Skip to main content

Cultural Diversity and Evolution: Looking for a Dialogical Teaching Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Evolution Education Re-considered

Abstract

Evolution education has not sufficiently explored the cultural and contextual aspects related to learning. In this chapter, we discuss the possibilities of teaching evolution using an intercultural dialogic approach. We worked with indigenous students in the Mayan Highlands in Mexico exploring their current knowledge about domestication of maize (a process of artificial selection ) and reflect on how knowledge about domestication of maize could be relevant for learning evolution . Indigenous people in Mexico managed to domesticate maize’s wild ancestor (teosinte) to produce an enormous diversity of maize, and this process is still performed in Mexico. Bringing this knowledge to the fore in the classroom generates opportunities to discuss the relevance of indigenous/traditional knowledge , as well as to find ways to make evolution more relevant for students. We present results from an exploratory study that illustrate the complexities of the task and shed light on issues that should be considered in order to teach evolution considering contextual and cultural diversity .

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Tsotsil is the language spoken by one of the indigenous groups in Chiapas Highlands. It is spoken by over 400,000 people and is the largest ethnic group, only after Tzeltales.

  2. 2.

    The type of schools we worked in are telesecundarias. This is a particular system in Mexico, where there is only one teacher per group (in regular secondary schools there is a teacher for every subject). The creation of this type of school was seen as a solution to reach distant populations through technological support.

  3. 3.

    Mestizos is the name that is used to identify non-indigenous people.

References

  • Aikenhead, G. (2001). Integrating western and aboriginal sciences: Cross-cultural science teaching. Research in Science Education, 31, 337–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aikenhead, G. (2006). Science education for everyday life: Evidence based practice. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aikenhead, G., & Michell, H. (2011). Bridging cultures. Indigenous and scientific ways of knowing nature. Canada: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Álvarez-Buylla, E., Carreón, A., & San Vicente, A. (2011). Haciendo milpa. La protección de las semillas y la agricultura campesina. México: UNAM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atwater, M. (2011). Significant science education research on multicultural science education, equity, and social justice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(1), 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergstrom, C., & Dugatkin, L. (2012). Evolution. New York: Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, B., & Anderson, C. (1990). Students conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(5), 415–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, C. (2008). Scientific discourse in the academy: A case study of an American Indian undergraduate. Science Education, 92, 825–847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnett, D. (2009). Savage selection: Analogy and elision in on the origin of species. Endeavour, 33(4), 120–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrillo Trueba, C. (2010). La milpa y la cosmovisión de los pueblos mesoamericanos (p. 34). La Jornada: La Jornada del Campo.

    Google Scholar 

  • CCA (Comisión para la Cooperación Ambiental). (2004). Maíz y biodiversidad. http://www3.cec.org/islandora/en/item/2152-maize-and-biodiversity-effects-transgenic-maize-in-mexico-key-findings-and-es.pdf. Accessed April 21, 2017.

  • Clement, J. (1993). Using bridging analogies and anchoring intuitions to deal with students’ preconceptions in physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(10), 1241–1257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chinn, P. (2007). Decolonizing methodologies and indigenous knowledge: The role of culture, place and personal experience in professional development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(9), 1247–1268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coley, J., & Tanner, K. (2012). Common origins of diverse misconceptions: Cognitive principles and the development of biology thinking. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 11(3), 209–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, G. A., López-Feldman, A., Yúnez-Naude, A., & Taylor, J. E. (2014). Genetic erosion in maize’s center of origin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 111(39), 14094–14099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, E. M. (2008). Conceptual change and evolutionary biology: A developmental analysis. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 263–294). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulton, T. M., Buckler, C. S., & Kissel, R. A. (2011). The teacher-friendly guide to the evolution of maize. New York: Paleontological Research Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • García Franco, A. (2015). La milpa como proyecto didáctico. In A. Gómez Galindo & M. Quintanilla (Eds.), La enseñanza de las ciencias naturales basad en proyectos (pp. 155–172). Chile: Bellaterra.

    Google Scholar 

  • García Franco, A., & Lazos Ramírez, L. (2016). Designing educational material for scientific intercultural education: The harvest of milpa in Mexico as an example for dialogue. Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Educao em Ciencias, 16(3), 871–888.

    Google Scholar 

  • González, L., & Meinardi, E. (2009). El pensamiento finalista como obstáculo epistemológico para la enseñanza del modelo darwiniano. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, Número Extra. http://ensciencias.uab.es/congreso09/numeroextra/art-1274-1276.pdf. Accessed April 11, 2017.

  • Gregory, R. (2009). Artificial selection and domestication: Modern lessons for Darwin’s enduring analogy. Evolution, Education and Outreach, 2(1), 5–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, A., & Treagust, D. (2005). Teaching and learning with analogies: friend or foe? In P. Aubusson, A. Harrison, & S. Ritchie (Eds.), Metaphor and analogy in science education. Holland: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICSU. (2002). Science and traditional knowledge. Report from the ICSU Study Group on Science and Traditional Knowledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inagaki, K., & Hatano, G. (2006). Young children´s conception of the biological world. Current Direction of Psychological Science, 15(4), 177–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez Aleixandre, M. (1992). Thinking about theories or thinking with theories?: A classroom study with natural selection. International Journal of Science Education, 14(1), 51–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jungwirth, E. (1975). The problem of teleology in biology as a problem of biology-teacher education. Journal of Biological Education, 9(6), 243–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keown, D. (1988). Teaching evolution: Improved approaches of unprepared students. The American Biology Teacher, 50(7), 407–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kampourakis, K. (2014). Understanding evolution. England: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kampourakis, K., & Zogza, V. (2009). Preliminary evolutionary explanations: A basic framework for conceptual change and explanatory coherence in evolution. Science & Education, 18(10), 1313–1340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kayumova, S., & Tippins, D. (2016). Toward re-thinking science education in terms of affective practices: Reflections from the field. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11(3), 567–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelemen, D. (2012). Teleological minds. How natural intuitions about agency and purpose influence learning about evolution. In K. Rosengren, S. Brem, & G. Sinatra (Eds.), Evolution challenges. Integrating research and practice in teaching and learning about evolution (pp. 66–92). England: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. (1996). La práctica del aprendizaje. In S. Chalkin & J. Lave (Eds.), Estudiar las prácticas, perspectivas sobre actividad y contexto (pp. 15–45). Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, J. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, A. (1971). The teaching of “adaptation”. Journal of Biological Education, 5(2), 86–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maffi, L. (2007). Biocultural diversity and sustainability. In J. Pretty, A. Ball, T. Benton, et al. (Eds.), Handbook of environment and society (pp. 267–277). UK: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuoka, Y., Vigouroux, Y., Goodman, M. M., Sánchez, G. J., Buckler, E., & Doebley, J. (2002). A single domestication for maize shown by multilocus microsatellite genotyping. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99, 6080–6084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. (1988). Toward a new philosophy of biology: Observations of an evolutionist. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olivé, L. (2007). La ciencia y la tecnología en la sociedad del conocimiento. Ética, política y epistemología. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parrota, J. A., & Trosper, R. L. (2012). Traditional forest-related knowledge. The Netherlands: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez Ruiz, M., & Argueta Villamar, A. (2011). Saberes indígenas y diálogo intercultural. Cultura y Representaciones Sociales, 5(10), 31–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosengren, K., Brem, S., & Sinatra, G. (Eds.). (2012). Evolution challenges. Integrating research and practice in teaching and learning about evolution. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W. M., & Calabrese, A. (2004). Rethinking scientific literacy. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Settlage, J. (1994). Conceptions of natural selection: A snapshot of the sense-making process. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(5), 449–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sickel, A., & Friedrichsen, P. (2013). Examining the evolution education literature with focus on teachers: Major findings, goals for teacher preparation, and directions for future research. Evolution, Education and Outreach, 6(23). http://www.evolution-outreach.com/content/6/1/23/. Accessed March 17, 2017.

  • Sinatra, G., Brem, S., & Evans, M. (2008). Changing minds? Implications of conceptual change for teaching. Learning about biological evolution. Evolution Education and Outreach, 1(2), 189–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. (2010). Current status of research in teaching and learning evolution: II. Pedagogical issues. Science and Education, 19(4–8), 523–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varelas, M., Martin, D. B., & Kane, J. M. (2012). Content learning and identity construction (CLIC): A framework to strengthen African American students’ mathematics and science learning in urban elementary schools. Human Development, 55, 319–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WGTE (Working Group on Teaching Evolution). (1998). Teaching about evolution and the nature of science. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to students in the Chiapas Highlands, their teachers, and the reviewers of this chapter. This work was supported by grants SEP/SEB 2013, No. 231425 y SEP/SEB 2014-01, No. 240192, CONACYT, México.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. A. Gómez Galindo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gómez Galindo, A.A., García Franco, A., Gonzáles Galli, L., Torres Frías, J.C. (2019). Cultural Diversity and Evolution: Looking for a Dialogical Teaching Perspective. In: Harms, U., Reiss, M. (eds) Evolution Education Re-considered. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14698-6_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14698-6_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-14697-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-14698-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics