Skip to main content

Implementing Corporate Social Responsibility as Institutional Work: Exploring the Day-to-Day Activities of CSR Managers in Multinational Corporations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Ethical Economy ((SEEP,volume 57))

Abstract

We investigate the role of CSR managers in the process of institutionalizing CSR at the organizational level. From an institutional theory perspective, CSR managers can be regarded as pursuing institutional work that aims to establish CSR as a taken-for-granted way of doing business within and beyond a single organization. We investigate inductively what the day-to-day practices of CSR-related institutional work are that these CSR managers are carrying out. Our qualitative inquiry suggests a pattern of five distinct but interrelated strategies applied within organizational contexts. The data further indicate that the CSR-institutionalization project and corresponding institutional work of CSR managers cannot only be achieved by crafting formalized bureaucratic structures, but must be complemented by informal strategies of convincing, “subtly nudging” others, and forming “silent” alliances with like-minded supporters. While our study provides evidence of what institutional work in the context of CSR actually entails, it also contributes to a better understanding of the nascent micro-perspective on CSR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We acknowledge the multifaceted and related literature on institutional entrepreneurship (e.g., Hardy & Maguire, 2008), but refrain from an in-depth review for reasons of space.

References

  • Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932–968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babbie, E. (2001). The practice of social research (9th ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumann-Pauly, D., Wickert, C., Spence, L., & Scherer, A. (2013). Organizing corporate social responsibility in small and large firms: Size matters. Journal of Business Ethics, 115(4), 693–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bondy, K., Moon, J., & Matten, D. (2012). An institution of corporate social responsibility in multi-national corporations: Form and implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(2), 281–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costas, J., & Kärreman, D. (2013). Conscience as control—Managing employees through CSR. Organization, 20(3), 394–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daudigeos, T. (2013). In their profession’s service: How staff professionals exert influence in their organization. Journal of Management Studies, 50(5), 722–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Empson, L., Cleaver, I., & Allen, J. (2013). Managing partners and management professionals: Institutional work dyads in professional partnerships. Journal of Management Studies, 50, 808–844.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2001, July). GREEN PAPER: Promoting a European framework for corporate social responsibility. Brussels: Commission of the European Union, 26 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D., Corley, K., & Hamilton, A. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haack, P., Schoeneborn, D., & Wickert, C. (2012). Talking the talk, moral entrapment, creeping commitment. Exploring narrative dynamics in corporate responsibility standardization. Organization Studies, 33(5–6), 815–845.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallett, T. (2010). The myth incarnate: Recoupling processes, turmoil, and inhabited institutions in an urban elementary school. American Sociological Review, 75(1), 52–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, C., & Maguire, S. (2008). Institutional entrepreneurship. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Shalin-Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 198–217). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, T., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutions and institutional work. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. Lawrence, & W. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organizations studies (2nd ed., pp. 215–254). London: SAGE.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, T., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. (2009). Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, T., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. (2011). Institutional work: Refocusing institutional studies of organization. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20(1), 52–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, T., Leca, B., & Zilber, T. (2013). Institutional work: Current research, new directions and overlooked issues. Organization Studies, 34(8), 1023–1033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “Explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Revivew, 33(2), 404–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morf, D., Schumacher, M., & Vitell, S. (1999). A survey of ethics officers in large organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 20(3), 265–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasche, A., de Bakker, F., & Moon, J. (2013). Complete and partial organizing for corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 115(4), 651–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Risi, D. (2014). Corporate social responsibility professionals and institutional work: An institutional perspective on a developing profession in multinational corporations. Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts-und Unternehmensethik, 15(2), 279–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Risi, D. (2016). Longitudinal comparison between CSR implementation and CSR function’s resource access. Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings, 2016(1), 25–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Risi, D. (Forthcoming). Time and business sustainability: Socially responsible investing in Swiss banks and insurance companies. Business & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650318777721.

  • Risi, D., & Wickert, C. (2017). Reconsidering the ‘symmetry’ between institutionalization and professionalization: The case of corporate social responsibility managers. Journal of Management Studies, 54(5), 613–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. (2008). Institutions and organizations (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smets, M., Morris, T., & Greenwood, R. (2012). From practice to field: A multilevel model of practice-driven institutional change. Academy Management Journal, 55(4), 877–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strand, R. (2013). The chief officer of corporate social responsibility: A study of its presence in top management teams. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(4), 721–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strand, R. (2014). Strategic leadership of corporate sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 123(4), 687–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, V., Burke, P., Buchan, A., & Daniels, R. (2014). The CR & Sustainability salary survey 2014. http://crsalarysurvey.com/home. Accessed March 12, 2018.

  • van Tulder, R., van Wijk, J., & Kolk, A. (2008). From chain liability to chain responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(2), 399–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickert, C., & de Bakker, F. G. A. (2018). Pitching for social change: Towards a relational approach to selling and buying social issues. Academy of Management Discoveries, 4(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wickert, C., & Schaefer, S. (2015). Towards a progressive understanding of performativity in critical management studies. Human Relations, 68(1), 107–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wickert, C., Scherer, A., & Spence, L. (2016). Walking and talking corporate social responsibility: Implications of firm size and organizational cost. Journal of Management Studies, 53(7), 1169–1196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, C., & Nyberg, D. (2012). Working with passion: Emotionology, corporate environmentalism and climate change. Human Relations, 65(12), 1561–1587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Risi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wickert, C., Risi, D. (2019). Implementing Corporate Social Responsibility as Institutional Work: Exploring the Day-to-Day Activities of CSR Managers in Multinational Corporations. In: Sales, A. (eds) Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Change. Ethical Economy, vol 57. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15407-3_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics