Skip to main content

Anatomy of the Elbow and How It Affects Implant Design

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Elbow Arthroplasty

Abstract

The elbow is considered a complex joint because it is composed of three closely connected articulations: the ulnohumeral joint, the radiohumeral joint, and the proximal radioulnar joint. A thorough knowledge of the morphology of the elbow has important implications on implant design. Indeed, the advancement in our understanding of the anatomy and biomechanics of the elbow in recent years has led to an improvement in the design of prostheses, which has in turn increased the indications and clinical results associated with such implants.

The aim of this chapter is to provide a detailed description of the morphology of the distal humerus, proximal radius, and proximal ulna, which is critical to the design of an anatomical implant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. McDonald CP, Brownhill J, King GJ, Peters TM, Johnson JA. Surface morphology of the capitellum: implications for computer-assisted surgery. In: 52nd annual meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society 2006; paper no. Rosemont: Orthopaedic Research Society; 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sabo MT, Mcdonald CP, Ng J, Ferreira LM, Johnson JA, King GJ. A morphological analysis of the humeral capitellum with an interest in prosthesis design. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011;20(6):880–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2011.01.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Adolfsson L, Nestorson J. The Kudo humeral component as primary hemiarthroplasty in distal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012;21(4):451–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2011.07.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dunn J, Kusnezov N, Pirela-Cruz M. Distal humeral Hemiarthroplasty: indications, results, and complications. A systematic review. Hand. 2014;9(4):406–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11552-014-9681-3.

  5. Phadnis J, Watts AC, Bain GI. Elbow hemiarthroplasty for the management of distal humeral fractures: current technique, indications and results. Shoulder Elbow. 2016;8(3):171–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/1758573216640210.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Goldfarb CA, Patterson JMM, Sutter M, Krauss M, Steffen JA, Galatz L. Elbow radiographic anatomy: measurement techniques and normative data. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012;21(9):1236–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2011.10.026.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Giannicola G, Scacchi M, Sedati P, Gumina S. Anatomical variations of the trochlear notch angle: MRI analysis of 78 elbows. Musculoskelet Surg. 2016;100(S1):89–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-016-0407-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Giannicola G, Spinello P, Scacchi M, Gumina S. Cartilage thickness of distal humerus and its relationships with bone dimensions: magnetic resonance imaging bilateral study in healthy elbows. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017;26(5):e128–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2016.10.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lapner M, Willing R, Johnson JA, King GJ. The effect of distal humeral hemiarthroplasty on articular contact of the elbow. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2014;29(5):537–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2014.03.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Willing R, Lapner M, King GJ, Johnson JA. In vitro assessment of the contact mechanics of reverse-engineered distal humeral hemiarthroplasty prostheses. Clin Biomech. 2014;29(9):990–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2014.08.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Willing R, King GJ, Johnson JA. Contact mechanics of reverse engineered distal humeral hemiarthroplasty implants. J Biomech. 2015;48(15):4037–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.09.047.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Morrey BF. Anatomy of the elbow joint. In: Morreys the elbow and its disorders. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2008. p. 11–38.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Brownhill JR, King GJ, Johnson JA. Morphologic analysis of the distal humerus with special interest in elbow implant sizing and alignment. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007;16(3):S126–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2006.01.018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kudo H, Iwano K, Nishino J. Total elbow Arthroplasty with use of a nonconstrained humeral component inserted without cement in patients who have rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81(9):1268–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lenoir H, Chammas M, Micallef JP, Lazerges C, Waitzenegger T, Coulet B. The effect of the anatomy of the distal humerus and proximal ulna on the positioning of the components in total elbow arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2015;97-B(11):1539–45. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.97b11.36071.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mcdonald CP, Peters TM, Johnson JA, King GJ. Stem abutment affects alignment of the humeral component in computer-assisted elbow arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011;20(6):891–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2010.12.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cowal LS, Pastor RF. Dimensional variation in the proximal ulna: evaluation of a metric method for sex assessment. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2008;135(4):469–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.20771.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Purkait R. Measurements of ulna—a new method for determination of sex. J Forensic Sci. 2001;46(4):924–7. https://doi.org/10.1520/jfs15071j.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Grechenig W, Clement H, Pichler W, Tesch NP, Windisch G. The influence of lateral and anterior angulation of the proximal ulna on the treatment of a Monteggia fracture: an anatomical cadaver study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89(6):836–8. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.89b6.18975.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rouleau DM, Faber KJ, Athwal GS. The proximal ulna dorsal angulation: a radiographic study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010;19(1):26–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2009.07.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Brownhill JR, Mozzon JB, Ferreira LM, Johnson JA, King GJ. Morphologic analysis of the proximal ulna with special interest in elbow implant sizing and alignment. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009;18(1):27–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2008.03.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Święszkowski W, Skalski K, Pomianowski S, Kędzior K. The anatomic features of the radial head and their implication for prosthesis design. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2001;16(10):880–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0268-0033(01)00075-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mahaisavariya B, Saekee B, Sitthiseripratip K, Oris P, Tongdee T, Bohez EL, et al. Morphology of the radial head: a reverse engineering based evaluation using three-dimensional anatomical data of radial bone. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2004;218(1):79–84. https://doi.org/10.1243/095441104322807785.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Captier G, Canovas F, Mercier N, Thomas E, Bonnel F. Biometry of the radial head: biomechanical implications in pronation and supination. Surg Radiol Anat. 2002;24:295–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-002-0059-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Riet RPV, Glabbeek FV, Neale PG, Bortier H, An K-N, O’Driscoll SW. The noncircular shape of the radial head. J Hand Surg Am. 2003;28(6):972–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0363-5023(03)00426-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kuhn S, Burkhart KJ, Schneider J, Muelbert BK, Hartmann F, Mueller LP, et al. The anatomy of the proximal radius: implications on fracture implant design. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012;21(9):1247–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2011.11.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. King GJ, Zarzour ZD, Patterson SD, Johnson JA. An anthropometric study of the radial head. J Arthroplast. 2001;16(1):112–6. https://doi.org/10.1054/arth.2001.16499.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Koslowsky TC, Beyer F, Germund I, Mader K, Jergas M, Koebke J. Morphometric parameters of the radial neck: an anatomical study. Surg Radiol Anat. 2007;29(4):279–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-007-0206-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Chanlalit C, Shukla DR, Fitzsimmons JS, An K-N, O’Driscoll SW. Influence of prosthetic design on radiocapitellar concavity-compression stability. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011;20(6):885–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2011.03.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Giannicola G, Sedati P, Polimanti D, Cinotti G, Bullitta G. Contribution of cartilage to size and shape of radial head circumference: magnetic resonance imaging analysis of 78 elbows. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016;25(1):120–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2015.07.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Yeung C, Deluce S, Willing R, Johnson M, King GJ, Athwal GS. Regional variations in cartilage thickness of the radial head: implications for prosthesis design. J Hand Surg Am. 2015;40(12):2364–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.09.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bachman DR, Thaveepunsan S, Park S, Fitzsimmons JS, An K-N, Odriscoll SW. The effect of prosthetic radial head geometry on the distribution and magnitude of Radiocapitellar joint contact pressures. J Hand Surg Am. 2015;40(2):281–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.11.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wegmann K, Hain MK, Ries C, Neiss WF, Müller LP, Burkhart KJ. Do the radial head prosthesis components fit with the anatomical structures of the proximal radioulnar joint? Surg Radiol Anat. 2014;37(7):743–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-014-1407-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Polimanti, D., Giannicola, G. (2020). Anatomy of the Elbow and How It Affects Implant Design. In: Castoldi, F., Giannicola, G., Rotini, R. (eds) Elbow Arthroplasty . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14455-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14455-5_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-14454-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-14455-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics