Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Gaining Mutual Benefits Through Business-non-profit Partnership in Base-of-the-Pyramid Markets: A Relational View

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Change

Part of the book series: Ethical Economy ((SEEP,volume 57))

Abstract

An increasing number of multinational corporations (MNCs) engage in base-of-the-pyramid (BOP) markets aiming at developing sustainable business models to achieve both economic performance and poverty reduction. In the recent past, it has become more and more evident that the success of such business models in BOP markets depends on establishing effective collaborative networks with various stakeholders. As conditions at the BOP are quite different from those in other markets, firms are particularly dependent on the knowledge, support, and trust of non-profit partners with a developmental orientation (e.g., non-governmental organizations, self-help groups, or public actors from the field of international cooperation). The mechanisms that contribute to the constitution of successful collaborations with non-profit partners at the BOP, however, are only poorly understood. Likewise, it is still not concretely conceptualized what successful collaboration respectively achieving mutual benefits in such partnerships mean. Based on this twofold research gap, we first consider the meaning of achieving mutual benefits in BOP partnerships, clarifying that it entails economic value creation for the MNC and social value creation in the form of improved basic capabilities at the BOP. Then we apply the relational view on competitive advantages through cooperation proposed by Dyer and Singh in Acad Manage Rev 23(4):660–679 (1998), which provides a solid conceptual framework to analyze the characteristics of the determinants of economic and social value creation in partnerships at the BOP. Based on the analytical exposure of the peculiarities of business-non-profit partnerships at the BOP, we are able to present recommendations for improving the potential to generate value at the BOP for the benefit of both partners.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Annan, K. (2005, June). Secretary-General’s address to meeting on “The Business Contribution to the Millennium Development Goals”. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, D. G., & Valentin, A. (2013). Corporate social responsibility at the base of the pyramid. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 1904–1914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnould, E. J., & Mohr, J. J. (2005). Dynamic transformations for base-of-the-pyramid market clusters. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33(3), 254–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arora, S., & Romijn, H. (2012). The empty rhetoric of poverty reduction at the base of the pyramid. Organization, 19(4), 481–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashta, A., & Hudon, M. (2009). To whom should we be fair? Ethical issues in balancing stakeholder interests from Banco Compartamos case study. CEB Working Paper No. 09/036. Brussels: Solvay Brussels School of Economics and Management Centre Emile Bernheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J. E., Gutiérrez, R., Ogliastri, E., & Reficco, E. (2007). Capitalizing on convergence. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 5(1), 24–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K. (1995). Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games and Economic Behavior, 10(1), 122–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blowfield, M., & Dolan, C. S. (2014). Business as a development agent: Evidence of possibility and improbability. Third World Quarterly, 35(1), 22–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, S. M., & Steenkamp, J.-B. (2006). Marketing renaissance: How research in emerging markets advances marketing science and practice. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 23(4), 337–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calton, J. M., Werhane, P. H., Hartman, L. P., & Bevan, D. (2013). Building partnerships to create social and economic value at the base of the global development pyramid. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(4), 721–733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S., & Ravallion, M. (2010, November). The developing world is poorer than we thought, but no less successful in the fight against poverty. Quartely Journal of Economics, 1577–1625.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesborough, H., Ahern, S., & Finn, M. (2006). Business models for technology in the developing world: The role of non-governmental organizations. California Management Review, 48(3), 48–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahan, N. M., Doh, J. P., Oetzel, J., & Yaziji, M. (2010). Corporate-NGO collaboration: Co-creating new business models for developing markets. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 326–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doz, Y. L., & Hamel, G. (1998). Alliance advantage: The art of creating value through partnering. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, S. (2002). Power and the illusion of transparency in negotiations. Journal of Business and Psychology, 17(1), 133–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, D. U., & Behnam, M. (2013). Trust and the United Nations Global Compact: A network theory perspective. Business and Society, 52(1), 135–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, A. A. (2011). Profits and alms: Cross-sector partnerships for global poverty reduction. Public Administration and Development, 31(1), 15–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomes-Casseres, B., Hagedoorn, J., & Jaffe, A. B. (2006). Do alliances promote knowledge flows? Journal of Financial Economics, 80(1), 5–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Govindarajan, V., & Trimble, C. (2012). Reverse innovation: A global growth strategy that could pre-empt disruption at home. Strategy & Leadership, 40(5), 5–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gradl, C., Krämer, A., & Amadigi, F. (2010). Partner Selection for inclusive business models: The case of Casa Melhor. Greener Management International, 56, 25–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. M. (1996). Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization Science, 7(4), 375–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R. (1998). Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal, 19(4), 293–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, R., & Gold, S. (2014). Resources and governance in “base of the pyramid”-partnerships: Assessing collaborations between businesses and non-business actors. Journal of Business Research, 67(7), 1321–1333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, A. L., Kramer, W. J., Katz, R. S., Tran, J. T., & Walker, C. (2007, Winter–Spring). The next 4 billion: Market size and business strategy at the base of the pyramid. Innovations, (pp. 147–158). Washington: World Resources Institute Innovations..

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, A. L., & Prahalad, C. K. (2004, May–June). Selling to the poor. Foreign Policy, 30–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herlin, H. (2013). Better safe than sorry. Business and Society, 54(6), 822–858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoegl, M., & Proserpio, L. (2004). Team member proximity and teamwork in innovative projects. Research Policy, 33(8), 1153–1165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humberg, K. (2011). Poverty reduction through social business? Lessons learnt from Grameen Joint Ventures in Bangladesh (1st ed.). Munich: Oekom-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humberg, K., & Braun, B. (2014). Social business and poverty alleviation: Lessons from Grameen Danone and Grameen Veolia. In A. Grove & G. A. Berg (Eds.), Social business: Theory, practice, and critical perspectives (pp. 201–223). Heidelberg: Springer, Berlin.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, R. D., Hitt, M. A., & Vaidyanath, D. (2002). Alliance management as a source of competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 28(3), 413–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamali, D., & Keshishian, T. (2009). Uneasy alliances: Lessons learned from partnerships between businesses and NGOs in the context of CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 84, 277–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karnani, A. (2010). Failure of the libertarian approach to reducing poverty. Asian Business & Management, 9(1), 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karnani, A. G. (2006). Misfortune at the bottom of the pyramid. Greener Management International, 51, 99–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karnani, A. G. (2011). Fighting poverty together: Rethinking strategies for business, governments, and civil society to reduce poverty (1st ed.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaur, M. (2013). Rural marketing: A case study on Hindustan Unilever Limited. International Journal of Applied Research and Studies, 2(6), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolk, A., Rivera-Santos, M., & Rufín, C. (2014). Reviewing a decade of research on the “Base/Bottom Of the Pyramid” (BOP) Concept. Business and Society, 53(3), 338–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, P. J., & Lubatkin, M. (1998). Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal, 19(5), 461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leete, L. (2000). Wage equity and employee motivation in nonprofit and for-profit organizations. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 43(4), 423–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • London, T. (2009). Making better investments at the base of the pyramid. Harvard Business Review, 87(5), 106–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • London, T., Anupindi, R., & Sheth, S. (2010). Creating mutual value: Lessons learned from ventures serving base of the pyramid producers. Journal of Business Research, 63(6), 582–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • London, T., & Hart, S. L. (2004). Reinventing strategies for emerging markets: beyond the transnational model. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(5), 350–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • London, T., & Hart, S. L. (2010). Next generation business strategies for the base of the pyramid: New approaches for building mutual value. Upper Saddle River: FT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and power. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, M., Perrot, F., & Rivera-Santos, M. (2012). New perspectives on learning and innovation in cross-sector collaborations. Journal of Business Research, 65(12), 1700–1709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2001). The DAC guidelines–Poverty reduction. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pauwels, K., Erguncu, S., & Yildirim, G. (2013). Winning hearts, minds and sales: How marketing communication enters the purchase process in emerging and mature markets. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 30(1), 57–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K. (2005). The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid: Eradicating poverty through profits. Philadelphia: Wharton School Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K., & Hart, S. L. (2002). The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid. Strategy Business, 26, 54–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reficco, E., & Marquez, P. (2009). Inclusive networks for building BOP markets. Business and Society, 51(3), 512–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivera-Santos, M., & Rufín, C. (2010a). Odd couples: Understanding the governance of firm-NGO alliances. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(S1), 55–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivera-Santos, M., Rufín, C., & Kolk, A. (2012). Bridging the institutional divide: Partnerships in subsistence markets. Journal of Business Research, 65(12), 1721–1727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivera-Santos, M., & Rufín, C. (2010b). Global village vs. small town: Understanding networks at the Base of the Pyramid. International business review, 19(2), 126–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rondinelli, D.A., & London, T. (2003). How corporations and environmental groups cooperate: Assessing cross-sector alliances and collaborations. The Academy of Management Executive (1993–2005), 17(1), 61–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, R. (2007). CGAP reflections on the compartamos initial public offering: A case study on microfinance interest rates and profits. CGAP Focus Note No. 42. Washington: Consultative Group to Assist the Poor (CGAP), 16 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salazar, J., Husted, B. W., & Biehl, M. (2012). Thoughts on the evaluation of corporate social performance through projects. Journal of Business Ethics, 105(2), 175–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuster, T., & Holtbrügge, D. (2012). Market entry of multinational companies in markets at the bottom of the pyramid: A learning perspective. International Business Review, 21(5), 817–830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuster, T., & Holtbrügge, D. (2014). Benefits of cross-sector partnerships in markets at the Base of the Pyramid. Business Strategy and the Environment, 23(3), 188–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwittay, A. (2011). The marketization of poverty. Current Anthropology, 52(S3), 71–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seagle, C., & Christensen, L. (2011). Case study: Procter & Gamble’s Pur. Financial Times, March 2 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seelos, C., & Mair, J. (2007). Profitable business models and market creation in the context of deep poverty: A strategic view. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(4), 49–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selsky, J., & Parker, B. (2005). Cross-sector partnerships to address social issues: Challenges to theory and practice. Journal of Management, 31(6), 849–873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shivarajan, S., & Srinivasan, A. (2013). The poor as suppliers of intellectual property: A social network approach to sustainable poverty alleviation. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(3), 381–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinkovics, N., Sinkovics, R. R., & Yamin, M. (2014). The role of social value creation in business model formulation at the bottom of the pyramid–Implications for MNEs? International Business Review, 23, 692–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teegen, H., Doh, J. P., & Vachani, S. (2004). The importance of Nongovernmental Organizations (NGOs) in global governance and value creation: An international business research agenda. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(6), 463–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torre, A., & Rallet, A. (2005). Proximity and localization. Regional Studies, 39(1), 47–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unilever (2017, February 8). Expanding opportunities in our value chain. https://www.unilever.com/sustainable-living/enhancing-livelihoods/opportunities-for-women/expanding-opportunities-in-our-value-chain/. Accessed March 12, 2018.

  • United Nations (2015). World population prospects: The 2015 revision. Key Findings and Advance Tables. Working Paper No. ESA/P/WP.241. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Waeyenberg, S., & Hens, L. (2012). Overcoming institutional distance: Expansion to base-of-the-pyramid markets. Journal of Business Research, 65(12), 1692–1699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Tulder, R., & Rosa, A.D. (2012). The role of cross-sector partnership portfolios in the inclusive business strategies of multinational enterprises. In R. van Tulder (Ed.), New policy challenges for European multinationals, 1st ed. (vol. 7, pp. 153–180). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venn, R., & Berg, N. (2011). Base-of-the-pyramid-strategien in emerging markets: Interorganisationales lernen zur kreation von innovationen in sektorübergreifenden partnerschaften. Zeitschrift für Management, 6(3), 261–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, J. W., Kistruck, G. M., Ireland, R. D., & Ketchen, J. J. (2010). The entrepreneurship process in base of the pyramid markets: The case of multinational enterprise/nongovernment organization alliances. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(3), 555–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xavier, M.J., Raja, J., & Usha Nandhini, S. (2007). Impact of entrepreneurship development through corporate interventions: An assessment of the case of HLL’s Project Shakti. In J.A. Rosa & M. Viswanathan (Eds.), Product and market development for subsistence marketplaces, 1st ed. (vol. 20, pp. 135–149). Boston: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany

    Jordis Grimm & Dirk Ulrich Gilbert

Authors
  1. Jordis Grimm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dirk Ulrich Gilbert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jordis Grimm .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada

    Arnaud Sales

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Grimm, J., Gilbert, D.U. (2019). Gaining Mutual Benefits Through Business-non-profit Partnership in Base-of-the-Pyramid Markets: A Relational View. In: Sales, A. (eds) Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Change. Ethical Economy, vol 57. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15407-3_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation