Advertisement

Cytogenetical Analysis of Bitter Gourd Genome

Chapter
Part of the Compendium of Plant Genomes book series (CPG)

Abstract

There are many studies about chromosomal characteristics of Momordica charantia, known as bitter gourd, a vegetable species with medicinal properties. The published data include characterization of the meiosis; haploid and diploid chromosome number; description of chromosome morphology, with chromosome length and primary constriction position; more recently there has been a focus of cytomolecular investigations, with localization of ribosomal DNA (rDNA) sequences and distribution pattern of heterochromatin bands. Usually, the M. charantia karyotype is presented as symmetric, composed of 22 small chromosomes with similar morphology, with two pairs of 45S rDNA, colocalized with CMA positive bands, and one pair of 5S rDNA. The chromosome counts for Momordica genus indicate two basic numbers: x = 11 and x = 14, dividing the genus into two groups with distinct characteristics. Polyploid counts were observed in both species’ groups. Variation in number and position of the cytogenetical markers were registered between the different species, evidenced by CMA fluorochrome banding. The karyotype evolution for Momordica may be related to the structural chromosome mutation associated with numeric chromosome variations.

Keywords

Basic chromosome number FISH Heterochromatic banding Karyotype Meiosis 

References

  1. Agarwal PK, Roy RP (1976) Natural polyploids in Cucurbitaceae I. Cytogenetical studies in triploid Momordica dioica Roxb. Caryologia 29(1):7–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Auquier P, Renard R (1975) Nombres chromosomiques de quelques angiospermes du Rwanda, Burundi et Kivu (Zaïre) I. Bull Jard Bot Belg 45:421–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ayyangar KR, Sampathkumar R (1978) On the chiasma specificity in the genus Momordica. Proc Indian Sci Congr Assoc 65(111):107Google Scholar
  4. Ayyangar KR (1976) Karyo-taxonomy, karyo-genetics and karyogeography of Cucurbitaceae. In: Nair PKK (ed) Aspects of plant sciences. Today & Tomorrow’s Printers & Publishers, New Delhi, India, pp 85–116Google Scholar
  5. Bai NH, Beevy SS (2012) Characterization of intraspecific F1 hybrids of Momordica charantia L. based on morphology, cytology and palynology. Cytologia 77(3):301–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bano M, Sharma G, Bhagat N (2019) Cytomorphological evaluation of cultivated and wild bitter gourds (Momordica charantia L.) of Jammu Province. Natl Acad Sci Lett 42(2):169–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barattake RC, Patil CG (2009) Identification of a RAPD marker linked to sex determination in Momordica dioica Roxb. Indian J Genet Pl Br 69(3):254–255Google Scholar
  8. Barrett SC, Hough J (2012) Sexual dimorphism in flowering plants. J Exp Bot 64(1):67–82PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Barros e Silva AE, Guerra M (2010) The meaning of DAPI bands observed after C-banding and FISH procedures. Biotech Histochem 85(2):115–125PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Behera TK, Singh K, Staub JE (2008) Comparative analysis of genetic diversity in Indian bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.) using RAPD and ISSR markers for developing crop improvement strategies. Sci Hort 115(3):209–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Beevy SS, Kuriachan P (1996) Chromosome numbers of south Indian Cucurbitaceae and a note on the cytological evolution in the family. J Cytol Genet 31:65–71Google Scholar
  12. Bhaduri PN, Bose PC (1947) Cytogenetical investigation in some cucurbits, with special reference to fragmentation of chromosomes as a physical basis of speciation. J Genet 48:237–256PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Bharathi LK, Munshi AD, Behera TK, Kattukunnel JJ, Das AB (2010) Cyto-morphological evidence for segmental allopolyploid origin of Teasle gourd (Momordica subangulata subsp. renigera). Euphytica 176(1):79–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bharathi LK, Munshi AD, Chandrashekaran S, Behera TK, Das AB, John KJ (2011) Cytotaxonomical analysis of Momordica L (Cucurbitaceae) species of Indian occurrence. J Genet 90(1):21–30PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Bhowmick BK, Jha S (2015) Differential heterochromatin distribution, flow cytometric genome size and meiotic behavior of chromosomes in three Cucurbitaceae species. Sci Hort 193:322–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bhowmick BK, Yamamoto M, Jha S (2016) Chromosomal localization of 45S rDNA, sex-specific C values, and heterochromatin distribution in Coccinia grandis (L.) Voigt. Protoplasma 253(1):201–209PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Chattopadhyay D, Sharma AK (1991) Chromosome studies and nuclear DNA in relation to sex difference and plant habit in two species of Cucurbitaceae. Cytologia 56:409–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chester M, Leitch AR, Solti PS, Soltis DE (2010) Review of the application of modern cytogenetic methods (FISH/GISH) to the study of reticulation (polyploidy/hybridization). Genes 1(2):166–192PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. De Storme N, Mason A (2014) Plant speciation through chromosome instability and ploidy change: cellular mechanisms, molecular factors and evolutionary relevance. Curr Plant Biol 1:10–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fernandes JB, Seguéla-Arnaud M, Larchevêque C, Lloyd AH, Mercier R (2018) Unleashing meiotic crossovers in hybrid plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 115(10):2431–2436PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Ghosh I, Bhowmick BK, Jha S (2018) Cytogenetics of two Indian varieties of Momordica charantia L. (bittergourd). Sci Hort 240:333–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Guha A, Sinha RK, Sinha S (2004) Average packing ratio as a parameter for analyzing the karyotypes of dioecious cucurbits. Caryologia 57(1):117–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Heslop-Harrison JS, Schwarzacher T (2011) Organization of the plant genome in chromosomes. Plant J 66(1):18–33PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Janse van Rensburg H, Robbertse PJ, Small JGC (1986) Morphology of the anther, microsporogenesis and pollen structure of Momordica balsamina. South Afr J Bot 51(2):15–132Google Scholar
  25. Kausar N, Yousaf Z, Younas A, Ahmed HS, Rasheed M, Arif A, Rehman HA (2015) Karyological analysis of bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L., Cucurbitaceae) from Southeast Asian countries. Plant Genet Resour Characteriz Utiliz 13(2):180–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kirsten L (2016) Meiosis in autopolyploid and allopolyploid Arabidopsis. Curr Opin Plant Biol 30:116–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kido M, Morikawa A, Saetiew K, Hoshi Y (2016) A cytogenetic study of three Japanese cultivars of Momordica charantia L. Cytologia 81(1):7–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Li K, Wang H, Wang J, Sun J, Li Z, Han Y (2016) Divergence between C. melo and African Cucumis species identified by chromosome painting and rDNA distribution pattern. Cytogenet Genome Res 150(2):150–155Google Scholar
  29. Lombello RA, Pinto-Maglio CAF (2007) Cytomolecular studies in Momordica charantia L. (Cucurbitaceae), a potential medicinal plant. Cytologia 72(4):415–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Luceño M, Guerra M (1996) Numerical variations in species exhibiting holocentric chromosomes: a nomenclatural proposal. Caryologia 49(3–4):301–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mandáková T, Schranz ME, Sharbel TF, de Jong H, Lysak MA (2015) Karyotype evolution in apomictic Boechera and the origin of the aberrant chromosomes. Plant J 82(5):785–793PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Mangenot S, Mangenot G (1962) Enquête sur les nombres chromosomiques dans une collection d’espèces tropicales. Bull Soc Bot Fran 109(sup2):411–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mehetre SS, Thombre MV (1980) Meiotic studies in Momordica cymbalaria Fenzl. Curr Sci 49:289Google Scholar
  34. Mohanty CR, Maharana T, Tripathy P, Senapati N (1994) Interspecific hybridization in Momordica species. Myso J Agri Sci 28:151–156Google Scholar
  35. Pagliarini MS (2000) Meiotic behavior of economically important plant species: the relationship between fertility and male sterility. Genet Mol Biol 23(4):997–1002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ramsey J, Schemske DW (1998) Pathways, mechanisms, and rates of polyploid formation in flowering plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 29(1):467–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rice A, Glick L, Abadi S, Einhorn M, Kopelman NM, Salman-Minkov A, Mayzel J, Chay O, Mayrose I (2014) The chromosome counts database (CCDB)—a community resource of plant chromosome numbers. New Phytol  https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13191. Accessed 17 Dec 2018PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Richharia RH, Ghosh PN (1953) Meiosis in Momordica dioica Roxb. Curr Sci 22:17–18Google Scholar
  39. Riley HP (1960) Chromosomes of some plants from the Kruger National Park. J South Afr Bot 26:37–44Google Scholar
  40. Roa F, Guerra M (2012) Distribution of 45S rDNA sites in chromosomes of plants: structural and evolutionary implications. BMC Evol Biol 12(1):225–237PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Roa F, Guerra M (2015) Non-random distribution of 5S rDNA sites and its association with 45S rDNA in plant chromosomes. Cytogenet Gen Res 146(3):243–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Romero-da Cruz MV, Urdampilleta JD, Forni-Martins ER, Moscone EA (2017) Cytogenetic markers for the characterization of Capsicum annuum L. cultivars. Plant Biosyst 151(1):84–91Google Scholar
  43. Roy RP, Thakur V, Trivedi RN (1966) Cytogenetical studies in Momordica. J Cytol Genet 1:30–40Google Scholar
  44. Sen R, Datta KB (1975) Sexual dimorphism and polyploidy in Momordica L. (Cucurbitaceae). In Proceedings of the 62nd Indian Science Congress. Part III, pp 127Google Scholar
  45. Shaina TJ, Beevy SS (2014) Chromosomal variations in Coccinia grandis (L.) Voigt, an actively evolving dioecious cucurbit exhibiting floral polymorphism. Nucleus 57(2):121–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shibata K (1962) Estudios citologicos de plantas silvestres y cultivadas. J Agri Sci 8:49–62Google Scholar
  47. Singh AK (1979) Cucurbitaceae and polyploidy. Cytologia 44(4):897–905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Soltis PS, Marchant DB, Van de Peer Y, Soltis DE (2015) Polyploidy and genome evolution in plants. Curr Opin Genet Dev 35:119–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sousa A, Fuchs J, Renner SS (2013) Molecular cytogenetics (FISH, GISH) of Coccinia grandis: a ca. 3 myr-old species of Cucurbitaceae with the largest Y/autosome divergence in flowering plants. Cytogenet Genome Res 139(2):107–118PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. The Plant List (2010) Version 1. Published on the Internet; http://www.theplantlist.org/. Accessed 15 Dec 2018
  51. Trivedi RN, Roy RP (1972) Cytological studies in some species of Momordica. Genetica 43:282–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Trivedi RN, Roy RP (1973) Cytogenetics of Momordica charantia and its polyploids. Cytologia 38:317–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Waminal NE, Kim NS, Kim HH (2011) Dual-color FISH karyotype analyses using rDNAs in three Cucurbitaceae species. Genes Genom 33(5):521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Waminal NE, Kim HH (2012) Dual-color FISH karyotype and rDNA distribution analyses on four Cucurbitaceae species. Hort Environ Biotechnol 53(1):49–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Whitaker TW (1933) Cytological and phylogenetic studies in the Cucurbitaceae. Bot Gaz 94(4):780–790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zaman MY, Alam SS (2009) Karyotype diversity in three cultivars of Momordica charantia L. Cytologia 74:473–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Natural and Human Sciences, Federal University of ABCSão Bernardo do CampoBrazil

Personalised recommendations