Maintaining an Effective Lab Notebook and Data Integrity
Efficient, organized, and detailed data maintenance are the cornerstones of a successful laboratory. Furthermore, institutional and federal requirements mandate proper maintenance, documentation, and dissemination of experimental data in a way that is rigorous and reproducible. The complexity of data generated in the modern laboratory setting presents a significant challenge to these principles of proper record keeping and data integrity. This chapter will focus on the elements of the scientific method, data maintenance, and paper and electronic record keeping that can be used to facilitate successful laboratory operations for the surgeon-scientist conducting basic research. In addition, there is recent increased emphasis on measures to ensure experimental rigor and reproducibility supported by the scientific community and National Institutes of Health. This chapter will introduce the surgeon-scientist to the critical aspects of these requirements to ensure compliance with grant submission guidelines and common author instructions for manuscript submission.
KeywordsNotebook Laboratory Electronic Data integrity Rigor Reproducibility Data archiving
- 5.Guerrero S, Dujardin G, Cabrera-Andrade A, Paz YMC, Indacochea A, Ingles-Ferrandiz M, Nadimpalli HP, Collu N, Dublanche Y, De Mingo I, Camargo D. Analysis and implementation of an electronic laboratory notebook in a biomedical research institute. PLoS One. 2016;11(8):e0160428. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160428.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 7.U.S. Food and Drug Administration CFR – Code of Federal Regulations Title 21. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?CFRPart=820. Accessed 30 July 2018.
- 10.The database of Genotypes and Phenotypes (dbGaP). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gap. Accessed 18 July 2018.
- 11.Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/. Accessed 18 July 2018.
- 12.The Jackson Laboratory: donate a strain. https://www.jax.org/jax-mice-and-services/cryo-and-strain-donation/donate-a-strain. Accessed 18 July 2018.
- 13.ATCC deposit services. https://www.atcc.org/en/Services/Deposit_Services.aspx. Accessed 18 July 2018.
- 14.NIH Data Sharing Policy and Implementation Guidance. 2003. https://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/data_sharing/data_sharing_guidance.htm. Accessed 18 July 2018.
- 17.Landis SC, Amara SG, Asadullah K, Austin CP, Blumenstein R, Bradley EW, Crystal RG, Darnell RB, Ferrante RJ, Fillit H, Finkelstein R, Fisher M, Gendelman HE, Golub RM, Goudreau JL, Gross RA, Gubitz AK, Hesterlee SE, Howells DW, Huguenard J, Kelner K, Koroshetz W, Krainc D, Lazic SE, Levine MS, Macleod MR, McCall JM, Moxley RT 3rd, Narasimhan K, Noble LJ, Perrin S, Porter JD, Steward O, Unger E, Utz U, Silberberg SD. A call for transparent reporting to optimize the predictive value of preclinical research. Nature. 2012;490(7419):187–91. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11556.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 18.National Institutes of Health Policy and Compliance: Rigor and Reproducibility. 2018. https://grants.nih.gov/reproducibility/index.htm. Accessed 19 July 2018.