Advertisement

Introduction: Beyond the Plague

  • Darryl ChalkEmail author
  • Mary Floyd-Wilson
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Literature, Science and Medicine book series (PLSM)

Abstract

In the absence of germ theory, what constituted contagion in the minds of the early moderns? In this introduction to the volume, Chalk demonstrates that early modern writers devoted constant attention to the possibility of contagious transmission, the notion that someone might be infected or transformed by the presence of others, through various kinds of exchange, or if exposed to certain ideas, practices, or environmental conditions, and they often did so in ways not limited to medical inquiry or the narrow study of a particular disease. In addition to outlining an approach to understanding pre-modern theories of contagion in relation to the efficacy of theatre in this period, he provides a guide to the interweaving concerns of the contributions to this collection.

Works Cited

  1. Bacon, Francis. Of the Proficience and Advancement of Learning, Divine and Humane. London: Early English Books Online, 1605.Google Scholar
  2. ———. Sylua Syluarum: or, A Naturall Historie in Ten Centuries. London: Early English Books Online, 1626.Google Scholar
  3. Carlin, Claire L. ed. Imagining Contagion in Early Modern Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.Google Scholar
  4. Chalk, Darryl. “Contagious Emulation: Antitheatricality and Theatre as Plague in Troilus and Cressida.” In This Earthly Stage: World and Stage in Late Medieval and Early Modern England, edited by Brett D. Hirsch and Christopher Wortham, 75–101. Turnhout: Brepols, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. ———. “‘To Creep in at Mine Eyes’: Theatre and Secret Contagion in Twelfth Night.” In Rapt in Secret Studies: Emerging Shakespeares, edited by Darryl Chalk and Laurie Johnson, 171–194. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars, 2010.Google Scholar
  6. Cooper, Thomas. Thesavrvs Lingvae Romanae & Britannicae. London: Early English Books Online, 1578.Google Scholar
  7. Craik, Katharine A., and Tanya Pollard, eds. Shakespearean Sensations: Experiencing Literature in Early Modern England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
  8. Crane, Mary Thomas. Losing Touch with Nature: Literature & the New Science in Sixteenth-Century England. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
  9. de Montaigne, Michel. The Complete Essays. Translated by M. A. Screech. London: Penguin, 1993.Google Scholar
  10. Floyd-Wilson, Mary. Occult Knowledge, Science, and Gender on the Shakespearean Stage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
  11. Gilman, Ernest B. Plague Writing in Early Modern England. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 2009.Google Scholar
  12. Harris, Jonathan Gil. Foreign Bodies and the Body Politic: Discourses of Social Pathology in Early Modern England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
  13. ———. Sick Economies: Drama, Mercantilism, and Disease in Shakespeare’s England. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2004.Google Scholar
  14. Healy, Margaret. Fictions of Disease in Early Modern England. Palgrave Macmillan: Basingstoke, 2001.Google Scholar
  15. ———. “Anxious and Fatal Contacts: Taming the Contagious Touch.” In Sensible Flesh: On Touch in Early Modern Culture, edited by Elizabeth D. Harvey, 22–38. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2003.Google Scholar
  16. Langley, Eric. “‘Plagued by Kindness’: Contagious Sympathy in Shakespearean Drama.” Medical Humanities 37, no. 2 (2011): 103–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lemnius, Levinus. The Secret Miracles of Nature. London: Early English Books Online, 1658.Google Scholar
  18. Lodge, Thomas. A Treatise of the Plague. London: Early English Books Online, 1603.Google Scholar
  19. Moss, Stephanie, and Kaara L. Peterson, eds. Disease, Diagnosis, and Cure on the Early Modern Stage. Farnham: Ashgate, 2004.Google Scholar
  20. Munday, Anthony. “A Second and Third Blast of Retrait from Plaies and Theaters.” In The English Drama and Stage Under the Tudor and Stuart Princes 1543–1664, edited by William Hazlitt. New York: Burt Franklin, 1869.Google Scholar
  21. Pantin, Isabelle. “Fracastoro’s De Contagione and Medieval Reflection on ‘Action at a Distance.’” In Imagining Contagion in Early Modern Europe, edited by Claire L. Carlin, 1–13. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.Google Scholar
  22. Pelling, Margaret. “Contagion / Germ Theory / Specificity.” In Companion Encyclopedia of the History of Medicine: Volume 1, edited by W. F. Bynum and Roy Porter, 309–334. London and New York: Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar
  23. Pollard, Tanya. Drugs and Theater in Early Modern England. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
  24. Prynne, William. Histrio-Mastix, the Players Scourge, or, Actors Tragoedie. London, 1633.Google Scholar
  25. Rainolds, John. The Overthrow of Stage-Playes. London: Blackwell, 1599.Google Scholar
  26. Rankins, William. A Mirrour of Monsters: Wherein Is Plainely Described the Manifold Vices and Spotted Enormities That Are Caused by the Infectious Sights of Playes, with the Description of the Subtile Slight of Sathan Making Them His Instruments. London, 1587.Google Scholar
  27. Spencer, Benjamin. Vox Civitatis, or London’s Complaint Against Her Children in the Countrey. London, 1625.Google Scholar
  28. Totaro, Rebecca. Suffering in Paradise: The Bubonic Plague in English Literature from More to Milton. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
  29. Totaro, Rebecca, and Ernest B. Gilman, eds. Representing the Plague in Early Modern England. New York and London: Routledge, 2011.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Southern QueenslandToowoombaAustralia
  2. 2.University of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations