Skip to main content

A Bibliographic Review of Software Metrics: Applying the Consolidated Meta-Analytic Approach

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics ((PROMS,volume 280))

Abstract

This research aimed to provide an integrating model for the principle contributions of the scientific literature on software metrics with an impact on that field. Software metrics has emerged as a crucially important aspect of software development planning insofar as indicators representing development costs and the effort involved are essential for the formulation of new systems proposals and the analysis of the systems already in use inside organizations. To that end an exploratory, quantitative, bibliometric study was carried out using the Theory of the Consolidated Meta-analytic Approach. The study retrieved 658 relevant registrations from the Web of Science database for the period 2010–2018. The main contributions and most important approaches are presented together with an integrating model with three main classifications (a) Metrics for Quality in Cloud (40.93%), (b) Software Metrics as Technique (29.30%), and (c) Current Uses of Software metrics (29.77%). In addition the taxonomy of the most cited articles was established and comparisons were made with the results from multi-language databases like Scopus and Google scholar.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Voulgaropoulou, S., Spanos, G.: Analyzing measurements of the R statistical open source software (2012). ieeexplore.ieee.org

  2. Kitchenham, B.: What’s up with software metrics?—a preliminary mapping study. J. Syst. Softw. 83(1), 37–51 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Melo, A., Br, M.A.: Revisão da Literatura: Apresentação de uma Abordagem Integradora. In: AEDEM International Conference, pp. 427–443 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pritchard, A.: Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. researchgate.net

  5. Gurzki, H., Woisetschläger, D.M.: Mapping the luxury research landscape: a bibliometric citation analysis. J. Bus. Res. 77, 147–166 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zupic, I. Čater, T.: Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organ. Res. Methods 18(3), 429–472 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mariano, A.M., García, R., Arenas-Gaitan, J.: Meta analysis as a tool of research: a systematic review of bibliography applied study of international strategic alliances. An. ADMPG, no. August (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Butler, S., Wermelinger, M., Yu, Y., Sharp, H.: Exploring the influence of identifier names on code quality: an empirical study. In: 2010 14th European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering, pp. 156–165 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Staron, M.: Critical role of measures in decision processes: managerial and technical measures in the context of large software development organizations. Inf. Softw. Technol. 54(8), 887–899 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mordal, K., Anquetil, N., Laval, J., Serebrenik, A., Vasilescu, B., Ducasse, S.: Software quality metrics aggregation in industry. J. Softw. Evol. Process 25(10), 1117–1135 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shin, Y., Meneely, A., Williams, L., Osborne, J.A.: Evaluating complexity, code churn, and developer activity metrics as indicators of software vulnerabilities. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 37(6), 772–787 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Van Eck, N.J., Waltman, L.: VOSviewer Manual. 1 January 2013, no. January, 1–28 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yadav, H.B., Yadav, D.K.: Early software reliability analysis using reliability relevant software metrics. Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag. 8(S4), 2097–2108 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wallace, L.G., Sheetz, S.D.: The adoption of software measures: a technology acceptance model (TAM) perspective. Inf. Manag. 51(2), 249–259 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Okutan, A., Yıldız, O.T.: Software defect prediction using Bayesian networks. Empir. Softw. Eng. 19(1), 154–181 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Abdellatief, M., Sultan, A.B.M., Ghani, A.A.A., Jabar, M.A.: A mapping study to investigate component-based software system metrics. J. Syst. Softw. 86(3), 587–603 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  17. He, P., Li, B., Liu, X., Chen, J., Ma, Y.: An empirical study on software defect prediction with a simplified metric set. Inf. Softw. Technol. 59, 170–190 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Harzing, A.-W., Alakangas, S.: Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison. Scientometrics 106(2), 87–804 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Radjenović, D., Heričko, M., Torkar, R., Živkovič, A.: Software fault prediction metrics: a systematic literature review. Inf. Softw. Technol. 55(8), 1397–1418 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Halstead, M.H.: Elements of Software Science, vol. 7. Elsevier, New York (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Singh, Y., Kaur, A., Malhotra, R.: Empirical validation of object-oriented metrics for predicting fault proneness models. Softw. Qual. J. 18(1), 3–35 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ferreira, K.A.M., Bigonha, M.A.S., Bigonha, R.S., Mendes, L.F.O., Almeida, H.C.: Identifying thresholds for object-oriented software metrics. J. Syst. Softw. 85(2), 244–257 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  23. McCabe, T.J.: A complexity measure. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. SE-2, 308–320 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chidamber, S.R., Kemerer, C.F.: A metrics suite for object oriented design. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 20(6), 476–493 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Basili, V.R., Briand, L.C., Melo, W.L.: A validation of object-oriented design metrics as quality indicators. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 22(10), 751–761 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Madeyski, L., Jureczko, M.: Which process metrics can significantly improve defect prediction models? An empirical study. Softw Qual. J. 23(3), 393–422 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Menzies, T. et al.: Local versus global lessons for defect prediction and effort estimation. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 39(6), 822–834 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ari Melo Mariano .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mariano, A.M., Reis, A.C.B., Althoff, L.d.S., Barros, L.B. (2019). A Bibliographic Review of Software Metrics: Applying the Consolidated Meta-Analytic Approach. In: Reis, J., Pinelas, S., Melão, N. (eds) Industrial Engineering and Operations Management I. IJCIEOM 2018. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, vol 280. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14969-7_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics