Skip to main content

New Measures of Vulnerability Within Supply Networks: A Comparison of Industries

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Handbook of Ripple Effects in the Supply Chain

Abstract

Modern supply chains have become increasingly complex and interconnected, raising concerns as to the potential loss of system-wide resilience. One distinct element of supply chain risk is the potential for detrimental material to propagate through the supply chain undetected, eventually exposing unsuspecting consumers to defective products. In this chapter, based on methods inspired by epidemiology, we propose new measures for quantifying this risk. We then apply these measures to real-life supply networks from eight industries to compare their relative levels of risk across a 17-year time horizon. Our results indicate that while in aggregate supply chain risk has increased overtime, both the level and sources of risk differ markedly by industry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 425–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basole, R. C., & Bellamy, M. A. (2014a). Visual analysis of supply network risks: Insights from the electronics industry. Decision Support Systems, 67, 109–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basole, R. C., & Bellamy, M. A. (2014b). Supply network structure, visibility, and risk diffusion: A computational approach. Decision Sciences, 45(4), 753–789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basole, R. C., Bellamy, M. A., Park, H., & Putrevu, J. (2016). Computational analysis and visualization of global supply network risks. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 12(3), 1206–1213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battiston, S., Gatti, D. D., Gallegati, M., Greenwald, B., & Stiglitz, J. E. (2007). Credit chains and bankruptcy propagation in production networks. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 31(6), 2061–2084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy, M. A., Ghosh, S., & Hora, M. (2014). The influence of supply network structure on firm innovation. Journal of Operations Management, 32(6), 357–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carnovale, S., & Yeniyurt, S. (2014). The role of ego networks in manufacturing joint venture formations. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 50(2), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carnovale, S., & Yeniyurt, S. (2015). The role of ego network structure in facilitating ego network innovations. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 51(2), 22–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, T. Y., Dooley, K. J., & Rungtusanatham, M. (2001). Supply networks and complex adaptive systems: Control versus emergence. Journal of Operations Management, 19(3), 351–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, T., & Hong, Y. (2002). Unveiling the structure of supply networks: Case studies in Honda, Acura, and DaimlerChrysler. Journal of Operations Management, 20, 469–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Stefano, M. C., & Montes-Sancho, M. J. (2018). Supply chain environmental R&D cooperation and product performance: Exploring the network dynamics of positional embeddedness. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2018.10.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolgui, A., Ivanov, D., & Sokolov, B. (2018). Ripple effect in the supply chain: An analysis and recent literature. International Journal of Production Research, 56(1-2), 414–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong, M., Liu, Z., Yu, Y., & Zheng, J. (2015). Opportunism in distribution networks: The role of network embeddedness and dependence. Production and Operations Management, 24(10), 1657–1670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gai, P., & Kapadia, S. (2010). Contagion in financial networks. In Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, p. rspa20090410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grewal, R., Lilien, G. L., & Mallapragada, G. (2006). Location, location, location: how network embeddedness affects project success in open source systems. Management Science, 52(7), 1043–1056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hethcote, H. (2000). The mathematics of infectious diseases. SIAM Review, 42(4), 599–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kermack, W., & McKendrick, A. (1927). Contributions to the mathematical theory of epidemics. In Proceedings of the Royal Society London Ser. A, Vol. 115(772), pp. 700–721.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y., Chen, Y.-S., & Linderman, K. (2015). Supply network disruption and resilience: A network structural perspective. Journal of Operations Management, 33–34, 43–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y. H. (2017). The effects of major customer networks on supplier profitability. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 53(1), 26–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzola, E., Perrone, G., & Kamuriwo, D. S. (2015). Network embeddedness and new product development in the biopharmaceutical industry: The moderating role of open innovation flow. International Journal of Production Economics, 160, 106–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. (1962). How to plan and control with PERT. Harvard Business Review, 40(2), 93–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pathak, S. D., Day, J. M., Nair, A., Sawaya, W. J., & Kristal, M. M. (2007). Complexity and adaptivity in supply networks: Building supply network theory using a complex adaptive systems perspective*. Decision Sciences, 38(4), 547–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phelps, C. C. (2010). A longitudinal study of the influence of alliance network structure and composition on firm exploratory innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 53(4), 890–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokolov, B., Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A., & Pavlov, A. (2016). Structural quantification of the ripple effect in the supply chain. International Journal of Production Research, 54(1), 152–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, E., Rand, W., Eftekhar, M., & Rabinovich, E. (2016). Evaluating information diffusion speed and its determinants in social media networks during humanitarian crises. Journal of Operations Management, 45, 123–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James P. Minas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Minas, J.P., Simpson, N.C., Kao, TW. (2019). New Measures of Vulnerability Within Supply Networks: A Comparison of Industries. In: Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A., Sokolov, B. (eds) Handbook of Ripple Effects in the Supply Chain. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 276. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14302-2_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics