Abstract
In phase I oncology trials, dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) is often used as the endpoint during early cycles in dose escalation studies to find the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Bayesian adaptive designs such as the Escalation with Overdose Control (EWOC; Babb et al., Stat Med 17:1103–1120, 1998) methods have been introduced to protect patients from overdosing and account for variability in toxicity estimates.
Because of the short term nature of the DLT endpoint, these methods may not be feasible in practice when a particular adverse event is likely to occur during longer term exposure. To accommodate a longer assessment time while maintaining escalation timelines, Tighiouart et al. (PLoS One 9(3):e93070, 2014) proposed an EWOC design using a time to event toxicity endpoint.
When both early and late onset toxicity are crucial for dose finding studies, we propose to define DLT with two components, one for immediate toxicity in a binary model, and the other for late onset toxicity in a time to event model. The types of immediate toxicity and late onset toxicity are different. Through simulations, we demonstrated that the proposed dose escalation design can incorporate historical knowledge, protect patients from being assigned to toxic doses, and consider early and late onset toxicity while maintaining the escalation timeline. This design has been implemented in a phase 1 dose escalation study with both short term DLT and long term AESI, which allowed the study team to consider both the short term DLT and long term AESI with an acceptable timeline.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Babb, J., Rogatko, A., Zacks, S.: Cancer phase I clinical trials: efficient dose escalation with overdose control. Stat. Med. 17, 1103–1120 (1998)
Berry, S.M., Carlin, B.P., Lee, J.J., Müller, P.: Bayesian Adaptive Methods for Clinical Trials. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2010)
Braun, T.M.: Generalizing the TITE-CRM to adapt for early- and late-onset toxicities. Stat. Med. 25, 2071–2083 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.23372
Cheung, Y., Chappell, R.: Sequential designs for phase I clinical trials with late-onset toxicities. Biometrics. 56, 1177–1182 (2000)
Cunanan, K., Koopmeiners, J.S.: Evaluating the performance of copula models in phase I-II clinical trials under model misspecification. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 14, 51 (2014)
EMA. Guideline on the evaluation of anticancer medicinal products in man. EMA/CHMP/205/95 Rev.5 (2017)
Goodman, S.N., Zahurak, M.L., Piantadosi, S.: Some practical improvements in the continual reassessment method for phase I studies. Stat. Med. 14(11), 1149–1161 (1995)
Iasonos, A., Wages, N.A., Conaway, M.R., Cheung, K., Yuan, Y., O’Quigley, J.: Dimension of model parameter space and operating characteristics in adaptive dose-finding studies. Stat. Med. 35, 3760–3775 (2016)
Kummar, S., Gutierrez, M., Doroshow, J.H., Murgo, A.J.: Drug development in oncology: classical cytotoxics and molecularly targeted agents. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 62(1), 15–26 (2006)
Ma, X., Zheng, W., Lu, Y.: Personalized effective dose selection in dose ranging studies. In: Lin, J., Wang, B., Hu, X., Chen, K., Liu, R. (eds.) Statistical Applications from Clinical Trials and Personalized Medicine to Finance and Business Analytics. Springer, Basel (2016)
Mauguen, A., Le Deley, M.C., Zohar, S.: Dose-finding approach for dose escalation with overdose control considering incomplete observations. Stat. Med. 30(13), 1584–1594 (2011)
Neuenschwander, B., Branson, M., Gsponer, T.: Critical aspects of the Bayesian approach to phase I cancer trials. Stat. Med. 27, 2420–2439 (2008)
O’Quigley, J., Pepe, M., Fisher, L.: Continual reassessment method: a practical design for phase 1 clinical trials in cancer. Biometrics. 46, 33–48 (1990). https://doi.org/10.2307/2531628
Paoletti, X., Toumeau, C.L., Verweij, J., Siiu, L.L., Seymour, L., Postel-Vinay, S., Collette, L., Rizzo, E., Ivy, P., Olmos, D., Massard, C., Lacombe, D., Kaye, S.B., Soria, J.-C.: Defining dose-liming toxicity for phase 1 trials of molecularly targeted agents: results of a DLT-TARGETT international survey. Eur. J. Cancer. 50(12), 2050–2056 (2014)
Sverdlov, O., Gao, L.: Phase I/II dose finding designs with efficacy and safety endpoints. In: O’Quigley, J., Iasonos, A., Bornkamp, B. (eds.) Handbook of Methods for Designing, Monitoring, and Analyzing Dose-Finding Trials. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2017)
Tighiouart, M., Liu, Y., Rogatko, A.: Escalation with overdose control using time to toxicity for cancer phase I clinical trials. PLoS One. 9(3), e93070 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093070
Tighiouart, M., Rogatko, A., Babb, J.: Flexible Bayesian methods for cancer phase I clinical trials. Dose escalation with overdose control. Stat. Med. 24, 2183–2196 (2005)
Varricchi, G., Galdiero, M.R., Marone, G., Criscuolo, G., Triassi, M., Bonaduce, D., Marone, G., Tocchetti, C.G.: Cardiotoxicity of immune checkpoint inhibitors. ESMO Open. 2(4), e000247 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2017-0002473
Acknowledgement
The authors appreciate the helpful discussions with Mourad Tighiouart and Pierre Colin. The authors thank referees and the associate editor for their excellent comments and suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Liu, L., Gao, L., Laird, G. (2019). Bayesian Dose Escalation Study Design with Consideration of Both Early and Late Onset Toxicity. In: Zhang, L., Chen, DG., Jiang, H., Li, G., Quan, H. (eds) Contemporary Biostatistics with Biopharmaceutical Applications. ICSA Book Series in Statistics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15310-6_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15310-6_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-15309-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-15310-6
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)