Barriers to Community Archaeology: Reviewing the Legal Heritage Frameworks Within the South African Context
- 224 Downloads
The archaeological landscape in South Africa has been changing, from one defined by the domination of white males to one now defined by women and acknowledging the role of local communities. While this is a welcomed approach to providing insights about the past, the “playing field” is still defined by the minority. As a result, the participation by local communities within archaeological projects happens within a paradigm of thinking defined by legal requirements which may be in contrasts to the beliefs they hold. This is, therefore, not a partnership that should be considered representative of everyone involved. Instead, it is biased towards the professionals. For instance, legal definitions of what heritage is and how such resources should be protected do not, in my view, correlate with an African perspective of heritage. I would argue, therefore, that views by local communities over what is heritage and how best to manage it are in most times ignored in the name of community archaeology and the legal framework within which such a relationship should occur. This chapter, focusing on community archaeology from a heritage management perspective, is a review of the legal challenges negatively affecting community archaeology within the South African context.
KeywordsCommunity archaeology Intangible heritage Legal frameworks Meletse/Madimatle case study South Africa
- Bega, S. (2015a). Our spirituality will move mountains. Saturday star. Retrieved March 20, 2018, from https://www.pressreader.com/south-africa/saturday-star/20150117/283463549693970.
- Bega, S. (2015b). Mining mountain will be ‘spiritual genocide’. Weekend Argus (Saturday edition). Retrieved May 30, 2018, from https://www.pressreader.com/south-africa/weekend-argus-saturday-edition/20150117/281775627546655.
- Bender, S. J., & Smith, G. S. (2000). Teaching archaeology in the 21st century. Washington, DC: Society for American Archaeology.Google Scholar
- Benjamin, C. (2015, February 27). Mining a threat to holy caves. Mail and Guardian. Retrieved March 20, 2018, from https://mg.co.za/article/2015-02-27-mining-a-threat-to-holy-caves.
- Bernbaum, E. (1997). Sacred mountains of the world. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Bernbaum, E. (2016). Sacred mountains in Asia: Themes and implications for protected areas. In B. Verschuuren & N. Furuta (Eds.), Asian sacred natural sites (pp. 52–62). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Bernbaum, E. (2017). Sacred mountains. Indigeneity and the Sacred: Indigenous Revival and the Conservation of Sacred Natural Sites in the Americas, 22, 92–104.Google Scholar
- Bromberg, F., Cressey, P., Fesler, G., Nasca, P., & Reeder, R. (2017). We dig Alexandria: A reflection on more than fifty years of community archaeology. In S. Baugher, D. Appler, & W. Moss (Eds.), Urban archaeology, municipal government and local planning (pp. 203–225). Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Carman, J. (2005). Against cultural property: Archaeology, ownership and heritage. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
- Centre for Environmental Rights. (2015). Traditional healers lay criminal charges against mining company and its directors for environmental crimes. Retrieved June 1, 2018, from https://cer.org.za/news/traditional-healers-lay-criminal-charges-against-mining-company-and-its-directors-for-environmental-crimes.
- Child, K. (2015). Ancestors thwart mining bosses. The Times. Retrieved March 20, 2018, from http://www.ornico.co.za/editorialstream/OwnMediaAttachments/2015_01_15_1845396.pdf.
- Davies, T. (2015, June 6). Mining - coming to a protected area near you. Groundup. Retrieved March 26, 2018, from https://www.groundup.org.za/article/mining-coming-protected-area-near-you_3094/.
- Dhanjal, S., & Moshenska, G. (2012). Community archaeology: Themes, methods and practices. Oxford: Oxbow Books Limited.Google Scholar
- Gould, P. G. (2018). Empowering communities through archaeology and heritage: The role of local governance in economic development. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
- Kortze, C. (2016, March 31). Limpopo iron ore mine denied authorisation on environmental protection basis. Mining Review Africa. Retrieved March 28, 2018, from https://www.miningreview.com/limpopo-iron-ore-mine-denied-authorisation-on-environmental-protection-basis/.
- Little, B. J., & Shackel, P. A. (Eds.). (2007). Archaeology as a tool of civic engagement. Lanham: Rowman Altamira.Google Scholar
- Merriman, N. (1991). Beyond the glass case: The past, the heritage, and the public in Britain. Leicester: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
- Ndlovu, N. (2009). Access to rock art sites: A right or qualification? South African Archaeological Bulletin, 64(189), 61–68.Google Scholar
- Ndlovu, N. (2016). Old archaeology camouflaged as new and inclusive? South African community archaeology in the twenty-first century. In P. Schmidt & I. Pikirayi (Eds.), Community archaeology and heritage in Africa: Decolonizing practice (pp. 136–152). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Smith, L., & Waterton, E. (2009). Heritage, communities and archaeology. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
- Thomas, S. (2014). Making archaeological heritage accessible in Great Britain: Enter community archaeology. In S. A. Thomas & J. Lea (Eds.), Public participation in archaeology (pp. 23–34). Woodbridge: Boydell Press.Google Scholar
- UNESCO. (n.d.-a). What is intangible cultural heritage? Retrieved July 12, 2018, from https://ich.unesco.org/en/what-is-intangible-heritage-00003.
- UNESCO. (n.d.-b). Text of the convention for the safeguarding of the intangible cultural heritage. Retrieved July 12, 2018, from https://ich.unesco.org/en/convention?raw_uri=%2Ffr%2Fconvention.