Skip to main content

Fiscal Structure and Residents’ Well-Being in Korea

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Perspectives on Community Well-Being

Part of the book series: Community Quality-of-Life and Well-Being ((CQLWB))

  • 419 Accesses

Abstract

Local financial expenditures have been the subject of focused inspection in Korea. There is little research devoted specifically either to the self-accountability of local governments or to a residents-oriented expenditure system. This chapter, in the context of local financial accountability, is an effort to find a way to reorganize the role apportionment for community well-being and explore it from the fiscal structure perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alvarez-Diaz, A., Gonzalez, L., & Radcliff, B. (2010). The politics of happiness: On the political determinants of quality of life in the American states. The Journal of Politics, 72(3), 894

    Google Scholar 

  • Babula, E., & Mrzyglod, U. (2013). Economic determinants of happiness among European nations. International Journal of Academic Research, 5(3), 519–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, Y. C. (2008). Relationships between national competitiveness and decentralization, Korean Association of Local Government Studies Summer Conference Proceedings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D., Frere, M., West, S., & Wiseman, J. (2010). Developing and using local community well-being Indicators: Learning from the experience of Community Indicators Victoria. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 45(1), Autumn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. David & M. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth: Essays in honour of Moses Abramovitz (pp. 89–125). Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrest, R., & Kearns, A. (2001). Social cohesion, social capital and the neighbourhood. Urban Studies, 38(12), 2125–2143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han, S., Kim, H., Lee, E.-S., & Lee, H. S. (2013). The contextual and compositional associations of social capital and subjective happiness: A multilevel analysis from Seoul, South Korea. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14, 1183–1200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helliwell, J., Huang, H., & Wang, S. (2014). Social capital and well-being in times of crisis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15, 145–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, J. P. (1998). The myth of self-esteem: Finding happiness and solving problems in America. St: Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, C. (2013). Social capital or social cohesion: What matters for subjective well-being? Social Indicators Research, 110, 891–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraut, R. (1979). Two conceptions of happiness. The Philosophical Review, 167–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y. K., & Dong K. K. (2007). A Study on the Quality of Life of Local Residents. Korean Policy Science Bulletin, 11(4), 223–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T. J., Park, C. M. & Song, K. S. (2005) Analysis of quality of life of local residents, Korean Local Government Review, 12(4), 75–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, A., Kier, C., Fung, T., Fung, L., & Sproule, R. (2011). Searching for happiness: The importance of social capital. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12, 443–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2014). How’s life in your region? Measuring regional and local well-being for policy making. Paris: OECD.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (1993). The prosperous community: Social capital and public life. The American Prospect, 4(13), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rath, T., & Harter, J. (2010). Well-being-the five essential elements. New York: Gallup Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soh, J. K. (1998) Definition of quality of life and its policy implications for urban policy, Regional Community Development Review, 23(1), 65–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, S. (2008). But what is Well-being? In A framework for analysis in social and development policy and practice (pp. 3–7). University of Bradford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman, J., & Brasher, K. (2008). Community well-being in an unwell World: Trends, challenges, and possibilities. Journal of Public Health Policy, 29(3), 353–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (NRF-2013S1A3A2054622).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Youngkyun Oh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Oh, Y. (2019). Fiscal Structure and Residents’ Well-Being in Korea. In: Kee, Y., Lee, S., Phillips, R. (eds) Perspectives on Community Well-Being . Community Quality-of-Life and Well-Being. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15115-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15115-7_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-15114-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-15115-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics