Abstract
With the growth of alternative forms of energy, and depletion of fossil fuels, energy storage will play an important part in the energy grid of the future. Mechanical forms of energy, although cheap, require specific geological features, and so increasingly electrochemical forms of energy, or batteries, are relied on. The implementation of these batteries relies on certain technological, economical, and regulatory factors. Although costs are lowering, they are still too high to have wide adoption levels at the current price level. There are opportunities to implement battery storage widely at the home level, but there is a lot of restructuring and regulations needed to jump start this process, as the traditional electrical utilities were not set up with the intention of isolated grids. Like both the solar and wind industries, market transformation will be needed to increase adoption.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
EIA. (2017). Electricity data. Eia.gov [Online]. Retrieved August 18, 2017, from https://www.eia.gov/electricity/monthly/epm_table_grapher.php?t=epmt_1_02_e
GTM Research. (2017). U.S. solar market insight executive summary Q2. Washington, DC: SEIA.
Speidel, S., & Bräun, T. (2016). Leaving the grid—The effect of combining home energy storage with renewable energy generation. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 60, 1213–1224.
Muoio, D. (2017). 10 home batteries that rival Tesla’s Powerwall 2. Business Insider [Online]. Retrieved August 18, 2017, from http://www.businessinsider.com/rechargeable-battery-options-compete-tesla-2017-5/#first-some-information-on-teslas-powerwall-2-a-264-pound-lithium-ion-battery-that-you-can-mount-on-your-wall-panasonic-makes-the-cells-for-the-battery-while-tesla-builds-the-battery-module-and-pack-1
Solar Quotes. (2017). Solar battery storage comparison table. Solarquotes.com.au [Online]. Retrieved June 15, 2017, from https://www.solarquotes.com.au/battery-storage/comparison-table/#notes
Grantham, A., et al. (2017). The viability of electrical energy storage for low-energy households. Solar Energy, 155, 1216–1224.
Green, J., & Newman, P. (2017). Citizen utilities: The emerging power paradigm. Energy Policy, 105, 283–293.
Kaschub, T., Jochem, P., & Fichtner, W. (2016). Solar energy storage in German households: profitability, load changes and flexibility. Energy Policy, 98, 520–532.
Kazhamiaka, F., et al. (2017). On the influence of jurisdiction on the profitability of residential photovoltaic-storage systems: A multi-national case study. Energy Policy, 109, 428–440.
GTM Research. (2017). U.S. energy storage monitor: 2016 year in review and Q1 2017 executive summary. Washington, DC: Energy Storage Association.
Lacey, S. (2017). Stem CTO: Lithium-ion battery prices fell 70% in the last 18 months. Greentechmedia.com [Online]. Retrieved August 7, 2017, from https://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/stem-cto-weve-seen-battery-prices-fall-70-in-the-last-18-months
(2017). Global lithium ion battery market to explode over the next decade. Engineering & Mining Journal (00958948), 218(5), 56.
Clean Energy Manufacturing Analysis Center. (2016). Automotive lithium-ion cell manufacturing: Regional cost structures and supply chain considerations. NREL, Golden, CO.
Wesoff, E. (2017). How soon can Tesla get battery cell costs below $100 per kilowatt-hour? Greentechmedia.com [Online]. Retrieved August 7, 2017, from https://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/How-Soon-Can-Tesla-Get-Battery-Cell-Cost-Below-100-per-Kilowatt-Hour
Penn, I. (2017). Edison and Tesla unveil giant energy storage system. latimes.com [Online]. Retrieved August 8, 2017, from http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-tesla-energy-storage-20170131-story.html
San Diego Gas & Electric – NewsCenter. (2017). SDG&E seeks more storage to harness clean energy and enhance reliability. Sdgenews.com [Online]. Retrieved August 8, 2017, from http://sdgenews.com/battery-storage-clean-innovative/sdge-seeks-more-storage-harness-clean-energy-and-enhance
Rahimi, F., Ilpakchi, A., & Fletcher, F. (2016). The changing electrical landscape. IEEE Power and Energy, 14(3), 52–62.
San Diego Gas & Electric – NewsCenter. (2017). SDG&E spurs energy storage innovation with flow battery technology. Sdgenews.com [Online]. Retrieved August 8, 2017, from http://sdgenews.com/battery-storage-clean-innovative-reliable/sdge-spurs-energy-storage-innovation-flow-battery
Patel, S. (2017). Battery storage goes mainstream. Power, 161(5), 25–29.
Wesoff, E. (2017). Aquion, the advanced battery startup funded by Bill Gates and Kleiner Perkins, is bankrupt. Greentechmedia.com [Online]. Retrieved August 8, 2017, from https://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/Aquion-the-Bill-Gates-and-Kleiner-Perkins-Funded-Advanced-Battery-Startup
Conca, J. (2017). The beguiling promise of John Goodenough’s new battery technology. Forbes.com [Online]. Retrieved August 8, 2017, from https://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesconca/2017/03/17/jack-goodenoughs-battery-technologies-keep-getting-better/#653794714e62
National Renewable Energy Laboratory. (2017, January). Federal tax incentives for battery storage systems [Online] Retrieved August 8, 2017, from https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy17osti/67558.pdf
GTM Research. (2017). U.S. energy storage monitor: Q2 2017 executive summary. Washington, DC: Energy Storage Association.
Florida State Bill SB 90 [Online]. Retrieved from https://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2017/90/BillText/er/PDF
Massachusetts Clean Energy Center. (2017). Advancing commonwealth energy storage (ACES) [Online]. Retrieved August 18, 2017, from http://www.masscec.com/aces
California Energy Commission. (2017). Self-generation incentive program metrics [Online]. Retrieved August 18, 2017, from https://www.selfgenca.com/home/program_metrics/
Pacific Gas and Electric Company. (2017). Time-of-use plan, Pge.com [Online]. Retrieved August 7, 2017, from https://www.pge.com/en_US/residential/rate-plans/rate-plan-options/time-of-use-base-plan/time-of-use-plan.page?
California Public Utilities Commission. (2018). Zero net energy. Cpuc.ca.gov [Online]. Retrieved June 14, 2017, from http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/ZNE/
California Public Utilities Commission. (2018, October). Residential zero net energy building integration cost analysis. Retrieved June 14, 2017, from http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=6442455013
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. (2018, February 15). Open commission meeting staff presentation item E-1. Retrieved from https://www.ferc.gov/industries/electric/indus-act/rto/02-15-18-E-1-presentation.pdf.
Johnson, L. (2018). Grid operators describe challenges of distributed energy aggregation to FERC. Greentechmedia.com [Online]. Retrieved June 14, 2017, from https://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/grid-operators-describe-challenges-of-distributed-energy-aggregation#gs.k=kWycs
Trabish, H. (2018). Have California’s efforts to value distributed resources hit a roadblock? Utility Dive [Online]. Retrieved June 14, 2017, from https://www.utilitydive.com/news/have-californias-efforts-to-value-distributed-resources-hit-a-roadblock/438400/
Tesla. (2017). Tesla Powerwall. Tesla.com [Online]. Retrieved June 15, 2017, from https://www.tesla.com/powerwall
EIA. (2017). Electric sales, revenue, and average price. Eia.gov [Online]. Retrieved August 18, 2017, from https://www.eia.gov/electricity/sales_revenue_price/index.php
EIA. (2017). Consumption and efficiency. Eia.gov [Online]. Retrieved August 18, 2017, from https://www.eia.gov/consumption/data.php#rec
EIA. (2017). Analysis & projections - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). Eia.gov [Online]. Retrieved August 18, 2017, from https://www.eia.gov/analysis/
Hemmati, R., & Saboori, H. (2017). Stochastic optimal battery storage sizing and scheduling in home energy management systems equipped with solar photovoltaic panels. Energy and Buildings, 152, 290–300.
St. John, J. (2017). Stem and CPower to combine behind-the-meter batteries and demand response. Greentech Media [Online] Retrieved August 8, 2017, from https://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/stem-and-cpower-to-combine-behind-the-meter-batteries-and-demand-response
EIA. (2017). Average price of retail electricity monthly. Eia.gov [Online]. Retrieved August 18, 2017, from https://www.eia.gov/electricity/data/browser/#/topic/7?agg=0,1&geo=vvvvvvvvvvvvo&endsec=vg&linechart=ELEC.PRICE.TX-ALL.M~ELEC.PRICE.TX-RES.M~ELEC.PRICE.TX-COM.M~ELEC.PRICE.TX-IND.M&columnchart=ELEC.PRICE.TX-ALL.M~ELEC.PRICE.TX-RES.M~ELEC.PRICE.TX-COM.M~ELEC.PRICE.TX-IND.M&map=ELEC.PRICE.US-ALL.M&freq=M&start=201509&end=201705&ctype=linechart<ype=pin&rtype=s&pin=&rse=0&maptype=0
NREL. (2018). U.S. solar radiation resource maps [Online]. Retrieved August 18, 2017, from http://rredc.nrel.gov/solar/old_data/nsrdb/1961-1990/redbook/atlas/
U.S. Census Bureau. (2017). Historical census of housing tables [Online]. Retrieved August 18, 2017, from https://www.census.gov/hhes/www/housing/census/historic/units.html
U.S. Census Bureau. (2017). Quarterly residential vacancies and homeownership, second quarter 2017 [Online]. Retrieved August 18, 2017, from https://www.census.gov/housing/hvs/files/currenthvspress.pdf
Parra, D., Sweirczynski, M., et al. (2017). An interdisciplinary review of energy storage for communities: Challenges and perspectives. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 79, 730–749.
Kansas City Power and Light. (2015). KCP&L green impact zone smartgrid demonstration final technical report. Kansas City: U.S. Department of Energy.
Henchen, M. (2018). Customer-centric energy transformation - Rocky mountain institute. Rocky Mountain Institute [Online]. Retrieved June 15, 2017, from https://www.rmi.org/news/customer-centric-energy-transformation/
Zame, K. (2017). Smart grid and energy storage: Policy recommendations. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82, 1646–1654.
Harrison, J. (2015). Energy storage as consumer product: Will storage follow the path of rooftop solar? Sept-Oct 2015 (pp. 18–19). Electric Light and Power.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix: Results
Appendix: Results
1.1 Daily Profile Summaries
Demand: August day | W/o battery | W/battery | Difference |
---|---|---|---|
Number of kWh purchased at peak | −0.25 | 0.00 | 0.25 |
Number of kWh purchased at nonpeak | −11.61 | 0.00 | 11.61 |
Number of kWh sold | 16.02 | 2.86 | −13.16 |
Revenue at peak | −0.08 | 0.00 | 0.08 |
Revenue at nonpeak | −2.66 | 0.00 | 2.66 |
Revenue from energy sold | 1.55 | 0.28 | −1.28 |
Energy revenue | −1.18 | 0.28 | 1.46 |
Demand: May day | W/o battery | W/battery | Difference |
---|---|---|---|
Number of kWh purchased at nonpeak | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Number of kWh purchased at peak | −12.33 | 0.00 | 12.33 |
Number of kWh sold | 14.21 | 0.52 | −13.69 |
Revenue at peak | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Revenue at nonpeak | −2.82 | 0.00 | 2.82 |
Revenue from energy sold | 1.38 | 0.05 | −1.33 |
Energy revenue | −1.45 | 0.05 | 1.50 |
1.2 Economic Analysis Base Case
Electricity rates | |
Peak rate | 0.305 |
Non peak rate | 0.229 |
Sellback rate | 0.097 |
Revenue | |
Average difference revenue consumed per day | $2.78 |
Average difference revenue produced per day | ($1.30) |
Number of days battery is charged | 365 |
Rate of increase of electricity tariff | 3.4% |
Battery price | |
Price of battery | $8200.00 |
Tax credit | 30% |
Price after federal credit | $5740.00 |
Year | Difference in revenue between system with and without battery—Consumed | Difference in revenue between system with and without battery—Produced | Total revenue |
---|---|---|---|
0 | ($5740) | ||
1 | $1014.65 | ($475.32) | $539.33 |
2 | $1049.15 | ($484.66) | $564.49 |
3 | $1084.82 | ($484.66) | $600.16 |
4 | $1121.70 | ($484.66) | $637.04 |
5 | $1159.84 | ($484.66) | $675.18 |
6 | $1199.28 | ($484.66) | $714.62 |
7 | $1240.05 | ($484.66) | $755.39 |
8 | $1282.21 | ($484.66) | $797.55 |
9 | $1325.81 | ($484.66) | $841.15 |
10 | $1370.89 | ($484.66) | $886.23 |
Internal rate of return | 3% | ||
Payback period | 9 years |
1.3 Economic Analysis: 300 Days of Sun
Electricity rates | |
Peak rate | 0.305 |
Nonpeak rate | 0.229 |
Sellback rate | 0.097 |
Revenue | |
Average difference revenue consumed per day | $2.78 |
Average difference revenue produced per day | ($1.30) |
Number of days battery is charged | 300 |
Rate of increase of electricity tariff | 3.4% |
Battery price | |
Price of battery | $8200.00 |
Tax credit | 30% |
Price after federal credit | $5740.00 |
Year | Difference in revenue between system with and without battery—Consumed | Difference in revenue between system with and without battery—Produced | Total revenue |
---|---|---|---|
0 | ($5740) | ||
1 | $833.96 | ($390.68) | $443.28 |
2 | $862.31 | ($398.35) | $463.96 |
3 | $891.63 | ($398.35) | $493.28 |
4 | $921.95 | ($398.35) | $523.60 |
5 | $953.29 | ($398.35) | $554.94 |
6 | $985.71 | ($398.35) | $587.36 |
7 | $1019.22 | ($398.35) | $620.87 |
8 | $1053.87 | ($398.35) | $655.52 |
9 | $1089.71 | ($398.35) | $691.36 |
10 | $1126.76 | ($398.35) | $728.41 |
Internal rate of return | 0% | ||
Payback period | 10 years |
1.4 Economic Analysis SGIP Program
Electricity rates | |
Peak rate | 0.305 |
Nonpeak rate | 0.229 |
Sellback rate | 0.097 |
Revenue | |
Average difference revenue consumed per day | $2.78 |
Average difference revenue produced per day | ($1.30) |
Number of days battery is charged | 365 |
Rate of increase of electricity tariff | 3.4% |
Battery price | |
Price of battery | $8200.00 |
Tax credit | $400/kWh + 30% |
Price after federal credit | $1820.00 |
Year | Difference in revenue between system with and without battery—Consumed | Difference in revenue between system with and without battery—Produced | Total revenue |
---|---|---|---|
0 | ($1820) | ||
1 | $1014.65 | ($475.32) | $539.33 |
2 | $1049.15 | ($484.66) | $564.49 |
3 | $1084.82 | ($484.66) | $600.16 |
4 | $1121.70 | ($484.66) | $637.04 |
5 | $1159.84 | ($484.66) | $675.18 |
6 | $1199.28 | ($484.66) | $714.62 |
7 | $1240.05 | ($484.66) | $755.39 |
8 | $1282.21 | ($484.66) | $797.55 |
9 | $1325.81 | ($484.66) | $841.15 |
10 | $1370.89 | ($484.66) | $886.23 |
Internal rate of return | 32% | ||
Payback period | 4 years |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wehner, N., Daim, T. (2019). Behind-the-Meter Energy Storage Implementation. In: Daim, T., Dabić, M., Başoğlu, N., Lavoie, J.R., Galli, B.J. (eds) R&D Management in the Knowledge Era. Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15409-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15409-7_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-15408-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-15409-7
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)