Abstract
The vast majority of the scientific community agrees upon the importance and validity of evolutionary theory while many in the American (US) public struggle to understand or accept it. For those individuals who perceive evolution to contradict their worldview, the effortful accommodation of new information into their existing worldview, conceptual change, is necessary. Affective factors, including motivation , are considered to be requisite for conceptual change to occur, so instruction designed to enhance the motivational nature of learning environments would be expected to enhance to the effectiveness of evolution education. The purpose of this mixed methods study was to evaluate the potential for gameful, inquiry -based learning to enhance students’ motivation to learn in the context of plant evolutionary life history. Eight sections of an introductory laboratory course, including 140 undergraduates , were randomly assigned to one of four conditions: control; repeat-testing ; leaderboard ; and leaderboard with repeat-testing . As compared with the other three conditions, gameful learning that included both the leaderboard and repeat-testing elements significantly enhanced students’ motivation to learn biology in the context of plant evolutionary life history. Participants indicated that the leaderboard increased interest , engagement , and motivation to prepare, while repeat-testing reduced test anxiety and made the material easier to learn. These results support the potential for gameful learning to aid evolution instruction by enhancing the affective nature of learning environments—a necessary component for conceptual change regarding the understanding and acceptance of evolution .
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.
Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26, 369–398.
Chaiken, S. (1987). The heuristic model of persuasion. In M. P. Zanna, J. M. Olson, & C. P. Herman (Eds.), Social influence: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 5, pp. 3–39). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Routledge Academic.
Cohen, A. R., Stotland, E., & Wolfe, D. M. (1955). An experimental investigation of need for cognition. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 291.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining “gamification.” In: Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
Dole, J. A., & Sinatra, G. M. (1998). Reconceptualizing change in the cognitive construction of knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 33, 109–128.
Elliot, A. J., & Murayama, K. (2008). On the measurement of achievement goals: Critique, illustration, and application. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 613.
Gallup, G. (2017). American beliefs: Evolution vs. Bible’s explanation of human origins. http://www.gallup.com/poll/21811/americanbeliefs-evolution-vs-bibles-explanation-human-origins.aspx. Accessed December 17, 2017.
Glynn, S. M., Brickman, P., Armstrong, N., & Taasoobshirazi, G. (2011). Science motivation questionnaire II: Validation with science majors and non-science majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 1159–1176.
Hidi, S. (1990). Interest and its contribution as a mental resource for learning. Review of Educational Research, 60, 549–571.
Hulleman, C. S., Schrager, S. M., Bodmann, S. M., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010). A meta-analytic review of achievement goal measures: Different labels for the same constructs or different constructs with similar labels? Psychological Bulletin, 136, 422–449.
Kampourakis, D. (2014). Understanding evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2002). The role of motivational beliefs in conceptual change. In M. Limon & L. Mason (Eds.), Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in theory and practice (pp. 115–135). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Miller, J. D., Scott, E. C., & Okamoto, S. (2006). Public acceptance of evolution. Science, 313, 765–766.
NRC. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
NRC. (2011). A framework for K–12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
Owens, D. C. (2017). Issues with tissues: A tale of gameful learning in an introductory undergraduate biology laboratory course. Journal of College Science Teaching, 47, 38–42.
Owens, D. C., Smith-Walters, C., & Barlow, A. T. (In Press). Enhancing motivation to learn in a biology laboratory course through gaming: A design case. International Journal of Designs for Learning: Special Issue on Games for Learning.
Owens, D. C., Sadler, T. D., Barlow, A. T., Smith-Walters, C. (In Press). Student motivation from and resistance to active learning rooted in essential science practices. Research in Science Education.
Owens, D. C., Smith-Walters, C., Oslund, E. L., Barlow, A. T. (2018). The motivational nature of gameful learning environments. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Conference, New York, April 13–17, 2018.
Pew Research Center. (2016). Israel’s Religiously Divided Society. http://www.pewforum.org/files/2016/03/Israel-Survey-Full-Report.pdf. Accessed January 10, 2018.
Piaget, J. (1970). Piaget’s theory. In Mussen, P. H. (Ed.), Carmichael’s manual of child psychology (Vol. 1, 3rd edn., pp 703–732). New York: Wiley.
Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., & Boyle, R. A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63, 167–199.
Pintrich, P. R., & Schrauben, B. (1992). Students’ motivational beliefs and their cognitive engagement in classroom academic tasks. In D. Schunk & J. Meese (Eds.), Student perceptions in the classroom (pp. 149–183). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Pintrich, P., & Schunk, D. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211–227.
Pugh, K. J. (2002). Teaching for idea-based, transformative experiences in science: An investigation of the effectiveness of two instructional elements. Teachers College Record, 104, 1101–1137.
Pugh, K. J. (2011). Transformative experience: An integrative construct in the spirit of Deweyan pragmatism. Educational Psychologist, 46, 107–121.
Pugh, K. J., Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Koskey, K. L., Stewart, V. C., & Manzey, C. (2010). Motivation, learning, and transformative experience: A study of deep engagement in science. Science Education, 94, 1–28.
Resnick, L. B., Levine, J. M., & Teasley, S. D. (Eds.). (1991). Perspectives on socially shared cognition. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
Sinatra, G. M. (2005). The “warming trend” in conceptual change research: The legacy of Paul R. Pintrich. Educational Psychologist, 40, 107–115.
Sinatra, G. M., & Pintrich, P. R. (2003). Intentional conceptual change. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Sinatra, G. M., Southerland, S. A., McConaughy, F., & Demastes, J. (2003). Intentions and beliefs in students’ understanding and acceptance of biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 510–528.
Strike, K. A., & Posner, G. J. (1992). A revisionist theory of conceptual change. In R. A. Duschl & R. Hamilton (Eds.), Philosophy of science, cognitive psychology, and educational theory and practice (pp. 142–176). Albany: State University of New York Press.
Toulmin, S. (1972). Human understanding. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Vodopich, D. S., & Moore, R. (2014). Biology laboratory manual (10th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill Education.
Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1987). Theories of knowledge restructuring in development. Review of Educational Research, 57, 51–67.
Acknowledgements
I am grateful to Angela Barlow and Cindi Smith-Walters for their help in planning and conducting the study, to Dennis Mullen and Eric Oslund for valuable feedback concerning the study design and statistical analyses, to Steve Howard for logistical and moral support, and to the graduate teaching assistants who were responsible for facilitating the inquiry -based instruction.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Owens, D.C. (2019). Overcoming Motivational Barriers to Understanding and Accepting Evolution Through Gameful Learning. In: Harms, U., Reiss, M. (eds) Evolution Education Re-considered. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14698-6_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14698-6_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-14697-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-14698-6
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)