Abstract
Spiders with around 48,000 recorded species are major terrestrial predators and thus crucially important for ecosystem functioning. They are widely used as research models and for biodiversity displays and sometimes also kept as pets. Nevertheless, we are not aware of any legal ethical rules bound to spider welfare during rearing or research. To set ethical standards, we first need to detect and assess how spiders “perceive” the external world. Based on the current knowledge of spiders’ sensory and nervous system, it is difficult to judge whether spiders feel pain, distress and suffering, although their behaviours like thanatosis, “bailing out”, autotomy and associative avoidance learning imply so. As is now known, arthropods are not simply mini-robots as traditionally believed. Thus, spider welfare deserves more research effort, and the ethical standards for rearing or using spiders in research need to be set. Here, we describe the variety of spider physiological and behavioural characteristics and how they apply to their rearing, housing, handling and experimental use. We hope reporting these methods will help ensuring welfare and well-being of spiders in captivity.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Amador-Vargas S, Gronenberg W, Wcislo WT, Mueller U (2015) Specialization and group size: brain and behavioral correlates of colony size in ants lacking morphological astes. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 282:20142502
Animal Behaviour (2018) Guidelines for the treatment of animals in behavioural research and teaching. Anim Behav 135:I–X
Barth FG (2013) A spider’s world: senses and behavior. Springer, Berlin
Bednarski JV, Taylor P, Jakob EM (2012) Optical cues used in predation by jumping spiders, Phidippus audax (Araneae, Salticidae). Anim Behav 84:1221–1227
Bennie N, Loaring C, Bennie M, Trim S (2012) An effective method for terrestrial arthropod euthanasia. Anim Technol Welf 215:4237–4241
Benson-Amram S, Dantzer B, Stricker G, Swanson EM, Holekamp KE (2016) Brain size predicts problem-solving ability in mammalian carnivores. Proc Natl Acad Sci 113:2532–2537
Bilde T, Tuni C, Elsayed R, Pekár S, Toft S (2006) Death feigning in the face of sexual cannibalism. Biol Lett 2:23–25
Blamires SJ, Hochuli DF, Thompson MB (2009) Prey protein influences growth and decoration building in the orb web spider Argiope keyserlingi. Ecol Entomol 34:545–550
Blamires SJ, Sahni V, Dhinojwala A, Blackledge TA, Tso IM (2014) Nutrient deprivation induces property variations in spider gluey silk. PLoS One 9:e88487
Blest AD, Hardie RC, McIntyre P, Williams DS (1981) The spectral sensitivities of identified receptors and the function of retinal tiering in the principal eyes of a jumping spider. J Comp Physiol A 145:227–239
Carere C, Maestripieri D (2013) Animal personalities: behavior, physiology, and evolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Carere C, Wood JB, Mather J (2011) Species differences in captivity: where are the invertebrates? Trends Ecol Evol 26:211
Coddington JA, Levi HW (1991) Systematics and evolution of spiders (Araneae). Annu Rev Ecol Syst 22:565–592
Cooper JE (2011) Anesthesia, analgesia, and euthanasia of invertebrates. ILAR J 52:196–204
Corral-López A, Bloch NI, Kotrschal A, Van Der Bijl W, Buechel SD, Mank JE, Kolm N (2017) Female brain size affects the assessment of male attractiveness during mate choice. Sci Adv 3:e1601990
Edwards GB, Jackson RR (1994) The role of experience in the development of predatory behaviour in Phidippus regius, a jumping spider (Araneae, Salticidae) from Florida. N Z J Zool 21:269–277
Eisner T, Camazine S (1983) Spider leg autotomy induced by prey venom injection: an adaptive response to “pain”? Proc Natl Acad Sci 80:3382–3385
Elwood RW (2011) Pain and suffering in invertebrates? ILAR J 52:175–184
Feinerman O, Traniello JFA (2016) Social complexity, diet, and brain evolution: modeling the effects of colony size, worker size, brain size, and foraging behavior on colony fitness in ants. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 70:1063–1074
Fleming PA, Muller D, Bateman PW (2007) Leave it all behind: a taxonomic perspective of autotomy in invertebrates. Biol Rev 82:481–510
Foelix RF (2011) Biology of spiders, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, New York
Gilbertson CR, Wyatt JD (2016) Evaluation of euthanasia techniques for an invertebrate species, land Snails (Succinea putris). J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci 55:577–581
Heiling AM, Herberstein ME (1999) The role of experience in web-building spiders (Araneidae). Anim Cogn 2:171–177
Hénaut Y, Machkour-M’Rabet S, Lachaud JP (2014) The role of learning in risk-avoidance strategies during spider-ant interactions. Anim Cogn 17:185–195
Herberstein ME (2011) Spider behaviour: flexibility and versatility. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Higgins L (1995) Direct evidence for trade-offs between foraging and growth in a juvenile spider. J Arachnol 23:37–43
Higgins L (2007) Juvenile Nephila (Araneae, Nephilidae) use various attack strategies for novel prey. J Arachnol 35:530–534
Higgins L, Goodnight C (2011) Developmental response to low diets by giant Nephila clavipes females (Araneae: Nephilidae). J Arachnol 1:399–408
Horvath K, Angeletti D, Nascetti G, Carere C (2013) Invertebrate welfare: an overlooked issue. Ann Ist Super Sanita 49:9–17
Jackson RR (1974) Rearing methods for spiders. J Arachnol 2:53–56
Jackson RR, Cross FR (2011) Spider cognition. Adv Insect Physiol 41:115–174
Jackson RR, Rowe RJ, Campbell GE (1992) Anti-predator defences of Psilochorus sphaeroides and Smeringopus pallidus (Araneae, Pholcidae), tropical web-building spiders. J Zool 228:227–232
Jakob EM, Dingle H (1990) Food level and life history characteristics in a pholcid spider (Holocnemus pluchei). Psyche 97:95–110
Jakob EM, Skow CD, Haberman MP, Plourde A (2007) Jumping spiders associate food with color cues in a T-Maze. J Arachnol 35:487–492
Jakob E, Skow C, Long S (2011) Plasticity, learning and cognition. In: Herberstein ME (ed) Spider behaviour: flexibility and versatility. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 307–347
Japyassú HF, Laland KN (2017) Extended spider cognition. Anim Cogn 20:375–395
Jensen K, Mayntz D, Toft S, Raubenheimer D, Simpson SJ (2011) Nutrient regulation in a predator, the wolf spider Pardosa prativaga. Anim Behav 81:993–999
Jones TC, Akoury TS, Hauser CK, Neblett MF II, Linville BJ, Edge AA, Weber NO (2011) Octopamine and serotonin have opposite effects on antipredator behavior in the orb-weaving spider, Larinioides cornutus. J Comp Physiol A 197:819–825
Kasumovic MM, Elias DO, Punzalan D, Mason AC, Andrade MCB (2009) Experience affects the outcome of agonistic contests without affecting the selective advantage of size. Anim Behav 77:1533–1538
Kralj-Fišer S, Kuntner M (2012) Eunuchs as better fighters? Naturwissenschaften 99:95–101
Kralj-Fišer S, Schneider JM (2012) Individual behavioural consistency and plasticity in an urban spider. Anim Behav 84:197–204
Kralj-Fišer S, Gregorič M, Zhang S, Li D, Kuntner M (2011) Eunuchs are better fighters. Anim Behav 81:933–939
Kuhn-Nentwig L, Nentwig W (2013) The immune system of spiders. In: Nentwig (ed) Spider ecophysiology. Springer, Berlin, pp 81–91
Kuntner M, Pristovšek U, Cheng RC, Li D, Zhang S, Tso IM, Liao CP, Miller JA, Kralj-Fišer S (2014) Eunuch supremacy: evolution of post-mating spider emasculation. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 69:117–126
Lewbart GA (2011) Invertebrate medicine, 2nd edn. Blackwell Publishing, Ames
Liedtke J, Schneider JM (2014) Association and reversal learning abilities in a jumping spider. Behav Processes 103:192–198
Liedtke J, Redekop D, Schneider JM, Schuett W (2015) Early environmental conditions shape personality types in a jumping spider. Front Ecol Evol 3:134
Lomborg JP, Toft S (2009) Nutritional enrichment increases courtship intensity and improves mating success in male spiders. Behav Ecol 20:700–708
Long SM, Leonard A, Carey A, Jakob EM (2015) Vibration as an effective stimulus for aversive conditioning in jumping spiders. J Arachnol 43:111–114
Mather J (2011) Philosophical background of attitudes toward and treatment of invertebrates. ILAR J 52:205–212
Merskey H, Bogduk N (1994) Classification of chronic pain: description of chronic pain syndromes and definitions of pain terms. IASP Press, Seattle
Nakamura T, Yamashita S (2000) Learning and discrimination of colored papers in jumping spiders (Araneae, Salticidae). J Comp Physiol 186:897–901
Nelson XJ, Jackson RR (2011) Flexibility in the foraging strategies of spiders. In: Herberstein ME (ed) Spider behaviour: flexibility and versatility. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 99–126
Nyffeler M, Birkhofer K (2017) An estimated 400–800 million tons of prey are annually killed by the global spider community. Sci Nat 104:30
Peckmezian T, Taylor PW (2015) Electric shock for aversion training of jumping spiders: towards an arachnid model of avoidance learning. Behav Processes 113:99–104
Pizzi R (2006) Spiders. In: Lewbart GA (ed) Invertebrate medicine. Blackwell, Ames, pp 143–168
Punzo F (1997) Leg autotomy and avoidance behavior in response to a predator in the wolf spider, Schizocosa avida (Araneae, Lycosidae). J Arachnol 25:202–205
