Skip to main content

Global Poverty by Different Poverty Lines Since the Cold War

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The End of Poverty

Abstract

In this chapter, we discuss trends in global poverty since the Cold War taking several poverty lines. We provide a basis for a set of stylised consumption groups based on global consumption and show how the benefits of growth were distributed since 1990.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The $10 poverty line is a proposal for a ‘security from poverty’ consumption line developed and used by López-Calva and Ortiz-Juarez (2014) based on the 10% probability of falling back below national poverty lines (which are $4–$5/day in 2005 PPP) in the near future in Mexico, Brazil and Chile. The 10% probability line is actually $8.50–$9.70 depending on whether Brazil, Mexico or Chile are used (and comparable estimates for Indonesia are $8.37 for a $4 national poverty line and $13.03 at $5, in 2005 PPP—see Sumner et al. 2014). Thus, the mean is $9.27 and if the mean is inflated to 2011 prices it is $10.47. However, given that this is not intended to be a precise estimate—rather, a rough proxy used for illustration purposes here—$10 per capita is used here in 2011 PPP.

References

  • Allen, R. (2017). Absolute poverty: When necessity displaces desire. American Economic Review, 107(12), 3690–3721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, A., & Duflo, E. (2008). What is middle class about the middle classes around the world? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22(2), 3–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birdsall, N., Lustig, N., & Meyer, C. (2014). The strugglers: The new poor in Latin America. World Development, 60, 132–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deaton, A. (2010). Price indexes, inequality, and the measurement of world poverty. American Economic Review, 100(1), 5–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterly, W. (2001). The middle class consensus and economic development. Journal of Economic Growth, 6(4), 317–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edward, P., & Sumner, A. (2015). New estimates of global poverty and inequality: How much difference do price data really make? (Center for Global Development Working Paper 403). Washington, DC: CGD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edward, P., & Sumner, A. (2016). Global inequality and global poverty since the cold war: How robust is the optimistic narrative? (CROP Working Paper). Bergen: CROP/UiB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, F., Chen, S., & Dabalen, A. L., et al. (2015). A global count of the extreme poor in 2012: Data issues, methodology, and initial results (World Bank Working Paper). Washington DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, F., & Sanchez, C. (2017). A richer array of international poverty lines. Available at: http://blogs.worldbank.org/developmenttalk/richer-array-international-poverty-lines.

  • Jolliffe, D., & Prydz, E. (2015). Global poverty goals and prices: How purchasing power parity matters (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 7256). Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kharas, H. (2010). The emerging middle class in developing countries. Paris: OECD Development Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahoti, R., Jayadev, A., & Reddy, S. (2014). The global consumption and income project (GCIP): An introduction and preliminary findings. www.globalconsumptionandincomeproject.org. Accessed 4 June 2018.

  • Linder, S. B. (1961). An essay on trade and transformation. New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • López-Calva, Luis F., & Ortiz-Juarez, E. (2014). A vulnerability approach to the definition of the middle class. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 12(1), 23–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravallion, M. (2002). How not to count the poor? A reply to Reddy and Pogge. Mimeo. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravallion, M. (2008). How not to count the poor? A reply to Reddy and Pogge. In S. Anand, P. Segal, & J. Stiglitz (Eds.), Debates on the measurement of poverty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravallion, M. (2010). The developing world’s bulging (but vulnerable) middle class. World Development, 38(4), 445–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, S., & Pogge, T. (2002). How not to count the poor (version 3.0). Mimeo. New York: Barnard College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, S., & Pogge, T. (2005). How not to count the poor (version 6.2). Mimeo. New York: Barnard College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standing, G. (2011). The Precariat: The new dangerous class. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumner, A. (2016). Global poverty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumner, A., Yusuf, A., & Suara, Y. (2014). The prospects of the poor: A set of poverty measures based on the probability of remaining poor (or not) in Indonesia. Working Papers in Economics and Development Studies (WoPEDS) from Department of Economics, Padjadjaran University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Edward .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Edward, P., Sumner, A. (2019). Global Poverty by Different Poverty Lines Since the Cold War. In: The End of Poverty. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14764-8_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics