Abstract
This paper presents a province-wide seismic monitoring network: the British Columbia Smart Infrastructure Monitoring System (BCSIMS), which encompasses a comprehensive Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) system and a Strong Motion Network (SMN). The SHM network currently involves 14 bridges, 1 tunnel, 1 building and 11 public schools. Real-time readings from these sensors are automatically analyzed: the results are then permanently stored on a data center and can be viewed in the BCSIMS website (www.bcsims.ca). The SHM system then continuously keeps track of the changes in the dynamic characteristics of these structures to detect and locate damage and to make fast decisions on the safety level of structures and the actions that need to be taken. The real-time data analysis includes drift analysis, modal identification, and the calculation of the important statistics of each data channel. Finite element model updating, the damage detection, and structural event reports are other important features that have been developed and implemented in the SHM network. The objective of the SHM network is to provide the British Columbia Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure with the performance of these structures immediately following a significant event such as strong earthquake or wind. Such information is then used to assess the safety level of these structures and also to help and support the inspection and maintenance program. The entire system has now been automated and tested and validated by an earthquake occurred on December 29th, 2015 in Sidney Island, BC. The SHM system successfully responded to the earthquake and provided the required information to make immediate decisions and expedite to the emergency.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Rogers GC (1998) Earthquakes and earthquake hazard in the vancouver area; in geology and natural hazards of the Fraser River delta British Columbia geological survey of Canada. Geol Surv Can Bull 525:17–25
Goldfinger C, Nelson CH, Morey AE, Johnson JE, Patton JR, Karabanov E, Getierrez-Pastor J, Eriksson AT, Eulalia G, Dunhills G, Enkins R, Dallimore A, Vallier T (2012) Turbidite event history: methods and implications for holocene paleoseismicity of the Cascadia subduction zone, United States Geological Survey Professional Paper
Clague JJ, Naesgaard E, Sy A (1992) Liquefaction features on the Fraser delta: evidence for prehistoric earthquakes. Can J Earth Sci 29:1734–1745
Gragert H, Hyndman RD, Rogers GC, Wank K (1994) Current deformation and the width of the seismogenic zone of the northern Cascadia subduction thrust. J Geophys Res 99:653–668
Kaya Y, Ventura C, Huffman S, Turek M (2017) British columbia smart infrastructure monitoring system. Can J Civil Eng 44(8):579–588
Rosenberger A, Beverley K, Rogers G (2004) The new strong motion seismic network in southern British Columbia, Canada. In: 13th world conference on earthquake engineering vancouver, B.C., Canada. Paper No. 3373
Katayama T, Sato N, Saito K (1998) SI-sensor for the identification of destructive ground motion. In: Proceedings of the ninth world conference of earthquake engineering, vol VII, Tokyo-Kyoto, p 667–672
Boore DM, Atkinson GM (2008, February) Ground-motion prediction equations for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and 5%-damped PSA at spectral periods between 0.01 s and 10.0 s. Earthq Spectra 24(1):99–138
Atkinson GM (2005) Ground motions for earthquakes in Southwestern British Columbia and Northwestren Washington: crustal, in-slab, and offshore events. Bull Seismol Soc Am 95(3):1027–1044
Atkinson GM, Boore DM (2011) Modifications to existing ground-motion prediction equations in light of new data. Bull Seismol Soc Am 101(3):1121–1135
Kaya Y, Safak E (2014) Real-time analysis and interpretation of continuous data from structural health monitoring (SHM) systems. Bull of Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-014-9642-9
Kaya Y, Turek M, Ventura C (2013) Temperature and traffic load effects on modal frequency for a permanently monitored bridge. In: Conference Proceedings of the society for experimental mechanics series 38. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6519-5_6
Peeters B, Roeck GD (2000) One-year monitoring of the Z24-bridge: environmental effects versus damage events. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 30:149–171
Overschee PV, Moor BD (2011) Subspace identification for linear systems: theory, implementation and applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands
Overschee PV, Moor BD (1991) Subspace algorithms for the stochastic identification problem. In: Proceedings of the 30th IEEE conference on decision and control, Brighton, UK, pp 1321–1326
Peeters B, Roeck GD (1999) Reference-based stochastic subspace identification for output-only modal analysis. Mech Syst Signal Process 13(6):855–878
Overschee PV, Moor BD (2012) Subspace identification for linear systems: theory-implementation-application. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin
Ventura C, Laverick B, Brinker R, Andersen P (2003) Comparison of dynamic characteristics of two instrumented tall buildings. In: Proceedings of the XXI international modal analysis conference, Orlando, Florida
Ljung L (1999) System identification: theory for the user (2nd edition). Prentice Hall PTR
Magalhães F, Cunha Á, Caetano E (2009) Online automatic identification of the modal parameters of a long span arch bridge. Mech Syst Signal Process 23(2):316–329
McDonald S (2016) Operational modal analysis, model updating, and seismic analysis of a cable-stayed bridge. M.Sc., Department of Civil Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver
Cross EJ (2012) On SHM in changing environmental and operational conditions. Ph.D., Faculty of Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield
Farrar CR, Doebling SW, Cornwell P, Straser EG (1997) Variability of modal parameters measured on the Alamosa Canyon bridge. In: Proceedings of the XV international modal analysis conference, Orlando, Florida
Cross EJ, Koo KY, Brownjohn J, Worden K (2012) Long-term monitoring and data analysis of the Tamar Bridge. Mech Syst Signal Process 35(1–2):16–34
United States Geological Survey (USGS). http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/feed/v1.0/
MATLAB (2000) Commercial integrating technical computing program. The MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA, USA. www.mathworks.com
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kaya, Y., Ventura, C. (2019). Seismic Structural Health Monitoring of Bridges in British Columbia, Canada. In: Limongelli, M., Çelebi, M. (eds) Seismic Structural Health Monitoring. Springer Tracts in Civil Engineering . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13976-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13976-6_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-13975-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-13976-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)