Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Healthcare Simulation Technology Specialist and Educational Constructs in Simulation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation: Operations, Technology, and Innovative Practice

Part of the book series: Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation ((CHS))

  • 1100 Accesses

Abstract

Instructional design models are used to guide the development of education and training programs. Simulation is a learning activity commonly used in healthcare education and training programs. The US Navy developed a modification of the popular ADDIE (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, Evaluation) model of instructional design, known as PADDIE+M. The modified version is well suited to simulation-based education as it incorporates two extra steps that are invaluable additions to a simulation program: planning and maintenance. While many different simulation instructional models exist, this chapter explores application of the PADDIE+M process to healthcare simulation course development. Many important educational theories and practices are introduced here to highlight their application for each phase of the development and review process of designing and running a simulation scenario.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Richey RC, Klein JD, Tracey MW. The instructional design knowledge base: theory, research, and practice. London: Routledge; 2010.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Battles J. Improving patient safety by instructional systems design. BMJ Qual Saf. 2006;15(suppl 1):i25–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chiniara G, Cole G, Brisbin K, Huffman D, Cragg B, Lamacchia M, et al. Simulation in healthcare: a taxonomy and a conceptual framework for instructional design and media selection. Med Teach. 2013;35(8):e1380–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kern D, Thomas P, Howard D, Bass E. Curriculum development for medical education: a six-step process. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  5. United States Navy. Naval education and training command integrated learning environment course development and life-cycle maintenance [Online]. http://www.netc.navy.mil/ile/_Documents/NAVEDTRA136/NAVEDTRA_136.pdf2010. Available from: http://www.netc.navy.mil/ile/_Documents/NAVEDTRA136/NAVEDTRA_136.pdf

  6. INACSL Standards Committee. INACSL Standards of best practice: SimulationSM Simulation design. Clin Simul Nurs. 2016;12(Supplement):s5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  7. INACSL Standards Committee. INACSL Standards of best practice: SimulationSM Participant evaluation. Clin Simul Nurs. 2016;12(Supplement):s26–9.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Health Professions Network Nursing and Midwifery Office. Framework for action on interprofessional education & collaborative practice. Geneva: WHO; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  9. INACSL Standards Committee. INACSL Standards of best practice: SimulationSM Simulation enhanced interprofessional education (Sim-IPE). Clin Simul Nurs. 2016;12(Supplement):s34–8.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Carnegie Mellon University. Design & teach a course: articulate your learning objectives [Online]. https://www.cmu.edu/teaching/designteach/design/learningobjectives.html. Available from: https://www.cmu.edu/teaching/designteach/design/learningobjectives.html

  11. INACSL Standards Committee. INACSL Standards of best practice: SimulationSM Outcomes and objectives. Clin Simul Nurs. 2016;12(Supplement):S13–5.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Knowles M. The modern practice of adult education, vol. 41. New York: New York Association Press; 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kolb D. Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cook DA, Hamstra SJ, Brydges R, Zendejas B, Szostek JH, Wang AT, et al. Comparative effectiveness of instructional design features in simulation-based education: systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Teach. 2013;35(1):e867–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Issenberg BS, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER, Lee Gordon D, Scalese RJ. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach. 2005;27(1):10–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hamstra SJ, Brydges R, Hatala R, Zendejas B, Cook DA. Reconsidering fidelity in simulation-based training. Acad Med. 2014;89(3):387–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rusticic software. SCORM explained [Online]. https://scorm.com/scorm-explained/. Available from: https://scorm.com/scorm-explained/

  18. Web Accessibility Initiative. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) overview [Online]. https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/. Available from: https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/

  19. INACSL Standards Committee. INACSL Standards of best practice: SimulationSM Facilitation. Clin Simul Nurs. 2016;12(Supplement):s16–20.

    Google Scholar 

  20. INACSL Standards Committee. INACSL Standards of best practice: SimulationSM Professional integrity. Clin Simul Nurs. 2016;12(Supplement):s30–3.

    Google Scholar 

  21. INACSL Standards Committee. INACSL Standards of best practice: SimulationSM Debriefing. Clin Simul Nurs. 2016;12(Supplement):S21–5.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sawyer T, Eppich W, Brett-Fleegler M, Grant V, Cheng A. More than one way to debrief: a critical review of healthcare simulation debriefing methods. Simul Healthc. 2016;11(3):209–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zigmont JJ, Kappus LJ, Sudikoff SN, editors. The 3D model of debriefing: defusing, discovering, and deepening. Semin. Perinatol. 2011;35:52; Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kuiper R, Heinrich C, Matthias A, Graham MJ, Bell-Kotwall L. Debriefing with the OPT model of clinical reasoning during high fidelity patient simulation. Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2008;5(1):1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Adamson KA, Kardong-Edgren S, Willhaus J. An updated review of published simulation evaluation instruments. Clin Simul Nurs. 2013;9(9):e393–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Brett-Fleegler M, Rudolph J, Eppich W, Monuteaux M, Fleegler E, Cheng A, et al. Debriefing assessment for simulation in healthcare: development and psychometric properties. Simul Healthc. 2012;7(5):288–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Rural Health, University of Melbourne, Wangaratta, VIC, Australia

    Kirrian Steer

Authors
  1. Kirrian Steer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kirrian Steer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso, El Paso, TX, USA

    Scott B. Crawford

  2. SimGHOSTS, Las Vegas, NV, USA

    Lance W. Baily

  3. Department of Emergency Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso, El Paso, TX, USA

    Stormy M. Monks

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Steer, K. (2019). The Healthcare Simulation Technology Specialist and Educational Constructs in Simulation. In: Crawford, S., Baily, L., Monks, S. (eds) Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation: Operations, Technology, and Innovative Practice. Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15378-6_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15378-6_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-15377-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-15378-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation