Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Question-Answer Nets Objectifying a Conceptual Space in the Design of a System with Software

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of 6th International Conference in Software Engineering for Defence Applications (SEDA 2018)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 925))

  • 452 Accesses

Abstract

Becoming of any system with software should be implemented especially carefully in a conceptual space (CS) where designers create the conceptual states of the system in parallel with its surrounding. In such work, they must build as useful conceptual models so regularities of the project space and its language, the controlled use of which is strictly obligatory. Thus, at the early stage of designing the system, the effectiveness and quality of work essentially depend on the form in which designers objectify the corresponding CS. This paper deals with the use of question-answer nets for objectifying the CS. In such conditions, providing the consistency between current states of the project and CS facilitate increasing the success of designing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Gärdenfors P (2000) Conceptual spaces – the geometry of thought. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Reports of standish group. www.standishgroup.com/outline. Accessed Oct 2018

  3. IBM rational unified process. http://www-01.ibm.com/software/rational/rup/. Accessed Sept 2018

  4. Sosnin P (2018) Experience-based human-computer interactions: emerging research and opportunities. IGI-Global, Pennsylvania

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Sosnin P (2016) Precedent-oriented approach to conceptually experimental activity in designing the software intensive systems. Int J Ambient Comput Intell (IJACI) 7(1):69–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Welwood J (1977) On psychological space. J Transpers Psychol 9(2):97–118

    Google Scholar 

  7. Boden MA (2009) Conceptual spaces. In: Meusburger P (ed) Milieus of creativity knowledge and space, vol 2. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 235–243

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Gärdenfors P (2011) Semantics based on conceptual spaces. In: Banerjee M, Seth A (eds) Logic and its applications, vol 6521. LNCS. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 1–11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Rickard JT, Aisbett J, Gibbon G (2007) Reformulation of the theory of conceptual spaces. Inf Sci 177(21):4539–4565

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Bechberger L, Kühnberger K-U (2017) A thorough formalization of conceptual spaces. In: Advances in artificial intelligence. LNCS, vol 10505, pp 58–71

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gero JS, Kannengiesser NN (2004) The situated function-behavior-structure framework. Des Stud 25(4):373–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gero JS, Kannengiesser U (2013) The function-behaviour-structure ontology of design. In: Chakrabarti A, Blessing L (eds) An anthology of theories and models of design. Springer, London, pp 263–283

    Google Scholar 

  13. Al-Fedaghi S (2016) Function-behavior-structure model of design: an alternative approach. Int J Adv Comput Sci Appl 7(7):133–139

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bedjeti A, Lago P, Lewis G, De Boer RD, Hilliard R (2017) Modeling context with an architecture viewpoint. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on software architecture, pp 117–120

    Google Scholar 

  15. Charmaz K (2006) Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sosnin P (2017) A way for creating and using a theory of a project in designing of a software intensive system. In: Proceedings of the 17th international conference on computational science and its applications, pp 3–6

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The Russian Fund for Basic Research supported this work (RFBR), Grant # 18- 07-00989а, 18-47-730016 р_а, 18-47-732012 р_мк, and the State Contract №2.1534.2017/4.6.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ulyanovsk State Technical University, Ulyanovsk, 432027, Russia

    Petr Sosnin

Authors
  1. Petr Sosnin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Petr Sosnin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy

    Paolo Ciancarini

  2. Innopolis University, Innopolis, Russia

    Manuel Mazzara

  3. Innopolis University, Innopolis, Russia

    Angelo Messina

  4. Innopolis University, Innopolis, Russia

    Alberto Sillitti

  5. Innopolis University, Innopolis, Russia

    Giancarlo Succi

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sosnin, P. (2020). Question-Answer Nets Objectifying a Conceptual Space in the Design of a System with Software. In: Ciancarini, P., Mazzara, M., Messina, A., Sillitti, A., Succi, G. (eds) Proceedings of 6th International Conference in Software Engineering for Defence Applications. SEDA 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 925. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14687-0_27

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation