Abstract
In this chapter, I complete Theory of Amusement (ToA) from Chapter 2. In Section 1, I complete ToA by combining the Cognitive Component of Amusement (CCoA) from Chapter 4 with the Affective Component of Amusement (ACoA) from Chapter 5 and, in Section 2, I briefly outline some techniques for increasing amusement by increasing arousal. Finally, in Section 3, I summarise the key claims of this chapter and of this book.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
In the context of cognitive dissonance theory, a ‘cognition’ is an attitude, belief or behaviour.
- 2.
Mental states with a positive valence are intrinsically attractive whereas mental states with a negative valence are intrinsically aversive. For example, happiness has a positive valence and sadness has a negative valence.
- 3.
That the Liar Paradox is a potential counter-example to ToA might explain the striking resemblance of Bertrand Russell’s (2009) analogous paradox to Groucho Marx’s famous line ‘I would never want to belong to any club that would have someone like me for a member’.
- 4.
An alief is an automatic belief-like attitude that is activated by features of one’s environment and can be in tension with one’s beliefs (Gendler 2008). For example, when standing on a glass balcony, one may believe that one is safe but alieve that one is in danger.
- 5.
This list is by no means exhaustive and there are many other techniques for increasing amusement by increasing arousal.
- 6.
Generally, increasing the degree of surprise serves to increase the corresponding degree of amusement. Alan Roberts (2017) outlines how the degree of surprise in puns can be represented through assigning probabilities.
- 7.
Roughly, Bicchieri (2005) characterises social norms as based on people having the ‘empirical expectations’ that enough other people conform to the norm, and the ‘normative expectations’ that enough other people expect them to conform to the norm.
- 8.
The ‘factor analysis’ approach was to have a large number of participants provide amusingness ratings on a large number of humour samples, then categorise these ratings so that humour samples that have correlated ratings fall into the same category, whereas humour samples that have uncorrelated ratings fall into different categories.
- 9.
References
Abrams, Jessica R., and Amy Bippus. 2011. “An Intergroup Investigation of Disparaging Humor.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 30 (2): 193–201.
Apter, Michael J. 1982. The Experience of Motivation: The Theory of Psychological Reversals. Academic.
Berlyne, D. E. 1960. Conflict, Arousal and Curiosity. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Bicchieri, Cristina. 2005. The Grammar of Society: The Nature and Dynamics of Social Norms. Cambridge University Press.
Carroll, Noël. 2014. Humour: A Very Short Introduction. OUP Oxford.
Clark, Michael. 1970. “Humour and Incongruity.” Philosophy 45 (171): 20–32.
Croyle, Robert T., and Joel Cooper. 1983. “Dissonance Arousal: Physiological Evidence.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45 (4): 782–91.
Elkin, Roger A., and Michael R. Leippe. 1986. “Physiological Arousal, Dissonance, and Attitude Change: Evidence for a Dissonance-Arousal Link and a ‘Don’t Remind Me’ Effect.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (1): 55–65.
Etgen, Michael P., and Ellen F. Rosen. 1993. “Cognitive Dissonance: Physiological Arousal in the Performance Expectancy Paradigm.” Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 31 (3): 229–31.
Eysenck, H. J. 1942. “The Appreciation of Humour: An Experimental and Theoretical Study.” British Journal of Psychology 32 (4): 295–309.
Festinger, Leon. 1957. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford University Press.
Freud, Sigmund. 2014. Jokes and Their Relation to the Unconscious. White Press.
Gendler, Tamar Szabó. 2008. “Alief and Belief.” Journal of Philosophy 105 (10): 634–63.
Harmon-Jones, Eddie, and Cindy Harmon-Jones. 2007. “Cognitive Dissonance Theory After 50 Years of Development.” Zeitschrift Für Sozialpsychologie 38 (1): 7–16.
Harmon-Jones, Eddie, and Judson Mills, eds. 1999. Cognitive Dissonance: Progress on a Pivotal Theory in Social Psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Hehl, Franz-Josef, and Willibald Ruch. 1985. “The Location of Sense of Humor within Comprehensive Personality Spaces: An Exploratory Study.” Personality and Individual Differences 6 (6): 703–15.
Herzog, Thomas R., and David A. Larwin. 1988. “The Appreciation of Humor in Captioned Cartoons.” The Journal of Psychology 122 (6): 597–607.
Hull, Rachel, Sümeyra Tosun, and Jyotsna Vaid. 2017. “What’s So Funny? Modelling Incongruity in Humour Production.” Cognition & Emotion 31 (3): 484–99.
Hurley, Matthew M., Daniel Dennett, and Reginald B. Adams. 2011. Inside Jokes: Using Humor to Reverse-Engineer the Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kao, Justine T., Roger Levy, and Noah D. Goodman. 2015. “A Computational Model of Linguistic Humor in Puns.” Cognitive Science 40 (1): 1270–85.
Kiesler, C. A., and M. S. Pallak. 1976. “Arousal Properties of Dissonance Manipulations.” Psychological Bulletin 83 (6): 1014–25.
Kirkham, Richard L. 1992. Theories of Truth: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Leddington, Jason. 2016. “The Experience of Magic.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 74 (3): 253–64.
Linder, Darwyn E., Joel Cooper, and Edward E. Jones. 1967. “Decision Freedom as a Determinant of the Role of Incentive Magnitude in Attitude Change.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 6 (3): 245–54.
Losch, Mary E., and John T. Cacioppo. 1990. “Cognitive Dissonance May Enhance Sympathetic Tonus, But Attitudes Are Changed to Reduce Negative Affect Rather than Arousal.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 26 (4): 289–304.
McGhee, Paul E., and Nelda S. Duffey. 1983. “Children’s Appreciation of Humor Victimizing Different Racial-Ethnic Groups: Racial-Ethnic Differences.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 14 (1): 29–40.
McGhee, Paul E., and Sally A. Lloyd. 1981. “A Developmental Test of the Disposition Theory of Humor.” Child Development 52 (3): 925–31.
Morreall, John. 2009. Comic Relief: A Comprehensive Philosophy of Humor. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
Ritchie, Graeme. 2004. The Linguistic Analysis of Jokes. London: Routledge.
Roberts, Alan. 2017. “Funny Punny Logic.” Dialectica 71 (4): 531–39.
Ruch, Willibald. 1988. “Sensation Seeking and the Enjoyment of Structure and Content of Humour: Stability of Findings across Four Samples.” Personality and Individual Differences 9 (5): 861–71.
Ruch, Willibald, and Franz-Josef Hehl. 1988. “Attitudes to Sex, Sexual Behaviour and Enjoyment of Humour.” Personality and Individual Differences 9 (6): 983–94.
Ruch, Willibald, Paul E. McGhee, and Franz-Josef Hehl. 1990. “Age Differences in the Enjoyment of Incongruity-Resolution and Nonsense Humor during Adulthood.” Psychology and Aging 5 (3): 348–55.
Russell, Bertrand. 2009. Principles of Mathematics. London: Routledge.
Santayana, George. 1955. The Sense of Beauty. New York: Dover Publications Inc.
Schopenhauer, Arthur. 2014. The World as Will and Representation: Volume 1. Translated by Judith Norman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wiseman, Richard. 2015. Quirkology: The Curious Science of Everyday Lives. Pan.
Wyer, R. S., and J. E. Collins. 1992. “A Theory of Humor Elicitation.” Psychological Review 99 (4): 663–88.
Zillmann, Dolf, and Joanne R. Cantor. 1972. “Directionality of Transitory Dominance as a Communication Variable Affecting Humor Appreciation.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 24 (2): 191–98.
Zillmann, Dolf, and Joanne R. Cantor. 1976. “A Disposition Theory of Humour and Mirth.” In Humour and Laughter: Theory, Research and Applications, edited by Anthony J. Chapman and Hugh C. Foot, 93–115. Transaction Publishers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Roberts, A. (2019). A Theory of Amusement. In: A Philosophy of Humour. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14382-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14382-4_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-14381-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-14382-4
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)