov/electricity/monthly/epm_table_grapher.php?t=epmt_1_02_e

  2. GTM Research. (2017). U.S. solar market insight executive summary Q2. Washington, DC: SEIA.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Speidel, S., & Bräun, T. (2016). Leaving the grid—The effect of combining home energy storage with renewable energy generation. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 60, 1213–1224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Muoio, D. (2017). 10 home batteries that rival Tesla’s Powerwall 2. Business Insider [Online]. Retrieved August 18, 2017, from http://www.businessinsider.com/rechargeable-battery-options-compete-tesla-2017-5/#first-some-information-on-teslas-powerwall-2-a-264-pound-lithium-ion-battery-that-you-can-mount-on-your-wall-panasonic-makes-the-cells-for-the-battery-while-tesla-builds-the-battery-module-and-pack-1

  5. Solar Quotes. (2017). Solar battery storage comparison table. Solarquotes.com.au [Online]. Retrieved June 15, 2017, from https://www.solarquotes.com.au/battery-storage/comparison-table/#notes

  6. Grantham, A., et al. (2017). The viability of electrical energy storage for low-energy households. Solar Energy, 155, 1216–1224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Green, J., & Newman, P. (2017). Citizen utilities: The emerging power paradigm. Energy Policy, 105, 283–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kaschub, T., Jochem, P., & Fichtner, W. (2016). Solar energy storage in German households: profitability, load changes and flexibility. Energy Policy, 98, 520–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kazhamiaka, F., et al. (2017). On the influence of jurisdiction on the profitability of residential photovoltaic-storage systems: A multi-national case study. Energy Policy, 109, 428–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. GTM Research. (2017). U.S. energy storage monitor: 2016 year in review and Q1 2017 executive summary. Washington, DC: Energy Storage Association.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lacey, S. (2017). Stem CTO: Lithium-ion battery prices fell 70% in the last 18 months. Greentechmedia.com [Online]. Retrieved August 7, 2017, from https://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/stem-cto-weve-seen-battery-prices-fall-70-in-the-last-18-months

  12. (2017). Global lithium ion battery market to explode over the next decade. Engineering & Mining Journal (00958948), 218(5), 56.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Clean Energy Manufacturing Analysis Center. (2016). Automotive lithium-ion cell manufacturing: Regional cost structures and supply chain considerations. NREL, Golden, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wesoff, E. (2017). How soon can Tesla get battery cell costs below $100 per kilowatt-hour? Greentechmedia.com [Online]. Retrieved August 7, 2017, from https://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/How-Soon-Can-Tesla-Get-Battery-Cell-Cost-Below-100-per-Kilowatt-Hour

  15. Penn, I. (2017). Edison and Tesla unveil giant energy storage system. latimes.com [Online]. Retrieved August 8, 2017, from http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-tesla-energy-storage-20170131-story.html

  16. San Diego Gas & Electric – NewsCenter. (2017). SDG&E seeks more storage to harness clean energy and enhance reliability. Sdgenews.com [Online]. Retrieved August 8, 2017, from http://sdgenews.com/battery-storage-clean-innovative/sdge-seeks-more-storage-harness-clean-energy-and-enhance

  17. Rahimi, F., Ilpakchi, A., & Fletcher, F. (2016). The changing electrical landscape. IEEE Power and Energy, 14(3), 52–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. San Diego Gas & Electric – NewsCenter. (2017). SDG&E spurs energy storage innovation with flow battery technology. Sdgenews.com [Online]. Retrieved August 8, 2017, from http://sdgenews.com/battery-storage-clean-innovative-reliable/sdge-spurs-energy-storage-innovation-flow-battery

  19. Patel, S. (2017). Battery storage goes mainstream. Power, 161(5), 25–29.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wesoff, E. (2017). Aquion, the advanced battery startup funded by Bill Gates and Kleiner Perkins, is bankrupt. Greentechmedia.com [Online]. Retrieved August 8, 2017, from https://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/Aquion-the-Bill-Gates-and-Kleiner-Perkins-Funded-Advanced-Battery-Startup

  21. Conca, J. (2017). The beguiling promise of John Goodenough’s new battery technology. Forbes.com [Online]. Retrieved August 8, 2017, from https://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesconca/2017/03/17/jack-goodenoughs-battery-technologies-keep-getting-better/#653794714e62

  22. National Renewable Energy Laboratory. (2017, January). Federal tax incentives for battery storage systems [Online] Retrieved August 8, 2017, from https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy17osti/67558.pdf

  23. GTM Research. (2017). U.S. energy storage monitor: Q2 2017 executive summary. Washington, DC: Energy Storage Association.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Florida State Bill SB 90 [Online]. Retrieved from https://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2017/90/BillText/er/PDF

  25. Massachusetts Clean Energy Center. (2017). Advancing commonwealth energy storage (ACES) [Online]. Retrieved August 18, 2017, from http://www.masscec.com/aces

  26. California Energy Commission. (2017). Self-generation incentive program metrics [Online]. Retrieved August 18, 2017, from https://www.selfgenca.com/home/program_metrics/

  27. Pacific Gas and Electric Company. (2017). Time-of-use plan, Pge.com [Online]. Retrieved August 7, 2017, from https://www.pge.com/en_US/residential/rate-plans/rate-plan-options/time-of-use-base-plan/time-of-use-plan.page?

  28. California Public Utilities Commission. (2018). Zero net energy. Cpuc.ca.gov [Online]. Retrieved June 14, 2017, from http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/ZNE/

  29. California Public Utilities Commission. (2018, October). Residential zero net energy building integration cost analysis. Retrieved June 14, 2017, from http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=6442455013

  30. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. (2018, February 15). Open commission meeting staff presentation item E-1. Retrieved from https://www.ferc.gov/industries/electric/indus-act/rto/02-15-18-E-1-presentation.pdf.

  31. Johnson, L. (2018). Grid operators describe challenges of distributed energy aggregation to FERC. Greentechmedia.com [Online]. Retrieved June 14, 2017, from https://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/grid-operators-describe-challenges-of-distributed-energy-aggregation#gs.k=kWycs

  32. Trabish, H. (2018). Have California’s efforts to value distributed resources hit a roadblock? Utility Dive [Online]. Retrieved June 14, 2017, from https://www.utilitydive.com/news/have-californias-efforts-to-value-distributed-resources-hit-a-roadblock/438400/

  33. Tesla. (2017). Tesla Powerwall. Tesla.com [Online]. Retrieved June 15, 2017, from https://www.tesla.com/powerwall

  34. EIA. (2017). Electric sales, revenue, and average price. Eia.gov [Online]. Retrieved August 18, 2017, from https://www.eia.gov/electricity/sales_revenue_price/index.php

  35. EIA. (2017). Consumption and efficiency. Eia.gov [Online]. Retrieved August 18, 2017, from https://www.eia.gov/consumption/data.php#rec

  36. EIA. (2017). Analysis & projections - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). Eia.gov [Online]. Retrieved August 18, 2017, from https://www.eia.gov/analysis/

  37. Hemmati, R., & Saboori, H. (2017). Stochastic optimal battery storage sizing and scheduling in home energy management systems equipped with solar photovoltaic panels. Energy and Buildings, 152, 290–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. St. John, J. (2017). Stem and CPower to combine behind-the-meter batteries and demand response. Greentech Media [Online] Retrieved August 8, 2017, from https://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/stem-and-cpower-to-combine-behind-the-meter-batteries-and-demand-response

  39. EIA. (2017). Average price of retail electricity monthly. Eia.gov [Online]. Retrieved August 18, 2017, from https://www.eia.gov/electricity/data/browser/#/topic/7?agg=0,1&geo=vvvvvvvvvvvvo&endsec=vg&linechart=ELEC.PRICE.TX-ALL.M~ELEC.PRICE.TX-RES.M~ELEC.PRICE.TX-COM.M~ELEC.PRICE.TX-IND.M&columnchart=ELEC.PRICE.TX-ALL.M~ELEC.PRICE.TX-RES.M~ELEC.PRICE.TX-COM.M~ELEC.PRICE.TX-IND.M&map=ELEC.PRICE.US-ALL.M&freq=M&start=201509&end=201705&ctype=linechart&ltype=pin&rtype=s&pin=&rse=0&maptype=0

  40. NREL. (2018). U.S. solar radiation resource maps [Online]. Retrieved August 18, 2017, from http://rredc.nrel.gov/solar/old_data/nsrdb/1961-1990/redbook/atlas/

  41. U.S. Census Bureau. (2017). Historical census of housing tables [Online]. Retrieved August 18, 2017, from https://www.census.gov/hhes/www/housing/census/historic/units.html

  42. U.S. Census Bureau. (2017). Quarterly residential vacancies and homeownership, second quarter 2017 [Online]. Retrieved August 18, 2017, from https://www.census.gov/housing/hvs/files/currenthvspress.pdf

  43. Parra, D., Sweirczynski, M., et al. (2017). An interdisciplinary review of energy storage for communities: Challenges and perspectives. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 79, 730–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Kansas City Power and Light. (2015). KCP&L green impact zone smartgrid demonstration final technical report. Kansas City: U.S. Department of Energy.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Henchen, M. (2018). Customer-centric energy transformation - Rocky mountain institute. Rocky Mountain Institute [Online]. Retrieved June 15, 2017, from https://www.rmi.org/news/customer-centric-energy-transformation/

  46. Zame, K. (2017). Smart grid and energy storage: Policy recommendations. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82, 1646–1654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Harrison, J. (2015). Energy storage as consumer product: Will storage follow the path of rooftop solar? Sept-Oct 2015 (pp. 18–19). Electric Light and Power.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tuğrul Daim .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: Results

Appendix: Results

1.1 Daily Profile Summaries

Demand: August day

W/o battery

W/battery

Difference

Number of kWh purchased at peak

−0.25

0.00

0.25

Number of kWh purchased at nonpeak

−11.61

0.00

11.61

Number of kWh sold

16.02

2.86

−13.16

Revenue at peak

−0.08

0.00

0.08

Revenue at nonpeak

−2.66

0.00

2.66

Revenue from energy sold

1.55

0.28

−1.28

Energy revenue

−1.18

0.28

1.46

Demand: May day

W/o battery

W/battery

Difference

Number of kWh purchased at nonpeak

0.00

0.00

0.00

Number of kWh purchased at peak

−12.33

0.00

12.33

Number of kWh sold

14.21

0.52

−13.69

Revenue at peak

0.00

0.00

0.00

Revenue at nonpeak

−2.82

0.00

2.82

Revenue from energy sold

1.38

0.05

−1.33

Energy revenue

−1.45

0.05

1.50

1.2 Economic Analysis Base Case

Electricity rates

Peak rate

0.305

Non peak rate

0.229

Sellback rate

0.097

Revenue

Average difference revenue consumed per day

$2.78

Average difference revenue produced per day

($1.30)

Number of days battery is charged

365

Rate of increase of electricity tariff

3.4%

Battery price

Price of battery

$8200.00

Tax credit

30%

Price after federal credit

$5740.00

Year

Difference in revenue between system with and without battery—Consumed

Difference in revenue between system with and without battery—Produced

Total revenue

0

  

($5740)

1

$1014.65

($475.32)

$539.33

2

$1049.15

($484.66)

$564.49

3

$1084.82

($484.66)

$600.16

4

$1121.70

($484.66)

$637.04

5

$1159.84

($484.66)

$675.18

6

$1199.28

($484.66)

$714.62

7

$1240.05

($484.66)

$755.39

8

$1282.21

($484.66)

$797.55

9

$1325.81

($484.66)

$841.15

10

$1370.89

($484.66)

$886.23

Internal rate of return

3%

Payback period

9 years

1.3 Economic Analysis: 300 Days of Sun

Electricity rates

Peak rate

0.305

Nonpeak rate

0.229

Sellback rate

0.097

Revenue

Average difference revenue consumed per day

$2.78

Average difference revenue produced per day

($1.30)

Number of days battery is charged

300

Rate of increase of electricity tariff

3.4%

Battery price

Price of battery

$8200.00

Tax credit

30%

Price after federal credit

$5740.00

Year

Difference in revenue between system with and without battery—Consumed

Difference in revenue between system with and without battery—Produced

Total revenue

0

  

($5740)

1

$833.96

($390.68)

$443.28

2

$862.31

($398.35)

$463.96

3

$891.63

($398.35)

$493.28

4

$921.95

($398.35)

$523.60

5

$953.29

($398.35)

$554.94

6

$985.71

($398.35)

$587.36

7

$1019.22

($398.35)

$620.87

8

$1053.87

($398.35)

$655.52

9

$1089.71

($398.35)

$691.36

10

$1126.76

($398.35)

$728.41

Internal rate of return

0%

Payback period

10 years

1.4 Economic Analysis SGIP Program

Electricity rates

Peak rate

0.305

Nonpeak rate

0.229

Sellback rate

0.097

Revenue

Average difference revenue consumed per day

$2.78

Average difference revenue produced per day

($1.30)

Number of days battery is charged

365

Rate of increase of electricity tariff

3.4%

Battery price

Price of battery

$8200.00

Tax credit

$400/kWh + 30%

Price after federal credit

$1820.00

Year

Difference in revenue between system with and without battery—Consumed

Difference in revenue between system with and without battery—Produced

Total revenue

0

  

($1820)

1

$1014.65

($475.32)

$539.33

2

$1049.15

($484.66)

$564.49

3

$1084.82

($484.66)

$600.16

4

$1121.70

($484.66)

$637.04

5

$1159.84

($484.66)

$675.18

6

$1199.28

($484.66)

$714.62

7

$1240.05

($484.66)

$755.39

8

$1282.21

($484.66)

$797.55

9

$1325.81

($484.66)

$841.15

10

$1370.89

($484.66)

$886.23

Internal rate of return

32%

Payback period

4 years

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wehner, N., Daim, T. (2019). Behind-the-Meter Energy Storage Implementation. In: Daim, T., Dabić, M., Başoğlu, N., Lavoie, J.R., Galli, B.J. (eds) R&D Management in the Knowledge Era. Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15409-7_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics