Skip to main content

The Psychopathological Process as a System of Dysfunction and Systemic Compensation with Top-Down Modulation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Systemics of Incompleteness and Quasi-Systems

Abstract

In agreement with a systemic approach to mental illness, it is possible to detect five components in the pathogenesis of a psychiatric disorder: overload/subjective discomfort, relational disorders/social disorder, loss of emerging functions, appearance of less adaptable primary functions, activation of top-down reactions with the emergency of compensatory activities of collateral systems At the base of these processes it could be the reduced integration of a subsystem, which would lead to the loss of flexibility of the entire mind system, with the appearance of the five psychopathological components described above. To confirm this hypothesis we have observed data got from some studies performed with high-density EEG recording during neuropsychological tests. In these studies, subjects with a history of maltreatment (having problems in error management, meaning attribution, and social relations) resulted in a different brain integration than controls, with a reduction in the level of integration in some areas and with an appearance of new integrations in different areas; at the same time, behavioral response tends to extend over time with late aware operations, corresponding to the time window of the LPP event related potential (450–1000 ms), while controls seem perform quicker evaluations, in the time windows of the P3 wave (250–450 ms). Differently from control subjects, maltreated people have a greater difficulty also in distinguishing non-significant stimuli and in inhibiting unnecessary responses, although the presence of a warning stimulus supports the strengthening of the self-control functions. These responses would therefore confirm the reference theoretical model, as the loss of integration of some brain areas results in a loss of efficiency in the cognitive performance with less mind control in the responses. The possibility to reach comparable performances with those of control subjects seems to relate to a different resource use (collateral compensation) and to a greater consequent response delay (loss of efficiency). The presence of a collateral compensation may be explained with the presence of top-down modulation functions of emerging properties, which in the specific case may be represented by conscious mental activities and by the need for warranting congruity with the external request.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bressler, S. L., & Menon, V. (2010). Large-scale brain networks in cognition: Emerging methods and principles. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 277–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bressler, S. L., & Scott Kelso, J. A. (2016). Coordination dynamics in cognitive neuroscience. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 10, 397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bressloff, P. C. (2012). Spatiotemporal dynamics of continuum neural fields. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 45(3), 033001.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Coombes, S. (2005). Waves, bumps, and patterns in neural field theories. Biological Cybernetics, 93, 91–108.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Deco, G., Jirsa, V.K., Robinson, P.A., Brealspear, M., & Friston, K. (2008). The dynamic brain: From spiking neurons to neural masses and cortical fields. PLoS Computational Biology, 4(8), e1000092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marconi, P. L. (2014). La malattia mentale nella prospettiva sistemica. Rivista di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica, 3, 561–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meehan, T. P., & Bressler, S. L. (2012). Neurocognitive networks: Findings, models, and theory. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 36, 2232–2347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meijer, H. G. E., & Coombes, S. (2014). Traveling waves in models of neural tissue: From localised structures to periodic waves. EPJ Nonlinear Biomedical Physics, 2(3), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menon, V. (2011). Large-scale brain networks and psychopathology: A unifying triple network model. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(10), 483–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raichle, M. E. (2011). The restless brain. Brain Connectivity, 1(1), 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephen, K. E., Harrison, L. M., Kiebel, S. J., David, O., Penny, W. D., & Friston, K. J. (2006). Dynamic causal models of neural system dynamics: Current state and future extensions. Journal of Biosciences, 31, 129–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, X., Li, Q., Yu, X., Chen, K., Fleisher, A. S., Guo, X., et al. (2016). A triple network connectivity study of large-scale brain systems in cognitively normal APOE4 carriers. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 8, 231.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pier Luigi Marconi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Marconi, P.L., Penna, M.P., Pessa, E. (2019). The Psychopathological Process as a System of Dysfunction and Systemic Compensation with Top-Down Modulation. In: Minati, G., Abram, M., Pessa, E. (eds) Systemics of Incompleteness and Quasi-Systems. Contemporary Systems Thinking. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15277-2_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics