Abstract
This chapter highlights the old cultural idea that love is the benevolent intentions and actions toward other; it is the wishing and doing something good to other. It requires the feeling of empathy, compassion, caring, altruism, and sometimes, abnegation of self-interests. The chapter reviews cross-cultural studies of agape love attitude. The studies of cultural practices of gift-giving within romantic love model are reviewed.
The chapter reviews the variety of experiences and expressions of benevolent love, such as agape and compassion, the methods and measures, which researchers employed to study those, and the results that they obtained in their studies. The chapter describes in details (1) the research designs, (2) methods, (3) instruments and measures, (4) samples (including their location, sample size, and other details), and (5) the data and results of studies (including descriptive statistics, such as means and size of correlations).
The details of descriptive statistics help readers understand what the differences in the means for cultural samples are, what is the size of correlations, and other statistics. These details allow readers to make independent judgments about reliability and validity of results.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
The items of LAS were rated and scored with 1 = strongly agree, and 5 = strongly disagree. Therefore, the lower score stands for the higher love style measured by a given item. The agreement side of the scale (positive endorsement of an item) was indicated in scores below 3—the neutral point.
- 2.
The items of LAS were rated and scored with 1 = strongly agree, and 5 = strongly disagree. Therefore, the lower score stands for the higher love style measured by a given item.
- 3.
The items of LAS were rated and scored with 1 = strongly agree, and 5 = strongly disagree. Therefore, the lower score stands for the higher love style measured by a given item.
- 4.
The items of LAS were rated and scored with 1 = strongly agree, and 5 = strongly disagree. Therefore, the lower score stands for the higher love style measured by a given item.
- 5.
The items of LAS were rated and scored with 1 = strongly agree, and 5 = strongly disagree. Therefore, the lower score stands for the higher love style measured by a given item.
References
Areni, C. S., Kiecker, P., & Palan, K. M. (1998). Is it better to give than to receive? Exploring gender differences in the meaning of memorable gifts. Psychology & Marketing, 15(1), 81–109.
Belk, R. W. (1996). “The Perfect Gift” In Otnes, C. and Beltramini, R. F. (eds.) Gift Giving: A Research Anthology, pp. 59–84. Bowling Green, OH: Bowling Green State University Popular Press.
Belk, R. W., & Coon, G. S. (1993). Gift giving as agapic love: An alternative to the exchange paradigm based on dating experiences. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(3), 393–417.
Berg, J. H., & McQuinn, R. D. (1986). Attraction and exchange in continuing and noncontinuing dating relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(5), 942.
Carrier, J. (1990). Gifts in a world of commodities: the ideology of the perfect gift in American society. Social Analysis: The International Journal of Social and Cultural Practice, (29), 19–37.
Contreras, R., Hendrick, S. S., & Hendrick, C. (1996). Perspectives on marital love and satisfaction in Mexican American and Anglo-American couples. Journal of Counseling & Development, 74(4), 408–415.
de Munck, V. C., Korotayev, A., de Munck, J., & Khaltourina, D. (2011). Cross-cultural analysis of models of romantic love among US residents, Russians, and Lithuanians. Cross-Cultural Research, 45(2), 128–154.
de Munck, V., Korotayev, A., & Khaltourina, D. (2009). A comparative study of the structure of love in the US and Russia: Finding a common core of characteristics and national and gender differences. Ethnology: An International Journal of Cultural and Social Anthropology, 48(4), 337–357.
Ehman, R. R. (1989). Personal love. In A. Soble (Ed.), Eros, agape, and philia: Readings in the philosophy of love (pp. 254–272). New York, NY: Paragon House.
Fromm, E. (1956/2006). The art of loving: The centennial edition. New York, NY: The Continuing International Publishing (originally published in 1956).
Gilbert, P. (2010). The compassionate mind: A new approach to life’s challenges. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Publications.
Goodwin, R., & Findlay, C. (1997). “We were just fated together” … Chinese love and the concept of yuan in England and Hong Kong. Personal Relationships, 4(1), 85–92.
Hendrick, C., & Hendrick, S. (1986). A theory and method of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 392–402.
Hendrick, C., & Hendrick, S. (1989). Research on love: Does it measure up? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 784–794.
Hendrick, C., Hendrick, S. S., & Dicke, A. (1998). The love attitudes scale: Short form. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15(2), 147–159.
Hwang, J. Y., Plante, T., & Lackey, K. (2008). The development of the Santa Clara brief compassion scale: An abbreviation of Sprecher and Fehr’s compassionate love scale. Pastoral Psychology, 56(4), 421–428.
Jankowiak, W., Shen, Y., Yao, S., Wang, C., & Volsche, S. (2015). Investigating love’s universal attributes: A research report from China. Cross-Cultural Research, 49(4), 422–436.
Katz, J. M. (1976). How do you love me? Let me count the ways (the phenomenology of being loved). Sociological Inquiry, 46(1), 17–22.
Kline, S. L., Horton, B., & Zhang, S. (2008). Communicating love: Comparisons between American and East Asian university students. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 32, 200–214.
Kraus, S., & Sears, S. (2009). Measuring the immeasurables: Development and initial validation of the Self-Other Four Immeasurables (SOFI) scale based on Buddhist teachings on loving kindness, compassion, joy, and equanimity. Social Indicators Research, 92(1), 169–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9300-1
Lama, D. (1995). The power of compassion. New Delhi, India: Harper-Collins.
Lama, D. (2002). An open heart: Practicing compassion in everyday life. London, UK: Hachette UK.
Lee, J. (1973). The colors of love: The exploration of the ways of loving. Don Mills, ON: New Press.
Lee, J. (1976). The colors of love. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Lee, J. A. (1977). A typology of styles of loving. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 3(2), 173–182.
Leon, J. J., Parra, F., Cheng, T., & Flores, R. E. (1995). Love-styles among Latino community college students in Los Angeles. Psychological Reports, 77(2), 527–530.
Leon, J., Philbrick, J. L., Parra, E., Escobedo, E., & Malcesini, F. (1994). Love-styles among university students in Mexico. Psychological Reports, 74, 307–310.
Lomas, T. (2018). The flavours of love: A cross‐cultural lexical analysis. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 48, 134–152.
Luhmann, N. (1986). In J. Gaines & D. L. Jones (Eds.), Love as passion: The codification of intimacy (Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lutz, C. (1982). The domain of emotion words on Ifaluk. American Ethnologist, 9(1), 113–128.
Lutz, C. (1988). Unnatural emotions: Everyday sentiments on a Micronesian atoll and their challenge to Western theory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Murstein, B. I., Merighi, J. R., & Vyse, S. A. (1991). Love styles in the United States and France: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 10(1), 37–46.
Neto, F. (2007). Love styles: A cross-cultural study of British, Indian, and Portuguese college students. Journal of comparative family studies, 38(2), 239–254.
Neto, F., Mullet, E., Deschamps, J. C., Barros, J., Benvindo, R., Camino, L., et al. (2000). Cross-cultural variations in attitudes toward love. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31(5), 626–635.
Nygren, A. (1989). Agape and eros. In A. Soble (Ed.), Eros, agape, and philia: Readings in the philosophy of love (pp. 85–95). New York, NY: Paragon House.
Parry, J. (1986). The gift, the Indian gift and the ‘Indian gift’. Man, 21, 453–473.
Pérez, V. A. F., Fiol, E. B., Guzmán, C. N., Palmer, C. R., & Buades, E. G. (2009). The concept of love in Spain. Psychology in Spain, 13(1), 40–47.
Sanrı, Ç., & Goodwin, R. (2013). Values and love styles in Turkey and Great Britain: An intercultural and intracultural comparison. International Journal of Psychology, 48(5), 837–845.
Smith, R., & Klases, A. (2016). Predictors of Love Attitudes: The contribution of cultural orientation, gender attachment style, relationship length and age in participants from the UK and Hong Kong. Interpersona: An International Journal on Personal Relationships, 10(1), 90–108.
Soble, A. (1990). The Structure of Love. New Haven; London: Yale University Press.
Solomon, R. C. (1995). The cross-cultural comparison of emotion. In J. Marks & R. T. Ames (Eds.), Emotions in Asian thought (pp. 253–294). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Sprecher, S., Aron, A., Hatfield, E., Cortese, A., Potapova, E., & Levitskaya, A. (1994). Love: American style, Russian style, and Japanese style. Personal Relationships, 1, 349–369.
Sprecher, S., & Fehr, B. (2005). Compassionate love for close others and humanity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22(5), 629–651.
Sprecher, S., & Toro-Morn, M. (2002). A study of men and women from different sides of earth to determine if men are from Mars and women are from Venus in their beliefs about love and romantic relationships. Sex Roles, 46(5-6), 131–147.
Swensen, C. H. (1972). The behavior of love. In H. A. Otto (Ed.), Love today: A new exploration (pp. 86–101). New York, NY: Association Press.
Tournier, P. (1963). In J. S. Gilmour (Ed.), The meaning of gifts (Trans.). Richmond, VA: John Knox.
Ubillos, S., Zubieta, E., Paez, D., Deschamps, J.C., Ezeiza, A., & Vera, A. (2001). Amor, cultura y sexo. Revista Electronica de Motivacion y Emocion (REME), 4(8-9). Retrieved from http://reme.uji.es/articulos/aubils9251701102/texto.html
Wierzbicka, A. (1999). Emotions across languages and cultures: Diversity and universals. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Karandashev, V. (2019). Love as Benevolence. In: Cross-Cultural Perspectives on the Experience and Expression of Love . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15020-4_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15020-4_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-15019-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-15020-4
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)