Abstract
The purpose of this contribution is to list some current, advanced systemic issues whilst searching for suitable, possibly theoretical, approaches. As is well known the peculiar aspect characterizing systemics is considered to be the process of acquisition, by collective interactive, interrelated constitutive elements, of properties different than those of the constituent elements themselves. We consider whether the peculiarity of acquiring a property is attributable only to systems, that is, to their processes of interaction among their constituent elements. We consider some elementary examples where the mechanism seems to be different, such as capillarity, composition of properties, density variations, optical properties, percolation, phase transitions, Quantum Field Theory, and the sloppiness of models. The mystical expression “the whole is more than the sum of its parts” could be dealt with in different ways, even within the constructivist role of the observer. We consider how some current systemic issues could take advantage of the adoption of new unconventional approaches, such as the ability to act on phenomena of emergence; the need to have suitable network representations for some primary systemic properties, e.g., adaptation and logical openness; theory-less systems based on concordances in Big Data (are they still systems?); incompleteness and quasi-systems. We consider the difficulties in applying systemic approaches to human societies which may often not be reducible to social systems.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Anderson, C. (2008). The end of theory: The data deluge makes the scientific method obsolete. Wired Magazine, 26(6). https://www.wired.com/2008/06/pb-theory
Barabási, A. L. (2002). Linked: The new science of networks. Cambridge, MA: Perseus.
Butts, R., & Brown, J. (Eds.). (1989). Constructivism and science. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Calude, C. S., & Longo, G. (2017). The deluge of spurious correlations in big data. Foundations of Science, 22, 595–612.
Cohen, R., & Havlin, S. (2010). Complex networks: Structure, robustness and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
de Gennes, P.-G., Brochard-Wyart, F., & Quéré, D. (2003). Capillarity and wetting phenomena: Drops, bubbles, pearls, waves. New York, NY: Springer.
Estrada, E. (2016). The structure of complex networks: Theory and applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Grimmett, G. R., & Kesten, H. (2012). Percolation theory at saint-flour. New York: Springer.
Hall, A. D., & Fagen, R. E. (1956). Definition of a system. General Systems Yearbook, 1, 18–28.
Ho, R. J. Y., & Gibaldi, M. (2013). Biotechnology and biopharmaceuticals: Transforming proteins and genes into drugs. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Licata, I. (2008). Logical openness in cognitive models. Epistemologia, 31, 177–191.
Minati, G. (2016). Knowledge to manage the knowledge society: The concept of theoretical incompleteness. Systems, 4 (3), 26. http://www.mdpi.com/2079-8954/4/3/26/pdf
Minati, G. (2017). The past, present and possible future for systems. International Journal of Systems and Society, 4(1), 1–9.
Minati, G., Penna, M. P., & Pessa, E. (1998). Thermodynamic and logical openness in general systems. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 15, 131–145.
Minati, G., & Pessa, E. (2006). Collective beings. New York, NY: Springer.
Minati, G., & Pessa, E. (2018). From collective beings to quasi-systems. New York, NY: Springer.
Sagiroglu, S., & Sinanc, D. (2013). Big data: A review. In 2013 International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems (CTS) (pp. 42–47). IEEE Xplore Digital Library. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261456895_Big_data_A_review
Solé, R. V. (2011). Phase transitions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Steffe, L. P., & Thompson, P. W. (Eds.). (2010). Radical constructivism in action: Building on the pioneering work of Ernst von Glasersfeld. London: Routledge.
Sukul, N. C., & Sukul, A. (2010). High dilution effects: Physical and biochemical basis. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Transtrum, M. K., Machta, B., Brown, K. S., Daniels, B. C., Myers, C. R., & Sethna, J. P. (2015). Perspective: Sloppiness and emergent theories in physics, biology, and beyond. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 143(1), 010901-1–13.
Von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General system theory. Development, applications. New York, NY: George Braziller.
Von Foerster, H. (2003). Understanding understanding: essays on cybernetics and cognition. New York, NY: Springer.
Von Glasersfeld, E. (Ed.). (1991a). Radical constructivism in mathematics education. Dordrecht: Springer.
Von Glasersfeld, E. (1991b). Knowing without metaphysics. Aspects of the radical constructivist position. In F. Steier (Ed.), Research and reflexivity (pp. 12–29). London, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. London: Falmer Press.
Web Resources
https://sourceforge.net/projects/msp3dfbsimulator/?source=navbar.
International Journal of High Dilution Research, at http://www.highdilution.org/index.php/ijhdr. Accessed September 6, 2017.
International Research Group on Very Low Dose and High Dilution Effects, at http://giri-society.org//. Accessed September 6, 2017.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Minati, G. (2019). On Some Open Issues in Systemics. In: Minati, G., Abram, M., Pessa, E. (eds) Systemics of Incompleteness and Quasi-Systems. Contemporary Systems Thinking. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15277-2_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15277-2_28
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-15276-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-15277-2
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)