Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Intention Based Networking Management

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Developing Networks using Artificial Intelligence

Part of the book series: Wireless Networks ((WN))

  • 785 Accesses

Abstract

Compared to traditional networking which using command-line interfaces, intent-based networking abstracts network complexity and improves automation by eliminating manual configurations. It allows a user or administrator to send a simple request—using natural language—to plan, design and implement/operate the physical network which can improve network availability and agility. For example, an IT administrator can request improved voice quality for its voice-over-IP application, and the network can respond. For intent-based networking, the translation and validation system take a higher-level business policy (what) as input from end users and converts it to the necessary network configuration (how) by natural language understanding technology. In this chapter, we focus on how artificial intelligence technology can be used in the natural language understanding in translation and validation system. We firstly propose an effective model for the similarity metrics of English sentences. In the model, we first make use of word embedding and convolutional neural network (CNN) to produce a sentence vector and then leverage the information of the sentence vector pair to calculate the score of sentence similarity. Then, we propose the SM-CHI feature selection method based on the common method used in Chinese text classification. Besides, the improved CHI formula and synonym merging are used to select feature words so that the accuracy of classification can be improved and the feature dimension can be reduced. Finally, we present a novel approach which considers both the semantic and statistical information to improve the accuracy of text classification. The proposed approach computes semantic information based on HowNet and statistical information based on a kernel function with class-based weighting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.sogou.com/labs/resource/list_news.php.

  2. 2.

    http://www.nlpir.org/download/tc-corpus-answer.rar.

  3. 3.

    https://github.com/Irvinglove/Chinese_stop_words/blob/master/stopwords.txt.

References

  1. Mikolov Tomas, Sutskever Ilya, Chen Kai, Corrado Greg S, Dean Jeff. Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality. In: Burges C. J. C., Bottou L., Welling M., Ghahramani Z., Weinberger K. Q., eds. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 26, Curran Associates, Inc. 2013 (pp. 3111–3119).

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. Jiang, H. Zhang, R. Yong, and H. H. Chen, “Energy-efficient non-cooperative cognitive radio networks: Micro, meso, and macro views,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 52, no. 7, pp. 14–20, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mikolov Tomas, Chen Kai, Corrado Greg, Dean Jeffrey. Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space. Computation and Language. 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. Lei, L. Zhou, Q. Peng, and H. Yao, “Openflow based spatial information network architecture,” in International Conference on Wireless Communications & Signal Processing, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Collobert Ronan, Weston Jason. A unified architecture for natural language processing: deep neural networks with multitask learning. In: International conference on machine learning:160–167; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hu Baotian, Lu Zhengdong, Li Hang, Chen Qingcai. Convolutional neural network architectures for matching natural language sentences. In: International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems:2042–2050; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yin Wenpeng, Schütze Hinrich. Convolutional Neural Network for Paraphrase Identification. In: Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies:901–911; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  8. C. Jiang, C. Yan, and K. J. R. Liu, “Graphical evolutionary game for information diffusion over social networks,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 524–536, 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. wikipedia. tf-idf. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tf%E2%80%93idf.

  10. Tai Kai Sheng, Socher Richard, Manning Christopher D. Improved Semantic Representations From Tree-Structured Long Short-Term Memory Networks. Computer Science. 2015;5(1): 36.

    Google Scholar 

  11. F. Xu, L. Rong, C. Zhao, H. Yao, and J. Zhang, “Congestion-aware signaling aggregation scheme for cellular based underwater acoustic sensor network,” in IEEE International Conference on Communication Workshop, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kalchbrenner Nal, Grefenstette Edward, Blunsom Phil. A Convolutional Neural Network for Modelling Sentences. Meeting of the association for computational linguistics. 2014;655–665.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kim Yoon. Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentence Classification. Empirical methods in natural language processing. 2014;1746–1751.

    Google Scholar 

  14. He Hua, Gimpel Kevin, Lin Jimmy. Multi-Perspective Sentence Similarity Modeling with Convolutional Neural Networks. In: Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing:1576–1586; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  15. ——, “Multi-channel sensing and access game: Bayesian social learning with negative network externality,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 2176–2188, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  16. He Hua, Lin Jimmy. Pairwise Word Interaction Modeling with Deep Neural Networks for Semantic Similarity Measurement. In: Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies:937–948; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  17. H. Yao, X. Sun, Z. Zhou, L. Tang, and L. Shi, “Joint optimization of subchannel selection and spectrum sensing time for multiband cognitive radio networks,” in International Symposium on Communications & Information Technologies, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  18. S. Lei, Z. Zheng, T. Liang, H. Yao, and Z. Jing, “Ultra-wideband channel estimation based on Bayesian compressive sensing,” in International Symposium on Communications & Information Technologies, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Socher Richard, Karpathy Andrej, Le Quoc V., Manning Chris D., Ng Andrew Y.. Grounded compositional semantics for finding and describing images with sentences. Nlp.stanford.edu. 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mueller Jonas, Thyagarajan Aditya. Siamese recurrent architectures for learning sentence similarity. In: Thirtieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence:2786–2792; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  21. C. Jiang, Y. Chen, Y. H. Yang, C. Y. Wang, and K. J. R. Liu, “Dynamic Chinese restaurant game: Theory and application to cognitive radio networks,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1960–1973, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. T. Liang, Z. Zhou, L. Shi, H. Yao, J. Zhang, and Y. Ye, “Laplace prior based distributed compressive sensing,” in International 1st Conference on Communications & Networking in China, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Erk Katrin. A structured vector space model for word meaning in context. In: Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing:897–906; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Z. Zhen, T. Jiang, W. S. Zhang, and H. Yao, “Analysis speech of polypus patients based on channel parameters and fuzzy logic systems,” in Seventh International Conference on Fuzzy Systems & Knowledge Discovery, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lapata Mirella, Mitchell Jeff. Vector-based Models of Semantic Composition. 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mitchell J, Lapata M. Composition in distributional models of semantics. Cognitive Science. 2010;34(8):1388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Turney Peter D. Domain and Function: A Dual-Space Model of Semantic Relations and Compositions. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research. 2013;44(4):533–585.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Y. H. Yang, Y. Chen, C. Jiang, C. Y. Wang, and K. J. R. Liu, “Wireless access network selection game with negative network externality,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 5048–5060, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. H. Yao, Z. Zheng, L. He, and L. Zhang, “Optimal power allocation in joint spectrum underlay and overlay cognitive radio networks,” in International Conference on Cognitive Radio Oriented Wireless Networks & Communications, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Erk Katrin. Vector Space Models of Word Meaning and Phrase Meaning: A Survey. Language & Linguistics Compass. 2012;6(10):635–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Clarke Daoud. A Context-theoretic Framework for Compositionality in Distributional Semantics. Computational Linguistics. 2011;38(1):41–71.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Das Dipanjan, Smith Noah A. Paraphrase identification as probabilistic quasi-synchronous recognition. In: Joint Conference of the Meeting of the ACL and the International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the Afnlp: Volume:468–476; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  33. C. Jiang, C. Yan, and K. J. R. Liu, “Distributed adaptive networks: A graphical evolutionary game-theoretic view,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 61, no. 22, pp. 5675–5688, 2013.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. H. Yao, Z. Zheng, L. Zhang, L. He, T. Liang, and K. S. Kwak, “An efficient power allocation scheme in joint spectrum overlay and underlay cognitive radio networks,” in International Conference on Communications & Information Technologies, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Dolan Bill, Quirk Chris, Brockett Chris. Unsupervised construction of large paraphrase corpora: exploiting massively parallel news sources. In: International Conference on Computational Linguistics:350; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Nakov Preslav, Zesch Torsten, eds. Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation. The Association for Computer Linguistics 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Marelli Marco, Bentivogli Luisa, Baroni Marco, Bernardi Raffaella, Menini Stefano, Zamparelli Roberto. Semeval-2014 Task 1: Evaluation of compositional distributional semantic models on full sentences through semantic relatedness and textual entailment. In: Semeval 2014: International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation:16; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Zhao Jiang, Zhu Tiantian, Lan Man. ECNU: One Stone Two Birds: Ensemble of Heterogenous Measures for Semantic Relatedness and Textual Entailment. In: International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation:271–277; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  39. B. Li, Z. Zheng, W. Zou, K. S. Kwak, F. Wu, and H. Yao, “A nonlinear transform and its application in the optimum receiving of ultra narrow-band,” in International Conference on Communications & Information Technologies, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Bjerva Johannes, Bos Johan, Goot Rob Van Der, Nissim Malvina. The Meaning Factory: Formal Semantics for Recognizing Textual Entailment and Determining Semantic Similarity. In: SemEval-2014 Workshop; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Jimenez Sergio, Dueñas George Enrique, Baquero Julia, Gelbukh Alexander. UNAL-NLP: Combining Soft Cardinality Features for Semantic Textual Similarity, Relatedness and Entailment. In: Semeval; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Lai Alice, Hockenmaier Julia. Illinois-LH: A Denotational and Distributional Approach to Semantics. In: International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation:329–334; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Bestgen Yves. CECL: a New Baseline and a Non-Compositional Approach for the Sick Benchmark. In: International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation:160–165; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  44. H. Yao, L. Zhang, Z. Ran, and Z. Zheng, “An efficient game-based competitive spectrum offering scheme in cognitive radio networks with dynamic topology,” in IEEE International Conference on Communication Technology, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Proisl Thomas, Evert Stefan, Greiner Paul, Kabashi Besim. SemantiKLUE: Robust Semantic Similarity at Multiple Levels Using Maximum Weight Matching. In: International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation:532–540; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Rus Vasile, Mccarthy Philip M., Lintean Mihai C., Mcnamara Danielle S., Graesser Arthur C. Paraphrase Identification with Lexico-Syntactic Graph Subsumption. In: International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, May 15–17, 2008, Coconut Grove, Florida, USA:201–206; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Blacoe William, Lapata Mirella. A comparison of vector-based representations for semantic composition. In: Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning:546–556; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Z. Ran, L. Zhang, Y. Fei, H. Yao, and Z. Zheng, Balanced clustering multi-hop routing algorithm for LEACH protocol in wireless sensor networks, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Fernando Samuel, Stevenson Mark. A Semantic Similarity Approach to Paraphrase Detection. Computational Linguistics UK Annual Research Colloquium. 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Yao Haipeng, Liu Chong, Zhang Peiying, Wang Luyao. A feature selection method based on synonym merging in text classification system. Eurasip Journal on Wireless Communications & Networking. 2017;2017(1):166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. C. Jiang, C. Yan, G. Yang, and K. J. R. Liu, “Joint spectrum sensing and access evolutionary game in cognitive radio networks,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 2470–2483, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Hwee Tou Ng, Wei Boon Goh, and Kok Leong Low. Feature selection, perceptron learning, and a usability case study for text categorization. In International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 67–73. ACM, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Yiming Yang and Jan O Pedersen. A comparative study on feature selection in text categorization. In Fourteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 412–420. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Gui Chuan Feng and Shubin Cai. An improved feature extraction algorithm based on chi and mi. 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Yan Tang and Ting Xiao. An improved χ 2 (chi) statistics method for text feature selection. In International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Software Engineering, pages 1–4. IEEE, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Thorsten Joachims. Text categorization with Support Vector Machines: Learning with many relevant features. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  57. H. P. Yao, L. Y. Zhang, Z. Zhou, and X. U. Fang-Min, “A handoff algorithm based on grey prediction model for bluetooth network,” Radio Engineering of China, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  58. C. Jiang, Y. Chen, K. J. R. Liu, and Y. Ren, “Renewal-theoretical dynamic spectrum access in cognitive radio networks with unknown primary behavior,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 406–416, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Ted Dunning. Accurate methods for the statistics of surprise and coincidence. Linguistics-74 Computational Dirk Geeraerts Stefan Grondelaers and, 19(1):61–74, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  60. J. Tian and W. Zhao. Words similarity algorithm based on tongyici cilin in semantic web adaptive learning system. Journal of Jilin University, 28(06):602–608, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  61. H. Yao, Z. Zhang, and Y. Liu, “Research on the embedded sim technology in internet of things,” Information & Communications Technologies, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Sijun Qin, Jia Song, Pengzhou Zhang, and Yue Tan. Feature selection for text classification based on part of speech filter and synonym merge. In International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery, pages 681–685, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  63. H. Yao, Z. Yang, H. Jiang, and L. Ma, “A scheme of ad-hoc-based d2d communication in cellular networks.” Adhoc & Sensor Wireless Networks, vol. 32, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Susan Dumais, John Platt, David Heckerman, and Mehran Sahami. Inductive learning algorithms and representations for text categorization. In Proceedings of the seventh international conference on Information and knowledge management, pages 148–155. ACM, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Quoc V. Le and Tomas Mikolov. Distributed representations of sentences and documents. 4:II–1188, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Jeffrey Pennington, Richard Socher, and Christopher Manning. Glove: Global vectors for word representation. In Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 1532–1543, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Bernhard E Boser, Isabelle M Guyon, and Vladimir N Vapnik. A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers. In Proceedings of the fifth annual workshop on Computational learning theory, pages 144–152. ACM, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Stephan R Sain. The nature of statistical learning theory. Technometrics, 38(4):409–409, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Thorsten Joachims. Text categorization with support vector machines: Learning with many relevant features. In European conference on machine learning, pages 137–142. Springer, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Shun-ichi Amari and Si Wu. Improving support vector machine classifiers by modifying kernel functions. Neural Networks, 12(6):783–789, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Jamal Abdul Nasir, Asim Karim, George Tsatsaronis, and Iraklis Varlamis. A knowledge-based semantic kernel for text classification. In International Symposium on String Processing and Information Retrieval, pages 261–266. Springer, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Berna Altınel, Banu Diri, and Murat Can Ganiz. A novel semantic smoothing kernel for text classification with class-based weighting. Knowledge-Based Systems, 89:265–277, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  73. George Siolas and Florence d’Alché Buc. Support vector machines based on a semantic kernel for text categorization. In Neural Networks, 2000. IJCNN 2000, Proceedings of the IEEE-INNS-ENNS International Joint Conference on, volume 5, pages 205–209. IEEE, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Dimitrios Mavroeidis, George Tsatsaronis, Michalis Vazirgiannis, Martin Theobald, and Gerhard Weikum. Word sense disambiguation for exploiting hierarchical thesauri in text classification. In European Conference on Principles of Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, pages 181–192. Springer, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  75. C Fellbaum and G Miller. WordNet:An Electronic Lexical Database. MIT Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Yan-Lan Zhu, Jin Min, Ya-qian Zhou, Xuan-jing Huang, and Li-De Wu. Semantic orientation computing based on hownet. Journal of Chinese Information Processing, 20(1):14–20, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Pei-Ying Zhang. A hownet-based semantic relatedness kernel for text classification. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 11(4):1909–1915, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Jiaju Mei. Tongyi ci cilin. Shangai cishu chubanshe, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Nicholas E. Evangelopoulos. Latent semantic analysis. Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science, 4(6):683, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Berna Altlnel, Murat Can Ganiz, and Banu Diri. A novel higher-order semantic kernel for text classification. In Electronics, Computer and Computation (ICECCO), 2013 International Conference on, pages 216–219. IEEE, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Berna Altinel, Murat Can Ganiz, and Banu Diri. A semantic kernel for text classification based on iterative higher-order relations between words and documents. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing, pages 505–517. Springer, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Berna Altinel, Murat Can Ganiz, and Banu Diri. A simple semantic kernel approach for svm using higher-order paths. In Innovations in Intelligent Systems and Applications (INISTA) Proceedings, 2014 IEEE International Symposium on, pages 431–435. IEEE, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Berna Altınel, Murat Can Ganiz, and Banu Diri. A corpus-based semantic kernel for text classification by using meaning values of terms. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 43:54–66, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  84. H. Yao, Y. Liu, and C. Fang, “An abnormal network traffic detection algorithm based on big data analysis.” International Journal of Computers, Communications & Control, vol. 11, no. 4, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Karen Sparck Jones. A statistical interpretation of term specificity and its application in retrieval. Journal of documentation, 28(1):11–21, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Gerard Salton and Christopher Buckley. Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval. Information processing & management, 24(5):513–523, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Youngjoong Ko and Jungyun Seo. Automatic text categorization by unsupervised learning. In Proceedings of the 18th conference on Computational linguistics-Volume 1, pages 453–459. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Verayuth Lertnattee and Thanaruk Theeramunkong. Analysis of inverse class frequency in centroid-based text classification. In Communications and Information Technology, 2004. ISCIT 2004. IEEE International Symposium on, volume 2, pages 1171–1176. IEEE, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Göksel Biricik, Banu Diri, Ahmet Co, et al. A new method for attribute extraction with application on text classification. In Soft Computing, Computing with Words and Perceptions in System Analysis, Decision and Control, 2009. ICSCCW 2009. Fifth International Conference on, pages 1–4. IEEE, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  90. GÖKSEL BİRİCİK, Banu Diri, and AHMET COŞKUN SÖNMEZ. Abstract feature extraction for text classification. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering & Computer Sciences, 20(Sup. 1):1137–1159, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Simon Parsons. Introduction to machine learning by ethem alpaydin, MIT press, 0-262-01211-1, 400 pp., $50.00/£ 32.95, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Nello Cristianini, John Shawe-Taylor, and Huma Lodhi. Latent semantic kernels. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 18(2-3):127–152, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Edward Loper and Steven Bird. Nltk: the natural language toolkit. In Acl-02 Workshop on Effective TOOLS and Methodologies for Teaching Natural Language Processing and Computational Linguistics, pages 63–70, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Fabian Pedregosa, Alexandre Gramfort, Vincent Michel, Bertrand Thirion, Olivier Grisel, Mathieu Blondel, Peter Prettenhofer, Ron Weiss, Vincent Dubourg, and Jake Vanderplas. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12(10):2825–2830, 2011.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  95. Mohamed El Kourdi, Amine Bensaid, and Tajje Eddine Rachidi. Automatic arabic document categorization based on the naïve bayes algorithm. In The Workshop on Computational Approaches To Arabic Script-Based Languages, pages 51–58, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Mostafa M Syiam, Zaki T Fayed, and Mena B Habib. An intelligent system for Arabic text categorization. International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Information Sciences, 6(1):1–19, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  97. Xiang Zhang, Junbo Zhao, and Yann Lecun. Character-level convolutional networks for text classification. pages 649–657, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sch of Info & Communication Engg, Beijing University of Posts and Telecomm, China, Beijing, China

    Haipeng Yao

  2. Tsinghua Space Center, Tsinghua University, Beijing, Beijing, China

    Chunxiao Jiang

  3. Dept of Electrical & Computer Engg, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Omaha, NE, USA

    Yi Qian

Authors
  1. Haipeng Yao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chunxiao Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yi Qian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Yao, H., Jiang, C., Qian, Y. (2019). Intention Based Networking Management. In: Developing Networks using Artificial Intelligence. Wireless Networks. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15028-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15028-0_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-15027-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-15028-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation