Abstract
Timbre is a complex auditory attribute that is extracted from a fused auditory event. Its perceptual representation has been explored as a multidimensional attribute whose different dimensions can be related to abstract spectral, temporal, and spectrotemporal properties of the audio signal, although previous knowledge of the sound source itself also plays a role. Perceptual dimensions can also be related to acoustic properties that directly carry information about the mechanical processes of a sound source, including its geometry (size, shape), its material composition, and the way it is set into vibration. Another conception of timbre is as a spectromorphology encompassing time-varying frequency and amplitude behaviors, as well as spectral and temporal modulations. In all musical sound sources, timbre covaries with fundamental frequency (pitch) and playing effort (loudness, dynamic level) and displays strong interactions with these parameters.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Allen EJ, Oxenham AJ (2014) Symmetric interactions and interference between pitch and timbre. J Acoust Soc Am 135(3):1371–1379. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4863269
Almeida A, Schubert E, Smith J, Wolfe J (2017) Brightness scaling of periodic tones. Atten Percept Psychophys 79(7):1892–1896. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-017-1394-6
Cabe PA, Pittenger JB (2000) Human sensitivity to acoustic information from vessel filling. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 26(1):313–324. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.26.1.313
Caclin A, McAdams S, Smith B, Winsberg S (2005) Acoustic correlates of timbre space dimensions: a confirmatory study using synthetic tones. J Acoust Soc Am 118(1):471–482. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1929229
Caclin A, Brattico E, Ternaviemi M, Näätänen R, Morlet D, Giard MH, McAdams S (2006) Separate neural processing of timbre dimensions in auditory sensory memory. J Cognitive Neurosci 18(12):1959–1972. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2006.18.12.1959
Caclin A, Giard MH, Smith B, McAdams S (2007) Interactive processing of timbre dimensions: a Garner interference study. Brain Res 1138(1):159–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2006.12.065
Carello C, Wagman JB, Turvey MT (2005) Acoustic specification of object properties. In: Anderson JD, Anderson BF (eds) Moving image theory: ecological considerations. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, pp 79–104
Chambers C, Akram S, Adam V, Pelofi C, Sahani M, Shamma S, Pressnitzer D (2017) Prior context in audition informs binding and shapes simple features. Nat Commun 8:15027. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15027
Chiasson F, Traube C, Lagarrigue C, McAdams S (2017) Koechlin’s volume: perception of sound extensity among instrument timbres from different families. Music Sci 21(1):113–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1029864916649638
van Dinther R, Patterson RD (2006) Perception of acoustic scale and size in musical instrument sounds. J Acoust Soc Am 120(4):2158–2176. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2338295
Elliott TM, Hamilton LS, Theunissen FE (2013) Acoustic structure of the five perceptual dimensions of timbre in orchestral instrument tones. J Acoust Soc Am 133(1):389–404. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4770244
Esling P, Agon C (2013) Multiobjective time series matching for audio classification and retrieval. IEEE Trans Audio Speech Lang Process 21(10):2057–2072. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASL.2013.2265086
Fabiani M, Friberg A (2011) Influence of pitch, loudness, and timbre on the perception of instrument dynamics. J Acoust Soc Am 130(4):EL193–EL199. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3633687
Freed DJ (1990) Auditory correlates of perceived mallet hardness for a set of recorded percussive sound events. J Acoust Soc Am 87(1):311–322. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.399298
Gaver WW (1993) What in the world do we hear?: an ecological approach to auditory event perception. Ecol Psychol 5(1):1–29. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326969eco0501_1
Giordano BL, McAdams S (2010) Sound source mechanics and musical timbre perception: evidence from previous studies. Music Percept 28(2):155–168. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2010.28.2.155
Giordano BL, Rocchesso D, McAdams S (2010) Integration of acoustical information in the perception of impacted sound sources: the role of information accuracy and exploitability. J Exp Psychol Human 36(2):462–476. https://doi.org/10.1037/A0018388
Grey JM (1977) Multidimensional perceptual scaling of musical timbres. J Acoust Soc Am 61(5):1270–1277. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.381428
Grey JM (1978) Timbre discrimination in musical patterns. J Acoust Soc Am 64(2):467–472. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.382018
Grey JM, Gordon JW (1978) Perceptual effects of spectral modifications on musical timbres. J Acoust Soc Am 63(5):1493–1500. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.381843
Grey JM, Moorer JA (1977) Perceptual evaluations of synthesized musical instrument tones. J Acoust Soc Am 62(2):454–462. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.381508
Hajda JM, Kendall RA, Carterette EC, Harshberger ML (1997) Methodological issues in timbre research. In: Deliège I, Sloboda J (eds) The perception and cognition of music. Psychology Press, Hove, pp 253–306
Handel S, Erickson ML (2001) A rule of thumb: the bandwidth for timbre invariance is one octave. Music Percept 19(1):121–126. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2001.19.1.121
Helmholtz HLF von (1885) On the sensations of tone as a physiological basis for the theory of music. Republ.1954 by Dover, New York, from 1877 trans by AJ Ellis from 4th German ed
Houben M, Kohlrausch A, Hermes DJ (2004) Perception of the size and speed of rolling balls by sound. Speech Comm 43:331–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2004.03.004
Kawahara H, Masuda-Katsuse I, de Cheveigné A (1999) Restructuring speech representations using a pitch-adaptive time-frequency smoothing and an instantaneous-frequency-based F0 extraction: possible role of a repetitive structure in sounds. Speech Comm 27:187–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6393(98)00074-0
Kazazis S, Esterer N, Depalle P, McAdams S (2017) A performance evaluation of the Timbre Toolbox and the MIRtoolbox on calibrated test sounds. In: Scavone G, Maestre E, Kemp C, Wang S (eds) Proceedings of the 2017 International Symposium on Musical Acoustics (ISMA). McGill University, Montreal, QC, pp 144–147
Kendall RA (1986) The role of acoustic signal partitions in listener categorization of musical phrases. Music Percept 4(2):185–213. https://doi.org/10.2307/40285360
Kendall RA, Carterette EC (1991) Perceptual scaling of simultaneous wind instrument timbres. Music Percept 8(4):369–404. https://doi.org/10.2307/40285519
Klatzky RL, Pai DK, Krotkov EP (2000) Perception of material from contact sounds. Presence Teleop Virt 9(4):399–410. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474600566907
Koechlin C (1954-1959) Traité de l’orchestration: En quatre volumes [Treatise on orchestration: In four volumes]. M. Eschig, Paris
Krumhansl CL (1989) Why is musical timbre so hard to understand? In: Nielzén S, Olsson O (eds) Structure and perception of electroacoustic sound and music. Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, pp 43–53
Krumhansl CL, Iverson P (1992) Perceptual interactions between musical pitch and timbre. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 18(3):739–751. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.18.3.739
Kruskal JB (1964) Non-metric multidimensional scaling: a numerical method. Psychometrika 29(2):115–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289694
Kunkler-Peck AJ, Turvey MT (2000) Hearing shape. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 26(1):279–294. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00040
Lartillot O, Toiviainen P (2007) A Matlab toolbox for musical feature extraction from audio. In: Marchand S (ed) Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on digital audio effects (DAFx-07). Université de Bordeaux 1, Bordeaux, France, pp 237–244
Lemaitre G, Heller LM (2012) Auditory perception of material is fragile while action is strikingly robust. J Acoust Soc Am 131(2):1337–1348. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3675946
Lemaitre G, Heller LM (2013) Evidence for a basic level in a taxonomy of everyday action sounds. Exp Brain Res 226(2):253–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3430-7
Marozeau J, de Cheveigné A (2007) The effect of fundamental frequency on the brightness dimension of timbre. J Acoust Soc Am 121(1):383–387. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2384910
Marozeau F, de Cheveigné A, McAdams S, Winsberg S (2003) The dependency of timbre on fundamental frequency. J Acoust Soc Am 114(5):2946–2957. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1618239
McAdams S (1993) Recognition of sound sources and events. In: McAdams S, Bigand E (eds) Thinking in sound: the cognitive psychology of human audition. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 146–198. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198522577.003.0006
McAdams S (2013) Musical timbre perception. In: Deutsch D (ed) The psychology of music, 3rd edn. Academic Press, New York, pp 35–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-381460-9.00002-X
McAdams S (2015) Perception et cognition de la musique [Perception and cognition of music]. Editions J. Vrin, Paris, France
McAdams S, Winsberg S, Donnadieu S, De Soete G, Krimphoff J (1995) Perceptual scaling of synthesized musical timbres: common dimensions, specificities, and latent subject classes. Psychol Res-Psych Fo 58(3):177–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/Bf00419633
McAdams S, Beauchamp J, Meneguzzi S (1999) Discrimination of musical instrument sounds resynthesized with simplified spectrotemporal parameters. J Acoust Soc Am 105(2):882–897. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.426277
McAdams S, Chaigne A, Roussarie V (2004) The psychomechanics of simulated sound sources: material properties of impacted bars. J Acoust Soc Am 115(3):1306–1320. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1645855
McAdams S, Roussarie V, Chaigne A, Giordano BL (2010) The psychomechanics of simulated sound sources: material properties of impacted thin plates. J Acoust Soc Am 128(3):1401–1413. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3466867
Melara RD, Marks LE (1990) Interaction among auditory dimensions: timbre, pitch and loudness. Percept Psychophys 48(2):169–178. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207084
Nymoen K, Danielsen A, London J (2017) Validating attack phase descriptors obtained by the Timbre Toolbox and MIRtoolbox. In: Proceedings of the 14th sound and music computing conference 2017. Proceedings of the SMC Conferences. Aalto University, Espoo, Finland, pp 214–219
Patil K, Pressnitzer D, Shamma S, Elhilali M (2012) Music in our ears: the biological bases of musical timbre perception. PLoS Comput Biol 8(11):e1002759. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002759
Patterson RD (2000) Auditory images: how complex sounds are represented in the auditory system. Journal of the Acoustical Society of Japan 21(4):183–190. https://doi.org/10.1250/ast.21.183
Patterson RD, Allerhand M, Giguère C (1995) Time-domain modeling of peripheral auditory processing: a modular architecture and a software platform. J Acoust Soc Am 98(4):1890–1894. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.414456
Patterson RD, Gaudrain E, Walters TC (2010) The perception of family and register in musical tones. In: Jones MR, Fay RR, Popper AN (eds) Music perception. Springer, New York, pp. 13–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6114-3_2
Peeters G, Giordano BL, Susini P, Misdariis N, McAdams S (2011) The Timbre Toolbox: extracting audio descriptors from musical signals. J Acoust Soc Am 130(5):2902–2916. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3642604
Plazak J, McAdams S (2017) Perceiving changes of sound-source size within musical tone pairs. Psychomusicology: Music, Mind, and Brain 27(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1037/pmu0000172
Plomp R (1970) Timbre as a multidimensional attribute of complex tones. In: Plomp R, Smoorenburg GF (eds) Frequency analysis and periodicity detection in hearing. Sijthoff, Leiden, pp 397–410
Repp BH (1987) The sound of two hands clapping: an exploratory study. J Acoust Soc Am 81(4):1100–1109. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.394630
Robinson K (1993) Brightness and octave position: are changes in spectral envelope and in tone height perceptually equivalent? Contemp Music Rev 9(1):83–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/07494469300640361
Russo FA, Thompson WF (2005) An interval size illusion: the influence of timbre on the perceived size of melodic intervals. Percept Psychophys 67(4):559–568. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193514
Schubert E, Wolfe J (2006) Does timbral brightness scale with frequency and spectral centroid? Acta Acustica united with Acustica 92(5):820–825
Shamma S (2001) On the role of space and time in auditory processing. Trends Cogn Sci 5(8):340–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01704-6
Shepard RN (1964) Circularity in judgments of relative pitch. J Acoust Soc Am 36(12):2346–2353. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1919362
Siedenburg K (2018) Timbral Shepard-illusion reveals ambiguity and context sensitivity of brightness perception. J Acoust Soc Am 143(2):EL93–EL98. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5022983
Siedenburg K, Jones-Mollerup K, McAdams S (2016) Acoustic and categorical dissimilarity of musical timbre: evidence from asymmetries between acoustic and chimeric sounds. Front Psychol 6:1977. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01977
Smith DR, Patterson RD, Turner R (2005) The processing and perception of size information in speech sounds. J Acoust Soc Am 117(1):305–318. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1828637
Steele K, Williams AK (2006) Is the bandwidth for timbre invariance only one octave? Music Percept 23(3):215–220. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2006.23.3.215
Stilp CE, Rogers TT, Kluender KR (2010) Rapid efficient coding of correlated complex acoustic properties. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107(50):21914–21919. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1009020107
Stoelinga CNJ, Hermes DJ, Hirschberg A, Houtsma AJM (2003) Temporal aspects of rolling sounds: a smooth ball approaching the edge of a plate. Acta Acustica united with Acustica 89(5):809–817
van Heuven VJJP, van den Broecke MPR (1979) Auditory discrimination of rise and decay times in tone and noise bursts. J Acoust Soc Am 66 (5):1308-1315. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.383551
Vurma A, Raju M, Kuuda A (2011) Does timbre affect pitch? Estimations by musicians and non-musicians. Psychol Music 39(3):291–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735610373602
Wessel DL (1973) Psychoacoustics and music: a report from Michigan State University. PACE: Bulletin of the Computer Arts Society 30:1–2
Zahm JA (1892) Sound and music. AC McClurg and Company, Chicago
Zwicker E, Fastl H (1990) Psychoacoustics: facts and models. Springer-Verlag, Berlin
Acknowledgements
The writing of this chapter was supported by grants from the Canadian Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (RGPIN-2015-05280 and RGPAS-478121-15), the Canada Research Chairs Program (#950-223484), and the Killam Research Fellow Program of the Canada Council for the Arts.
Compliance with Ethics Requirements
Stephen McAdams declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McAdams, S. (2019). The Perceptual Representation of Timbre. In: Siedenburg, K., Saitis, C., McAdams, S., Popper, A., Fay, R. (eds) Timbre: Acoustics, Perception, and Cognition. Springer Handbook of Auditory Research, vol 69. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14832-4_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14832-4_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-14831-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-14832-4
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)