Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Synthetic Indexes for a Sustainable Information Society: Measuring ICT Adoption and Sustainability in Polish Government Units

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Technology for Management: Emerging Research and Applications (AITM 2018, ISM 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 346))

Abstract

The paper is complementary with papers [1,2,3] which aims were to advance information society research by examining and understanding the information and communication technologies (ICT) adoption within government units in the context of the sustainable information society (SIS). In [4] the impact of ICT adoption on sustainability within government units was explored, whereas this paper extends these research findings by new insights into SIS measurement. The aim of this paper is to propose an approach to the measurement of two constructs shaping SIS, i.e. ICT adoption and sustainability within government units. ICT adoption is described by four sub-constructs, i.e. ICT outlay, information culture, ICT management, and ICT quality, whereas sustainability is composed of ecological, economic, socio-cultural, and political sustainability. This study employs a quantitative approach and, additionally, Hellwig’s taxonomic measure of development is adopted for multivariate comparative analyses to evaluate ICT adoption and sustainability within government units. A value of the Hellwig’s synthetic indicator can be in the interval [0, 1] where a higher value of the indicator means that the object is closer to the pattern. The survey questionnaires were used and data collected from 185 government units were analyzed. We proposed and calculated five synthetic indicators for measuring ICT adoption, i.e. ICT adoption index and sub-indexes of ICT outlay, information culture, ICT management, and ICT quality as well as five synthetic indexes for evaluating sustainability, i.e. sustainability index and sub-indexes of ecological, economic, socio-cultural, and political sustainability. The research revealed that the medium level of ICT adoption index, i.e. in the interval (0.34, 0.68], is in the largest share of examined government units (68.6%). With regard to sustainability, the medium level of sustainability index is in the interval (0.32, 0.64] and is characteristic for 71.2% of government units. Furthermore, the high levels of ICT adoption and sustainability indexes exceeding the value of 0.68 for ICT adoption and 0.64 for sustainability are indicated by 17.0% and 14.4% of government units respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ziemba, E.: The contribution of ICT adoption to the sustainable information society. J. Comput. Inform. Syst. 59, 116–126 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2017.1312635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ziemba, E.: The ICT adoption in enterprises in the context of the sustainable information society. In: Ganzha, M., Maciaszek, L., Paprzycki M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2017 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems FedCSIS, 3–6 September 2017, pp. 1031–1038. Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague (2017). http://dx.doi.org/10.15439/2017F89

  3. Ziemba, E.: Synthetic indexes for a sustainable information society: measuring ICT adoption and sustainability in Polish enterprises. In: Ziemba, E. (ed.) AITM/ISM-2017. LNBIP, vol. 311, pp. 151–169. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77721-4_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Ziemba, E.: The ICT adoption in government units in the context of the sustainable information society. In: Ganzha, M., Maciaszek, L., Paprzycki M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2018 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems FedCSIS, 9–12 September 2018, pp. 725–733. Adam Mickiewicz University Poznan, Poland (2018). https://doi.org/10.15439/2018F116

  5. Fuchs, Ch.: Sustainable information society as ideology (part I). Inf. Tarsadalom 9(2), 7–19 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fuchs, Ch.: Sustainable information society as ideology (part II). Inf. Tarsadalom 9(3), 27–52 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fuchs, Ch.: Theoretical foundations of defining the participatory, co-operative, sustainable information society. Inf. Comm. Soc. 13(1), 23–47 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180902801585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hilty, L.M., Aebischer, B.: ICT for sustainability: an emerging research field. Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput. 310, 1–34 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09228-7_1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hilty, L.M., Hercheui, M.D.: ICT and sustainable development. In: Berleur, J., Hercheui, M.D., Hilty, L.M. (eds.) CIP/HCC-2010. IAICT, vol. 328, pp. 227–235. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15479-9_22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Houghton, John W.: ICT and the environment in developing countries: a review of opportunities and developments. In: Berleur, J., Hercheui, M.D., Hilty, Lorenz M. (eds.) CIP/HCC-2010. IAICT, vol. 328, pp. 236–247. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15479-9_23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Schauer, T.: The sustainable information society – vision and risks. The Club of Rome – European Support Centre, Vienna (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Servaes, J., Carpentier, N. (eds.): Towards a Sustainable Information Society. Deconstructing WSIS. Intellect, Portland (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ziemba, E.: The holistic and systems approach to a sustainable information society. J. Comput. Inform. Syst. 54(1), 106–116 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2013.11645676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ziemba, E. (ed.): Towards a Sustainable Information Society: People, Business and Public Administration Perspectives. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle upon Tyne (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Avgerou, C.: Discourses on ICT and development. Inf. Technol. Int. Dev. 6(3), 1–18 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Curry, E., Donnellan, B.: Understanding the maturity of sustainable ICT. In: vom Brocke, J., Seidel, S., Recker, J. (eds.) Green Business Process Management – Towards the Sustainable Enterprise, pp. 203–216. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27488-6_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Donnellan, B., Sheridan, C., Curry, E.: A capability maturity framework for sustainable information and communication technology. IT Prof. 13(1), 33–40 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2011.2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Guillemette, M.G., Paré, G.: Toward a new theory of the contribution of the IT function in organizations. MIS Q. 36(2), 529–551 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Guillemette, M.G., Paré, G.: Transformation of the information technology function in organizations: a case study in the manufacturing sector. Can. J. Adm. Sci. 29, 177–190 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Seidel, S., Recker, J., vom Brocke, J.: Sensemaking and sustainable practicing: functional affordances of information systems in green transformations. MIS Q. 37(4), 1275–1299 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Watson, R.T., Boudreau, M.C., Chen, A.J., Huber, M.: Green IS: building sustainable business practices. In: Watson, R.T. (ed.) Information Systems, pp. 247–261. Global Text Project, Athens (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bartle, J.R., Leuenberger, D.Z.: Sustainable Development for Public Administration. M.E. Sharpe, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  23. McDonald, W.: Sustainable development and public administration: challenges and innovation in citizen engagement. Rev. Pub. Adm. Manag. 5(2), 219 (2017). https://doi.org/10.4172/2315-7844.1000219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Parrado, S., Löffler, E.: Towards sustainable public administration. National Agency for the Evaluation of Public Policies and Quality of Services, Madrid (2010). http://www.eupan.eu/files/repository/Final_Report_on_Measuring_Sustainability.pdf. Accessed 4 Jan 2019

  25. Radu, L.: How to develop sustainable public administration reforms. Transylv. Rev. Adm. Sci. 44E, 180–195 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Svara, J.H., Brunet, J.R.: Social equity is a pillar of public administration. J. Public Aff. Educ. 11(3), 253–258 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2005.12001398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. United Nations: Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. A/RES/70/1 (2015). https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20web.pdf. Accessed 4 Jan 2019

  28. United Nations: Compendium of innovative practices in public governance and administration for sustainable development. Division for Public Administration and Development Management, Department of Economic and Social Affairs (2016). https://publicadministration.un.org/publications/content/PDFs/Compendium%20Public%20Governance%20and%20Administration%20for%20Sustainable%20Development.pdf. Accessed 4 Jan 2019

  29. Jurado-González, J., Gómez-Barroso, J.L.: What became of the information society and development? Assessing the information society’s relevance in the context of an economic crisis. Inf. Technol. Dev. 22(3), 436–463 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2016.1155143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Palvia, P., Baqir, N., Nemati, H.: ICT for socio-economic development: a citizens’ perspective. Inf. Manag. 55, 160–176 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2017.05.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Nord, J.H., Riggio, M.T., Paliszkiewicz, J.: Social and economic development through information and communications technologies: Italy. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 57(3), 278–285 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2016.1213621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ross, J.W., Vitale, M.R.: The ERP revolution: surviving vs thriving. Inf. Syst. Front. 2(2), 233–241 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026500224101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sachs, J.D.: The Age of Sustainable Development. Columbia University Press, New York (2015)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  34. Fuchs, C.: Sustainability and the information society. In: Berleur, J., Nurminen, M.I., Impagliazzo, J. (eds.) HCC 2006. IIFIP, vol. 223, pp. 219–230. Springer, Boston, MA (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-37876-3_18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  35. Nicolette, J., Burr, S., Rockel, M.: A practical approach for demonstrating environmental sustainability and stewardship through a net ecosystem service analysis. Sustainability 5, 2152–2177 (2013). https://doi.org/10.3390/su5052152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Nyström, T., Mustaquim, M.M.: Finding sustainability indicators for information system assessment. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Academic Mindtrek Conference, Tampere, 22–24 September 2015, pp. 106–113 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2818187.2818278

  37. Missimer, M., Robèrt, K.H., Broman, G.: A strategic approach to social sustainability. part 2: a principle-based definitions. J. Clean. Prod. 149(1), 42–52 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Khan, R.: How frugal innovation promotes social sustainability. Sustainability 8(10), 1034 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3390/su8101034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ngwenya, B.: Realigning governance: from e-government to e-democracy for social and economic development. In: Bwalya, K.J., Mutula, S. (eds.) Digital Solutions for Contemporary Democracy and Government, pp. 21–45. IGI Global, Hershey (2015). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-8430-0.ch002

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  40. ITU: International Telecommunication Union. Measuring the Information Society Report 2016. International Telecommunication Union, Geneva (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Information Economy Report 2017: Digitalization, Trade, and Development. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development UNCTAD (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ziemba, E., Żelazny, R.: Measuring the information society in Poland – dilemmas and a quantified image. In: Ganzha, M., Maciaszek, L., Paprzycki M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2018 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems FedCSIS, 9–12 September 2018, pp. 1185–1192. AGH University of Science and Technology, Cracow (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Bilbao-Osorio, B., Dutta, S., Lanvin, B. (eds.) The Global Information Technology Report 2014. Rewards and Risks of Big Data. World Economic Forum, Geneva (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  44. United Nations: E-government Survey 2018. Gearing e-government to support transformation towards sustainable and resilient societies. United Nations, New York (2018). https://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/E-Government%20Survey%202018_FINAL.pdf. Accessed 24 Dec 2018

  45. Van de Kerk, G., Manuel, A.R.: A comprehensive index for a sustainable society: the SSI—the sustainable society index. Ecol. Econ. 66, 228–242 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.01.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Panda, S., Chakraborty, M., Misra, S.K.: Assessment of social sustainable development in urban India by a composite index. Int. J. Sustain. Built Environ. 5, 435–450 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2016.08.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. ŚCSI: Strategia rozwoju społeczeństwa informacyjnego województwa śląskiego do roku 2015 [Strategy of information society development in Upper Silesia region]. Śląskie Centrum Społeczeństwa Informacyjnego, Katowice (2009). http://www.e-slask.pl/article/strategia_rozwoju_spoleczenstwa_informacyjnego_wojewodztwa_slaskiego_do_roku_2015. Accessed 12 June 2016

  48. Collis, J., Hussey, R.: Business Research: A Practical Guide for Undergraduate and Postgraduate Students. Palgrave Macmillan, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Ziemba, E., Papaj, T.: A pragmatic approach to e-government maturity in Poland – implementation and usage of SEKAP. In: Ferrari, E., Castelnovo, W. (eds.) Proceedings of 13th European Conference on eGovernment ECEG, 13–14 June 2013, pp. 560–570. University of Insubria, Como (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Hellwig, Z.: Zastosowanie metody taksono micznej do typologicznego podziału krajów ze względu na poziom rozwoju oraz zasoby i strukturę wykwalifikowanych kadr (The application of the taxonomic method to the typological division of a countries due to their level of development, resources and structure of qualified personnel – in Polish. Przegląd Statystyczny 4, 307–326 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Hwang, C.L., Yoon, K.: Multiple Attribute Decision-Making Methods and Applications. Springer, Heidelberg (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  52. Kaczmarczyk, P.: Application of the linear ordering methods in the voivodships research in the field of social media usage in enterprises in the period 2014–2017. J. Econ. Manag. 33(3), 39–62 (2018). https://doi.org/10.22367/jem.2018.33.03

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Bolibok, P., Żukowski, M.: The impact of inequalities in regional economic development on disparities in spatial distribution of cashless payment infrastructure in Poland. J. Econ. Manag. 21(3), 173–188 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

I wish to express my sincere gratitude to my friend Maria Jadamus-Hacura for helping with statistical analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Economics in Katowice, 1 Maja 50, 40-287, Katowice, Poland

    Ewa Ziemba

Authors
  1. Ewa Ziemba
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ewa Ziemba .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Economics in Katowice, Katowice, Poland

    Ewa Ziemba

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ziemba, E. (2019). Synthetic Indexes for a Sustainable Information Society: Measuring ICT Adoption and Sustainability in Polish Government Units. In: Ziemba, E. (eds) Information Technology for Management: Emerging Research and Applications. AITM ISM 2018 2018. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 346. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15154-6_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15154-6_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-15153-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-15154-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation