Skip to main content

The Semantics of Timbre

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Timbre: Acoustics, Perception, and Cognition

Part of the book series: Springer Handbook of Auditory Research ((SHAR,volume 69))

Abstract

Because humans lack a sensory vocabulary for auditory experiences, timbral qualities of sounds are often conceptualized and communicated through readily available sensory attributes from different modalities (e.g., bright, warm, sweet) but also through the use of onomatopoeic attributes (e.g., ringing, buzzing, shrill) or nonsensory attributes relating to abstract constructs (e.g., rich, complex, harsh). The analysis of the linguistic description of timbre, or timbre semantics, can be considered as one way to study its perceptual representation empirically. In the most commonly adopted approach, timbre is considered as a set of verbally defined perceptual attributes that represent the dimensions of a semantic timbre space. Previous studies have identified three salient semantic dimensions for timbre along with related acoustic properties. Comparisons with similarity-based multidimensional models confirm the strong link between perceiving timbre and talking about it. Still, the cognitive and neural mechanisms of timbre semantics remain largely unknown and underexplored, especially when one looks beyond the case of acoustic musical instruments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abeles H (1979) Verbal timbre descriptors of isolated clarinet tones. Bull Council Res Music Educ 59:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Albersheim G (1939) Zur Psychologie der Toneigenschaften (On the psychology of sound properties). Heltz, Strassburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Alluri V, Toiviainen P (2010) Exploring perceptual and acoustical correlates of polyphonic timbre. Music Percept 27:223–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alluri V, Toiviainen P (2012) Effect of enculturation on the semantic and acoustic correlates of polyphonic timbre. Music Percept 29:297–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almeida A, Schubert E, Smith J, Wolfe J (2017) Brightness scaling of periodic tones. Atten Percept Psychophys 79(7):1892–1896

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bell R (2015) PAL: the percussive audio lexicon. An approach to describing the features of percussion instruments and the sounds they produce. Dissertation, Swinburne University of Technology

    Google Scholar 

  • Bensa J, Dubois D, Kronland-Martinet R, Ystad S (2005) Perceptive and cognitive evaluation of a piano synthesis model. In: Wiil UK (ed) Computer music modelling and retrieval. 2nd international symposium, Esbjerg, May 2004. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 232–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernays M, Traube C (2009) Expression of piano timbre: verbal description and gestural control. In: Castellengo M, Genevois H (eds) La musique et ses instruments (Music and its instruments). Delatour, Paris, pp 205–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernays M, Traube C (2011) Verbal expression of piano timbre: multidimensional semantic space of adjectival descriptors. In: Williamon A, Edwards D, Bartel L (eds) Proceedings of the international symposium on performance science 2011. European Association of Conservatoires, Utrecht, pp 299–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloothooft G, Plomp R (1988) The timbre of sung vowels. J Acoust Soc Am 84:847–860

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boring EG, Stevens SS (1936) The nature of tonal brightness. Proc Natl Acad Sci 22:514–521

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bowles EA (1954) Haut and bas: the grouping of musical instruments in the middle ages. Music Discip 8:115–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowling DL, Purves D, Gill KZ (2018) Vocal similarity predicts the relative attraction of musical chords. Proc Natl Acad Sci 115:216–221

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bregman AS (1990) Auditory scene analysis. The perceptual organization of sound. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brent W (2010) Physical and perceptual aspects of percussive timbre. Dissertation, University of California

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton H (2016) Menuhin: a life, revised edn. Faber & Faber, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiasson F, Traube C, Lagarrigue C, McAdams S (2017) Koechlin’s volume: perception of sound extensity among instrument timbres from different families. Music Sci 21:113–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cousineau M, Carcagno S, Demany L, Pressnitzer D (2014) What is a melody? On the relationship between pitch and brightness of timbre. Front Syst Neurosci 7:127

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel P, Weber R (1997) Psychoacoustical roughness: implementation of an optimized model. Acta Acust united Ac 83:113–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas C, Noble J, McAdams S (2017) Auditory scene analysis and the perception of sound mass in Ligeti’s continuum. Music Percept 33:287–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Ceuster D (2016) The phenomenological space of timbre. Dissertation, Utrecht University

    Google Scholar 

  • Disley AC, Howard DM, Hunt AD (2006) Timbral description of musical instruments. In: Baroni M, Addessi AR, Caterina R, Costa M (eds) Proceedings of the 9th international conference on music perception and cognition, Bologna, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolan EI (2013) The orchestral revolution: Haydn and the technologies of timbre. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dolscheid S, Shayan S, Majid A, Casasanto D (2013) The thickness of musical pitch: psychophysical evidence for linguistic relativity. Psychol Sci 24:613–621

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D (2000) Categories as acts of meaning: the case of categories in olfaction and audition. Cogn Sci Q 1:35–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards RM (1978) The perception of trombones. J Sound Vib 58:407–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eitan Z, Rothschild I (2011) How music touches: musical parameters and listeners’ audio-tactile metaphorical mappings. Psychol Music 39:449–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott TM, Hamilton LS, Theunissen FE (2013) Acoustic structure of the five perceptual dimensions of timbre in orchestral instrument tones. J Acoust Soc Am 133:389–404

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fastl H, Zwicker E (2007) Psychoacoustics: facts and models, 3rd edn. Springer, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Faure A (2000) Des sons aux mots, comment parle-t-on du timbre musical? (From sounds to words, how do we speak of musical timbre?). Dissertation, Ecoles des hautes etudes en sciences sociales

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritz C, Blackwell AF, Cross I et al (2012) Exploring violin sound quality: investigating English timbre descriptors and correlating resynthesized acoustical modifications with perceptual properties. J Acoust Soc Am 131:783–794

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gallese V, Lakoff G (2005) The brain’s concepts: the role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cogn Neuropsychol 22:455–479

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garnier M, Henrich N, Castellengo M et al (2007) Characterisation of voice quality in Western lyrical singing: from teachers’ judgements to acoustic descriptions. J Interdiscipl Music Stud 1:62–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Giragama CNW, Martens WL, Herath S et al (2003) Relating multilingual semantic scales to a common timbre space – part II. Paper presented at the 115th audio engineering society convention, New York, 10–13 October 2003

    Google Scholar 

  • Grill T (2012) Perceptually informed organization of textural sounds. Dissertation, University of Music and Performing Arts Graz

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas H (1972) The influence of a single echo on the audibility of speech. J Audio Eng Soc 20:146–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Heise DR (1969) Some methodological issues in semantic differential research. Psychol Bull 72:406–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helmholtz H (1877) Die Lehre von den Tonempfindungen als physiologische Grundlage für die Theorie der Musik, 4th edn. F. Vieweg und Sohn, Braunschweig. English edition: Helmholtz H (1954) On the sensations of tone as a physiological basis for the theory of music (trans: Ellis AJ), 2nd edn. Dover, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Isshiki N, Okamura H, Tanabe M, Morimoto M (1969) Differential diagnosis of hoarseness. Folia Phoniatr 21:9–19

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Iwamiya S, Zhan M (1997) A comparison between Japanese and Chinese adjectives which express auditory impressions. J Acoust Soc Jpn 18:319–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakobson R, Halle M (1971) Fundamentals of language, 2nd edn. Mouton, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Juslin PN, Laukka P (2004) Expression, perception, and induction of musical emotions: a review and a questionnaire study of everyday listening. J New Music Res 33:217–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall RA, Carterette EC (1993a) Verbal attributes of simultaneous wind instrument timbres: I. von Bismarck’s adjectives. Music Percept 10:445–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall RA, Carterette EC (1993b) Verbal attributes of simultaneous wind instrument timbres: II. Adjectives induced from Piston’s orchestration. Music Percept 10:469–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall RA, Carterette EC, Hajda JM (1999) Perceptual and acoustical features of natural and synthetic orchestral instrument tones. Music Percept 16:327–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koelsch S (2011) Toward a neural basis of processing musical semantics. Phys Life Rev 8:89–105

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kursell J (2013) Experiments on tone color in music and acoustics: Helmholtz, Schoenberg, and Klangfarbenmelodie. Osiris 28:191–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff G, Johnson M (2003) Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lavoie M (2013) Conceptualisation et communication des nuances de timbre à la guitare classique (Conceptualization and communication of classical guitar timbral nuances). Dissertation, Université de Montréal

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemaitre G, Houix O, Misdariis N, Susini P (2010) Listener expertise and sound identification influence the categorization of environmental sounds. J Exp Psychol Appl 16:16–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lembke S-A, McAdams S (2015) The role of spectral-envelope characteristics in perceptual blending of wind-instrument sounds. Acta Acust United Ac 101:1039–1051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liberman AM, Mattingly IG (1985) The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cogn 21:1–36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lichte WH (1941) Attributes of complex tones. J Exp Psychol 28:455–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lokki T, Pätynen J, Kuusinen A, Tervo S (2016) Concert hall acoustics: repertoire, listening position, and individual taste of the listeners influence the qualitative attributes and preferences. J Acoust Soc Am 140:551–562

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marozeau J, de Cheveigné A (2007) The effect of fundamental frequency on the brightness dimension of timbre. J Acoust Soc Am 121(1):383–387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McAdams S, Winsberg S, Donnadieu S et al (1995) Perceptual scaling of synthesized musical timbres: common dimensions, specificities, and latent subject classes. Psychol Res 58:177–192

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McDermott JM, Lehr AJ, Oxenham AJ (2010) Individual differences reveal the basis of consonance. Curr Biol 20:1035–1041

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre ME, Schumacher RT, Woodhouse J (1981) Aperiodicity in bowed-string motion. Acustica 49:13–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Melara RD, Marks LE (1990) Interaction among auditory dimensions: timbre, pitch and loudness. Percept Psychophys 48:169–178

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer J (2009) Acoustics and the performance of music. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Miller R (1986) The structure of singing: system and art of vocal technique. Schirmer Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravec O, Štěpánek J (2003) Verbal description of musical sound timbre in Czech language. In: Bresin R (ed) Proceedings of the Stockholm Music Acoustics Conference 2003. KTH, Stockholm, p 643–646

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravec O, Štěpánek J (2005) Relations among verbal attributes describing musical sound timbre in Czech language. In: Proceedings of Forum Acusticum Budapest 2005: the 4th European congress on acoustics. Hirzel, Stuttgart, p 1601–1606

    Google Scholar 

  • Mores R (2011) Nasality in musical sounds – a few intermediate results. In: Schneider A, von Ruschkowski A (eds) Systematic musicology: empirical and theoretical studies. Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main, pp 127–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Nykänen A, Johansson Ö, Lundberg J, Berg J (2009) Modelling perceptual dimensions of saxophone sounds. Acta Acust United Ac 95:539–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osgood CE (1952) The nature and measurement of meaning. Psychol Bull 49:197–237

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Porcello T (2004) Speaking of sound: language and the professionalization of sound-recording engineers. Soc Studies Sci 34:733–758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt RL, Bowsher JM (1978) The subjective assessment of trombone quality. J Sound Vib 57:425–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt RL, Doak PE (1976) A subjective rating scale for timbre. J Sound Vib 45:317–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pressnitzer D, McAdams S (1999) Two phase effects in roughness perception. J Acoust Soc Am 105:2773–2782

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Radocy RE, Boyle JD (eds) (2012) Psychological foundations of musical behavior, 5th edn. Thomas Books, Springfield

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuter C (1997) Karl Erich Schumann’s principles of timbre as a helpful tool in stream segregation research. In: Leman M (ed) Music, gestalt, and computing. Studies in cognitive and systematic musicology. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 362–372

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Reybrouck M (2013) From sound to music: an evolutionary approach to musical semantics. Biosemiotics 6:585–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rich GJ (1916) A preliminary study of tonal volume. J Exp Psychol 1:13–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rioux V, Västfjäll D (2001) Analyses of verbal descriptions of the sound quality of a flue organ pipe. Music Sci 5:55–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozé J, Aramaki M, Kronland-Martinet R, Ystad S (2017) Exploring the perceived harshness of cello sounds by morphing and synthesis techniques. J Acoust Soc Am 141:2121–2136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saitis C, Fritz C, Guastavino C, Giordano BL, Scavone GP (2012) Investigating consistency in verbal descriptions of violin preference by experienced players. In: Cambouropoulos E, Tsougras C, Mavromatis P, Pastiadis K (eds) Proceedings of the 12th international conference on music perception and cognition and 8th triennial conference of the European Society for the Cognitive Sciences of Music, Thessaloniki

    Google Scholar 

  • Saitis C, Fritz C, Guastavino C, Scavone GP (2013) Conceptualization of violin quality by experienced performers. In: Bresin R, Askenfelt A (eds) Proceedings of the Stockholm music acoustics conference 2013. Logos, Berlin, p 123–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Saitis C, Fritz C, Scavone GP et al (2017) Perceptual evaluation of violins: a psycholinguistic analysis of preference verbal descriptions by experienced musicians. J Acoust Soc Am 141:2746–2757

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saitis C, Järveläinen H, Fritz C (2018) The role of haptic cues in musical instrument quality perception. In: Papetti S, Saitis C (eds) Musical Haptics. Springer, Cham, pp 73–93

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Saitis C, Scavone GP, Fritz C, Giordano BL (2015) Effect of task constraints on the perceptual evaluation of violins. Acta Acust United Ac 101:382–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samoylenko E, McAdams S, Nosulenko V (1996) Systematic analysis of verbalizations produced in comparing musical timbres. Int J Psychol 31:255–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaeffer P (1966) Traité des objets musicaux: essai interdisciplines. Editions du Seuil, Paris. English edition: Schaeffer P (2017) Treatise on musical objects: an essay across disciplines (trans: North C, Dack J). University of California Press, Oakland

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider A (1997) “Verschmelzung”, tonal fusion, and consonance: carl stumpf revisited. In: Leman M (ed) Music, gestalt, and computing. Springer, Berlin, pp 117–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumann KE (1929) Physik der Klangfarben (Physics of timbres). Habilitation, Universität Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Serra X (1997) Musical sound modelling with sinusoids plus noise. In: Roads C, Pope S, Piccialli A, de Poli G (eds) Musical signal processing. Swets Zeitlinger, Lisse, pp 91–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Simner J, Cuskley C, Kirby S (2010) What sound does that taste? Cross-modal mappings across gustation and audition. Perception 39:553–569

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slawson W (1985) Sound color. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Smalley D (1997) Spectromorphology: explaining sound-shapes. Organised Sound 2:107–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon LN (1958) Semantic approach to the perception of complex sounds. J Acoust Soc Am 30:421–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Štěpánek J (2006) Musical sound timbre: verbal description and dimensions. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on digital audio effects. McGill University, Montreal, p 121–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Štěpánek J, Otcěnásek Z (1999) Rustle as an attribute of timbre of stationary violin tones. Catgut Acoust Soc J (Series II) 3:32–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens SS (1934) Tonal density. J Exp Psychol 17:585–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens SS, Guirao M, Slawson AW (1965) Loudness, a product of volume times density. J Exp Psychol 69:503–510

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stumpf C (1890) Tonpsychologie (Psychology of sound), vol 2. Hirzel, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • Stumpf C (1898) Konsonanz und Dissonanz (Consonance and dissonance). Barth, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundberg J (2013) Perception of singing. In: Deutsch D (ed) The psychology of music, 3rd edn. Academic, London, pp 69–105

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Susini P, Lemaitre G, McAdams S (2012) Psychological measurement for sound description and evaluation. In: Berglund B, Rossi GB, Townsend JT, Pendrill LR (eds) Measurement with persons: theory, methods, and implementation areas. Psychology Press, New York, pp 227–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Terrace HS, Stevens SS (1962) The quantification of tonal volume. Am J Psychol 75:596–604

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Traube C (2004) An interdisciplinary study of the timbre of the classical guitar. Dissertation, McGill University

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiering M (2015) Spatial semiotics and spatial mental models. Figure-ground asymmetries in language. De Gruyter Mouton, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Vassilakis PN, Kendall RA (2010) Psychoacoustic and cognitive aspects of auditory roughness: definitions, models, and applications. In: Rogowitz BE, Pappas TN (eds) Human vision and electronic imaging XV. SPIE/IS&T, Bellingham/Springfield, p 75270

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • von Bismarck G (1974a) Timbre of steady tones: a factorial investigation of its verbal attributes. Acustica 30:146–159

    Google Scholar 

  • von Bismarck G (1974b) Sharpness as an attribute of the timbre of steady sounds. Acustica 30:159–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Wake S, Asahi T (1998) Sound retrieval with intuitive verbal expressions. Paper presented at the 5th international conference on auditory display, University of Glasgow, 1–4 November 1998

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker P (2016) Cross-sensory correspondences: a theoretical framework and their relevance to music. Psychomusicology 26:103–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallmark Z (2014) Appraising timbre: embodiment and affect at the threshold of music and noise. Dissertation, University of California

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallmark Z (2018) A corpus analysis of timbre semantics in orchestration treatises. Psychol Music. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735618768102

  • Walsh V (2013) Magnitudes, metaphors, and modalities: a theory of magnitude revisited. In: Simner J, Hubbard E (eds) Oxford handbook of synesthesia. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 837–852

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster J, Woodhead M, Carpenter A (1970) Perceptual constancy in complex sound identification. Br J Psychol 61:481–489

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weinzierl S, Lepa S, Ackermann D (2018a) A measuring instrument for the auditory perception of rooms: the Room Acoustical Quality Inventory (RAQI). J Acoust Soc Am 144:1245–1257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weinzierl S, Lepa S, Schultz F et al (2018b) Sound power and timbre as cues for the dynamic strength of orchestral instruments. J Acoust Soc Am 144:1347–1355

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weinzierl S, Vorländer M (2015) Room acoustical parameters as predictors of room acoustical impression: what do we know and what would we like to know? Acoust Aust 43:41–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zacharakis A, Pastiadis K, Reiss JD (2014) An interlanguage study of musical timbre semantic dimensions and their acoustic correlates. Music Percept 31:339–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zacharakis A, Pastiadis K, Reiss JD (2015) An interlanguage unification of musical timbre: bridging semantic, perceptual, and acoustic dimensions. Music Percept 32:394–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Charalampos Saitis wishes to thank the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation for support through a Humboldt Research Fellowship.

Compliance with Ethics Requirements

Charalampos Saitis declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Stefan Weinzierl declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charalampos Saitis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Saitis, C., Weinzierl, S. (2019). The Semantics of Timbre. In: Siedenburg, K., Saitis, C., McAdams, S., Popper, A., Fay, R. (eds) Timbre: Acoustics, Perception, and Cognition. Springer Handbook of Auditory Research, vol 69. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14832-4_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics