Abstract
Despite widespread use of video in higher education, there is still much to be learnt about what constitutes optimal teaching practices in leveraging digital resources for learning. Research on student interactions with online video suggests that practices can range from as minimal as setting passive-receptive viewing requirements through to teacher-structured purposeful engagement. Some approaches focus on either technological or pedagogical solutions, or both, to guide learning with video. This chapter examines several published cases of teaching practice with video in undergraduate education. It draws from these examples a focus on teacher-set analysis categories to guide student exploration of digital video content to help novices to scaffold their thinking. Various explicit and implicit uses of analysis categories within Australian, Taiwan, and US universities are reviewed from the literature. Some cases demonstrate transferability and/or scalability to apply to other disciplines. Overall, the literature reviewed indicates that the use of categories to inform the design of digital video analysis needs to ensure that an active learning challenge is retained. Analysis guided by teacher-set categories tends to be beneficial for student performance evaluation and development in particular, as well as knowledge acquisition/consolidation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Adams Becker, S., Cummins, M., Davis, A., Freeman, A., Hall Giesinger, C., & Ananthanarayanan, V. (2017). NMC horizon report: 2017 Higher education edition. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium. Retrieved August 10, 2017, from https://www.nmc.org/publication/nmc-horizon-report-2017-higher-education-edition/
Adams, C., Yin, Y., Vargas Madriz, L. F., & Mullen, S. (2014). A phenomenology of learning large: The tutorial sphere of xMOOC video lectures. Distance Education, 35(2), 202–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2014.917701
Barry, S. (2012). A video recording and viewing protocol for student group presentations: Assisting self-assessment through a Wiki environment. Computers & Education, 59(2012), 855–860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.008
Bates, A. W., & Sangra, A. (2011). Managing technology in higher education: Strategies for transforming teaching and learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass (Wiley).
Becker, M. R., Winn, P., & Erwin, S. L. (2015). Student-centered, e-learning design in a university classroom. In P. Isaías, J. Spector, D. Ifenthaler, & D. Sampson (Eds.), E-Learning systems, environments and approaches (pp. 229–246). Springer: Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05825-2_16
Biggs, J. B., & Tang, C. S. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill/Society for Research into Higher Education/Open University Press.
Blessing, S. B., & Blessing, J. S. (2015). Using a movie as a capstone activity for the introductory course. Teaching of Psychology, 42(1), 51–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628314562678
Blight, D., Davis, D., & Olsen, A. (2000). The globalization of higher education. In P. Scott (Ed.), Higher education re-formed. London: Falmer Press.
Bruner, J. S. (1960). The process of education. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
Cisco. (2013). Cisco Visual Networking Index: Forecast and Methodology, 2012–2017. Cisco white paper, San Jose, CA. Retrieved January 4, 2014, from http://www.cisco.com/en/US/solutions/collateral/ns341/ns525/ns537/ns705/ns827/white_p aper_c11-481360.pdf
Cisco (2017). Cisco Visual Networking Index: Forecast and Methodology, 2016–2021 (June 6, 2017). White Paper. San Jose, CA. Retrieved August 10, 2017, from https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/collateral/service-provider/visual-networking-index-vni/complete-white-paper-c11-481360.html
Clarke, M., Butler, C., Schmidt-Hansen, P., & Somerville, M. (2004). Quality assurance for distance learning: A case study at Brunel University. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(1), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2004.00363.x
Colasante, M. (2011). Using video annotation to reflect on and evaluate physical education pre-service teaching practice. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(1), 66–88. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.983
Colasante, M. (2016). Purposeful exploratory learning with video using analysis categories. In D.G. Sampson, J.M. Spector, D. Ifenthaler & Isaías P (Eds.), Proceedings from 13th International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in The Digital Age (CELDA), Mannheim, Germany, (pp. 245-252).
Colasante, M., & Douglas, K. (2016). Prepare-participate-connect: Active learning with video annotation. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 32(4), 68–91. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2123
Colasante, M., Kimpton, A., & Hallam, J. (2014). A curriculum model to promote (chiropractic) critical thinking with video-case annotation. In M. Gosper & D. Ifenthaler (Eds.), Curriculum models for the 21st century: Using learning technologies in higher education (pp. 181–210). New York, NY: Springer.
Colasante, M., & Lang, J. (2012). Can a media annotation tool enhance online engagement with learning? A multi-case work-in-progress report. In J. Cordeiro et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th International Conference of Computer Supported Education, Porto, Portugal (Vol. 2, pp. 455–464). Setúbal: SciTePress.
Conole, G. (2013). Designing for learning in an open world. New York, NY; London: Springer.
Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath and Company.
Douglas, K., Colasante, M., & Kimpton, A. (2015). Exploiting emerging video annotation technology and industry engagement to authentically prepare students for the complex world of work. In Proceedings HERDSA Conference, Melbourne, Australia (pp. 60–71).
Douglas, K., Lang, J., & Colasante, M. (2014). The challenges of blended learning using a media annotation tool. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 11(2), 7. Retrieved from http://ro.uow.edu.au/jutlp/vol11/iss2/7
Friess, D., Oliver, G., Quak, M., & Lau, A. (2016). Incorporating “virtual” and “real world” field trips into introductory geography modules. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 40(4), 546–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2016.1174818
Gibbings, P., Lidstone, J., & Bruce, C. (2015). Students’ experience of problem-based learning in virtual space. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(1), 74–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.934327
Hannafin, M., Hannafin, K., & Gabbitas, B. (2009). Re-examining cognition during student-centered, web-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57(6), 767–785. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/67539/
Hew, K. F. (2016). Promoting engagement in online courses: What strategies can we learn from three highly rated MOOCS. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(2), 320–341. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12235
Hsieh, P.-A. J., & Cho, V. (2011). Comparing e-Learning tools’ success: The case of instructor–student interactive vs. self-paced tools. Computers & Education, 57(3), 2025–2038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.05.002
Ibrahim, M., Antonenko, P. D., Greenwood, C. M., & Wheeler, D. (2012). Effects of segmenting, signalling, and weeding on learning from educational video. Learning, Media and Technology, 37(3), 220–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2011.585993
Ifenthaler, D. (2010). Introduction. In J. M. Spector et al. (Eds.), Learning and instruction in the digital age (pp. 3–10). New York, NY: Springer.
Kay, R. H. (2012). Exploring the use of video podcasts in education: A comprehensive review of the literature. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 820–831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.01.011
Lai, C.-Y. (2016). Training nursing students’ communication skills with online video peer assessment. Computers & Education, 97, 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.017
Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking university teaching; A framework for the effective use of learning technologies (2nd ed.). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a design science; Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. New York, NY: Routledge.
Laurillard, D., & Derntl, M. (2014). Learner centred design-overview. In Y. Mor, H. Mellar, S. Warburton, & N. Winters (Eds.), Practical design patterns for teaching and learning with technology (pp. 13–16). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Maier, H., de Heer, G., Ortac, A., & Kuijten, J. (2015). Capturing and displaying microscopic images used in medical diagnostics and forensic science using 4K video resolution – An application in higher education. Journal of Microscopy, 260(2), 175–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmi.12280
Merkt, M., Weigand, S., Heier, A., & Schwan, S. (2011). Learning with videos vs. learning with print: The role of interactive features. Learning and Instruction, 21(6), 687–704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.03.004
Miller, K., & Zhou, X. (2007). Learning from classroom video: What makes it compelling and what makes it hard. In R. Goldman et al. (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 321–334). Abingdon: Routledge.
Morris, L. V. (2013). MOOCs, emerging technologies, and quality (Editorial, 8 June 2013). Innovative Higher Education, 8, 251–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-013-9263-2
Murphy, K., & Barry, S. (2016). Feed-forward: Students gaining more from assessment via deeper engagement in video-recorded presentations. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(2), 213–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.996206
Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education (2nd ed.). Abingdon: RoutledgeFalmer.
Razzouk, R., & Shute, V. (2012). What is design thinking and why is it important? Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 330–348. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312457429
Rogow, F. (1997). Don’t turn off the lights! Tips for classroom use of ITV. New York, NY: Insighters Educational Consulting. (Unpublished teaching resource, received via email exchange between Rogow and first author, September 2013).
Selwyn, N. (2007). The use of computer technology in university teaching and learning: A critical perspective. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(2), 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00204.x
Selwyn, N. (2017). Education and technology: Key issues and debates (2nd ed.). London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Sharples, M., Adams, A., Ferguson, R., Gaved, M., McAndrew, P., Rienties, B., … Whitelock, D. (2014). Innovating pedagogy 2014: Open University innovation report 3. Milton Keynes: The Open University. Retrieved August 10, 2017 from http://www.openuniversity.edu/sites/www.openuniversity.edu/files/The_Open_University _Innovating_Pedagogy_2014_0.pdf
Sharples, M., de Roock, R., Ferguson, R., Gaved, M., Herodotou, C., Koh, E., … Wong, L. H. (2016). Innovating pedagogy 2016: Open University innovation report 5. Milton Keynes: The Open University. Retrieved August 10, 2017, from https://iet.open.ac.uk/file/innovating_pedagogy_2016.pdf
Snelson, C., Rice, K., & Wyzard, C. (2012). Research priorities for YouTube and video-sharing technologies: A Delphi study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(1), 119–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01168.x
Spector, J. M. (2008). Cognition and learning in the digital age: Promising research and practice. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 249–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.01.016
Wright, L. K., Newman, D. L., Cardinale, J. A., & Teese, R. (2016). Web-based Interactive Video Vignettes create a personalized active learning classroom for introducing big ideas in introductory biology. Bioscene, 42(2), 32–43.
Yousef, A. M. F., Chatti, M. A., & Schroeder, U. (2014). Video-based learning: A critical analysis of the research published in 2003-2013 and future visions. In eLmL 2014, The Sixth International Conference on Mobile, Hybrid, and On-line Learning (pp. 112–119). Copenhagen: IARIA XPS Press.
Yousef, A. M. F., Chatti, M. A., Schroeder, U., & Wosnitza, M. (2014). What drives a successful MOOC? An empirical examination of criteria to assure design quality of MOOCs. In 2014 IEEE 14th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (pp. 44–48). Washington, DC: IEEE.
Zhang, D., Zhou, L., Briggs, R. O., & Nunamaker, J. F., Jr. (2006). Instructional video in e-learning: Assessing the impact of interactive video on learning effectiveness. Information & Management, 43(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2005.01.004
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Colasante, M., Lang, J. (2019). Fostering Active Learning with Video Using Teacher-Set Analysis Categories. In: Sampson, D., Spector, J.M., Ifenthaler, D., Isaías, P., Sergis, S. (eds) Learning Technologies for Transforming Large-Scale Teaching, Learning, and Assessment. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15130-0_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15130-0_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-15129-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-15130-0
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)