Skip to main content

Ethics in Health Research Using Social Media

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Social Web and Health Research

Abstract

Over the past decade, scholars have been able to actively engage with patients, informal caregivers, and providers through social media sites and patient-centered groups in ways that are reshaping patient-centered research design and recruitment. As with the introduction of any new technology, there exists both potential for new modes of inquiry and unforeseen ethical quandaries. This chapter presents researchers with the types of questions, ongoing points of debate, and nascent solutions relevant to a research platform in which ethical considerations have yet to be well defined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Valdez RS, Brennan PF. Exploring patients’ health information communication practices with social network members as a foundation for consumer health IT design. Int J Med Inf. 2015;84:363–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Keim-Malpass J, Steeves RH, Kennedy C. Internet ethnography: a review of methodological considerations for studying online illness blogs. Int J Nurs Stud. 2014;51(12):1686–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bassett E, O’Riordan K. Ethics of Internet Research: contesting the human subjects research model. Ethics Inf Technol. 2002;4(3):233–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Eysenbach G, Till J. Ethical issues in qualitative research on internet communities. Br Med J. 2010;10(323):1103–5.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Conway M. Ethical issues in using Twitter for public health surveillance and research: developing a taxonomy of ethical concepts from the research literature. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(12):e290.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Bender J, Cyr A, Arbuckle L, Ferris L. Ethics for privacy implications of using the internet and social media to recruit participants for health research: a privacy-by-design framework for online recruitment. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(4):e104.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Vayena E, Tasioulas J. Adapting standards: ethical oversight of participant-led health research. PLoS Med. 2013;10(3):1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wongkoblap A, Vadillo M, Curcin V. Researching mental health disorders in the era of social media. J Med Internet Res. 2017;29(19):e228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Grimes J, Fleischman KR, Jaeger PT. Virtual guinea pigs: ethical implications of human subjects research in virtual worlds. Int J Internet Res Ethics. 2009;2(1):1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Monks H, Cardoso P, Papageorgiou A, Carolan C, Costello L, Thomas L. Young people’s views regarding participation in mental health and wellbeing research through social media. Int J Emot Educ. 2015;7(1):4–19.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Buchanan E, Ess C. Internet research ethics and the institutional review board: current practices and issues. SIGCAS Comput Soc. 2009;39(3):43–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Benton A, Coppersmith G, Dredze M. Ethical research protocols for social media health research. In: Proceedings of the First Workshop on Ethics in Natural Language Processing. 2017. p. 94–102.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Markham A, Buchanan E. Ethical decision-making and internet research recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee. Recomm from AoIR Ethics Work Comm (Version 20) [Internet]. 2012;19.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Denecke K, Bamidis P, Bond C, Gabarron E, Househ M, Lau AYS, et al. Ethical issues of social media usage in healthcare. Yearb Med Inform. 2015;10(1):137–47.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Sinnenberg L, Buttenheim AM, Padrez K, Mancheno C, Ungar L, Merchant RM. Twitter as a tool for health research: a systematic review. Am J Public Health. 2017;107(1):e1–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Moreno MA, Goniu N, Moreno PS, Diekema D. Ethics of social media research: common concerns and practical considerations. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2013;16(9):708–13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Lunnay B, Borlagdan J, McNaughton D, Ward P. Ethical use of social media to facilitate qualitative research. Qual Health Res. 2015;25(1):99–109.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mikal J, Hurst S, Conway M. Ethical issues in using Twitter for population-level depression monitoring: a qualitative study. BMC Med. 2016;17(1):1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  19. McKee R. Ethical issues in using social media for health and health care research. Health Policy. 2013;110(2–3):298–301.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Elm M. How do various notions of privacy influence decisions in qualitative internet research? In: Internet Inquiry. Los Angeles: Sage Publications; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sharf B. Beyond netiquette: the ethics of doing naturalistic discourse research on the internet. In: Jones S, editor. Doing internet research: critical issues and methods for examining the net. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Valdez R, Guterbock T, Thompson M, Reilly J, Menefee H, Bennici M. Beyond traditional advertisements: leveraging Facebook’s social structures for research recruitment. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(10):e243.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Keim-Malpass J, Steeves RH. Talking with death at a diner: young women’s online narratives of cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2012;39(4):373–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Keim-Malpass J, Baernholdt M, Erickson JM, Ropka ME, Schroen AT, Steeves RH. Blogging through cancer: young women’s persistent problems shared online. Cancer Nurs. 2013;36(2):163–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Keim-Malpass J, Mitchell EM, Sun E, Kennedy C. Using Twitter to understand public perceptions regarding the #HPV vaccine: opportunities for public health nurses to engage in social marketing. Public Health Nurs. 2017;34(4):316–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Reavley NJ, Pilkington PD. Use of Twitter to monitor attitudes toward depression and schizophrenia: an exploratory study. PeerJ. 2014;2:e647.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Cole-Lewis H, Pugatch J, Sanders A, Varghese A, Posada S, Yun C, et al. Social listening: a content analysis of e-cigarette discussions on Twitter. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(10):1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. van Lent LG, Sungur H, Kunneman FA, van de Velde B, Das E. Too far to care? Measuring public attention and fear for ebola using Twitter. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(6):e193.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Whiteman E. “Just chatting”: research ethics and cyberspace. Int J Qual Methods. 2007;6(2):1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB. Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu Rev Public Health. 1998;19(1):173–202.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Menefee H, Thompson M, Guterbock T, Williams I, Valdez R. Mechanisms of communicating health information through Facebook: implications for consumer health IT design. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(8):e218.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Valdez R, Guterbock T, Fitzgibbon K. From Ioquacious to reticent: understanding patient health information communication to guide consumer health IT design. J Am Med Informatics Assoc. 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Dyson M, Shave K, Fernandes R, Scott S, Hartling L. Outcomes in child health: exploring the use of social media to engage parents in patient-centered outcomes research. J Med Internet Res. 2017;16(19):e78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Markham A. The methods, politics and ethics of representation in online ethnography. In: Denzin N, Lincoln Y, editors. The Sage handbook of qualitative research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Walther JB. Research ethics in Internet-enabled research: human subjects issues and methodological myopia. Ethics Inf Technol. 2002;4:205–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Martinez O, Wu E, Shultz A, Capote J, Lopez Rios J, Sandort T. Still a hard to reach population? Using social media to recruit Latino gay couples for an HIV intervention adaptation study. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(4):e113.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Yaun P, Bare M, Johnson M, Saberi P. Using online social media for recruitment of human immunodeficiency virus-positive participants. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(5):e117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Fine M, Weis L, Weseen S, Wong L. For whom? Qualitative research, representations, and social responsibilities. In: Denzin N, Lincoln Y, editors. The Sage handbook of qualitative research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Keim-Malpass J, Adelstein K, Kavalieratos D. Legacy making through illness blogs: online spaces for young adults approaching the end-of-life. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2015;4(4):209–12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Lincoln Y, Guba E. Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications; 1985.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  41. Bond C, Ahmed O, Hind M, Thomas B, Hewitt-Taylor J. The conceptual and practical ethical dilemmas of using health discussion board posts as research data. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(6):e112.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Wilkinson D, Thelwall M. Researching personal information on the public web. Soc Sci Comput Rev. 2010;29(4):387–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. O’Connor A, Jackson L, Goldsmith L, Skirton H. Can I get a retweet please? Health research recruitment and the Twittersphere. J Adv Nurs. 2014;70(3):599–609.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Pitts V. Illness and Internet empowerment: writing and reading breast cancer in cyberspace. Health (London). 2004;8(1):33–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Schumacher KR, Lee JM. Harnessing social media for child health research. JAMA Pediatr. 2016;170(1):5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rupa Valdez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Valdez, R., Keim-Malpass, J. (2019). Ethics in Health Research Using Social Media. In: Bian, J., Guo, Y., He, Z., Hu, X. (eds) Social Web and Health Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14714-3_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics