Abstract
Knowledge and understanding of evolution are generally poor. Yet evolution is foundational to the science of biology. Here, we review the contributions made by the other chapters in this book and suggest ways forward for the field. The chapters in this book demonstrate that knowledge and understanding of evolution are aided by the sorts of pedagogical approaches that are known to work well in other areas of science education and beyond. In particular, there is evidence that the appropriate use of teaching for metacognition , multimodal approaches, argumentation , inquiry-based science education , reinforcement of learning, context-based learning , models , intercultural dialogic approach and object-based learning can all help promote learning about evolution. To this list, we can add that teacher expertise is of great importance. In addition, as the chapters in this book show, there are some reasons for optimism as the biology education community is gradually building up a corpus of knowledge about what works well when teaching specific aspects of evolution. Nevertheless, one of the conclusions of this book is that there is much that still remains to be done in researching evolution education ; we know more about the problems that learners have in acquiring a good understanding of evolution that about how to help them so acquire this. While there are an increasing number of research-based interventions in evolution education that are leading to greater conceptual understanding, the curriculum and pedagogical approaches that these interventions draw on are rarely ones that are robustly established. Furthermore, we still lack consensus about the best instruments for measuring cognitive gains and there is a paucity of longitudinal studies. Overall, the field of evolution education , while perhaps no longer in its infancy, still has a long way to go before it matures.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aikenhead, G. (2001). Integrating western and aboriginal sciences: Cross-cultural science teaching. Research in Science Education, 31, 337–355.
Bell, P., Lewenstein, B., Shouse, A., & Feder, M. A. (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places and pursuits. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Braund, M., & Reiss, M. J. (2006). Towards a more authentic science curriculum: The contribution of out-of-school learning. International Journal of Science Education, 28(12), 1373–1388.
Campbell, B., Lazonby, J., Millar, R., Nicolson, P., Ramsden, J., & Waddington, D. (1994). Science: The Salters’ approach—A case study of the process of large scale curriculum development. Science Education, 78(5), 415–447.
Chatterjee, H. J. (2011). Object-based learning in higher education: The pedagogical power of museums. In International Committee for University Museums and Collections (UMAC) Proceedings (Vol. 3).
Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287–312.
Duncan, R. G., & Rivet, A. E. (2013). Science learning progressions. Science, 339(6118), 396–397.
Flanagan, J. C., & Roseman, J. E. (2011). Assessing middle and high school students’ understanding of evolution with standards-based items. Paper presented at the National Association of Research in Science Teaching Annual Meeting, Orlando, FL.
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 8410–8415.
Grosz, S. (2014). The examined life: How we lose and find ourselves. London: Vintage.
Hermann, R. S. (2008). Evolution as a controversial issue: A review of instructional approaches. Science & Education, 17, 1011–1032.
Legare, C. H., Lane, J. D., & Evans, E. M. (2013). Anthropomorphizing science: How does it affect the development of evolutionary concepts? Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 59(2), 168–197.
Long, D. E. (2011). Evolution and religion in American education: An ethnography. Dordrecht: Springer.
Malone, K. L., Schuchardt, A. M., & Schunn, C. D. (2018). Improving conceptual understanding and representation skills through Excel-Based modeling. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27(1), 30–44.
Nehm, R. H. (2018). Evolution. In K. Kampourakis & M. J. Reiss (Eds.), Teaching biology in schools: Global research, issues and trends (pp. 164–177). New York: Routledge.
Newall, E. (2017). Evolution, insight and truth? School Science Review, 99(367), 61–66.
Pugh, K. J., Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Koskey, K. L., Stewart, V. C., & Manzey, C. (2010). Motivation, learning, and transformative experience: A study of deep engagement in science. Science Education, 94, 1–28.
Reiss, M. J. (2009). The relationship between evolutionary biology and religion. Evolution, 63, 1934–1941.
Reiss, M. J. (2011). How should creationism and intelligent design be dealt with in the classroom? Journal of Philosophy of Education, 45, 399–415.
Reiss, M. J. (2017). Teaching the theory of evolution in informal settings to those who are uncomfortable with it. In P. G. Patrick (Ed.), Preparing informal science educators: Perspectives from science communication and education (pp. 495–507). Cham: Springer.
Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36(1–2), 111–139.
Tang, K.-S., Delgardo, C., & Moje, E. B. (2014). An integrative framework for the analysis of multiple and multimodal representations for meaning-making in science education. Science Education, 98(2), 305–326.
Tibell, L. A. E., & Harms, U. (2017). Biological principles and threshold concepts for understanding natural selection—Implications for developing visualizations as a pedagogic tool. Science & Education (SCED), 26(7), 953–973.
Tracy, J. L., Hart, J., & Martens, J. P. (2011). Death and science: The existential underpinnings of belief in intelligent design and discomfort with evolution. PLoS ONE, 6(3), e17349. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017349.
Williams, J. D. (2015). Evolution versus creationism: A matter of acceptance versus belief. Journal of Biological Education, 49, 322–333.
Winslow, M. W., Staver, J. R., & Scharmann, L. C. (2011). Evolution and personal religious belief: Christian university biology-related majors’ search for reconciliation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 1026–1049.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Reiss, M.J., Harms, U. (2019). What Now for Evolution Education?. In: Harms, U., Reiss, M. (eds) Evolution Education Re-considered. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14698-6_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14698-6_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-14697-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-14698-6
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)