Skip to main content

An Optical Technique for Measuring Transient and Residual Interstory Drift as Seismic Structural Health Monitoring (S2HM) Observables

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Seismic Structural Health Monitoring

Part of the book series: Springer Tracts in Civil Engineering ((SPRTRCIENG))

  • 1111 Accesses

Abstract

Building interstory drift (ID), which is a measure of the relative displacement between two successive floors in a vibrating building, is a key response parameter utilized in both seismic design and post-earthquake damage assessments. To this point in time, there has been no accepted methodology or sensor technology for reliable and accurate direct measurements of building drift. Indirect measurement of drift, through signal processing and double integration of accelerometer data, is fraught with challenges, particularly when inelasticity-induced permanent drifts occur. In this paper, recent developments toward a new optically-based technique for measurement of both transient interstory drift (TID(t)) and residual interstory drift (RID) are described. The ability of a newly designed laser-based optical sensor system to directly measure interstory drift is demonstrated through experimental and model-based evaluations. This sensor technology has progressed to the point where practical application is feasible as an enabling S2HM technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) (2005) Seismic design criteria for structures, systems, and components in nuclear facilities. ASCE/SEI 43-05, Reston, VA

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bommer JJ, Magenes G, Hancock J, Penazzo P (2004) The influence of strong-motion duration on the seismic response of masonry structures. Bull Earthq Eng 2(1):1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Celebi M, Sanli A, Sinclair M, Gallant S, Radulescu D (2004) Real-time seismic monitoring needs of a building owner—and the solution: a cooperative effort. Earthq Spectra 20(2):333–346

    Google Scholar 

  4. Celebi M (2008) Real-time monitoring of drift for occupancy resumption. In: 14th world conference on earthquake engineering, Beijing China

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chen X (1995) Near-field ground motion from the landers earthquake. Report No. EERL 95-02, California Institute of Technology, Earthquake Engineering Research Laboratory, Pasadena, California, USA

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chen WM, Bennett KD, Feng J, Wang YP, Huang SL (1998) Laser technique for measuring three dimensional interstory drift. In: Proceedings of the society for photonics and optics, vol 3555, pp 305–310

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dai F, Dong S, Kamat VR, Lu M (2011) Photogrammetry assisted measurement of interstory drift for rapid post-disaster building damage reconnaissance. J Nondestruct Eval 30:201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dai F, Lu M (2010) Assessing the accuracy of applying photogrammetry to take geometric measurements on building products. J Constr Eng Manage 136(2):242–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Doebling SW, Farrar CR, Prime MB, Shevitz DW (1996) Damage identification and health monitoring of structural and mechanical systems from changes in their vibration characteristics: a literature review. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Hancock J, Bommer JJ (2006) A state-of-knowledge review of the influence of strong-motion duration on structural damage. Earthq Spectra 22(3):827–845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hou S, Zeng CS, Zhang HB, Ou JP (2018) Monitoring interstory drift in buildings under seismic loading using MEMS inclinometers. Constr Build Mater 185:453–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hsu TY, Yin RC, Wu YM (2018) Evaluating post-earthquake building safety using economical MEMS seismometers. Sensors 18(5)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lynch JP, Partridge A, Law KH, Kenny TW, Kiremidjian AS, Carryer E (2003) Design of piezoresistive MEMS-based accelerometer for integration with wireless sensing unit for structural monitoring. J Aerosp Eng 16(3):108–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. McCallen D, Larsen S (2003) NEVADA—a simulation environment for regional estimation of ground motion and structural response. Report UCRL-ID-152115, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

    Google Scholar 

  15. McCallen D, Petrone F, Coates J, Repanich N (2017) A laser-based optical sensor for broad-band measurements of building earthquake drift. Earthq Spectra 33(4):1573–1598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. OpenSees v 2.5.0 [Computer software]. Berkeley, CA, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center Ground Motion Database (PEER). https://ngawest2.berkeley.edu/

  18. Pakzad SN, Fenves GL, Kim S, Culler DE (2008) Design and implementation of scalable wireless sensor network for structural monitoring. J Infrastruct Syst 14(1):89–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Petrone F, McCallen D, Buckle I, Wu S (2018) Direct measurement of building transient and residual drift using an optical sensor system. Eng Struct 176:115–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sabato A, Niezrecki C, Fortino G (2017) Wireless MEMS-based accelerometer sensor boards for structural vibration monitoring: a review. IEEE Sens J 17(2):226–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Skolnik DA, Kaiser WJ, Wallace JW (2008) Instrumentation for structural health monitoring: measuring interstory drift. In: Proceedings of the 14th world conference on earthquake engineering, 12–17 Oct, Beijing China

    Google Scholar 

  22. Skolnik DA, Wallace JW (2010) Critical assessment of interstory drift measurements. J Struct Eng 136:1574–1584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Trifunac MD, Ivanovic SS, Todorovska MI (2001) Apparent periods of a building II: time-frequency analysis. J Struct Eng 127:527–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Trifunac MD, Todorovska MI (2001) A note on the usable dynamic range of accelerographs recording translation. J Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 21:275–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yun F, Yong Z, Weimin C, Rong S, Shanglian H, Bennett KD (1999) Five dimensional interstory drift measurement with cross hair laser. Acta Photonica Sinica 28:1006–1009

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work presented in this paper was supported in part by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Nuclear Safety. This support and the encouragement of Dr. Alan Levin of the Office of Nuclear Safety Research Program is greatly appreciated. The DDPS GEN1 and GEN2 sensors were fabricated at California State University Chico by engineers Jason Coates and Nicholas Repanich. The contributions of Professor Ian Buckle and Dr. Suiwen Wu in designing and conducting the University of Nevada shake table experiments are gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David B. McCallen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

McCallen, D.B., Petrone, F. (2019). An Optical Technique for Measuring Transient and Residual Interstory Drift as Seismic Structural Health Monitoring (S2HM) Observables. In: Limongelli, M., Çelebi, M. (eds) Seismic Structural Health Monitoring. Springer Tracts in Civil Engineering . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13976-6_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13976-6_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-13975-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-13976-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics