Abstract
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) is one of the techniques for measuring activities in the brain and it has been demonstrated to have a high potential in clinical application. However, fMRI is limited by some of the contradictory results reported by different studies. One of the possible reasons for this contradiction is the lack of standard and acceptable methods of analyzing fMRI data. Analysis of fMRI data in studies focusing on brain connectivity normally requires the definition of region of interest. This is normally done using regions of interest drawn on high resolution anatomical images. The use of anatomical images implies using structural information, thereby losing any functional information that could improve the analysis of fMRI data. In this article, we present the framework for a region of interest definition for fMRI using structural and functional information. Contrary to existing approaches, the proposed method will also consider the use of network properties. The method uses a bottom-up approach as it starts with structural information, then include functional information before it finally includes network properties. We hypothesize that the use of multiple information in defining the regions of interests in fMRI data will produce a more accurate, more reproducible and more trusted results than the use of structural information only. It is hoped that the use of the proposed model will lead to improved analysis of fMRI brain data, hence increasing its diagnostic potential.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Chen JE, Glover GH (2015) Functional magnetic resonance imaging methods. Neuropsychol Rev 25(3):289–313
Ogawa S et al (1990) Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 87(24):9868–9872
Elliott ML et al (2018) General functional connectivity: shared features of resting-state and task fMRI drive reliable individual differences in functional brain networks, p 330530
Martuzzi R et al (2010) Functional connectivity and alterations in baseline brain state in humans. Neuroimage 49(1):823–834
Hampson M et al (2006) Brain connectivity related to working memory performance. J Neurosci 26(51):13338–13343
Dezhina Z et al (2018) A systematic review of associations between functional MRI activity and polygenic risk for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder 1–16
Kenny ER et al (2010) Functional connectivity in late-life depression using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 18(7):643–651
Friston K et al (1993) Functional connectivity: the principal-component analysis of large (PET) data sets. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 13(1):5–14
McKeown MJ et al (1998) Analysis of fMRI data by blind separation into independent spatial components. Hum Brain Mapp 6(3):160–188
Salvador R et al (2005) Neurophysiological architecture of functional magnetic resonance images of human brain. Cereb Cortex 15(9):1332–1342
Griffanti L et al (2016) Challenges in the reproducibility of clinical studies with resting state fMRI: an example in early Parkinson’s disease. Neuroimage 124:704–713
Bennett CM, Miller MB (2010) How reliable are the results from functional magnetic resonance imaging? Ann N Y Acad Sci 1191(1):133–155
Cole DM, Smith SM, Beckmann CF (2010) Advances and pitfalls in the analysis and interpretation of resting-state FMRI data. Front Syst Neurosci 4:8
Islam M et al (2018) A survey of graph based complex brain network analysis using functional and diffusional MRI. Am J Appl Sci 14(12):1186–1208
Strogatz SH (2001) Exploring complex networks. Nature 410(6825):268
Albert R, Barabási AL (2002) Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Rev Mod Phys 74(1):47
Newman ME (2003) The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Rev 45(2):167–256
Bullmore E, Sporns O (2009) Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nat Rev Neurosci 10(3):186
Rubinov M et al (2009) Small-world properties of nonlinear brain activity in schizophrenia. Hum Brain Mapp 30(2):403–416
Finotellia P, Dulioa P (2015) Graph theoretical analysis of the brain. An overview. Scienze e Ricerche 9:89–96
Bassett DS, Bullmore ET (2017) Small-world brain networks revisited. Neuroscientist 23(5):499–516
Meunier D et al (2009) Hierarchical modularity in human brain functional networks. Front Neuroinform 3:37
Di X et al (2013) Task vs. rest—different network configurations between the coactivation and the resting-state brain networks. Front Hum Neurosci 7:493
Supekar K, Musen M, Menon V (2009) Development of large-scale functional brain networks in children. PLoS Biol 7(7):e1000157
Wang L et al (2010) Age-related changes in topological patterns of large-scale brain functional networks during memory encoding and recognition. Neuroimage 50(3):862–872
Achard S, Bullmore E (2007) Efficiency and cost of economical brain functional networks. PLoS Comput Biol 3(2):e17
Buckner RL et al (2009) Cortical hubs revealed by intrinsic functional connectivity: mapping, assessment of stability, and relation to Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurosci 29(6):1860–1873
Cieri F et al (2017) Late-life depression: modifications of brain resting state activity. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 30(3):140–150
Korhonen O et al (2017) Consistency of regions of interest as nodes of fMRI functional brain networks. Netw Neurosci 1(3):254–274
Fornito A, Zalesky A, Bullmore ET (2010) Network scaling effects in graph analytic studies of human resting-state fMRI data. Front Syst Neurosci 4:22
Stanley ML et al (2013) Defining nodes in complex brain networks. Front Comput Neurosci 7:169
Wang J, Zuo X, He Y (2010) Graph-based network analysis of resting-state functional MRI. Front Syst Neurosci 4:16
Zalesky A et al (2010) Whole-brain anatomical networks: does the choice of nodes matter? Neuroimage 50(3):970–983
Achard S et al (2006) A resilient, low-frequency, small-world human brain functional network with highly connected association cortical hubs. J Neurosci 26(1):63–72
Aubert-Broche B et al (2009) Clustering of atlas-defined cortical regions based on relaxation times and proton density. Neuroimage 47(2):523–532
Chen ZJ et al (2008) Revealing modular architecture of human brain structural networks by using cortical thickness from MRI. Cereb Cortex 18(10):2374–2381
Deleus F, Van Hulle MM (2009) A connectivity-based method for defining regions-of-interest in fMRI data. IEEE Trans Image Process 18(8):1760–1771
Estrada E, Hatano N (2008) Communicability in complex networks. Phys Rev E 77(3):036111
Honey C et al (2009) Predicting human resting-state functional connectivity from structural connectivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106(6):2035–2040
Zhang J et al (2013) A manual, semi-automated and automated ROI study of fMRI hemodynamic response in the caudate. Nucleus 2(150):2
Wang J et al (2009) Parcellation-dependent small-world brain functional networks: a resting-state fMRI study. Hum Brain Mapp 30(5):1511–1523
Collins DL et al (1995) Automatic 3-D model-based neuroanatomical segmentation. Hum Brain Mapp 3(3):190–208
Tzourio-Mazoyer N et al (2002) Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. Neuroimage 15(1):273–289
Fischl B et al (2004) Automatically parcellating the human cerebral cortex. Cereb Cortex 14(1):11–22
Shi J, Malik J (2000) Normalized cuts and image segmentation. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 22(8):888–905
Newman ME (2006) Modularity and community structure in networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103(23):8577–8582
DonGiovanni D, Vaina LM (2016) Select and cluster: a method for finding functional networks of clustered voxels in fMRI. Comput Intell Neurosci 2016
Hagmann P et al (2008) Mapping the structural core of human cerebral cortex. PLoS Biol 6(7):e159
Hagmann P et al (2007) Mapping human whole-brain structural networks with diffusion MRI. PloS One 2(7):e597
Shen X, Papademetris X, Constable RT (2010) Graph-theory based parcellation of functional subunits in the brain from resting-state fMRI data. Neuroimage 50(3):1027–1035
McLachlan G, Peel D (2000) Finite mixture models, Willey series in probability and statistics. Wiley, New York
Heckemann RA et al (2006) Automatic anatomical brain MRI segmentation combining label propagation and decision fusion. Neuroimage 33(1):115–126
Golland Y, Golland P, Bentin S, Malach RJN (2008) Data-driven clustering reveals a fundamental subdivision of the human cortex into two global systems, 46(2):540–553
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Zubair, A.F., Aribisala, S.B., Manca, M., Mazzara, M. (2020). On the Parcellation of Functional Magnetic Resonance Images. In: Ciancarini, P., Mazzara, M., Messina, A., Sillitti, A., Succi, G. (eds) Proceedings of 6th International Conference in Software Engineering for Defence Applications. SEDA 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 925. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14687-0_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14687-0_29
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-14686-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-14687-0
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)