Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Recent Advances in Intelligent Engineering pp 253–277Cite as

Industrial and Medical Cyber-Physical Systems: Tackling User Requirements and Challenges in Robotics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Topics in Intelligent Engineering and Informatics ((TIEI,volume 14))

Abstract

Robotics is one of the major megatrends unfolding these days. Clearly, robots are capable of doing much more outside the factories than ever imagined, and that has a great impact on the whole society. This chapter provides some practical updates and guidelines on a few exciting aspects of automated technologies: applied robotics in the industry, in service and personal use and in the operating theaters, performing not only teleoperated surgeries but complex, delicate procedures as well. However, building reliable autonomous systems is not easy, and for another while, human operators will be required as a fallback option. Ensuring the safety of such hybrid control systems is complex, and requires novel human–machine interfaces. Situation awareness remains a key issue, keeping humans in the loop. Arguably, the social robotic sector is growing much faster than any industrial one, and as predicted, there soon will be robots in every household and around.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. T. Jacobs, J. Veneman, G.S. Virk, T. Haidegger, The flourishing landscape of robot standardization. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 25(1), 8–15 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. A. Takacs, I. Rudas, D. Bosl, T. Haidegger, Highly automated vehicles and self-driving cars. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 25(4), 106–112 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. G.S. Virk, C. Herman, R. Bostelman, T. Haidegger, Challenges of the changing robot markets, in Nature-Inspired Mobile Robotics (2013), pp. 833–840

    Google Scholar 

  4. V.O. Robotics, A roadmap for US robotics: from internet to robotics, in Robotics Virtual Organization, 2nd edn. (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. J.W. Mroszczyk, Safety Practices for Automated Guided Vehicles (AGVs) (American Society of Safety Engineers, 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. Bischoff, U. Huggenberger, E. Prassler, Kuka youBot-a mobile manipulator for research and education, in 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (IEEE, 2011), pp. 1–4

    Google Scholar 

  7. L. Márton, Z. Szántó, T. Haidegger, P. Galambos, J. Kövecses, Internet-based bilateral teleoperation using a revised time-domain passivity controller. Acta Polytech. Hung. (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. B. Takács, R. Dóczi, B. Sütő, J. Kalló, T.A. Várkonyi, T. Haidegger, M. Kozlovszky, Extending AUV response robot capabilities to solve standardized test methods. Acta Polytech. Hung. 13(1), 157–170 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  9. G.S. Virk, T. Haidegger, Classification guidelines for personal care robots–medical and non-medical applications, in Proceedings of the IEEE IROS Workshop on Safety in Human-Robot Coexistence & Interaction (2012), pp. 33–36

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. Takács, D.Á. Nagy, I. Rudas, T. Haidegger, Origins of surgical robotics: from space to the operating room. Acta Polytech. Hung. 13(1), 13–30 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Hoeckelmann, I.J. Rudas, P. Fiorini, F. Kirchner, T. Haidegger, Current capabilities and development potential in surgical robotics. Int. J. Adv. Rob. Syst. 12(5), 61 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. T. Haidegger, B. Benyó, L. Kovács, Z. Benyó, Force sensing and force control for surgical robots, in 7th IFAC Symposium on Modeling and Control in Biomedical Systems, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 413–418, Aug 2009

    Google Scholar 

  13. Á. Takács, I. Rudas, T. Haidegger, Open-source research platforms and system integration in modern surgical robotics. Acta Univ. Sapientiae; Electr. Mech. Eng. 14(6), 20–34 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  14. J.A. Marvel, Performance metrics of speed and separation monitoring in shared workspaces. IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 10(2), 405–414 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. J.A. Falco, J.A. Marvel, R.J. Norcross, Collaborative robotics: measuring blunt force impacts on humans. Chest 140(210), 45 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Marvel, R. Bostelman, Towards mobile manipulator safety standards, in 2013 IEEE International Symposium on Robotic and Sensors Environments (ROSE) (IEEE, 2013), pp. 31–36

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. Bostelman, R. Norcross, J. Falco, J. Marvel, Development of standard test methods for unmanned and manned industrial vehicles used near humans, in Multisensor, Multisource Information Fusion: Architectures, Algorithms, and Applications 2013, vol. 8756 (International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2013), p. 87560P

    Google Scholar 

  18. Development of Standard Test Methods for Emergency Response Robots for Department of Homeland Security, Science and Technology Directorate (DHS S&T) and National Institute of Justice, NIST 2013. http://www.nist.gov/el/isd/ms/robottestmethods.cfm

  19. T. Haidegger, I.J. Rudas, From concept to market: surgical robot development, in Human-Computer Interaction: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (IGI Global, 2016), pp. 484–522

    Google Scholar 

  20. J.B. Stiehl, J. Bach, D.A. Heck, Validation and metrology in CAOS, in Navigation and MIS in Orthopedic Surgery (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007), pp. 68–78

    Google Scholar 

  21. A. Barrera, J. Bach, P. Kazanzides, H. Haider, Validation of an ASTM standard proposed to assess localizer functionality of CAOS systems: a joint effort by three laboratories, in Proceedings of the 20th Annual Congress of International Society for Technology in Arthroplasty (ISTA), Paris (2007), pp. 81–81

    Google Scholar 

  22. J.C. Chiao, J.M. Goldman, D.A. Heck, P. Kazanzides, W.J. Peine, J.B. Stiehl et al., Metrology and standards needs for some categories of medical devices. J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. 113(2), 121 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. A. Gartner, Teleneurology and requirements of the Medical Devices Directive (MDD) (Baaske Medical GmbH & Co., Lübbecke, 2008), pp. 1–22

    Google Scholar 

  24. D.B. Kaber, M.R. Endsley, The effects of level of automation and adaptive automation on human performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task. Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci. 5(2), 113–153 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. B. Fei, W.S. Ng, S. Chauhan, C.K. Kwoh, The safety issues of medical robotics. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 73(2), 183–192 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. P. Varley, Techniques for development of safety-related software for surgical robots. IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed. 3(4), 261–267 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. J. Guiochet, A. Vilchis, Safety analysis of a medical robot for tele-echography, in 2nd IARP IEEE/RAS Joint Workshop on Technical Challenge for Dependable Robots in Human Environments, Toulouse, France, Oct 2002

    Google Scholar 

  28. S.Y. Nof (ed.), Handbook of Industrial Robotics, vol. 1 (John Wiley & Sons, 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  29. P. Grunert, K. Darabi, J. Espinosa, R. Filippi, Computer-aided navigation in neurosurgery. Neurosurg. Rev. 26(2), 73–99 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. G. Kronreif, Robot systems for percutaneous needle placement, in Proceedings of the 1st BME–MAVE International Computer-Integrated Surgery Workshop, Budapest (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  31. D.V. Makarov, J.B. Yu, R.A. Desai, D.F. Penson, C.P. Gross, The association between diffusion of the surgical robot and radical prostatectomy rates. Med. Care 333–339 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  32. G.S. Virk, Safety standard for personal care robots, in Mobile Robotics: Solutions and Challenges (2010), pp. 147–154

    Google Scholar 

  33. Food and Drug Administration, De novo classification process (evaluation of automatic class III designation) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  34. A. Bannat, T. Bautze, M. Beetz, J. Blume, K. Diepold, C. Ertelt et al., Artificial cognition in production systems. IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 8(1), 148–174 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. B. Matthias, S. Kock, H. Jerregard, M. Källman, I. Lundberg, Safety of collaborative industrial robots: certification possibilities for a collaborative assembly robot concept, in 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Assembly and Manufacturing (ISAM) (IEEE, 2011), pp. 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  36. A.M. Zanchettin, N.M. Ceriani, P. Rocco, H. Ding, B. Matthias, Safety in human-robot collaborative manufacturing environments: metrics and control. IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 13(2), 882–893 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. J.A. Marvel, R. Bostelman, Test methods for the evaluation of manufacturing mobile manipulator safety. JRM 28(2), 199–214 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. E. Messina, A. Jacoff, Performance standards for urban search and rescue robots, in Unmanned Systems Technology VIII, vol. 6230 (International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2006), p. 62301V

    Google Scholar 

  39. J.B. Guinée, Handbook on life cycle assessment operational guide to the ISO standards. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 7(5), 311 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. M. Delvaux, Draft report with recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics, vol. 22. European Parliament: Brussels, Belgium (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  41. C.B. Frey, M.A. Osborne, The future of employment: how susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 114, 254–280 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thank are expressed to the robot standardization work groups at the various SODs. Authors acknowledge the financial support of this work by the Hungarian State and the European Union under the EFOP-3.6.1-16-2016-00010 project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University Research, Innovation and Service Center, Óbuda University, Budapest, Hungary

    Tamás Haidegger

  2. Austrian Center for Medical Innovation and Technology (ACMIT), Wiener Neustadt, Austria

    Tamás Haidegger

  3. CLAWAR Association Ltd, Sheffield, UK

    Gurvinder S. Virk

  4. Innovative Technology & Science Ltd (InnoTecUK), Cambridge, UK

    Gurvinder S. Virk

  5. Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation, Arlington, VA, 22203-1633, USA

    Carol Herman

  6. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, 20899, USA

    Roger Bostelman

  7. Antal Bejczy Center for Intelligent Robotics, Óbuda University, Budapest, Hungary

    Péter Galambos, György Györök & Imre J. Rudas

  8. Antal Bejczy Center for Intelligent Robotics, Óbuda University, Budapest, Székesfehérvár, Hungary

    Péter Galambos, György Györök & Imre J. Rudas

Authors
  1. Tamás Haidegger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gurvinder S. Virk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Carol Herman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Roger Bostelman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Péter Galambos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. György Györök
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Imre J. Rudas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tamás Haidegger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Obuda University, Budapest, Hungary

    Levente Kovács

  2. Óbuda University, Budapest, Hungary

    Tamás Haidegger

  3. Óbuda University, Budapest, Hungary

    Anikó Szakál

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Haidegger, T. et al. (2020). Industrial and Medical Cyber-Physical Systems: Tackling User Requirements and Challenges in Robotics. In: Kovács, L., Haidegger, T., Szakál, A. (eds) Recent Advances in Intelligent Engineering. Topics in Intelligent Engineering and Informatics, vol 14. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14350-3_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation