Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Bridging the Gap Towards Flying: Archaeopteryx as a Unique Evolutionary Tool to Inquiry-Based Learning

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Evolution Education Re-considered

Abstract

A theoretically derived sixth-grade classroom module focusing on the evolution of birds contains the core of our study. Participants, assumed to be novices in evolutionary classroom issues when they completed matching hands-on experiments based on the inquiry-based vision, learned about the theoretical background and formulated explanations based on observations. Our age-appropriate inquiry-based hands-on and multimedia workstations focusing on the unique Archaeopteryx fossil contained a (replica) fossil with its extraordinary importance for better understanding evolution. Student-centred object-based activities including self-dependent learning opportunities were supported by the individual learning stations. The method applied was scientific inquiry which is assumed to allow students to derive empirically supported explanations. The structure originated in the 5 ‘E’ (engage, explore, explain, extent and evaluate), a key concept regarded as optimally supporting individual cognitive learning. The module integrated (a) arts in science with (b) authentic tools and aimed to further interesting in learning science. It intended to promote enthusiasm, to support successful learning in science and to cross-link interdisciplinary tools. A working booklet and various tools provided background information about, for instance, the bird flight and probable life of Archaeopteryx. Participation caused a substantial and sustained increase in individual knowledge scores after the lesson unit, i.e. signalling a sustained learning success. As no gender effect appeared, the module apparently affects female and male students equally. Subsequent conclusions for everyday teaching in school are discussed and recommendations for teaching derived.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, T. J., Stull, G. S., Hsu, T. M., & Hegarty, M. (2015). Constrained interactivity for relating multiple representations in Science. When virtual is better than real. Computers & Education, 81, 69–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bissinger, K., & Bogner, F. X. (2017). Environmental literacy in practice: Education on tropical rainforests and climate change. Journal Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blancke, S., Boudry, M., Braeckman, J., deSmedt, J., & deCruz, H. (2011). Dealing with creationist challenges. What European Biology teachers might expect in the classroom. Journal of Biology Education, 45(4), 176–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogner, F. X. (1998). The influence of short-term outdoor ecology education on long-term variables of environmental perspective. Journal of Environmental Education, 29(4), 17–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogner, F. X. (1999). Empirical evaluation of an educational conservation programme introduced in Swiss Secondary Schools. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 1169–1185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bossert, U. (1998). Archaeopteryx—Untersuchung eines Fossilfundes. [A.—Investigating a fossil]. Biologie in der Schule, 47(6), 333–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catley, K. M. (2006). Darwin’s missing link—A novel paradigm for evolution education. Science Education, 90(5), 767–783. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavallo, A. M., & McCall, D. (2008). Seeing may not mean believing: Examining students’ understandings & beliefs in evolution. The American Biology Teacher, 70(9), 522–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, J. (2005). A proposal for action: Strategies for recognizing heritage language competence as a learning resource within the mainstream classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 89, 585–592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, D. L., & Wescott D. J. (2009). Still more “fancy” and “myth” than “fact” in students’ conceptions of evolution. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 2(3), 505–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deadman, J. A., & Kelly, P. J. (1978). What do secondary school boys understand about evolution and heredity before they are taught the topics? Journal of Biological Education, 12(1), 7–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeWitt, J., Archer, L., & Osborne, J. (2013). Nerdy, brainy and normal: Children’s and parent’s constructions of those who are highly engaged with science. Research in Science Education, 43(4), 1455–1476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dieser, O., & Bogner, F. X. (2015). Young people’s cognitive achievement as fostered by hands-on-centred environmental education. Environmental Education Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2015.1054265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dieser, O., & Bogner, F. X. (2017). How individual environmental values influence knowledge acquisition of adolescents within a week-long outreach biodiversity module. Journal of Global Research in Education and Social Science, 9(4), 213–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, T. (1973). Nothing makes sense in biology except in the light of evolution. The American Biology Teacher, 35(3), 125–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodson, P. (1985). Review of the international archaeopteryx conference. Journal of Vertebrate Palaeontology, 5(2), 177–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724634.1985.10011856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R., & Easley, J. (1978). Pupils and paradigms: a review of literature related to concept development in adolescent science students. Studies in Science Education, 5, 61–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, G. M., Rauhut, O. W. M., Zhou, Z., Turner, A. H., Inouye, B. D., Hu, D., & Norell, M. A. (2009). Was dinosaurian physiology inherited by birds? Reconciling slow growth in Archaeopteryx. PLoS One, 4(10), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, E. M., & Lane, J. D. (2011). Contradictory or complementary? Creationist and evolutionist explanations of the origin of species. Human Development, 54, 144–159. https://doi.org/10.1159/000329130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foth, C., Tischlinger, H., & Rauhut, O. W. M. (2014). New specimen of Archaeopteryx provides insights into the evolution of pennaceous feathers. Nature, 511, 79–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fremerey, C., & Bogner, F. X. (2014). Learning about drinking water: How important are the three dimensions of knowledge that can change individual behaviour? Education Sciences, 4, 213–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fremerey, C., & Bogner, F. X. (2015). Cognitive learning in authentic environments in relation to green attitude preferences. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 44, 9–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geier, C. S., & Bogner, F. X. (2011). Learning at workstations. Students’ satisfaction, attitudes towards cooperative learning and intrinsic motivation. Journal for Educational Research Online, 3(2), 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt, M., & Bogner, F.-X. (2015). Learning about genetic engineering in an outreach laboratory: Influence of motivation and gender on students’ cognitive achievement. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 6(2), 166–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodale, T. A. (2017). Utility of context-based learning to influence teacher understanding of evolution and genetics concepts related to food security issues in East Africa (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Girwidz, R., Bogner, F. X., Robitzko, T., & Schaal, S. (2006a). Media assisted learning in science education: An interdisciplinary approach to hibernation and energy transfer. Science Education International, 17(2), 95–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girwidz, R., Robitzko, T., Schaal, S., & Bogner, F. X. (2006b). Theoretical concepts for using multimedia in science education. Science Education International, 17(2), 77–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gropengießer, H., Harms, U., & Kattmann, U. (2013). Auswahl und Verknüpfung der Lerninhalte [Selecting and connecting learning contents]. In Fachdidaktik Biologie. Donauwörth: Aulis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammann, M., & Aschoff, R. (2013). Schülervorstellungen im Biologieunterricht: Ursachen für Lernschwierigkeiten [Student conceptions in Biology lessons: Causes of learning difficulties]. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampden-Thompson, G., & Bennett, J. (2013). Science teaching and learning activities and student’s engagement in science. International Journal of Science Education, 35(8), 1325–1343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harlen, W. (2010). Principles and big ideas of science education. Hatfield: Association for Science Education. http://www.ase.org.uk/documents/principles-and-big-ideas-of-science-education.

  • Hermann, R. S. (2008). Evolution as a controversial issue: A review of instructional approaches. Science & Education, 17, 1011–1032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakobi, S. R. (2010). “Little Monkeys on the Grass …” How people for and against evolution fail to understand the theory of evolution. Evolution: Education & Outreach, 3(3), 416–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kattmann, U. (2017). Geschichte und Verwandtschaft der Lebewesen. Ein Basiskonzept der Evolutionsbiologie [History and relationship of animals. A basic concept of evolution]. Unterricht Biologie, 421, 39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kossack, A., & Bogner, F. X. (2012). How does a one-day environmental education programme support individual connectedness with nature? Journal of Biological Education, 46(3), 180–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liefländer, A., & Bogner, F. X. (2014). The effects of children’s age and sex on acquiring pro-environmental attitudes through environmental education. Journal of Environmental Education, 45(2), 105–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lienert, G. A. (1969). Testaufbau und Testanalyse [Test construction and Analysis] (3rd ed.). Weinheim: Julius Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marth, M., & Bogner, F. X. (2018). Does the issue of bionics within a student-centered module generate longterm knowledge. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 55, 117–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (1998). A split-attention effect in multimedia learning: Evidence for dual processing systems in working memory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 312–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. (1997). This is biology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, R., Hejmadi, M., & Hurst, L. D. (2017). Teaching genetics prior to teaching evolution improves evolution understanding but not acceptance. PLoS Biology, 15(5), e2002255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. (2002). Inquiry-based science instruction—What is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. https://doi.org/10.10002/tea.20347.

  • Morgan, J. M. (1992). A theoretical basis for evaluating wildlife-related education programs. The American Biology Teacher, 54, 153–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, M. D. (2002). Social innovations: Ten cases from Benjamin Franklin. Creativity Research Journal, 14(2), 253–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nachtigall, W. (1985). Warum Vögel fliegen [Why birds fly]. Hamburg: Rasch & Röhring.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2012). Programme for the international assessment of adult competencies (PIAAC). Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, J. H. (1976). Archaeopteryx and the origin of birds. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 8, 91–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peter, D. S. (1994). Entwicklung des Vogelflugs [Development of the bird flight]. Praxis der Naturwissenschaften, 43(7), 10–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randler, C., & Bogner, F. X. (2002). Comparing methods of instruction using bird species identification skills as indicators. Journal of Biological Education, 36(4), 2–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randler, C., & Bogner, F. X. (2006). Cognitive achievement of group-based hands-on identification skill training. Journal of Biological Education, 40(4), 161–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sattler, S., & Bogner, F. X. (2017). Short- and long-term outreach at the zoo: Cognitive learning about marine ecological and conservational issues. Environmental Education Research, 23(2), 252–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1144173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharfenberg, F.-J., & Bogner, F. X. (2010). Instructional efficiency of changing cognitive load in an out-of-school laboratory. International Journal of Science Education, 32(6), 829–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharfenberg, F.-J., Bogner, F. X., & Klautke, S. (2006). The sustainability of external control groups for empirical control purposes: A cautionary story in science education research. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 11(1), 22–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, S., & Bogner, F. X. (2015). Effects of students’ effort scores in a structured inquiry unit on long-term recall abilities of content knowledge. Education Research International, (Article ID 826734).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schönfelder, M., & Bogner, F. X. (2017). How to sustainably increase students’ willingness to protect pollinators. Environmental Education Research, 2–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumm, M., & Bogner, F. X. (2016). The impact of science motivation on cognitive achievement within a 3-lesson unit about renewable energies. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 50, 14–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinatra, G. M., Kienhues, D., & Hofer, B. K. (2014). Addressing challenges to public understanding of science: Epistemic cognition, motivated reasoning and conceptual change. Educational Psychologist, 49(2), 123–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sotiriou, S., & Bogner, F. X. (2011). Inspiring science learning: Designing the science classroom of the future. Advanced Science Letters, 4, 3304–3309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sotiriou, S., Bybee, R., & Bogner, F. X. (2016). PATHWAYS: A case of large-scale implementation of evidence-based practice in science inquiry-based science education. International Journal of Higher Education, 6(2), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamos, D. N. (2008). Evolution and the big questions. Sex, race and other matters. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturm, H., & Bogner, F. X. (2008). Student-oriented versus teacher-centred: The effect of learning at workstations about birds and bird flight on cognitive achievement and motivation. International Journal of Science Education, 30(7), 941–959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sturm, H., & Bogner, F. X. (2010). Learning at workstations in two different environments: A museum and a classroom. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 36(1–2), 14–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, B. (2013). Archaeopteryx. Kinder lernen den einzigartigen Urvogel kennen [Kids get to know the unique fossil bird]. Grundschule Sachunterricht, 57, 28–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • To, C., Tenenbaum, H. R., & Hogh, H. (2017). Secondary school students’ reasoning about evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(2), 247–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1992). Mental models of the earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 535–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, I., & Kattmann, U. (1991). Archaeopteryx—ein befiederter Dinosaurier? [A.—A feathered dinosaur]. Unterricht Biologie, 15, 41–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellnhofer, P. (2008). Archaeopteryx. Der Urvogel von Solnhofen [The fossil bird of Solnhofen] (pp. 205–216). München: Pfeil.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, B. Y., & Frederiksen, J. R. (1998). Inquiry, modelling and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16, 3–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zabel, J., & Gropengießer, H. (2011). Learning progress in evolution theory: Climbing a ladder or roaming a landscape? Journal of Biological Education, 45(3), 143–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the European HORIZON-2020 framework labelled CREATIONS: Developing an Engaging Science Classroom (Grant Agreement No. 665917; http://creations-project.eu). We would like to thank all students and teachers who supported our study. We kindly thank M. Wiseman for constructive discussion and assistance in statistical analyses, H.-D. Haas at the Jura-Museum in Eichstaett for providing the Archaeopteryx fossil replica as well as him and K. Elsner-Mann for supporting our first pilot test runs.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Educational Biology, Centre of Math and Science Education, University Bayreuth, Z-MNU, University Campus, NW-1, 95447, Bayreuth, Germany

    Alexandra Buck & Franz X. Bogner

  2. Ellinogermaniki Agogi, R&D, Pallini, Athens, Greece

    Sofoklis Sotiriou

Authors
  1. Alexandra Buck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sofoklis Sotiriou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Franz X. Bogner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Franz X. Bogner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. IPN - Leibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education at Kiel University, Kiel, Germany

    Ute Harms

  2. Institute of Education, University College London, London, UK

    Michael J. Reiss

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Buck, A., Sotiriou, S., Bogner, F.X. (2019). Bridging the Gap Towards Flying: Archaeopteryx as a Unique Evolutionary Tool to Inquiry-Based Learning. In: Harms, U., Reiss, M. (eds) Evolution Education Re-considered. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14698-6_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14698-6_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-14697-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-14698-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation