Skip to main content

Understanding, Supporting, and Redesigning Cognitive Work

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Human Mental Workload: Models and Applications (H-WORKLOAD 2018)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1012))

Abstract

Cognitive work analysis (CWA) is a framework that has been used in many settings to describe various aspects of work. This paper outlines how CWA can be used to understand work and mental workload. The work domain, control task, and strategies analysis can be useful to understand the nature of work, work allocation and mental workload. Finally, the prediction of work patterns is discussed. Predicting the influence of new technologies on human work is a critical capability for the human factors practitioners of the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ashoori, M., Burns, C.M., Momtahan, K., d’Entremont, B.: Using team cognitive work analysis to reveal healthcare team interactions in a labor and delivery unit. Ergonomics 57, 973–986 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2014.909949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Burns, C.M.: CWA: models of expertise. In: Ward, P., Schraagen, J.M., Gore, J., Roth, E. (eds.) Oxford Handbook of Expertise: Research and Application. Oxford University Press (in press). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780188795772.001.0001

  3. Burns, C.M., Bisantz, A.M., Roth, E.M.: Lessons from a comparison of work models: representational choices and their implications. Hum. Fact. 46, 711–727 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1518/hfes.46.4.711.56810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Burns, C.M., Torenvliet, G., Scott, S., Chalmers, B.: Work domain analysis for establishing collaborative work requirements. In: Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, pp. 314–318. HFES, Santa Monica (2009). https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120905300432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cahill, J., et al.: Adaptive automation and the third pilot: managing teamwork and workload in an airline cockpit. In: Longo, L., Leva, M.C. (eds.) H-WORKLOAD 2017. CCIS, vol. 726, pp. 161–173. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61061-0_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Edwards, T., Martin, L., Bienert, N., Mercer, J.: The relationship between workload and performance in air traffic control: exploring the influence of levels of automation and variation in task demand. In: Longo, L., Leva, M.C. (eds.) H-WORKLOAD 2017. CCIS, vol. 726, pp. 120–139. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61061-0_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Hajdukiewicz, J.R., Vicente, K.J., Doyle, D.J., Milgram, P., Burns, C.M.: Modeling a medical environment: an ontology for integrated medical informatics design. Int. J. Med. Inform. 62, 79–99 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1386-5056(01)00128-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Karasek, R.A.: Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental: strain: implications for job redesign. Admin. Sci. Quart. 24, 285–308 (1979). https://doi.org/10.2307/2392498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Keresteglioclu, D., Burns, C.M., Grindrod, K.: Building bridges between physicians and pharmacists: an interprofessional approach to electronic health record requirements. In: HFES 2016 International Symposium on Human Factors and Ergonomics: Shaping the Future, pp. 9–14. HFES (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/2327857916051000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Li, Y., Wang, X., Burns, C.M.: Modeling automation with cognitive work analysis to support human-automation coordination. J. Cogn. Eng. Decis. Mak. 11, 299–322 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/1555343417709669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Li, Y., Wang, X., Burns, C.M.: Improved monitoring performance of financial trading algorithms using a graphical display. Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Annu. Meet. 62(1), 187–191 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931218621045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Longo, L.: Designing medical interactive systems via assessment of human mental workload. In 2015 IEEE 28th International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS), pp. 364–365. IEEE, June 2015

    Google Scholar 

  13. Longo, L., Leva, M.C.: Human Mental Workload: Models and Applications, vol. 726. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61061-0

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Mijović, P., Milovanović, M., Ković, V., Gligorijević, I., Mijović, B., Mačužić, I.: Neuroergonomics method for measuring the influence of mental workload modulation on cognitive state of manual assembly worker. In: Longo, L., Leva, M.C. (eds.) H-WORKLOAD 2017. CCIS, vol. 726, pp. 213–224. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61061-0_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Moustafa, K., Luz, S., Longo, L.: Assessment of mental workload: a comparison of machine learning methods and subjective assessment techniques. In: Longo, L., Leva, M.C. (eds.) H-WORKLOAD 2017. CCIS, vol. 726, pp. 30–50. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61061-0_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Naikar, N., Moylen, A., Pearce, B.: Analysing activity in complex systems with cognitive work analysis: concepts, guidelines and case study for control task analysis. Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci. 7, 371–394 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1080/14639220500098821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rasmussen, J.: The role of hierarchical knowledge representation in decision making and system management. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 15, 234–243 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1109/tsmc.1985.6313353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rizzo, L., Longo, L.: Representing and inferring mental workload via defeasible reasoning: a comparison with the NASA task load index and the workload profile. In: AI^3@AI*IA, 1st Workshop on Advances in Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence co-located with XVI International Conference of the Italian Association for Artificial Intelligence (AI*IA 2017), Bari, Italy, 16–17 November 2017 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rizzo, L., Dondio, P., Delany, S.J., Longo, L.: Modeling mental workload via rule-based expert system: a comparison with NASA-TLX and workload profile. In: Iliadis, L., Maglogiannis, I. (eds.) AIAI 2016. IAICT, vol. 475, pp. 215–229. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44944-9_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Smith, K.T.: Observations and issues in the application of cognitive workload modelling for decision making in complex time-critical environments. In: Longo, L., Leva, M.C. (eds.) H-WORKLOAD 2017. CCIS, vol. 726, pp. 77–89. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61061-0_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. St. Maurice, J., Burns, C.M.: Using comparative cognitive work analysis to identify design priorities in complex socio-technical systems. In: 2015 International Symposium on Human Factors and Ergonomics in Health Care: Improving the Outcomes, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 118–123 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/2327857915041019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Vicente, K.J.: Cognitive Work Analysis: Toward Safe, Productive, and Health Computer-Based Work. LEA, Mahwah (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wickens, C.D.: Mental workload: assessment, prediction and consequences. In: Longo, L., Leva, M.C. (eds.) H-WORKLOAD 2017. CCIS, vol. 726, pp. 18–29. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61061-0_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catherine M. Burns .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Burns, C.M. (2019). Understanding, Supporting, and Redesigning Cognitive Work. In: Longo, L., Leva, M. (eds) Human Mental Workload: Models and Applications. H-WORKLOAD 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1012. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14273-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14273-5_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-14272-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-14273-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics