Skip to main content

What Is Semantically Important to “Donald Trump”?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Human Centered Computing (HCC 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 11354))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1172 Accesses

Abstract

In the recent years, there is a growing interest in combining explicitly defined formal semantics (in the forms of ontologies) with distributional semantics “learnt” from a vast amount of data. In this paper, we try to bridge the best of the two worlds by introducing a new metrics called the “Semantic Impact” together with a novel method to derive a numerical measurement that can summarise how strong an ontological entity/concept impinges on the domain of discourse. More specifically, by taking into consideration the semantic representation of a concept that appears in documents and its correlation with other concepts in the same document corpus, we measure the importance of a concept with respect to the knowledge domain at a semantic level. Here, the “semantic” importance of an ontology concept is two-fold. Firstly, the concept needs to be informative. Secondly, it should be well connected (strong correlation) with other concepts in the same domain. We evaluated the proposed method with 200 BBC News articles about Donald Trump (between February 2017 and September 2017). The preliminary result is promising: we demonstrated that semantic impact can be learnt: the top 3 most important concepts are Event, Date and Organisation and the least essential concepts are Substance, Duration and EventEducation. The crux of our future work is to extend the evaluation with larger datasets and more diverse domains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Zúñiga, G.L.: Ontology: its transformation from philosophy to information systems. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems, vol. 2001, pp. 187–197. ACM, Ogunquit (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Maedche, A., Staab, S.J.: Ontology learning for the semantic web. IEEE Intell. Syst. 16(2), 72–79 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wong, W., Liu, W., Bennamoun, M.: Ontology learning from text: a look back and into the future. ACM Comput. Surv. 44(4), 1–36 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Horrocks, I.: Ontologies and the semantic web. Commun. ACM 51(12), 58–67 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Beel, J., Breitinger, C., Langer, S.J.: Evaluating the CC-IDF citation-weighting scheme: how effectively can ‘Inverse Document Frequency’ (IDF) be applied to references. In: Proceedings of the 12th iConference (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wan, J., Barnden, J.: A new semantic model for domain-ontology learning. In: Zu, Q., Hu, B., Gu, N., Seng, S. (eds.) HCC 2014. LNCS, vol. 8944, pp. 140–155. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15554-8_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Evert, S.: Distributional semantic models. NAACL HLT 2010 Tutorial Abstracts, pp. 15–18 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mikolov, T., et al.: Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.3781 (2013)

  9. Mikolov, T., et al.: Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. (NIPS 2013), vol. 26, pp. 3111–3119 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Reshef, D.N., et al.: Detecting novel associations in large data sets. Science 334(6062), 1518–1524 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. IBM: Natural Language Understanding. Watson Developer Cloud 2017. https://www.ibm.com/watson/developercloud/natural-language-understanding.html. Accessed 2017

  12. BBC: Trump says terror attacks ‘under-reported’: Is that true? US & Canada (2017). http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-38890090. Accessed 10 Feb 2017

  13. BBC. Core Concepts Ontology (2015). https://www.bbc.co.uk/ontologies/coreconcepts. Accessed 01 Apr 2018

  14. Deeplearning4J. Troubleshooting & Tuning Word2Vec. Word2Vec 2017. https://deeplearning4j.org/word2vec#trouble. Accessed 1 Feb 2017

  15. Glorot, X., Bengio, Y.: Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks. In: Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kingma, D.P., Ba, J.: Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980 (2014)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jizheng Wan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Wan, J., Barnden, J., Hu, B., Hancox, P. (2019). What Is Semantically Important to “Donald Trump”?. In: Tang, Y., Zu, Q., Rodríguez García, J. (eds) Human Centered Computing. HCC 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11354. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15127-0_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15127-0_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-15126-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-15127-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics