Abstract
Numerous examples exist where teams and organizations perform at a high level only to see performance decrease over time. This phenomenon can be observed in manufacturing and engineering organizations where teams provide value to organizations through the use of tools, processes, and procedures to address customer needs. The rapid acceleration of digital innovations aimed at making teams more effective have actually compounded these problems by increasing the complexity of a task while ignoring the capability of the team to harness these new tools. The aim of this paper is to provide managers with a theoretical analysis of how sociotechnical interactions influence team and organizational performance within a larger context of environmental demands. This paper will propose a team process capability model to explain how dynamic social and technical interactions coupled with organizational decision-making influence team and organizational performance. The model will illustrate how team social and technical system interactions are influenced by managerial decisions which subsequently influences its performance. The concept of requisite process capability will be introduced to the reader within the context of resiliency factors such as dynamic capability and environmental uncertainty. Academic readers can benefit from this paper through applying the concepts within this paper to future research related to sociotechnical and organizational interactions. Managers can use the information shared in this paper to improve his or her understanding of how team performance is influenced by such systemic changes as digital and technical innovations or system complexity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Bicheno, J.: The Service Systems Toolbox: Integrating Lean Thinking, Systems Thinking, and Design Thinking, 2nd edn. PICSIE Books, Buckingham, UK (2012)
Cusumano, M.A.: Technology strategy and management reflections on the Toyota debacle. Commun. ACM 54(1), 33–35 (2011)
Kerrigan, M.: A capability maturity model for digital investigations. Digital Investig. 10(1), 19–33 (2013)
Mandal, S.: An empirical competence-capability model of supply chain resilience. Int. J. Disast. Resilience Built Environ. 8(2), 190–208 (2017)
Naikar, N., Pearce, B., Drumm, D., Sanderson, P.: Designing teams for first-of-a-kind, complex systems using the initial phases of cognitive work analysis: case study. Hum. Fact. 45(2), 202–217 (2003)
Naikar, N., Sanderson, P.: Work domain analysis for training-system definition and acquisition. Int. J. Aviat. Psychol. 9(3), 271–290 (1999)
Pasmore, W.: Designing Effective Organizations: The Sociotechnical Systems Perspective, 1st edn. Wiley, New York (1988)
Vicente, K.: Cognitive Work Analysis: Towards Safe, Productive, and Healthy Computer-Based Work, 1st edn. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ (1999)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sexe, F.S. (2019). The Team Process Capability Model: A Sociotechnical Theoretical Framework for Understanding How Teams Interact with Their Environment. In: Reis, J., Pinelas, S., Melão, N. (eds) Industrial Engineering and Operations Management I. IJCIEOM 2018. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, vol 280. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14969-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14969-7_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-14968-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-14969-7
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)