Punzo F, Punzo T (2001) Monoamines in the brain of tarantulas (Aphonopelma hentzi) (Araneae, Theraphosidae): differences associated with male agonistic interactions. J Arachnol 29:388–395
Roeder T (1999) Octopamine in invertebrates. Prog Neurobiol 59:533–561
Russell WMS, Burch RL (1959) The principles of humane experimental technique. Methuen, London
Salomon M, Mayntz D, Lubin Y (2008) Colony nutrition skews reproduction in a social spider. Behav Ecol 19:605–611
Salomon M, Mayntz D, Toft S, Lubin Y (2011) Maternal nutrition affects offspring performance via maternal care in a subsocial spider. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:1191–1202
Schmidt JM, Sebastian P, Wilder SM, Rypstra AL (2012) The nutritional content of prey affects the foraging of a generalist arthropod predator. PLoS One 7:e49223
Skow CD, Jakob EM (2006) Jumping spiders attend to context during learned avoidance of aposematic prey. Behav Ecol 17:34–40
Sneddon LU, Elwood RW, Adamo SA, Leach MC (2014) Defining and assessing animal pain. Anim Behav 97:201–212
Steinhoff PO, Sombke A, Liedtke J, Schneider JM, Harzsch S, Uhl G (2017) The synganglion of the jumping spider Marpissa muscosa (Arachnida: Salticidae): insights from histology, immunohistochemistry and microCT analysis. Arthropod Struct Dev 46:156–170
Steinhoff PO, Liedtke J, Sombke A, Schneider JM, Uhl G (2018) Early environmental conditions affect the volume of higher-order brain centers in a jumping spider. J Zool 304:182–192
Suter RB, Gruenwald J (2000) Predator avoidance on the water surface? Kinematics and efficacy of vertical jumping by Dolomedes (Araneae, Pisauridae). J Arachnol 28:201–210
Sweeney K, Gadd RDH, Hess ZL, Mcdermott DR, Macdonald L, Cotter P, Armagost F, Chen JZ, Berning AW, Dirienzo N, Pruitt JN (2013) Assessing the effects of rearing environment, natural selection, and developmental stage on the emergence of a behavioral syndrome. Ethology 119:436–447
Tannenbaum J, Bennett TB (2015) Russell and Burch’s 3Rs then and now: the need for clarity in definition and purpose. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci 54:120–132
Tarsitano MS, Jackson RR (1997) Araneophagic jumping spiders discriminate between detour routes that do and do not lead to prey. Anim Behav 53:257–266
Taylor PW, Jackson RR (2003) Interacting effects of size and prior injury in jumping spider conflicts. Anim Behav 65:787–794
Toft S (2013) Nutritional aspects of spider feeding. In: Nentwig W (ed) Spider ecophysiology. Springer, Berlin, pp 373–384
Toft S, Wise DH (1999) Growth, development, and survival of a generalist predator fed single- and mixed-species diets of different quality. Oecologia 119:198–207
Uetz GW, Roberts JA (2002) Multisensory cues and multimodal communication in spiders: insights from video/audio playback studies. Brain Behav Evol 59:222–230
Uetz GW, Boyle J, Hieber CS, Wilcox RS (2002) Antipredator benefits of group living in colonial web-building spiders: the “early warning” effect. Anim Behav 63:445–452
Venner S, Pasquet A, Leborgne R (2000) Web-building behaviour in the orb-weaving spider Zygiella x-notata: influence of experience. Anim Behav 59:603–611
Vollrath F (1987) Growth, foraging and reproductive success. In: Nentwig W (ed) Ecophysiology of spiders. Springer, Berlin, pp 357–370
Whitehouse MEA (1997) Experience influences male-male contests in the spider Argyrodes antipodiana (Theridiidae: Araneae). Anim Behav 53:913–923
Widmer A (2005) Spider peripheral mechanosensory neurons are directly innervated and modulated by octopaminergic efferents. J Neurosci 25:1588–1598
Wilcox RS, Jackson RR (1993) Spider flexibly chooses aggressive mimicry signals for different prey by trial and error. Behaviour 127:21–36
Wilder SM, Rypstra AL (2008) Diet quality affects mating behaviour and egg production in a wolf spider. Anim Behav 76:439–445
World Spider Catalog (2018) World spider catalog. Version 19.5. Natural History Museum Bern. http://wsc.nmbe.ch. Accessed 14 Nov 2018
Yip EC, Lubin Y (2016) Effects of diet restriction on life history in a sexually cannibalistic spider. Biol J Linn Soc 118:410–420
Zschokke S, Herberstein ME (2005) Laboratory methods for maintaining and studying web-building spiders. J Arachnol 33:205–213
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kralj-Fišer, S., Gregorič, M. (2019). Spider Welfare. In: Carere, C., Mather, J. (eds) The Welfare of Invertebrate Animals. Animal Welfare, vol 18. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13947-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13947-6_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-13946-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-13947-6
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)