Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation ((CHS))

  • 1080 Accesses

Abstract

Simulation centers may operate in many different organizational styles and in a variety of settings from small-scale training within a hospital or community college building to multi-site institutions that support an entire healthcare workforce or graduate training program. Regardless of the setting, each center should have a mission and common goal to drive hiring and staffing needs. Specific knowledge, skills, and attributes must be clearly defined and carefully worded to attract and appropriately describe the needs of a position to improve success for any new hire. This chapter will review methods for identifying and carrying out a job skills analysis to fill positions within a simulation center. It will also describe interview best practices to help find the best candidate fit and protect your center during the hiring and employee evaluation process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Boushey H, Glynn SJ. There are significant business costs to replacing employees. Center for American Progress [Online]. 2012 [Cited 2019 April 17]. Available from: https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/economy/reports/2012/11/16/44464/there-are-significant-business-costs-to-replacing-employees/

  2. Pató BSG. Formal options for job descriptions: theory meets practice. J Manag Dev. 2017;36(8):1008–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Siggelkow N, Levinthal DA. Temporarily divide to conquer: centralized, decentralized, and reintegrated organizational approaches to exploration and adaptation. Organ Sci. 2003;14(6):650–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Anderson C, Brown CE. The functions and dysfunctions of hierarchy. Res Organ Behav. 2010;30:55–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Morgan J. The 5 types of organizational structures: part 3, flat organizations; 2015 July 5. Available from: https://www.forbes.com/sites/jacobmorgan/2015/07/13/the-5-types-of-organizational-structures-part-3-flat-organizations/-262ed7966caa

  6. INACSL Standards Committee. INACSL standards of best practice: SimulationSM operations. Clin Simul Nurs. 2017;13(12):681–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Beck B, Billing DC, Carr AJ. Developing physical and physiological employment standards: translation of job analysis findings to assessments and performance standards–a systematic review. Int J Ind Ergon. 2016;56:9–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Guder E. Identifying appropriate sources of work information. In: Wilson MA, Bennett Jr W, Gibson SG, Alliger GM, editors. The handbook of work analysis: methods, systems, applications and science of work measurement in organizations. New York: Routledge Academic; 2013. p. 31–44.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Morgeson FP, Spitzmuller M, Garza AS, Campion MA. Pay attention! The liabilities of respondent experience and carelessness when making job analysis judgments. J Manag. 2016;42(7):1904–33.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Uniform guidelines on employee selection procedures – no assumption of validity, Public Law no. 60–3.9 Part B Stat. 41 CFR; 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  11. The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. The Americans with Disabilities Act: your responsibilities as an employer [Online]. 2008 [Cited 2019 April 7]. Available from: https://www.eeoc.gov/facts/ada17.html

  12. Equal Pay Act of 1963 – EPA – 29 U.S. Code Chapter 8 § 206(d) [Online]. [Cited 2019 April 17]. Available from: https://finduslaw.com/equal-pay-act-1963-epa-29-us-code-chapter-8-206d

  13. Office of Personnel Management. Six steps to conducting a job analysis [Online]. [Cited 2018 June 6]. Available from: https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/assessment-and-selection/job-analysis/job_analysis_checklist.pdf

  14. Hartley DE. Job analysis at the speed of reality. Amhurts: HRD Press; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schneider B, Konz AM. Strategic job analysis. Hum Resour Manag. 1989;28(1):51–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. INACSL Standards Committee. INACSL standards of best practice: Simulation SM. Clin Simul Nurs. 2016;12(Supplement):S1–S50.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Society for Simulation in Healthcare. SSH accreditation of healthcare simulation programs [Online] http://www.ssih.org/accreditation. Available from: http://www.ssih.org/accreditation

  18. SimGHOSTS. The gathering of healthcare simulation technology specialists [Online] https://www.simghosts.org/sim/About_Us.asp2018. Available from: https://www.simghosts.org/sim/About_Us.asp

  19. Huffcutt AI, Roth PL, McDaniel MA. A meta-analytic investigation of cognitive ability in employment interview evaluations: moderating characteristics and implications for incremental validity. J Appl Psychol. 1996;81(5):459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. McDaniel MA, Whetzel DL, Schmidt FL, Maurer SD. The validity of employment interviews: a comprehensive review and meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol. 1994;79(4):599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Salgado JF, Moscoso S. Meta-analysis of interrater reliability of job performance ratings in validity studies of personnel selection. Percept Mot Skills. 1996;83(3_suppl):1195–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tran T, Blackman MC. The dynamics and validity of the group selection interview. J Soc Psychol. 2006;146(2):183–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kausel EE, Culbertson SS, Madrid HP. Overconfidence in personnel selection: when and why unstructured interview information can hurt hiring decisions. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2016;137:27–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wiersma UJ. The four stages of the employment interview: helping interviewers put two and two together. Evidence-based HRM. 2016;4(3):232–9. Emerald Group Publishing Limited

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rivera LA. Go with your gut: emotion and evaluation in job interviews. Am J Sociol. 2015;120(5):1339–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Federal Laws prohibiting job discrimination questions and answers 2009. August 8, 2018. Available from: https://www.eeoc.gov/facts/qanda.html

  27. Iyengar S. The art of choosing. New York: Twelve; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Frieder RE, Van Iddekinge CH, Raymark PH. How quickly do interviewers reach decisions? An examination of interviewers’ decision-making time across applicants. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2016;89(2):223–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Thomson, W.Z. (2019). Finding the Right Simulation Personnel. In: Crawford, S., Baily, L., Monks, S. (eds) Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation: Operations, Technology, and Innovative Practice. Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15378-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15378-6_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-15377-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-15378-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics