Skip to main content

Cognitive Autoimmunity: Metacognitive Consequences of the Bubble Theses

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 322 Accesses

Part of the book series: Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics ((SAPERE,volume 46))

Abstract

As I previously argued, the concept of autoimmunity refers to the partial incapability of the human agent to distinguish between her knowledge and her ignorance, due to an involuntary mechanism which underlies the fixation and revision of beliefs. In this chapter I will contend that the new concept of “cognitive autoimmunity” can be usefully employed beyond the epistemological and logical fieldwork, in order to describe the cognitive mechanism supporting what the philosophical literature calls “epistemic feelings” (Muñoz 2013, 2014; Michaelian and Muñoz 2014). The cognitive autoimmunity of the agents will justify both the fact that a lot of instantiations of ignorance are bound not to be recognized by their owners, and the fact that philosophers have had an hard time trying to describe ignorance as a concept. Moreover, the cognitive autoimmunity will explain how the fugitive state of ignorance has an impact on the metacognitive capacity of the human cognition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Although it is true that Woods introduced the term autoimmunity in logic, I should point out that the concept was already introduced in the philosophical arena by Jacques Derrida, in 1994. He deployed the term in order to describe the agent’s self-attack and self-deception in the “bio-political” field—which comprehends the relationship between the individual agent and the political asset within she is included. “To protect its life, to constitute itself [...], it must therefore take the immune defenses apparently meant for the non-ego, the enemy, the opposite, the adversary and direct them at once for itself and against itself” (Derrida 1994, p. 177).

  2. 2.

    Several famous examples of how easy these situations may occur can be found in Burton, “On Being Certain” Burton (2008).

  3. 3.

    Nagel (2010) also presents a small collection of the empirical works over the effects that epistemic anxiety has on the decision making of the agent both in ordinary and controlled circumstances.

  4. 4.

    For instance, Van Randenborgh and colleagues brought experimental results suggesting how in particular psychological states such as dysphoria, processes of rumination—“a phenomenon at the intersection of cognitive and affective processes”—may foster severe indecision and less confidence in one’s hardly-reached decisions, triggering states of deeper depression (Randenborgh et al. 2010, p. 230).

References

  • Atkinson, R.C., Shiffrin, R.M.: Human memory: a proposed system and its control processes. Psychol. Learn. Motiv. 2(1), 89–195 (1968)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beran, M.J., Brandl, J.L., Perner, J., Proust, J.: Foundations of Metacognition. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, K.S., Meichenbaum, D.: Conscious, Subconscious, Unconscious: A Cognitive Perspective. Wiley, New York (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  • Braver, T.S., Cohen, J.D.: On the control of control: the role of dopamine in regulating prefrontal function and working. In: Falk, J.H. (ed.) Making Working Memory Work, pp. 123–126. MIT Press Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, R.A.: On Being Certain: Believing You Are Right Even When You’re Not. St. Martin’s Press, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J.: Spectres of Marx. Routledge, Great Britain (1994). Translated by Peggy Kamuf

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagleman, D.: Incognito. The Secret Life of the Brain. Pantheon Book, New York (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldie, P.: The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration. Clarendon, Oxford (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldie, P.: Emotion, feelings and intentionality. Phenomenol. Cogn. Sci. 1(1), 235–254 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hertzog, C., Dunlosky, J., Sinclair, S.M.: Episodic feeling-of-knowing resolution derives from the quality of original encoding. Mem. Cogn. 38(6), 771–784 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hookway, C.: Doubt: affective states and the regulation of inquiry. Canad. J. Philos. 28(1), 203–225 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, W.: The Principles of Psychology, vol. 1. Holt, New York (1890)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kentridge, R.W., Heywood, C.A.: Metacognition and awareness. Conscious Cogn. 9(2), 308–326 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNab, F., Klingberg, T.: Prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia control access to working memory. Nat. Neurosci. 11(1), 103–107 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, J., Son, L.K.: Anoetic, noetic, and autonoetic metacognition. In: Carruthers, P., Stich, S., Siegal, M. (eds.) Foundations of Metacognition, pp. 289–301. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Michaelian, K., Muñoz, S.A.: Epistemic feelings, epistemic emotion: review and introduction to the focus section. Philos. Inq. 2(1), 97–122 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz, S.A.: The nature of epistemic feelings. Philos. Psychol. 27(2), 193–211 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz, S.A.: Metacognitive feelings, self-ascriptions and mental actions. Philos. Inq. 2(1) (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, J.: Epistemic intuitions. Philos. Compass 2(6), 792–819 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, J.: Epistemic anxiety and adaptive invariantism. Philos. Perspect. 24(1), 407–435 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, E., Blakstad, O., Johnsen, -O., Martinsen, S.K., Price, M.C.: The relationship between feelings-of-knowing and partial knowledge for general knowledge questions. Front. Psychol. 7(1), 996 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • Paynter, C.A., Reder, L.M., Kieffaber, P.D.: Knowing we know before we know: ERP correlates of initial feeling-of-knowing. Neurophychologia 47(3), 796–803 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C.S.: The fixation of belief. Popul. Sci. Mon. 12, 1–15 (1877)

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C.S.: How to make our ideas clear. In: Houser, N., Kloesel, C. (eds.) The Essential Peirce Selected Philosophical Writing, vol. 1, pp. 1867–1893. Indiana University Press, Indiana (1998a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C.S.: The fixation of belief. In: Houser, N., Kloesel, C. (eds.) The Essential Peirce Selected Philosophical Writing, vol. 1, pp. 1867–1893. Indiana University Press, Indiana (1998b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Randenborgh, A.V., Jong-Meyer, R.D., Hüffmeier, J.: Rumination fosters indecision in dysphoria. J. Clin. Psychol. 66(3), 229–248 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, D.M.: Consciousness, content, and metacognitive judgments. Conscious. Cogn. 9(2), 203–214 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schraw, G., Dennison, R.S.: Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemp. Edu. Psychol. 19(4), 460–475 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woods, J.: Epistemic bubbles. In: Artemov, S., Barringer, H., Garcez, A., Lamb, L., Woods, J. (eds.) We Will Show Them: Essay in Honour of Dov Gabbay (Volume II), pp. 731–774. College Publications, London (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, J.: Errors of Reasoning Naturalizing the Logic of Inference. Studies in Logic and Cognitive Systems, vol. 45. College Publications, London (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Selene Arfini .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Arfini, S. (2019). Cognitive Autoimmunity: Metacognitive Consequences of the Bubble Theses. In: Ignorant Cognition. Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, vol 46. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14362-6_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics