Skip to main content

Bayesian Dose Escalation Study Design with Consideration of Both Early and Late Onset Toxicity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Contemporary Biostatistics with Biopharmaceutical Applications

Part of the book series: ICSA Book Series in Statistics ((ICSABSS))

  • 812 Accesses

Abstract

In phase I oncology trials, dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) is often used as the endpoint during early cycles in dose escalation studies to find the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Bayesian adaptive designs such as the Escalation with Overdose Control (EWOC; Babb et al., Stat Med 17:1103–1120, 1998) methods have been introduced to protect patients from overdosing and account for variability in toxicity estimates.

Because of the short term nature of the DLT endpoint, these methods may not be feasible in practice when a particular adverse event is likely to occur during longer term exposure. To accommodate a longer assessment time while maintaining escalation timelines, Tighiouart et al. (PLoS One 9(3):e93070, 2014) proposed an EWOC design using a time to event toxicity endpoint.

When both early and late onset toxicity are crucial for dose finding studies, we propose to define DLT with two components, one for immediate toxicity in a binary model, and the other for late onset toxicity in a time to event model. The types of immediate toxicity and late onset toxicity are different. Through simulations, we demonstrated that the proposed dose escalation design can incorporate historical knowledge, protect patients from being assigned to toxic doses, and consider early and late onset toxicity while maintaining the escalation timeline. This design has been implemented in a phase 1 dose escalation study with both short term DLT and long term AESI, which allowed the study team to consider both the short term DLT and long term AESI with an acceptable timeline.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Babb, J., Rogatko, A., Zacks, S.: Cancer phase I clinical trials: efficient dose escalation with overdose control. Stat. Med. 17, 1103–1120 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, S.M., Carlin, B.P., Lee, J.J., Müller, P.: Bayesian Adaptive Methods for Clinical Trials. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2010)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, T.M.: Generalizing the TITE-CRM to adapt for early- and late-onset toxicities. Stat. Med. 25, 2071–2083 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.23372

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, Y., Chappell, R.: Sequential designs for phase I clinical trials with late-onset toxicities. Biometrics. 56, 1177–1182 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cunanan, K., Koopmeiners, J.S.: Evaluating the performance of copula models in phase I-II clinical trials under model misspecification. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 14, 51 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EMA. Guideline on the evaluation of anticancer medicinal products in man. EMA/CHMP/205/95 Rev.5 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, S.N., Zahurak, M.L., Piantadosi, S.: Some practical improvements in the continual reassessment method for phase I studies. Stat. Med. 14(11), 1149–1161 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iasonos, A., Wages, N.A., Conaway, M.R., Cheung, K., Yuan, Y., O’Quigley, J.: Dimension of model parameter space and operating characteristics in adaptive dose-finding studies. Stat. Med. 35, 3760–3775 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kummar, S., Gutierrez, M., Doroshow, J.H., Murgo, A.J.: Drug development in oncology: classical cytotoxics and molecularly targeted agents. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 62(1), 15–26 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, X., Zheng, W., Lu, Y.: Personalized effective dose selection in dose ranging studies. In: Lin, J., Wang, B., Hu, X., Chen, K., Liu, R. (eds.) Statistical Applications from Clinical Trials and Personalized Medicine to Finance and Business Analytics. Springer, Basel (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauguen, A., Le Deley, M.C., Zohar, S.: Dose-finding approach for dose escalation with overdose control considering incomplete observations. Stat. Med. 30(13), 1584–1594 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Neuenschwander, B., Branson, M., Gsponer, T.: Critical aspects of the Bayesian approach to phase I cancer trials. Stat. Med. 27, 2420–2439 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • O’Quigley, J., Pepe, M., Fisher, L.: Continual reassessment method: a practical design for phase 1 clinical trials in cancer. Biometrics. 46, 33–48 (1990). https://doi.org/10.2307/2531628

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Paoletti, X., Toumeau, C.L., Verweij, J., Siiu, L.L., Seymour, L., Postel-Vinay, S., Collette, L., Rizzo, E., Ivy, P., Olmos, D., Massard, C., Lacombe, D., Kaye, S.B., Soria, J.-C.: Defining dose-liming toxicity for phase 1 trials of molecularly targeted agents: results of a DLT-TARGETT international survey. Eur. J. Cancer. 50(12), 2050–2056 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sverdlov, O., Gao, L.: Phase I/II dose finding designs with efficacy and safety endpoints. In: O’Quigley, J., Iasonos, A., Bornkamp, B. (eds.) Handbook of Methods for Designing, Monitoring, and Analyzing Dose-Finding Trials. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tighiouart, M., Liu, Y., Rogatko, A.: Escalation with overdose control using time to toxicity for cancer phase I clinical trials. PLoS One. 9(3), e93070 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tighiouart, M., Rogatko, A., Babb, J.: Flexible Bayesian methods for cancer phase I clinical trials. Dose escalation with overdose control. Stat. Med. 24, 2183–2196 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Varricchi, G., Galdiero, M.R., Marone, G., Criscuolo, G., Triassi, M., Bonaduce, D., Marone, G., Tocchetti, C.G.: Cardiotoxicity of immune checkpoint inhibitors. ESMO Open. 2(4), e000247 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2017-0002473

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors appreciate the helpful discussions with Mourad Tighiouart and Pierre Colin. The authors thank referees and the associate editor for their excellent comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Li Liu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Liu, L., Gao, L., Laird, G. (2019). Bayesian Dose Escalation Study Design with Consideration of Both Early and Late Onset Toxicity. In: Zhang, L., Chen, DG., Jiang, H., Li, G., Quan, H. (eds) Contemporary Biostatistics with Biopharmaceutical Applications. ICSA Book Series in Statistics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15310-6_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics