Skip to main content

Manure Treatment for Biofuel

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Economics of Bioresources
  • 281 Accesses

Abstract

Animal excrements, such as manure, are by far the largest organic waste stream in the European Union. It is particularly large in the Netherlands where millions of animals per year are raised for meat, milk, eggs, gel, leather and many other products for daily consumption. As long as people consume such animal products, this production causes an unavoidable (wet) stream of organic matter containing various minerals. The question is, whether the material content of manure can be recycled, meaning all its main components reused as valuable products. In this chapter, we address the possibilities of separating and reusing these components. The focus is on cattle and pigs because most of the dry manure of chickens is already largely reused (mainly for energy production), and the manure volume of other animals is insignificant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Conijn JG, Lesschen JP (2015) Soil organic matter in the Netherlands. Quantification of stocks and flows in the top soil. Plant Research International/Alterra, WUR Wageningen

    Google Scholar 

  • De Buisonjé F, Verheijen R (2014) Drijfmest verliest snel zijn waarde voor biogas. Wageningen UR Livestock Research, Varkens Innovatie Centrum Sterksel. V-focus April 2014, pp 20–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasper GJ, Kemperman A (2015) Mestvergisting Fermtech Systems en Ecobag. Rapport 874 Wageningen UR Livestock Research

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasper GJ, Peters B (2012) Monovergisting varkensmest op boerderijschaal. Rapport 632 Wageningen UR Livestock Research

    Google Scholar 

  • Manure Resource (2017) 3rd International conference on manure management and valorization, November 2017, Eindhoven (NL)

    Google Scholar 

  • Morcatelli G, Mantovi P, Piccini S (2017) A farm scale process based on digestate microfiltration aimed at fertigation through drip lines. In: 3rd International conference on manure management and valorization, November 2017, Eindhoven (NL)

    Google Scholar 

  • Motta SR, Tambobe F, Adani F, Brenna S (2017) Phosphorous fertilizers efficiency compared in agronomic trials: struvite an opportunity of reuse and recycle. In: 3rd International conference on manure management and valorization, November 2017, Eindhoven (NL)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nest Vanden T (2017) Tailor made digestate products by blending with animal manure products, compost and mineral fertilizers. In: 3rd International conference on manure management and valorization, November 2017, Eindhoven (NL)

    Google Scholar 

  • Peeters SJW et al (2012) Achtergrondrapport integrale visie duurzame drijfmestverwaarding LTO. Energy Matters, Driebergen

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabo (2011) Vergisting benchmark (co-)vergisting boekjaar 2010: rendement door markt in verdrukking! Rabobank Food & Agri Thema-update, Utrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabo (2012a) Benchmark (co-)vergisting boekjaar 2010: rendement door markt in de verdrukking. Food & Agri Thema update vergisting, 4e jaargang, November 2011. Utrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabo (2012b) Toekomst biogas: van laagwaardige input naar hoogwaardige output. Food& Agri Thema biogas update, 37e jaargang, januari 2013. Utrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigurnjak I, Michels E, Crappe S, Buysens S, Tack FMG, Neve S, Meers E (2017) Can acidification increase nitrogen fertilizer value of bio-based fertilizers? In: 3rd International conference on manure management and valorization, November 2017, Eindhoven (NL)

    Google Scholar 

  • Smit A, Rulkens W, Sanders JPM, Verdoes N, Teng Y, Brunt D (2012) Verwerking van digestaat van Mestvergisting. Terreinverkenning van mogelijkheden tot kostenreductie. WUR/Alterra rapport 2310

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmerman M, van Eekert MHA, van Riel JW, Schuman E (2013) Mestvergisting bij korte verblijftijden. Rapport 729 WUR Wageningen

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Voort MPJ (2007) Saldoberekening van energiegewassen voor covergisting en bioethanolproductie. PPO Publicatienr. 32500580 Wageningen

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Voort MPJ et al (2008) Economie van energiegewassen. PPO Publicatienr. 32500608, Wageningen

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Waall WR, Verberne RA (2004) Multi-purpose pellet facility and real options portfolio management (ROPM) in response to value chain changes of biomass resources. Ingenia Consultants & Engineers, Eindhoven

    Google Scholar 

  • van Haaster J, van Laarhoven W (red) (2004) Samengestelde biomassapellets. Coalitievorming voor grootschalige experimenten voor de meestook van samengestelde biomassapellets in energiecentrales. Rapport in het kader van de regeling BSE Ondersteuning Transitie-Coalities Duurzame energiehuishouding. Novem rapport 5005-03-20-01-013. FIS, Wageningen/Aarle-Rixtel

    Google Scholar 

  • van Oosterhout T, van Laarhoven W (2004) Het gebruik van reststoffen van de voedings—en genotmiddelenindustrie in de veehouderij. Stuurgroep Technology Assessment ministerie LNV/Sirned. Den Haag/Ulvenhout

    Google Scholar 

  • Veldhuis J, van Laarhoven W (2006) Nabewerking van digestaat na vergisting. Onderzoek naar de technische en financiële haalbaarheid van het naverwerken van het digestaat van de vergisting van natte restproducten uit de voedings- en genotmiddelenindustrie, Hengelo (OV)

    Google Scholar 

  • Vis M (2002) Beschikbaarheid van reststromen uit de voedings—en genotmiddelenindustrie voor energieproductie. BTG/Novem, Enschede/Utrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Vos J, Zwart KB (2013) Mest(co)vergisting en biogas/groengas productie in Overijssel: Ervaringsproblemen, kansen & Verbeterstrategieën. BTG biomass technology group BV/Wageningen UR/Alterra rapport

    Google Scholar 

  • Welink JH (2015) Meer waarde uit de reststromen. Toekomstverkenning van mogelijkheden recycling reststromen uit de voeding—en genotsmiddelenindustrie, TU Delft

    Google Scholar 

  • Wikipedia (2018) https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biogas

  • Zwart KB, Oudendag DA, Ehlert PAI, Kuikman PJ (2006) Duurzame covergisting van dierlijke mest. WUR/Alterra rapport 1437, Wageningen

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Willem van Laarhoven .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Tables show options of manure processing and the typical cost of a CHP.

Economic parameters of (co-)digestion of manure and maize silage in different scenarios for the Dutch province of Overijssel (Vos and Zwart 2013)

Scenario

Biomass

Investment (€)

Specific investment (€/kW)

Profit per year (€)

Ratio cost to income

1,7 MWe

32,000 tons of ECN Mixa

4,712,055

2772

−922

2.2

Low price biomass

180,000 tons of fresh pig slurry

9,994,970

5879

−1,844,073

3.7

Scaling down (CHP)

5000 tons of fresh cattle manure

255,444

6904

−37,801

2.3

Scaling down (green gas)

5000 tons of fresh cattle manure

438,849

11,861

−59,303

4.4

Scaling up

100,000 tons of ECN mixa

15,961,652

3192

−3,036,324

2.2

Extra delivery of thermal energy (factor > 3)

32,000 tons of ECN mixa

4,821,714

2836

−761,632

1.8

  1. aECN mix: 25% manure from own farm + 25% manure from elsewhere + 13% silage maize + 37% other co-substrate

Typical technical and financial parameters of a CHP-production in 2010; unit costs in eurocents per kWh (Rabo 2011)

Technical parameters

2010

CHP capacity (MWe)

1.5

Investments/MWe

2,900,000

Total running hours CHP for full for load per year

7300

kWh production/MWe CHP

7,300,000

% Energy use by the process

8.0

Net energy production kWh/MWe CHP

6,700,000

Economical parameters

Other incomesa

−0.2

Costs for co-products (Input + Output)

7.8

Maintenance costs

1.8

Labour/consultation/others

1.8

Depreciation and interest

5.3

Total costs

16.5

Cost price/kWh delivered on the energy grid

18

  1. aNot including energy sales and subsidies (mostly thermal energy)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

van Laarhoven, W. (2019). Manure Treatment for Biofuel. In: Krozer, Y., Narodoslawsky, M. (eds) Economics of Bioresources. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14618-4_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics