Skip to main content

Sentences and Systems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Systemics of Incompleteness and Quasi-Systems

Part of the book series: Contemporary Systems Thinking ((CST))

  • 436 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper, it is argued on two different grounds that sentences in natural languages can be seen as systems. First, beyond their linear order, sentences exhibit a syntactic hierarchical structure. Therefore, they are structured entities. Second, although the principle of compositionality—which states that the meaning of a sentence is a function of the meanings of the parts of that sentence—is valid in general for natural languages, this principle has been shown to have many exceptions, where interpretation does not proceed bottom-up but top-down, from the meaning of the whole to the meaning of the parts. If the whole depends on its parts and the parts on the whole, then the sentence is a system that cannot be dissected into separate parts without losing something essential.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For written texts, “follow” is intended in a spatial sense; for oral texts, it is intended in a temporal sense.

  2. 2.

    Grice (1989) emphasizes that participants presuppose that their interlocutors say true and pertinent things.

References

  • Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague, Paris: Mouton.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Grice, P. (1989). Studies in the ways of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee, B. H., Meulen, A. G. ter, & Wall, R. E. (1990). Mathematical methods in linguistics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Recanati, F. (2004). Literal meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. (1980). The background of meaning. In J. Searle, F. Kiefer & M. Bierwisch (Eds.), Speech acts theory and pragmatics (pp. 221–232). Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aldo Frigerio .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Frigerio, A. (2019). Sentences and Systems. In: Minati, G., Abram, M., Pessa, E. (eds) Systemics of Incompleteness and Quasi-Systems. Contemporary Systems Thinking. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15277-2_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics