Skip to main content

Spread and Control of Misinformation with Heterogeneous Agents

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Complex Networks X (CompleNet 2019)

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Complexity ((SPCOM))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We consider an agent-based model to explore the mechanism behind the diffusion of low- and high-quality information in online social networks. In particular, we investigate how agents with heterogeneous criteria of quality affect the spread of low-quality information. We also propose a simple method for enhancing the spread of high-quality information without hindering the system’s information diversity. Our results show that the proposed solution mitigates the influence of malicious agents on the overall system’s quality, and also show how it controls low-quality information in the presence of agents with heterogeneous criteria of information’s quality assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Shearer, E., Gottfried, J.: News use across social media platforms 2017, Pew Research Center, Journalism & Media

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mendoza, M., Poblete, B., Castillo, C.: Twitter under crisis: can we trust what we RT? In: Proceedings of the First Workshop on Social Media Analytics, pp. 71–79. ACM, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Gupta, H. Lamba, P. Kumaraguru, A. Joshi, Faking Sandy: characterizing and identifying fake images on Twitter during hurricane Sandy. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 729–736. ACM, New York (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Starbird, K., Maddock, J., Orand, M., Achterman, P., Mason, R.M.: Rumors, false flags, and digital vigilantes: misinformation on Twitter after the 2013 Boston marathon bombing. In: Conference 2014 Proceedings

    Google Scholar 

  5. Domm, P.: False rumor of explosion at White House causes stocks to briefly plunge; AP confirms its Twitter feed was hacked. http://bit.ly/Complenet19 (2013). Accessed 27 Nov 2018

  6. Tambuscio, M., Oliveira, D.F., Ciampaglia, G.L., Ruffo, G.: Network segregation in a model of misinformation and fact-checking. J. Comput. Soc. Sci. 1(2), 261–275 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lerman, K.: Information is not a virus, and other consequences of human cognitive limits. Futur. Internet 8(2), 21 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. De Domenico, M., Lima, A., Mougel, P., Musolesi, M.: The anatomy of a scientific rumor. Sci. Rep. 3, 2980 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sreenivasan, S., Chan, K.S., Swami, A., Korniss, G., Szymanski, B.K.: Information cascades in feed-based networks of users with limited attention. IEEE Trans. Netw. Sci. Eng. 4(2), 120–128 (2017)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Weng, L., Menczer, F., Ahn, Y.-Y.: Virality prediction and community structure in social networks. Sci. Rep. 3, 2522 (2013)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ferrara, E., Varol, O., Davis, C., Menczer, F., Flammini, F.: The rise of social bots. Commun. ACM 59(7), 96–104 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kramer, A.D., Guillory, J.E., Hancock, J.T.: Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 111, 8788–8790 (2014)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Del Vicario, M., Bessi, A., Zollo, F., Petroni, F., Scala, A., Caldarelli, G., Stanley, H.E., Quattrociocchi, W.: The spreading of misinformation online. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 113(3), 554–559 (2016)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lazer, D.M., Baum, M.A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A.J., Greenhill, K.M., Menczer, F., Metzger, M.J., Nyhan, B., Pennycook, G., Rothschild, D., et al.: The science of fake news. Science 359(6380), 1094–1096 (2018)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Qiu, X., Oliveira, D.F., Shirazi, A.S., Flammini, A., Menczer, F.: Limited individual attention and online virality of low-quality information. Nat. Hum. Behav. 1(7), s41562–017 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Oliveira, D.F., Chan, K.S., Leonel, E.D.: Scaling invariance in a social network with limited attention and innovation. Phys. Lett. A 382(47), 3376–3380 (2018)

    ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research was supported by ARL through ARO Grant W911NF-16-1-0524 and was accomplished under Cooperative Agreement Number W911NF-18-2-0066. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the Army Research Laboratory or the U.S. Government. The U.S. Government is authorized to reproduce and distribute reprints for Government purposes notwithstanding any copyright notation here on.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Cisneros-Velarde, P., Oliveira, D.F.M., Chan, K.S. (2019). Spread and Control of Misinformation with Heterogeneous Agents. In: Cornelius, S., Granell Martorell, C., Gómez-Gardeñes, J., Gonçalves, B. (eds) Complex Networks X. CompleNet 2019. Springer Proceedings in Complexity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14459-3_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics