Skip to main content

Ignorant Cognition: Concluding Remarks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ignorant Cognition

Part of the book series: Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics ((SAPERE,volume 46))

  • 330 Accesses

Abstract

As mentioned in the introduction, every time some philosophers begin a publication on ignorance, they need to consider the three kinds of ignorance they are going to face in the process: the one that they have read about; the one that they are going to discuss; and the one they are going to leave behind. In this section, I am going to discuss the last of the three, trying to sum up the main argument of the dissertation and how it could motivate further research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bertolotti, T., Magnani, L.: Theoretical considerations on cognitive niche construction. Synthese 194(12), 4757–4779 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casadio, C.: Vie della Metafora. Linguistica, Filosofia, Psicologia. PrimeVie Edizioni, Corfinio (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A.: Word, niche and super-niche: how language makes minds matter more. Theoria 20(3), 255–268 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabbay, D., Woods, J.: The new logic. Log. J. IGPL 9(2), 141–174 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabbay, D.M., Woods, J.: Agenda Relevance: A Study in Formal Pragmatics, A Practical Logic of Cognitive Systems, vol. 1. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gabbay, D.M., Woods, J.: The Reach of Abduction: Insight and Trial, A Practical Logic of Cognitive Systems, vol. 2. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Galili, I.: Thought experiments: determining their meaning. Sci. Edu. 18(1), 1–23 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gendler, T.S.: Thought experiments rethought - and reperceived. Philos. Sci. 71(5), 1152–1163 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamblin, C.L.: Fallacies. Methuen, London (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, H.H.: The straw thing of fallacy theory: the standard definition of “fallacy”. Argumentation 16(2), 133–155 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, K.: What is the role of the self in self-deception? Philos. Stud. 173(2), 505–523 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnani, L.: Abductive Cognition. The Epistemological and Eco-Cognitive Dimensions of Hypothetical Reasoning. Springer, Berlin (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnani, L.: Understanding Violence. Morality, Religion, and Violence Intertwined: A Philosophical Stance. Springer, Berlin (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnani, L.: Is abduction ignorance-preserving? conventions, models, and fictions in science. Log. J. IGPL 21(6), 882–914 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnani, L.: The Eco-Cognitive Model of Abduction II. Irrelevance and Implausibility Exculpated. J. Appl. Log. 15(1), 94–129 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz, S.A.: The nature of epistemic feelings. Philos. Psychol. 27(2), 193–211 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz, S.A.: Metacognitive feelings, self-ascriptions and mental actions. Philos. Inq. 2(1) (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C.S.: Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1931–1958). Vols. 1–6, Hartshorne, C., Weiss, P. (eds.); Vols. 7–8, Burks, A.W. (ed.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C.S.: The Essential Peirce. Selected Philosophical Writings. Indiana University Press, Bloomington (1992–1998). Vol. 1 (1867-1893), Houser, N., Kloesel, C. (eds.); Vol. 2 (1893–1913), The Peirce Edition Project (ed.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pietarinen, A.V.: Cultivating habits of reasoning: Peirce and the logica utens versus logica docens distinction. Hist. Philos. Q. 22(4), 369–373 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S.: The cognitive niche: coevolution of intelligence, sociality, and language. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 17(Suppl. 2), 8993–8999 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smithson, M.: Ignorance and Uncertainty. Emerging Paradigms. Springer, New York (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuana, N.: The speculum of ignorance: the women’s health movement and epistemologies of ignorance. Hypatia 21(3), 1–19 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, D., Anderson, M.: Consensus on Peirce’s Concept of Habit: Before and Beyond Consciousness. Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics. Springer International Publishing, New York (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, J.: Epistemic bubbles. In: Artemov, S., Barringer, H., Garcez, A., Lamb, L., Woods, J. (eds.) We Will Show Them: Essay in Honour of Dov Gabbay (Volume II), pp. 731–774. College Publications, London (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, J., Irvine, A., Walton, D.: Argument: Critical Thinking. Logic and the Fallacies. Prentice Hall, Toronto (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Selene Arfini .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Arfini, S. (2019). Ignorant Cognition: Concluding Remarks. In: Ignorant Cognition. Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, vol 46. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14362-6_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics