Skip to main content

Evaluating and Using Medical Evidence in Integrative Mental Health Care: Literature Review, Evidence Tables, Algorithms, and the Promise of Artificial Intelligence

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
An Integrative Paradigm for Mental Health Care

Abstract

The problem of evidence in medicine is discussed. Criteria are introduced for assigning levels of evidence to CAM modalities. In Western medicine findings from laboratory studies comprise the highest level of evidence for a putative mechanism of action and the relationship between “treatment” and “outcomes.” In contrast, in non-Western systems of medicine “evidence” reflects the values and beliefs of the parent culture. Important differences between quantitative and qualitative evidence are described. Special problems pertaining to literature research on CAM are discussed including how to formulate a question, identifying resources most likely to yield pertinent information on a particular subject, and using methods for optimizing and streamlining literature research. A clearly phrased question is the basis for any literature search. If the question is ambiguous or unfocused important resources will be overlooked, and relevant information will be missed. Valuable web-based resources are identified and practical tips are provided for obtaining current reliable information. Techniques for using prefiltered databases and evidence mapping are reviewed. The concepts of the evidence table and the algorithm are introduced. A methodology is proposed for using these tools when planning integrative mental health care. The accuracy and quality of information put into an algorithm will determine the effectiveness and relevance of clinical solutions generated by it for each unique patient. The optimal integrative care plan for a patient depends on history, symptoms, circumstances, preferences, and financial constraints in the context of locally available health care resources, and the professional judgment and clinical experience of the practitioner. The chapter concludes with a discussion of advances in artificial intelligence (AI) software and AI’s implications for the future of mental health care.

“Three things cannot be long hidden: the sun, the moon, and the truth.”

—The Buddha

Links to all websites mentioned in this chapter are included in the book’s companion website http://integrativementalhealthplan.com

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • ISPOR Connections. (2012). International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) (pp. 3–4). Retrieved from http://www.ispor.org

  • Acion, L., Kelmansky, D., van der Laan, M., Sahker, E., Jones, D., & Arndt, S. (2017). Use of a machine learning framework to predict substance use disorder treatment success. PLoS One, 12(4), e0175383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appelboom, G., LoPresti, M., Reginster, J. Y., Sander Connolly, E., & Dumont, E. P. (2014). The quantified patient: A patient participatory culture. Current Medical Research and Opinion, 30(12), 2585–2587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banks, J. (1998). Handbook of simulation. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barry, C. A. (2006). The role of evidence in alternative medicine: Contrasting biomedical and anthropological approaches. Social Science & Medicine, 62(11), 2646–2657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner Jr., W. A., Cohen, K. B., Fox, L., Acquaah-Mensah, G. K., & Hunter, L. (2007). Manual curation is not sufficient for annotation of genomic databases. Bioinformatics, 23, i41–i48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckner, W., & Berman, B. (2003). Complementary therapies on the Internet. St. Louis, MO: Churchill Livingstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernardo, T. M., Rajic, A., Young, I., Robiadek, K., Pham, M. T., & Funk, J. A. (2013). Scoping review on search queries and social media for disease surveillance: A chronology of innovation. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(7), e147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brailsford, S. C., Harper, P. R., Patel, B., & Pitt, M. (2009). An analysis of the academic literature on simulation and modelling in health care. Journal of Simulation, 3(3), 130–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browman, G. (2001). Development and aftercare of clinical guidelines: The balance between rigor and pragmatism. Journal of the American Medical Association, 286, 1509–1511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dilsizian, S. E., & Siegel, E. L. (2014). Artificial intelligence in medicine and cardiac imaging: Harnessing big data and advanced computing to provide personalized medical diagnosis and treatment. Current Cardiology Reports, 16, 441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doan, S., Conway, M., Phuong, T. M., & Ohno-Machado, L. (2014). Natural language processing in biomedicine: A unified system architecture overview. In R. J. A. Trent (Ed.), Clinical bioinformatics. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doshi, P., Kickersin, K., Healy, D., Vedula, S., & Jefferson, T. (2013, June). Restoring invisible and abandoned trials: A call for people to publish the findings, BMJ, 13, 346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doshi, P., Shamseer, L., Jones, M., & Jefferson, T. (2018, April 26). Restoring biomedical literature with RIAT. BMJ, 361, k1742.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gantz, J., & Reinsel, D. (2011). Extracting value from chaos. IDC Iview, 1142, 9–10. Good Practices Task Force. Value Health. 2015b;18(1):5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J. (2016). Artificial intelligence, machine learning, and the FDA. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/theapothecary/2016/08/19/artificial-intelligence-machine-learning-and-the-fda/#4aca26121aa1

  • Gray, G. (2004). Concise guide to evidence-based psychiatry. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guyatt, G., & Rennie, D. (Eds.). (2002). Users’ guide to the medical literature: Essentials of evidence-based clinical practice. Chicago: AMA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, J. R., Lin, Z., Carroll, G. R., & Carley, K. M. (2007). Simulation modeling in organizational and management research. The Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1229–1245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, M. J., & Prasad, V. (2018). Financial Conflicts of Interest at FDA Drug Advisory Committee Meetings. Cent Rep. 48(2):10–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jadad, A., & Gagliardi, A. (1998). Rating health information on the Internet: Navigating to knowledge or to Babel? Journal of the American Medical Association, 279, 611–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jašović-Gašić, M., Dunjic-Kostić, B., Pantović, M., Cvetić, T., Marić, N. P., & Jovanović, A. A. (2013). Algorithms in psychiatry: State of the art. Psychiatria Danubina, 25(3), 280–283.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, D. L., Williams, A. L., Girard, C., Goodman, J., Comerford, B., Behrman, A., et al. (2003). The evidence base for complementary and alternative medicine: Methods of evidence mapping with applications to CAM. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine, 9(4), 22–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kayyali, B., Knott, D., & Kuiken, S. V. (2013). The big-data revolution in US health care: Accelerating value and innovation. Retrieved from http://www.mckinsey.com/industries/healthcare-systems-and-services/ourinsights/the-big-data-revolution-in-us-health-care

  • Laney, D. (2012). The importance of ‘big data’: A definition. Gartner. Retrieved from https://www.scirp.org/(S(oyulxb452alnt1aej1nfow45))/reference/ReferencesPapers.aspx?ReferenceID=1287330

  • Leeper, N. J., Bauer-Mehren, A., Iyer, S. V., LePendu, P., Olson, C., & Shah, N. H. (2013). Practice-based evidence: Profiling the safety of cilostazol by text-mining of clinical notes. PLoS One, 8(5), e63499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LePendu, P., Iyer, S. V., Bauer-Mehren, A., Harpaz, R., Mortensen, J. M., Podchiyska, T., et al. (2013). Pharmacovigilance using clinical notes. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 93(6), 547–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohr, S. (2016). IBM is counting on its bet on Watson, and paying big money for it. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/17/technology/ibm-is-counting-on-its-bet-on-watson-and-paying-big-money-for-it.html

  • Lu, Z. (2011). PubMed and beyond: A survey of web tools for searching biomedical literature. Database, 2011, baq036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lurie, P. (2018). Suggestions for improving conflict of interest processes in the US Food and Drug Administration Advisory Committees-Past Imperfect. JAMA Internal Medicine, 178(7), 997–998. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.1324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mancano, M., & Bullano, M. (1998). Meta-analysis: Methodology, utility, and limitations. Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 11(4), 239–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manchikanti, L., Kaye, A. D., Boswell, M. V., & Hirsch, J. A. (2015, January–February). Medical journal peer review: Process and bias. Pain Physician, 18(1), E1–E14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, D. A. (2012). Getting connected: Systems solutions for generating maximal value from health care resources. In International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) Connections. 2012, International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) (pp. 3–4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, D. A., Burgos-Liz, L., IJzerman, M. J., Crown, W., Padula, W. V., Wong, P. K., et al. (2015). Selecting a dynamic simulation modeling method for health care delivery research—part 2: Report of the ISPOR Dynamic Simulation Modeling Emerging Good Practices Task Force. Value in Health, 18(2), 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, D. A., Burgos-Liz, L., IJzerman, M. J., Osgood, N. D., Padula, W. V., Higashi, M. K., et al. (2015). Applying dynamic simulation modeling methods in health care delivery research—The SIMULATE checklist: Report of the ISPOR Simulation Modeling Emerging Good Practices Task Force. Value in Health, 18(1), 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, P. M., Edison, P., Geraghty, O. C., & Johnson, M. R. (2014). The emerging agenda of stratified medicine in neurology. Nature Reviews Neurology, 10(1), 15–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer-Schönberger, V., & Cukier, K. (2013). Big data: A revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mewes, H. W. (2013). Perspectives of a systems biology of the brain: The big data conundrum understanding psychiatric diseases. Pharmacopsychiatry, 46(Suppl 1), S2–S9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A. L., Crismon, M. L., Rush, A. J., Chiles, J., Kashner, M., Toprac, M., et al. (2004). The Texas medication algorithm project: Clinical results for schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 30, 627–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M., & McQuay, H. (2006). Bandolier’s little book of making sense of the medical evidence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Morley, J., Rosner, A. L., & Redwood, D. (2001). A case study of misrepresentation of the scientific literature: Recent reviews of chiropractic. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 7(1), 65–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neill, D. B. (2013). Using artificial intelligence to improve hospital inpatient care. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 28, 92–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ong, J. B. S., Chen, M. I., Cook, A. R., Lee, H. C., Lee, V. J., Lin, R. T., et al. (2010). Real-time epidemic monitoring and forecasting of H1N1-2009 using influenza-like illness from general practice and family doctor clinics in Singapore. PLoS One, 5(4), e10036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, N., & Liu, J. (2014). Towards closed loop modeling: Evaluating the prospects for creating recurrently regrounded aggregate simulation models using particle filtering. In Proceedings of the 2014 Winter Simulation Conference. IEEE Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel, V. L., Shortliffe, E. H., Stefanelli, M., Szolovits, P., Berthold, M. R., Bellazzi, R., et al. (2009). The coming of age of artificial intelligence in medicine. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 46, 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pathak, J., Bailey, K. R., Beebe, C. E., Bethard, S., Carrell, D. S., Chen, P. J., et al. (2013). Normalization and standardization of electronic health records for high-throughput phenotyping: The SHARPn consortium. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 20(e2), e341–e348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pathak, J., Kho, A. N., & Denny, J. C. (2013). Electronic health records-driven phenotyping: Challenges, recent advances, and perspectives. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 20(e2), e206–e211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, T. (2011). How to replicate Watson hardware and systems design for your own use in your basement. https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/blogs/insideSystemStorage/entry/ibm_watson_how_to_build_your_own_watson_jr_in_your_basement7?lang=en

  • Pham-Kanter, G. (2014, September). Revisiting financial conflicts of interest in FDA advisory committees. The Milbank Quarterly, 92(3), 446–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rankin-Box, D. (2006, May). Shaping medical knowledge II: Bias and balance. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice, 12(2), 77–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resch, K., Ernst, E., & Garrow, J. (2000). A randomized controlled study of reviewer bias against an unconventional therapy. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 93(4), 164–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokolowski, J. A., & Banks, C. M. (2009). Principles of modeling and simulation: A multidisciplinary approach. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vieiraa, S., Pinayab, W. H. L., & Mechellia, A. (2017). Using deep learning to investigate the neuroimaging correlates of psychiatric and neurological disorders: Methods and applications. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 74, 58–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitaker, R., & Cosgrove, L. (2015). Psychiatry Under the Influence: Institutional corruption, social injury and prescriptions for reform. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • White, R. W., Tatonetti, N. P., Shah, N. H., Altman, R. B., & Horvitz, E. (2013). Web-scale pharmacovigilance: Listening to signals from the crowd. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 20(3), 404–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lake, J.H. (2019). Evaluating and Using Medical Evidence in Integrative Mental Health Care: Literature Review, Evidence Tables, Algorithms, and the Promise of Artificial Intelligence. In: An Integrative Paradigm for Mental Health Care. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15285-7_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics